NZB Matrix is DEAD! :'(


Recommended Posts

I have PAID extra for films in there Triple Play, (DVD + BlueRay + Digital)... all i can say is i will NEVER EVER pay

extra for the digital copy (even if its come free). How can it take 1hour to run there silly installer to install the digital

copy on to a device and if you choose to put it on a phone you need there shody coded app to play it.

Then you get another film from another Studio and have to use a totally different App for that one.

Sorry but i will just buy the Blueray film on its own.. and download a digital copy from Torrents/Usenet or what other place

i find and bypass the studio junk of a digital copy full of DRM poor bitrate and stuttering rubbish App.

so yeah, studios are blind... so they can moan and groan all they like.. there people here paying Usenet and Torrents sites

for VIP access that if the Studios woke up they find people willing to pay for a proper combined and free to play on any device service.

but they won't invest that sort of cash.. as it just easier to blame there comsumers being pirates and evil. well if that how

they want to treat us then tough to them.

Where there is a will they will be a way.. do the Studios have a Will.. i doubt it.

  • Like 1

i stopped using index sites about a year ago when i found out you can just run your own private one.

its called newznab and most of the good usenet index sites use newznab

Hmm.. Interesting, and good to know!

As for the rest of the conversation that has been going on: I'll stand up and speak honestly about the state of media. Currently, I purchase all of my music or get it through legal means. Illegal music has just become more headache than it is worth. With all the big boys competing with each other and offering DRM-free files to download, the consumer music market has NEVER been better. When I was in high school back in the 90's a new CD cost $14-$18 (for a 1 disc album). These days new albums are HALF that. That's awesome, and really gives me nothing but petty reasons to pirate music now.

Wake up Movie and TV industry! Look at what is happening in the digital music market and please COPY. Stop punishing the folks who pay for your stuff while the people who pirate your content have a much better experience! We get our movies and TV through cable, Amazon Prime, and RedBox. Sometimes, though, we will miss our TV show or the movie we want to watch is just unavailable unless we pay a ridiculous amount to Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, or Google Play to rent or just go to Best Buy and purchase for a ridiculous amount. So yes, I use Usenet at time to supplement this. If they get their head on straight they will figure out that the best way to fight piracy is strip out the DRM crap, learn to trust their customers, and lower their prices.

talking of newznab, as mentioned about quite a few sites use it now to index, so just gotta find one of them you like (the only difference between each one is what it looks like/organised and how big the community is e.g. forums comments etc) but if you want to find one then here's a link Sabnzdb have posted on there forums page http://goo.gl/D4WL5

then there is always binsearch as well which is a very raw search but tends to have everything, just gotta look for collections on there

Private sites and hidden posts are were everything is going. Can't stop what doesn't exist. The newznab is a interesting idea, but with the advent of hidden posts its useless. By hidden I mean scrambled headers. Only stuff that ever gets shut down are the services that are easy enough for anyone to use. Adapt and use a brain for the more complicated solutions.

Private sites and hidden posts are were everything is going. Can't stop what doesn't exist. The newznab is a interesting idea, but with the advent of hidden posts its useless. By hidden I mean scrambled headers. Only stuff that ever gets shut down are the services that are easy enough for anyone to use. Adapt and use a brain for the more complicated solutions.

Yeah that's the future I guess :/

I'm on a big dutch private newsgroup myself btw :p

Yeah that's the future I guess :/

I'm on a big dutch private newsgroup myself btw :p

Something I found interesting is Newsleecher now offers a Usenet + Client + Supersearch package. What else would you need for a flat 9.99 (ish?) a month fee. Its actually quite tempting once they work out the kinks. They are a HighWinds reseller. No need to pay for a client AND usenet access. Then again who pays for clients these days lol, plenty good free alternatives. But as I said, scrambled headers and private sites will make this useless for "searching" with supersearch. These companies only auto report files they see matching titles on groups. If titles dont match they would have to police manually. Not very cost effective. I just like the idea of them offering the client for free. However, Newsleecher 4 really took away alot of options that Newsleecher 3 had. Interested to see where Newsleecher 5 goes.

