Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|Why my 'old' desktop is awesome||
|Changing of the guard: Nokia sign comes down, Microsoft's goes up||
|Microsoft profit slides on slumping PC sales||
|WZOR Talks About Windows (Codename) 9, Is a DP Imminent?||
|Slipstream Update 1 and other Windows Updates into Windows 8.1 (Guide)||
Posted 02 January 2013 - 03:33
Posted 02 January 2013 - 03:43
Posted 02 January 2013 - 04:12
Posted 02 January 2013 - 04:25
Posted 02 January 2013 - 04:29
Posted 02 January 2013 - 04:33
I've got a music app that suspends when in the background, so what you're saying would appear not to be the case.
Also, I don't really care about battery life or CPU usage on a desktop. That's fine for a phone which is guaranteed to not be connected to power and for which battery life is very important. It's silly not to offer a toggle option for a desktop that has upgradeable RAM and a multi-core CPU.
Posted 02 January 2013 - 05:08
Posted 02 January 2013 - 05:18
Listen to music, obviously. Some of the internet radio apps look interesting, but they're useless if I have to be in the interface for them the whole time that I'm listening.
And it definitely is the fault of the OS, if it doesn't have a toggle. RIM did it properly with PlayBook OS, and Windows 7 and earlier have always let you just run music while minimised. It's a pretty common usage scenario. If it's an issue of using APIs properly, they should make sure that every music app in the store can run in the background, and regardless, they should have put a toggle in as well.
Posted 02 January 2013 - 05:23
Posted 02 January 2013 - 05:42
And it definitely is the fault of the OS, if it doesn't have a toggle. RIM did it properly with PlayBook OS, and Windows 7 and earlier have always let you just run music while minimised.
Posted 02 January 2013 - 13:52
Well, try them out. They should work in the background. It sounds like you found one that was written incorrectly and doesn't. Try the default music app... it gives you free streaming. It's pretty awesome.
Microsoft isn't going to do an exhaustive test of the app.
It's up to the developer to do and to fix. Complain to them and/or write a review for that app that mentions the shortcoming. It's absolutely not a fault of the OS.
No, no toggle. That breeds laziness (developer laziness). It masks the symptoms instead of treating the disease. It should just be written properly. Yes, it's a matter of using APIs appropriately.
Posted 02 January 2013 - 13:55
Fault of the app developer.
Posted 02 January 2013 - 14:03
Thats like me saying I'll develop a chat app and it's up to the users to create the network connection (in code!). It's not Microsofts responsibility while I agree for these type of media apps there should be some check that they are indeed background-able it's still up to the developer to KNOW THE API and fix their ****.
Not of the type I want. I see that yes, it does play music in the background, but there's no mood-based playlists or artist discovery going on.
They totally should, they barely have enough apps as is. Once it gets more populated, it would make sense to just leave it up to the developers, but at the moment, it's about properly supporting the devs.
Yes it is, because the OS doesn't have a toggle for apps running in the background.
It's not a matter of developer laziness, it's a matter of choice to use the computer how I like. That was the appeal of Windows compared to OSX, if MS keeps this up they'll be removing that advantage, and handing it to Android (and Linux maybe). And it doesn't breed dev laziness on the PlayBook, so you're wrong all around.