Local Account vs Microsoft Account and Shares in Workgroup


Recommended Posts

So just some discussion on this, and no lets not get into "HomeGroup" discussion. I want permission level controls over shares/files.

Windows 7 workstation, and Windows 7 "server" for files shares. And setup with a identical username/password on both. Browsing to the server from the workstation, no problems. You just right click the share, and map the drive since the log on credentials are the same.

Now if I install Windows 8 on the workstation, and sign in to a Microsoft Account instead of local (because I think that is required to use the store) how is that going to interact with the Windows 7 "server"?

My obvious thought is, it isn't going to authenticate and either fail with an error or ask for credentials. Obviously I can map the drive with alternate credentials. But this is kind of goofy to have to fight with something to simple.

The best solution would be to allow "local" accounts to also "link" a Microsoft Account to the local login, but I don't think that is possible.

Thoughts guys?

There are a couple ways that you may be able to do it. Not sure if any of this is changed or easier in Windows 8.

1.) You should be able to add a Windows Credential to your account. Search for Credential in the Control Panel. They may have revamped it a bit in Windows 8 though. If it is still there, all of your online accounts and windows accounts can be stored there.

2.) Look into Linked IDs which links an online account, like Microsoft Account, with a local account.

Windows 8 I'm sure uses that Linked IDs concept, but just takes it further to making it default and more useful. It might be better to create the local account first, then add your ID. Try it out when you get it and report back your results.

couldn't you set share permissions with "Everyone"?

He wants to control permissions at the folder/file level not give it to everyone. However, there are actually 2 sets of permissions for shares, shared permissions and NTFS permissions. Whichever has the most restrictions will be used.

NTFS permissions give you the best control over shared permissions. Usually the best way to set the access is to set share permissions to everyone and then use NTFS permissions to lock down access to the groups/users you want.

The main issue here is not how to do the permissions, but how do you link an online acount to a local account which my comments above describe.

"Obviously I can map the drive with alternate credentials. But this is kind of goofy to have to fight with something to simple."

I don't really understand this statement - what do you think your fighting with?

The box doing the shares has permissions set with what it knows its local accounts. To access those you have to auth, where is the fight?

As mentioned you can use alternate creds to auth to that box to access its shares.

I am not seeing the issue?

"Obviously I can map the drive with alternate credentials. But this is kind of goofy to have to fight with something to simple."

I don't really understand this statement - what do you think your fighting with?

The box doing the shares has permissions set with what it knows its local accounts. To access those you have to auth, where is the fight?

As mentioned you can use alternate creds to auth to that box to access its shares.

I am not seeing the issue?

The way I am understanding his question is as long as the username/password are the same on machines, you can just browse to them via \\computername. I've always used this trick myself. I think what he's asking is, by using a Microsoft Account, it is no longer going to pass those credentials, as it will now be using a Windows Live ID.

It might be possible to create a local account first with the same username/password and then convert it to a Microsoft Account later. I would have to test this first to confirm though.

Edit - I downgraded my Microsoft Account to a local account and the shares instantly worked, but when I went back to a Microsoft Account, the credentials were invalid. I attempted to restart the machine just to see and Windows did a BSOD. After it came back, the shares continued to not work. The share is actually no longer working, giving me an error that the resource can't be found. I'm sure I broke a registry entry somewhere by downgrading and re-upgrading (maybe a bug?). I'll probably have to delete this account completely and make a new one now.

If anything, you can still use a local account, but just manually login to your Windows ID for the Store, Skydrive, Messenger, etc. The only thing you won't have access to is the synced settings features.

The way I am understanding his question is as long as the username/password are the same on machines, you can just browse to them via \\computername. I've always used this trick myself. I think what he's asking is, by using a Microsoft Account, it is no longer going to pass those credentials, as it will now be using a Windows Live ID.

Exactly...

I'll have to test that also, but I don't think it'll work.

