45 posts in this topic

Posted

Where you got your number from I have no clue. It's a big place.

 

Stephen Hawkin.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bf2B7DN3tqc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Stephen Hawkin.

 

I'm not claiming Stephen Hawkin is wrong, I'm just asking you to perform some really basic Math.

Diameter of Milky Way is 100,000 ly

Radius is 50,000 ly

we're about 35,000 ly from the center

which means we're about 15,000 ly from the edge.

 

Now, I'm no scientist, but I'm pretty sure if you go 100% the speed of light, in one year you'll go one light year.

 

So please, tell me how you can go 15,000 light years in 80 years going 99% the speed of light. Is there something Stephen Hawkin isn't telling me?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

An Enterprise would be nice, but I'll take the battlestar Galactica anyday.  :D

 

I honestly think BSG is closer to the type of FTL engines we'll have someday. I don't see man (or anything, really) actually travelling faster than light. Maybe we can push probes up to relativistic speeds, but certainly not faster than light.  

But with Warp Drive, you're not actually moving faster than light, you are riding a surf of space time behind you :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Pretty sure I read somewhere mentioning Einstein, it's impossible to travel @ 100% the speed of light.

This is all theory, after all I did use the word "if", as current technology shows it's currently impossible to even get anywhere near the speed of light.

 

The measurement of a "light year" (the term "year") is the measurement of an Earth year. Traveling at the speed of light (close to it [99%]) causes the affect of time to slow, so 1 Earth year would = 1 day on board an interglatic space ship traveling @ 99% speed of light.

 

So if 80 years (19200 days) passed on an intergalactic space ship traveling @ 99% the speed of light, 58400 years would of passed on Earth. The cause of the slowing of time.

 

1 day @ 99% light speed = 1 Earth year

 

80 years (19200 days) @ 99% light speed = 58400 Earth years

 

Urgh, it's 2am, too tired to do this.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

^

 

Aha!! You sir have betrayed your location to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

They have been claiming they were closer and closer to finding out for a looooong while now. While true in word play that they are closer today compared to yesterday timewise, that's like me saying i am closer to living in Africa as I know the continents are drifting slowly over time.

 

That said, I don't believe in 'life' as we know it elsewhere. I believe that it was all destroyed a long time ago by some giant war that rained havoc and misery around most of the universe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

^

 

Aha!! You sir have betrayed your location to me.

 

Feel free to step in and do it for me...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Pretty sure I read somewhere mentioning Einstein, it's impossible to travel @ 100% the speed of light.

This is all theory, after all I did use the word "if", as current technology shows it's currently impossible to even get anywhere near the speed of light.

 

The measurement of a "light year" (the term "year") is the measurement of an Earth year. Traveling at the speed of light (close to it [99%]) causes the affect of time to slow, so 1 Earth year would = 1 day on board an interglatic space ship traveling @ 99% speed of light.

 

So if 80 years (19200 days) passed on an intergalactic space ship traveling @ 99% the speed of light, 58400 years would of passed on Earth. The cause of the slowing of time.

 

1 day @ 99% light speed = 1 Earth year

 

80 years (19200 days) @ 99% light speed = 58400 Earth years

 

Urgh, it's 2am, too tired to do this.

 

I don't blame you, it's 1PM and I'm too tired to do this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

FYI the church has accepted the idea of off-world life for quite some time - just another zip code in creation.

 

Define "the church"... because from what I've seen it's not true of many Christian organisations. All of the Abrahamic faiths have very human centric views of the universe, and accepting new science or not, finding other intelligent life would be pretty damaging to the idea that we are in any way special.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Feel free to step in and do it for me...

 

Merry Olde Englandshire?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Merry Olde Englandshire?

 

Kings Lynn, I have 12 toes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Define "the church"... because from what I've seen it's not true of many Christian organisations. All of the Abrahamic faiths have very human centric views of the universe, ....(blather)


Think again.

1) Catholic Church: has talked extraterrestrials since the 1700's. The Vatican's lead astronomer sees no doctrinal problems, has publicly discussed it many times and has not been rebuked. The Vatican itself runs an active astronomy program, including the Vatican Advanced Technology Telescope in Arizona and through its universities, and it has hosted a major astrobiology conference.

2) Evangelical Lutherans (largest Lutheran denomination): no problem. We are taught of a wide ranging creation. Can't speak for the Missouri Synod.

3) LDS (Mormons): a central teaching is a universe teeming with life. Had a long talk about this with one of my best friends clergy.

4) Presbyterian: http://www.presbyterianmission.org/ministries/today/gofigure-1113/

on matters where Scripture is silent (e.g., aliens) or ambiguous (e.g., the age of the earth), Presbyterians are very comfortable looking to the scientific community

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Kings Lynn, I have 12 toes.


At least you have spares in the event of losing some to cold weather.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

That depends on the relative stage of development between us and an alien civilization. On Earth the less developed civilization usually doesn't fare too well, so it could he a period of passive observation, signals and probes approaching from a different direction would be prudent.

 

That is what I always say. In our own history we are always conquering so I will assume aliens would be the same. People always respond they would be smarter and not attack or destroy like us. Um. Ok. We know better yet still do it. Survival of the fittest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

If we found a primitive race do you think we would try to help them, leave them alone,  try to rule them or put them in Zoo's and wipe out the rest?

 

It depends. If they have resources we will tell them we are helping them out and take their resources. If they complain or retaliate we would retaliate and use that as an excuse for our behavior. Later after they are under our control we would leave them alone and continue to take ownership of their resources. Eventually if they do not give us any hassle we will give them rights. We would never put them in a zoo if they are intelligent and communicate with us, but if they are not then when their numbers got low we would control them in a zoo to maintain a few of their species. If they are more intelligent and advanced we would pretend to come in peace try to be their friend and infiltrate them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Untill i have a Alien outside my door trying to sell me Time Shares..... well you get the point!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

 

NASA Ames Director: We

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

"...Any alien civ smart enough to visit earth, will be smart enough not to visit earth..."

cant remember if this was NDT or Sagan or .... ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

FYI the church has accepted the idea of off-world life for quite some time - just another zip code in creation.

uhhh define :church" because my nutty grandmother still thinks the earth is only 6000 years old, and there was no such thing as dinosaurs....

Church of Christ for anyone wondering -

99% of religion is pathetically lame, but CoC is really bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Can't travel by conventional ways in space, it will take forever. Will take forever to even travel with light speed.

 

You need warp drive to go anywhere.

 

One can wonder though, with so vast distances in the universe, it seems all we can do is "look", never travel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.