Recommended Posts

@Razorwing: That painted Delta Plus looks pretty cool as well. The other 2 look alright, nothing too fancy :p

This custom build of Sinanju Stein looks pretty good for a HG!

MSN-06S_SINANJU-STIN_037.jpg

Source: HGUC Sinanju Stein - Custom Build

^What's wrong with it having a V fin? The actual Delta Plus is based off of Delta Gundam anyways, so it's not weird if you ask me.

And true that. Everything about AGE 2 is the best in Gundam AGE. It's pilot, it's design, it's way of fighting (due to Asemu), even the pilot's name, haha.

^What's wrong with it having a V fin? The actual Delta Plus is based off of Delta Gundam anyways, so it's not weird if you ask me.

And true that. Everything about AGE 2 is the best in Gundam AGE. It's pilot, it's design, it's way of fighting (due to Asemu), even the pilot's name, haha.

Doesn't seem right on it lol.

^You don't know what Otakon is? o_O It's basically a convention for people that like anime, manga and other things that have to do with the Asian pop culture. And saw that among other videos on Gundam Guy and The Verge. It's pretty epic!

Yay! My MG Unicorn has arrived ! Goodbye life! :p

Nice.. which version did you get?

@Jam : so it's like Comic/Anime-Con?. lol.

41.jpg

http://gundamguy.blogspot.ca/2012/07/mg-1100-rx-0-unicorn-gundam-w-led.html

21.jpg

http://gundamguy.blo...nted-build.html

1k.jpg

http://gundamguy.blo...eta-gundam.html

^Yeah, but it's made by fans for fans. Hence the name "Otaku".

Those last 2 builds aren't really my taste but I do like the craftsmanship that's been put into them a lot. Though ? Gundam is a cool Gundam because Bright Noa's son Hathaway pilots it. Though I don't like the shades of colors that they've used.

^Yeah, but it's made by fans for fans. Hence the name "Otaku".

Those last 2 builds aren't really my taste but I do like the craftsmanship that's been put into them a lot. Though Ξ Gundam is a cool Gundam because Bright Noa's son Hathaway pilots it. Though I don't like the shades of colors that they've used.

Oh I see (about the Otaku). I have to disagree with you on the taste of the Gundams yet again. I love those builds. lol

Oh I see (about the Otaku). I have to disagree with you on the taste of the Gundams yet again. I love those builds. lol

I guess you like bulky Gundam then. I just can't stand the feet and the head that they put on the Hyper Zeta. Also, you seem to be contradicting yourself with the face of that Hyper Zeta and the Zeta Gundam that had the same face. You don't like the origin Zeta Gundam because of the faceplate, it needs more redness and a "black line" (which I still don't know what you meant by that". Though you seem to like this Hyper Zeta and that modded Zeta Gundam with the same head, even though both don't seem to have the things you wanted the original Zeta Gundam to have on it's faceplate. It's not that I'm telling you should like the Zeta Gundam. I just find it odd how you don't seem to say the same thing about these 2.

The ? Gundam looks alright, but I dislike it's shoulders and feet. Also, these colors (the original) would've looked better on it:

Rx-105-ka.jpg

Come to think of it, the chest of the original looks way better as well. The feet of the original also look way better. And the head of the original looks a lot better as well.

The Hyper Zeta faceplate doesn't have the chin, and it's more smooth imo. I just hate the Original Zeta chin. First as I said, it's not even red. It's White. Which makes it ugly imo.

And that's the reason why I hate the faceplate of the Hyper Zeta and the modded Zeta with the same faceplate :p At least Zeta Gundam's faceplate looks more Gundam-ish than that smooth faceplate.

I've just bought the 1/100 MG Zeta Gundam. I've also bought Gundam Markers for the panel lining. I want to get into panel lining and I'd love to start doing that with the Zeta Gundam.

Also, you can say whatever you want about it. But this Zeta Gundam will have a special meaning to me now that I'll be building it in this period of my life regarding the 'issue' that I talked about several posts back.

I've just bought the 1/100 MG Zeta Gundam. I've also bought Gundam Markers for the panel lining. I want to get into panel lining and I'd love to start doing that with the Zeta Gundam.

Also, you can say whatever you want about it. But this Zeta Gundam will have a special meaning to me now that I'll be building it in this period of my life regarding the 'issue' that I talked about several posts back.

lol, If you like it, by all means man. I'm not gonna stop you. I just don't like the design that's all. But surely, enjoy the build. This should be a easy guide. http://www.gundam-fo...l-lining-marker

This is an interesting take on the Unicorn.

1.jpg

http://gundamguy.blo...-03-custom.html

01.jpg

This thing is full of awesome.

http://gundamguy.blogspot.ca/2012/07/hg-1144-gundam-age-2-normal-custom-build.html

^That AGE-2 looks gorgeous. Specially with those colors. They look way better than the originals. And with those decals etc. Though it shouldn't have the EFSF decals, haha.

And yeah, that Unicorn model looks pretty interesting. Look a possible mass production mobile suit.

And I know, but I just wanted to make clear that it has a special reason now and that it wouldn't be nice to bash it, haha. Had to spend almost the whol afternoon to search for a retailer that had the 2.0 version. Then I just thought "Aaah f*ck it, I'll just ask this retailer that ships straight from Bandai.". Turns out that they where able to take my request and ship only 1 Zeta Gundam ver. 2.0 for me, haha.

That also means that that webstore will now be my first stop for Gunpla since they actually take requests. That means I'm able to get Gunpla that aren't even in stock anymore in other stores. Which is a huge plus for me.

Also, thanks for the guide!

I want to start my Gundam collection, anyone know a reliable online store and which models should I go first? :/

I'd recommend any 1/144 HG (High Grades) for starters. They are less complex than 1/100 MG(Master Grades) and 1/60 PG(Perfect Grades). However, with more complexity, there are more details. For which models.. it really depends which Gundams you like.

I'd recommend these two sites.

http://www.hobbywave.com/

http://www.hlj.com/

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!