My obvious thought is, it isn't going to authenticate and either fail with an error or ask for credentials. Obviously I can map the drive with alternate credentials. But this is kind of goofy to have to fight with something to simple.
What? Everytime you access to a remote network drive, you are using the credential of that remote machine. So just enter your live account when accessing to the Windows 8 machine and it will work like a charm.

What? Everytime you access to a remote network drive, you are using the credential of that remote machine. So just enter your live account when accessing to the Windows 8 machine and it will work like a charm.

Server is Windows 7, it only uses local accounts... Desktop is Windows 8, logged on with a Microsoft account.. Does not compute.

Yes I know I can map the drives with other credentials, but looking to see if I am missing something built in....

It didn't. Read my edit.

Thanks for testing sorry it broke your load... do a system restore?

Server is Windows 7, it only uses local accounts... Desktop is Windows 8, logged on with a Microsoft account.. Does not compute.

Yes I know I can map the drives with other credentials, but looking to see if I am missing something built in....

Then log in with your Windows 7 account when accessing to the shared drive.

The built in feature is homegroup that you don't want to use for some random reasons.

/thread.

Thanks for testing sorry it broke your load... do a system restore?

I'm still testing in VMware so no biggie. I created a Snapshot before I did it anyway, so I just reverted to that.

Then log in with your Windows 7 account when accessing to the shared drive.

The built in feature is homegroup that you don't want to use for some random reasons.

/thread.

You certainly like to reply a lot even when you don't understand the issue. I create SMB shares on my Apple servers and I also have an Active Directory with shares as well. I just found out that all of those shares don't automatically login either (which is expected since the credentials aren't the same). Yes, you can manually mount them, but that is far from ideal. Homegroup is exactly what it is, a home feature. Now what?

You certainly like to reply a lot even when you don't understand the issue. I create SMB shares on my Apple servers and I also have an Active Directory with shares as well. I just found out that all of those shares don't automatically login either (which is expected since the credentials aren't the same). Yes, you can manually mount them, but that is far from ideal. Homegroup is exactly what it is, a home feature. Now what?

He isn't using SMB. You can't compare.

He isn't using SMB. You can't compare.

SMB is the backbone of Windows sharing......

If you have AD, just join the win8 client to the domain and use domain creds? (I really don't like the implementation of the Live ID for local login either...)

Well right, but then you can't use the live services sync. I know I'm talking about a different thing, but it's still an issue.

Alright, so while I don't like the solution for my personal issue, I think this should solve your issues.

It's very simple and I overlooked it on the first try. Create a Microsoft Account on Win8 and browse to the machine you want to access via \\computername.

Authenticate and check the remember password option. You should be set from then on out.

post-277424-0-29665700-1344710977_thumb.

Well right, but then you can't use the live services sync. I know I'm talking about a different thing, but it's still an issue.

I agree. It's a small issue but it's still an issue and it would have been nice if MS had given us the option to create local/AD accounts and link them to an MS account for syncing.

I agree. It's a small issue but it's still an issue and it would have been nice if MS had given us the option to create local/AD accounts and link them to an MS account for syncing.

You can link your domain account (AD) with an MS account, and you can also block that with a GPO.

I still don't see what the issue is here?

There is not much difference between you logging in locally with billy and Password1 so it matches up with remote machine billy Password1 and accessing the share, via saving credentials to send billy Password1 when your logged in with [email protected]

Its not like your local account was sync'd in any way to the remote machines shares\account - if you changed the password on your machines local billy account, you would of failed to auth. So either you would have to had changed the account info on the remote machine or saved credentials.

It's not some other account logged into you local machine would have access to shares that billy does.

I don't see anything really different here other than saving credentials once vs them being what you logged in with. The method of access is still the same to the remote share - your authing with billy Password1. Be it thats what you logged in with, or what you saved as auth for that remote machine.

Care to detail it?

Because WHS is a dead product and I don't see how it's related to the discussion :p

WHS 2011 is end of life in 2016, and is still being sold on systems today. So just because MS isn't making a successor to it, doesn't instantly mean it is dead.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Making US citizens pay is a prominent tool? Joke of the week…
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!