Sorry guys but there's no justification for using sites like these.

Plenty of ways to see movies/TV shows/etc legally.

Cinema, cable, iTunes, Netflix, other TV services, etc.

Depends on the country someone lives in, It's COMPLETELY legal to download movies and music here, I pay a damn "media" fee on every "media" object I buy...

Sorry guys but there's no justification for using sites like these.

Plenty of ways to see movies/TV shows/etc legally.

Cinema, cable, iTunes, Netflix, other TV services, etc.

Read my earlier post - it comes from dissatisfaction from whats available. If you haven't used a streamlined solution like sickbeard/couchpotato/sabnzbd/plex then I would very much believe you'd be happy using something inferior and riddled with DRM. But for many, dropping back to the mainstream stuff is simply a downgrade I'm afraid.

The industry needs to offer something better. It's currently just not good enough. If people didn't feel like they were justified using them then they simply wouldn't use them and they'd use the legal alternatives you mentioned. Music piracy forced THAT industry to adapt (we now have DRM free music downloads) and now the Movie/TV industry needs to do the same.

Your blanket "no justification" comment is frankly a bit shortsighted. Changes need to be made.

  • Like 1

Sorry guys but there's no justification for using sites like these.

Plenty of ways to see movies/TV shows/etc legally.

Cinema, cable, iTunes, Netflix, other TV services, etc.

You can sit on your high horse all you want thinking we don't spend money legally. You think just becuase we use sites like this doesn't mean we arn't doing legal services also? Its all about availability. I have NetFlix, MoviePass, TV Service, and have a massive collection of blurays not to mention limited editions that you end up paying more than double the cost of a normal bluray. I can tell you justification comes with availability. When these services finally get up to snuff of what the "pirates" are doing. MAYBE there wouldn't be such an issue. Look at hidef rips of movies not even available in retail channels but you can "pirate" a copy of it online in hidef. I'd gladly give them more, but they choose to fight rather than work together. Then you got these companies trying to pass on crap to the end-user with low quality transfers.

When there is no company providing what you want, you will seek alternatives. When you seek alternatives, some people create there own and share to others wanting the same.

  • Like 3

Depends on the country someone lives in, It's COMPLETELY legal to download movies and music here, I pay a damn "media" fee on every "media" object I buy...

That goes without saying. I'm talking about countries where piracy is illegal.

Read my earlier post - it comes from dissatisfaction from whats available. If you haven't used a streamlined solution like sickbeard/couchpotato/sabnzbd/plex then I would very much believe you'd be happy using something inferior and riddled with DRM. But for many, dropping back to the mainstream stuff is simply a downgrade I'm afraid.

The industry needs to offer something better. It's currently just not good enough. If people didn't feel like they were justified using them then they simply wouldn't use them and they'd use the legal alternatives you mentioned. Music piracy forced THAT industry to adapt (we now have DRM free music downloads) and now the Movie/TV industry needs to do the same.

Your blanket "no justification" comment is frankly a bit shortsighted. Changes need to be made.

If you're dissatisfied with what's available then go and stand on a picket line and protest, write in to the media, whatever. Getting content by illegal means does nothing to express your dissatisfaction; the content providers will just assume you're a cheapo.

If you're not happy with what's available then you should abstain from getting that media altogether, rather than becoming a criminal and seeking illegal means to get them.

Shortsighted my ass. I'm just being realistic.

You can sit on your high horse all you want thinking we don't spend money legally. You think just becuase we use sites like this doesn't mean we arn't doing legal services also? Its all about availability. I have NetFlix, MoviePass, TV Service, and have a massive collection of blurays not to mention limited editions that you end up paying more than double the cost of a normal bluray. I can tell you justification comes with availability. When these services finally get up to snuff of what the "pirates" are doing. MAYBE there wouldn't be such an issue. Look at hidef rips of movies not even available in retail channels but you can "pirate" a copy of it online in hidef. I'd gladly give them more, but they choose to fight rather than work together. Then you got these companies trying to pass on crap to the end-user with low quality transfers.

