Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|Falcon 9 / Dragon CRS-6 ISS resupply||
|Marvel's 'Daredevil' becomes the second most pirated TV show on the internet||
|Official Dogs vs Cats||
|Another bad ad||
|Latest Nvidia GPU driver comes with support for linux kernel 4.0!||
Posted 18 October 2012 - 23:13
Posted 19 October 2012 - 05:11
Well, if you look up, there's another poster claiming that it takes 2-3 seconds to start a metro app. I also back that figure.
Posted 19 October 2012 - 05:42
Posted 19 October 2012 - 07:23
what I don't get is why people expect people to spoonfeed them and baby stuff down.... people should try to better themselves and grow up instead of being babied and drag everyone down.... this is for those who think proper media players are too overwhelming....
Posted 19 October 2012 - 07:29
Posted 19 October 2012 - 07:31
Posted 19 October 2012 - 08:05
Posted 19 October 2012 - 08:21
Why is it photoshop opens faster than most metro apps?
Its always, pointless animation, loading, then the app fades/slides in... (I'm on a ssd/not slow machine)
Posted 19 October 2012 - 08:24
Posted 19 October 2012 - 08:25
WinRTisnt really a media management device. And besides music apps is perfectly fine at handling huge libraries and manage playlists.
Posted 19 October 2012 - 08:32
Posted 19 October 2012 - 09:17
Posted 19 October 2012 - 09:44
I am a metro fanboy and most built-in apps in Windows 8 don't start instantaneously. They take noticeably longer than they should. I think Photos (viewer), Reader, Music and Video are all very slow for the miniscule interface that they load afterwards.
LIES! PURE LIES! How dare you lie about Windows 8 in such a manor! You're doing it wrong!
/end over dramatization of Windows 8 fanboys.
For those of you who "open metro apps in less than a second", good for you! It doesn't work that way for everyone. So quit downplaying the issue that appears to be more widespread than you care to admit.