What was your initial reaction to Windows 8?


Recommended Posts

Remember back at D9, where Microsoft officially unveiled Windows 8 for the first time? I think it was Steven Sinofsky and Julie Larson-Green who presented the whole presentation. They revealed the new tablet UI that was rumoured to be in development, and everyone was amazed.

But what we're your initial reactions? I just can't seem to think people automatically thought that Windows 8 wasn't going to be popular among desktop users. I remember seeing it and thinking "wow, I can't wait for Windows 8". The only time I thought it was a hassle to use was when the Developer Preview launched in September, since in that build the Start Screen wasn't really optimized for the mouse and keyboard.

In fact, Windows 8 made me change the way I use my desktop. I used to have a 22" standard LCD monitor, but since September of 2011, when Microsoft released the Developer Preview, I purchased myself a 23" touch screen monitor... Which was to be used on my gaming machine. Yes, gaming machine.

For me, Windows 8 has always been something positive in my eyes, however I feel as if for the most part, initial reactions were good, but then people had a proper feel for it and were scared away by the removal of the start button and other old goodies.

When it first started leaking, and there was screens of Metro UI, I was excited for people to work out how to enable it

When the dev preview arrived, I turned into Jekyll and Hyde, one minute I thought it was genius, the next I hated it more than anything I had hated before

Consumer Preview, Jekyll and Hyde again

Release Preview, Jekyll and Hyde again

RTM, Jekyll and Hyde and then just hate after trying to run it full time

  • Like 2

But what we're your initial reactions? I just can't seem to think people automatically thought that Windows 8 wasn't going to be popular among desktop users. I remember seeing it and thinking "wow, I can't wait for Windows 8".

That was about right for most people. Then Microsoft removed the start menu. It was about then when they ****ed a lot of users off. It's understandable why Microsoft have done it. They needed people to get in on the idea of apps for Windows for their ecosystem they've created to fight off the likes of Apple and Google's Marketplaces/stores on the mobile platforms.

Unfortunately for Microsoft they're using their desktop users as a quick way to enforce and create a user-base.

I personally do like Windows 8, even with the forced (and somewhat broken app ecosystem/setup we have). All the under the hood tweaks make it so much faster.

My first impressions of Windows 8 was a bit weird since I didn't see a reason why we needed a new version after Windows 7, and Microsoft as always trying to hide what the final look was going to be meant it was always going to up in the air with the final design, and its proved it self with the removal of the start menu but no way to remove the rest of the classic desktop system.

"This is retarded, where is the start button, why is this a tablet UI on a desktop?"

I still feel this way.

The start button was still present in it's official reveal. It was removed in early 2012.

The start button was still present in it's official reveal. It was removed in early 2012.

Initial Reveal... it was concept, it wasn't fact..my first reaction was when the concept started to become reality.

at first i was like

"Oooooh clean ... wait ..... how do i get to the desktop UGHHHH .... Ohh,... i see, ....... wait, where's the start button ... how do i access hard drives, where are the programs ..... aghhhhhh WTF !!!#$^#&!!"

but then i was like

"ah, this is not so bad, .... i'll just pin this here, this one here, and this one here ..... home screen,... remove panel,... DONE ..... ahhhh sweeeeeeeet"

I remember being really excited for Windows 8. I wanted to play with the Start Screen. It had all these flashy fly-ins and big hit targets and just felt refreshing.

Then I installed the DP on my laptop and it was stuttering all over the place. The lack of proper driver support at the time kinda soured my experience.

I now use Windows 8 full time, and to be fair, I kinda feel like how i did when I had Windows 7: it's an operating system, I don't feel anything for it. The differences between each Windows version eventually become transparent over time to the average user like me.

my only thought was "it's different .."

then once the CP came out i preceded to poke around and figure out where everything moved to etc.

i now like it enough to look past what i don't like about it for all the other improvements made :)

yes I have Start8 installed, but I quite often still use the Start Screen depending on what i'm doing at the time

  • This is going to be cool. About time they refreshed the UI, about time it worked on tablets.
  • Dual Personality sucks.
  • Some of these applets are cool, sometimes.
  • Weird bugs, especially after installing some Win32 app. Little nagging things.
  • Search sucks.
  • Video app is weak.
  • Music app is horrendous.
  • Search is abhorrent.
  • It's fast.
  • Office 2013 is sweet on this and the Surface RT.
  • Whoever made the Music app should be destroyed.
  • Modern UI Search should be destroyed.
  • Start8 is great! I'm much happier and Search is useable again without File Explorer. Navigating from Start Menu, yes!
  • Native UASP support, Windows 8 all the way.
  • At least it has Windows Media Player Classic to sync a Windows Phone 8.
  • Music and Search suck. Something is wrong at Microsoft.
  • I like my Surface RT, just wish I had more apps and could sync with Desktop.
  • Can't wait to get Digital Storm Bolt running Windows 8 with an OCZ Vector SSD and almost double all my USB 3.0 storage performance with native UASP drivers.

Windows 8 is alright.

  • Like 2

Looks nice.

OMG Im moving my mouse way too much.

Now why cant I add a shutdown button to the Start Page

God my Start page is looking messy

I wish these metro apps were a bit more detailed.

Why does it keep jumping from my desktop to metro

Stick with it

My 23 inch screen is being wasted

How long until Blue?

Thats pretty much what went through my head during the first week. I just find Win 8 to be a step back on my desktop, Im sure it would be cool on a tablet, but Im not planning on getting a tablet so this is a desktop users view. Im not going to install Start8 but I do need somewhere to put all my options that used to be in the Start Menu because its too much on the Start page.

Win8 is a lot of things but plain and boring? And that's coming from OS X. You gotta explain that one.

I thought it was self-explanitory. Looks to me like something made for a child.

windows-8-screen.jpg

Start button is still there.... move mouse to bottom left corner, left click.... or right click for advanced options

The 'button' or 'orb' is gone, however the functionality still exists, in the corner.

Microsoft, up until Win8, was very choice-friendly with the UI, so when they released 8 and wanted to herd everybody in one direction, it got my immediate disapproval. I'm not opposed to change, but when the change is a large burden (imo), I want nothing of it.

If we had an option to turn on/off the start button and the Modern UI, Win8 would be an insanely good OS.

Start8 makes things better, but at that point, what's the point in trying to make it look and feel like 7 when I could just run 7 natively?

Win8 just seems like the bast*rd child of a tablet and PC one-night-stand.

  • Like 2

Mine was holy crap, I love that!

I'm thinking of the very old purple preview, where the colours looked very refined and the scheme worked great. The concept was fantastic but in the end, for me, it never lived up to what they promised.

Due to a lack of decent apps.

"This is retarded, where is the start button, why is this a tablet UI on a desktop?"

I still feel this way.

Is it fun living in the past?

A lot of people don't seem to realise you can section off your shortcuts and label them. Here's a section of mine:

14azy8j.png

  • Like 3

Is it fun living in the past?

A lot of people don't seem to realise you can section off your shortcuts and label them. Here's a section of mine:

14azy8j.png

And...that still looks like crap. The fact that you can sort tiles into groupings with labels does nothing to dispute his statement.

I really like Windows 8. The underlying core operating system is great. The 'Modern' UI is a 'Hollywood Squares' pastel abortion, more annoying and disruptive than it is useful.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!