Recommended Posts

Test

 

 

Edit: I didn't add any tags to it and it went through just fine. Are you using IE10?

 

Also, make sure you're grabbing the share url from underneath the video. By default the one in the URL bar is secure (https:) and won't post.

 

 

Btw,  you've been Rebecca rolled. :)

Test

 

 

Edit: I didn't add any tags to it and it went through just fine. Are you using IE10?

 

Also, make sure you're grabbing the share url from underneath the video. By default the one in the URL bar is secure (https:) and won't post.

 

 

Btw,  you've been Rebecca rolled. :)

 

Hehehehe :)

 

I'm using Chrome - 29.0.1541.0 dev-m

 

I see that you added the video with an address of http://youtu.be/
I tried to add it with the normal http://www.youtube.com/ address. Always worked.

Testing........

 

^This was using the share option

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A43JOxLa5MM

^This was copying the url.

 

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/A43JOxLa5MM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

^This was embed code

  • Like 1

What about the others? On my screen, none of them recieved a hero's welcome....

I mean none of those are working, they're just links

 

You mean even the one I posted? I see them fine.

 

Edit: If you're speaking of just your post, yes they're all just links.

Why does it work for me and not you?

 

I haven't a clue, I quoted marshall (when he copied one of my links) and it worked,

when I try to post url, embed, or share... I get the link only... not sure what I'm doing wrong....

 

 

edit, just like right now

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ

 

Members don't seem to have permission to use the media tag, but I can't find where that is determined (Neobond on test account)

OMG! He's got an alternate account BAN HIM :p

 

No Alternate (Dupe) Accounts.

Should you be disciplined with a restriction or ban, you are not allowed to open a new account to obtain freedom to post. Restrictions and bans are given for a reason, and usurping that ability by re-registering is not tolerated. If another account is opened, that account will be banned immediately, and the original account will be further penalized. Anyone who has warnings on their account is automatically excluded from changing their user name.

 

Sorry Boss, couldn't pass up that opportunity.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yes, it was amusing at the time because even then dbrand was well known for stealing the designs of products from other companies. That’s what they do.
    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      57
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!