When there is no company providing what you want, you will seek alternatives. When you seek alternatives, some people create there own and share to others wanting the same.

All I see is WAHHH.

If you can't get what you want by legal means then just don't have it. You act like you're ENTITLED to have that content in the way that YOU want it. Get over yourself.

That goes without saying. I'm talking about countries where piracy is illegal.

If you're dissatisfied with what's available then go and stand on a picket line and protest, write in to the media, whatever. Getting content by illegal means does nothing to express your dissatisfaction; the content providers will just assume you're a cheapo.

If you're not happy with what's available then you should abstain from getting that media altogether, rather than becoming a criminal and seeking illegal means to get them.

Shortsighted my ass. I'm just being realistic.

Protest and picket, seriously? Can you not see the voice of the internet? Its a new generation of protest and picket. Are they listening, they will eventually, this is our way of protest and picket.

Protest and picket, seriously? Can you not see the voice of the internet? Its a new generation of protest and picket. Are they listening, they will eventually, this is our way of protest and picket.

Except that there's no clear message being sent to these companies. How do they differentiate between those who simply want to avoid payment and those who are protesting?

It's a poor protest at best. I think it's more of an excuse.

Except that there's no clear message being sent to these companies. How do they differentiate between those who simply want to avoid payment and those who are protesting?

It's a poor protest at best. I think it's more of an excuse.

The same can be said if you stand outside a building with a sign and write letters. I am in no way saying every pirate is a saint, people who seek profit by piracy are not saints.

The same can be said if you stand outside a building with a sign and write letters. I am in no way saying every pirate is a saint, people who seek profit by piracy are not saints.

Not really because the message is clear then; it's written down. You're issuing your demands, telling them what you want.

If you just pirate material, you're not actually telling them anything and they have to second guess your intent.

Surely you can see the difference?

Not really because the message is clear then; it's written down. You're issuing your demands, telling them what you want.

If you just pirate material, you're not actually telling them anything and they have to second guess your intent.

Surely you can see the difference?

Are we not writing down now? Its not my fault if they choose to ignore what is written, or if they choose not to look out of the 40th floor window to see the crowd below. My voice is one but of many throughout the internet, freely available for them to see. You can say its scattered but just as a disfunctional crowd or a single letter would prove, eventually that voice is heard. We are both on the same page you just choose not to believe the internet is a proper voice.

  • Like 1

Except that there's no clear message being sent to these companies. How do they differentiate between those who simply want to avoid payment and those who are protesting?

It's a poor protest at best. I think it's more of an excuse.

Your arguments are fairly shallow... picket and protest? REALLY? Thanks for not even attempting to understand the issue. You're also not listening. Piracy has steered the music industry in the right direction, it's gonna happen with the Movie industry eventually.

We're not entitled. We just know what we like. There are people who sit back and take it, and others who make stuff work the way they want.

I'm just a firm believer that the consumer should drive the industry - these methods are just an alternate way of consumerism that still needs to be tapped as a legitimate business. It's just evolution. Without these steps, no progress will ever be made. We'd probably all still be sitting around watching DVD's that cost ?15 each if people didn't start sharing movies online. So thank that for your Netflix etc.

  • Like 1

Are we not writing down now? Its not my fault if they choose to ignore what is written, or if they choose not to look out of the 40th floor window to see the crowd below. My voice is one but of many throughout the internet, freely available for them to see. You can say its scattered but just as a disfunctional crowd or a single letter would prove, eventually that voice is heard. We are both on the same page you just choose not to believe the internet is a proper voice.

I don't think the movie industry employs people to comb through message boards finding out what people's opinion of them is.

