Recommended Posts

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. ? A Santa Fe man said his fight to get his controversial license plate back is about protecting everyone's rights.

Robert Anaya's vanity license plate was initially approved back in 2009, but he just got a letter from the Motor Vehicle Division saying it's revoked because it's considered obscene. The plate in question reads IB6UB9.

"If something is obscene or profanity, we have no place for it in New Mexico," Taxation and Revenue Department Secretary Demesia Padilla said.

Anaya said his plate is not a sexual reference, but an inside joke with a friend from a night at a casino.

However, the state said it's gotten enough complaints to cancel the plate. The state can't provide those complaints because officials say they weren't written or recorded.

Anaya's attorney said the license plate is not obscene, according to the definition in the constitution. He said in order for something to be obscene it has to be intolerable. If that were the case, the attorney says, people couldn't have any license plates with the number combination 6 and 9. In fact, he goes on to say those numbers couldn't be consecutively on house numbers, telephone numbers, prices and sports jerseys.

"If you allow the government to start chipping away at our constitutional rights, it can have more serious implications in the future," attorney Leon Howard said. "Mr. Anaya feels bullied by the MVD."

Anaya has appealed the MVD's decision and is waiting for a hearing. In the meantime, he's using a generic state-approved license plate.

source

post-37120-0-90131900-1346075538.jpg

You'd have to be an adult who knew what that plate was referring to to even decode that.

There's a guy around here with the license plate B1R and I don't think anyone gets it, but I laugh every time I see it. :rofl:

You'd have to be an adult who knew what that plate was referring to to even decode that.

Uhm.. most people driving that would notice the plate ARE adults and 99% of adults are clearly aware what those numbers mean.

It does not matter how the driver interrupts the message to mean. What matters is how the general public interrupts the message. Obviously enough complaints have come to the attention of the DMV to indicate people DO understand the message and object to it.

Uhm.. most people driving that would notice the plate ARE adults and 99% of adults are clearly aware what those numbers mean.

It does not matter how the driver interrupts the message to mean. What matters is how the general public interrupts the message. Obviously enough complaints have come to the attention of the DMV to indicate people DO understand the message and object to it.

Normal people shouldn't have to change their lives because some idiots dislike anything remotely sexual.

I guess I'm in the 1% of adults who don't get it. I also never usually get l33t speak either. Too old to give a damn I guess.

I didn't see it either. I think most people wouldn't even notice it's encrypted meaning.

And from the first reply to the OP :)

Seriously? The issue here is that there is a 6 and a 9 in the plate? Ridiculous.

Oh wait I get it now.. I be 6, you be 9. Pretty funny.

think 69

So if enough people complain about an arbitary number plate in Santa Fe they ban it............Utter stupidy and they cant even justify the decision with proof.

All those in Santa Fe should make a complaint about the Mayors number plate and see how that fairs in getting it banned :rolleyes: :D

Uhm.. most people driving that would notice the plate ARE adults and 99% of adults are clearly aware what those numbers mean.

It does not matter how the driver interrupts the message to mean. What matters is how the general public interrupts the message. Obviously enough complaints have come to the attention of the DMV to indicate people DO understand the message and object to it.

No, bull****. What if it's a reference to "If 6 were 9?" the Jimi Hendrix song? It's two numbers, for someone to read that and then take it as some sexual message clearly requires some cognitive skills which would evade anyone offended by it.

Or, maybe it doesn't. Either way everyone who complained should have their licenses taken away, it's the only way to be safe.

This only shows how ridiculous getting "offended" is.. When you're a child your parents tell you the cliche sayings of "sticks and stones" or just to ignore it, things like that. But when you become adults just claim your offended and people roll out the red carpet to accommodate your over-sensitivity.

If you don't like what I say or what something I own says then feel free to move to North Korea. There anything offensive is punishable by death. It would be pure heaven for you. /s

However, the state said it's gotten enough complaints to cancel the plate. The state can't provide those complaints because officials say they weren't written or recorded.

And they banned the plate based on that? That makes it even more incredible.

So this is just because the numbers 6 and 9 appear in it? How utterly pathetic.

I guess that means that me, and everyone else born in 1969, would get our birth records censored too?

Uhm no. See, if you had a plate that said "1969" or something like "69 CHVY"" it would be an extremely far stretch (if not impossible) to say it is obscene in some way. However, the plate mentioned could very easily be interpreted as obscene. According to N.M's own DMV site:

A prestige plate may have 1-7 characters (1-6 characters for a motorcycle). The characters can include the Zia symbol, spaces, apostrophes, dashes, or any combination of letters and numbers. A requested character set may be rejected if 1) it duplicates any existing plate; 2) the division finds it to be derogatory or obscene; or (3) it falsely states or implies that the vehicle or the driver represents the authority of a governmental agency or official.

This includes plates that have/had no original intention of being obscene. Most plate registrations asks the registrar to explain the meaning of the custom plate. Someone at the DMV was asleep at the wheel.

They didn't find it obscene.. People on the road did.. and they complained about it.

If they're offended by it, well.. **** them. Who cares what they think.

People found it obscene, they reported it. The agency found it to be obscene after investigating, which means they found it obscene.

Splitting hairs is not your strong suit. :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!