Recommended Posts

Ok, I need a little bit of help here, I'm running a Windows Vista 32 bit guest OS, and trying to connect it to the outside Internet, but so far, I'm coming up short. I have the network adapter configured (as far as I know), but when I install the guest OS, a network adapter isn't being found, nor can I manually install one.

 

Help me! :cry:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1171723-windows-8-and-hyper-v/
Share on other sites

Something's not right here, each time I try to enable Hyper-V Extensible Virtual Switch, it kills completely kills all networking connectivity...???

 

EDIT: Force uninstalled and re-installed Hyper-V Extensible Virtual Switch under adapter properties, and now I can't create a new external connection in the Virtual Switch Manager.

 

 

What's your host OS?
What version of Hyper-V?
What service pack of Vista do you have installed?
Have you installed integration services in your guest?

Reference: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc794868(v=ws.10).aspx

 

Host is Windows 8, and it's a clean install of Vista RTM.

yeah it's hilariously annoying, 

 

Unless you're specifically learning about Hyper-V then i highly recommend a switch to VirtualBox, much more powerful on client machines and can run anything and everything. I use virtualbox on my desktop and hyper-V on my servers. 

yeah it's hilariously annoying, 

 

Unless you're specifically learning about Hyper-V then i highly recommend a switch to VirtualBox, much more powerful on client machines and can run anything and everything. I use virtualbox on my desktop and hyper-V on my servers. 

Yeah, I'm trying to poke around it a little, never used it before, plus, I was hoping to run a few older games that don't fully support 7 or 8.

Try going in to the VM's settings, removed the network adapter and then add a legacy network adapter and point that to your external enabled switch.

Oh, heck, that worked... Still doesn't reason why Microsoft doesn't support their own damn operating systems with this thing.

Virtualbox is good if you want to run XP etc.. it's also really good at other OS's and the VHD's it creates work fine on Hyper-V

 

Im pleased the question has been answered but when you've had enough of Hyper-V on the desktop i would recommend looking into VirtualBox. 

Oh, heck, that worked... Still doesn't reason why Microsoft doesn't support their own damn operating systems with this thing.

 

Because Windows Home Edition's do not contain any virtualization rights at all.  Its flat out forbidden. Technically you are in violation of your license agreement by putting anything less than Professional editions (aka Vista Business) within a VM. You may not agree with this... but then again... you kind of already did... :p

 

http://download.microsoft.com/Documents/UseTerms/Windows%20Vista_Home%20Premium_English_b6fbe7e6-f312-4692-8aee-f5b3d60987b4.pdf

 

 

That said, you can probably use Orca to generate an MST transform that would obliterate the OS requirement check within the Integration Services MSI installer.  I've never needed to try as I've only ever used Vista Enterprise and Ultimate editions within Hyper-V. I doubt there is a functional limitation on the part of Home Edition to receive the drivers once the MSI OS check has been overridden...

 

Even easier, you may be able to just extract the network drivers from the CAB file and then try to directly install them through device manager.

you may be able to just extract the network drivers from the CAB file and then try to directly install them through device manager.

 

This in fact does appear to be the generally accepted solution for getting Integration Services working on unsupported editions of Windows.  This is a much better option than using the slow old legacy adapter, so you may want to give it a try.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I think this will appeal to a lot of enthusiasts. If the thermals are similar to those of a single system in a compact case, many people running multiple systems may choose to combine them into one machine, provided the case footprint remains reasonable.
    • No, "a great deal" for 32GB of DDR5 is $50, not $350. I mean I see what you mean, that it's a decent price compared to what's currently available, but you really should put a disclaimer in this articles explaining that it's still multiple times more expensive than it used to be.
    • Linux 7.1 stable launch looms as Linus Torvalds releases the final release candidate by Paul Hill Linus Torvalds has just released what’s expected to be the final release candidate of Linux 7.1, rc7. The Linux founder said that this RC is not small, but smaller than recent releases, which is a good sign because he expects the stable version to drop next week if things continue on this trajectory. Linux kernels see a merge window for the first two weeks of their life, where developers add new features, then there are about seven or eight weeks of release candidates before the stable version. Typically, there are seven release candidates, but if more time is needed, then an eighth release candidate is released too. This week’s RC’s biggest area of fixes was for GPUs, with networking just behind. Torvalds said that the rest of the release was “pretty random and spread out” with some architecture fixes, driver fixes, filesystem improvements, and build fixes for more unusual configs. In terms of specific pieces of hardware receiving improvements in this update, we had more AMD Zen6 models supported and fixes for AMD SDMA 7.1 and GFX11. Hardware that got improvements includes Lenovo laptops, HONOR laptops, and MSI laptops. Here are the changelogs for those: ASoC: amd: acp: Add DMI quirk for Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15ASH11 Input: atkbd - add DMI quirk for Lenovo Yoga Air 14 (83QK) Input: atkbd - skip deactivate for HONOR BCC-N's internal keyboard ASoC: amd: yc: Add MSI Raider A18 HX A9WJG to quirk table ASoC: amd: yc: Enable internal mic on MSI Bravo 17 C7VF When the stable Linux 7.1 is released, it will be up to distribution maintainers, such as Canonical and Red Hat, to release the update to their users via the update manager. Some versions of Linux will get it before others, and some will never get it at all. Fedora and Arch-based distros will be among the first to get it, though. If you don’t get it, the security fixes will be backported to your system’s kernel, so you won’t be at risk, but you won’t get newer hardware support, which is fine if your computer works now.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      68
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!