Again, all I'm seeing here are excuses. If you really wanted to make a difference you'd let the movie companies know about your dissatisfaction directly and be quite vocal about it. I think "fighting the system" is just a convenient excuse for pirates to justify their criminal activity.

Your arguments are fairly shallow... picket and protest? REALLY? Thanks for not even attempting to understand the issue. You're also not listening. Piracy has steered the music industry in the right direction, it's gonna happen with the Movie industry eventually.

We're not entitled. We just know what we like. There are people who sit back and take it, and others who make stuff work the way they want.

I'm just a firm believer that the consumer should drive the industry - these methods are just an alternate way of consumerism that still needs to be tapped as a legitimate business. It's just evolution. Without these steps, no progress will ever be made. We'd probably all still be sitting around watching DVD's that cost ?15 each if people didn't start sharing movies online. So thank that for your Netflix etc.

Consumers would drive the industry by simply not buying the movies at all. Getting them in some other way does nothing to strengthen the argument. No movie company wants to make movies that nobody buys. Obviously if everybody voted with their wallets and didn't buy something because they didn't like the way it's distributed, the companies would look at what they're doing wrong. Obtaining the content via illegal means actually adds very little to the argument at all.

Again, convenient excuse. ;)

I don't think the movie industry employs people to comb through message boards finding out what people's opinion of them is.

Again, all I'm seeing here are excuses. If you really wanted to make a difference you'd let the movie companies know about your dissatisfaction directly and be quite vocal about it. I think "fighting the system" is just a convenient excuse for pirates to justify their criminal activity.

Consumers would drive the industry by simply not buying the movies at all. Getting them in some other way does nothing to strengthen the argument. No movie company wants to make movies that nobody buys. Obviously if everybody voted with their wallets and didn't buy something because they didn't like the way it's distributed, the companies would look at what they're doing wrong. Obtaining the content via illegal means actually adds very little to the argument at all.

Again, convenient excuse. ;)

People won't stop buying movies because they DO want to watch movies. I'm just saying that industry would have been happy sitting back and charging ?15 a pop for DVD's and you wouldn't be able to consume the media you can now via streaming because it probably wouldn't exist. The industry has had it's arm twisted and it's had to evolve. Therefore you CAN consume the media in a more convenient fashion.

It's not a convenient excuse. We're paying. All of us are paying. We're not cheap. We want to force it in the right direction. Why can't you look at the situation objectively without acting like a school headmaster quoting rules and just admit there's obviously a problem with the system somewhere.

People won't stop buying movies because they DO want to watch movies. I'm just saying that industry would have been happy sitting back and charging ?15 a pop for DVD's and you wouldn't be able to consume the media you can now via streaming because it probably wouldn't exist. The industry has had it's arm twisted and it's had to evolve. Therefore you CAN consume the media in a more convenient fashion.

It's not a convenient excuse. We're paying. All of us are paying. We're not cheap. We want to force it in the right direction. Why can't you look at the situation objectively without acting like a school headmaster quoting rules and just admit there's obviously a problem with the system somewhere.

Okay. Keep fighting the good fight man!

*snickers*

People won't stop buying movies because they DO want to watch movies. I'm just saying that industry would have been happy sitting back and charging ?15 a pop for DVD's and you wouldn't be able to consume the media you can now via streaming because it probably wouldn't exist. The industry has had it's arm twisted and it's had to evolve. Therefore you CAN consume the media in a more convenient fashion.

It's not a convenient excuse. We're paying. All of us are paying. We're not cheap. We want to force it in the right direction. Why can't you look at the situation objectively without acting like a school headmaster quoting rules and just admit there's obviously a problem with the system somewhere.

I hand the argue torch to you, I have other things to do ;)

If a service existed that allowed me to watch all the latest movies and TV Episodes as soon as they are out on bluray in 1080p streaming to my tv via some box with a monthly fee i'd be very happy to do that. Unfortunately my netflix and Amazon prime really dont offer anything new.

People dont always pirate because they dont want to pay, many do it because there is no other way to get the content..

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!