• 0

AVG 7 with Outlook 2003? How?


Question

Goodevening everyone,

I was just wondering if someone could help me out with setting up my AVG 7 to work with emails i recieve with Outlook 2003. I have the latest version of AVG and on the 'Control Center' of the program, it states that "Email Scanner Is Not Fully Functional". What do i need to make it be functional?

When i click on Activate for the E-mail scanner, it comes up with the Email Application Selection screen but only shows Outlook Express 4, 5 and 6. But no Outlook 2003

Can anyone help?

Thank you for your help and time

Alex

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/153301-avg-7-with-outlook-2003-how/
Share on other sites

20 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Download the latest version from www.grisoft.com and then run the installer and select to add componets (not remove, etc). Then add the email scanner and the MS Outlook plugin. The MS Outlook plugin will work out of the box so to speak however you will need to setup the email scanner which is a proxy between your Outlook and your mail server. So you set your servers (both POP and SMTP) to 127.0.0.1 and the ports you specify. Your mail will then be checked when you send/receive it as it will automatically go through AVG and be scanned.

Technically you don't need both plugins installed but it won't hurt doing it. PM or MSN (I would prefer MSN) me if you need any help.

  • 0
Yeah, thats what i did basicly, only im not too keen on the proxy type one, so i dont use it

Technically the Email Scanner (local proxy) is the most powerful antivirus email scanning posibility as it means AVG has exclusive access to the email and all atachments. The problem with plugins is that the developer of the plugin is limited to the APIs that the client (in this case Outlook 2003) has on offer. Now I don't know a great deal about the Outlook 2003 plugin however I very much doubt that AVG is given exclusive access to the email. Outlook probably says "this is the attachment, does it have a virus?" and AVG will reply saying either yes or no.

I use both the Email Scanner and the plugin for The Bat! email client however if I had to choose I would pick the Email Scanner. Just my opinion though. Why do you not like it btw?

  • 0
uninstalled AVG... it sucks with Email scanning IMO

Alex :cool:

Why do you think it sucks? You never got it working so therefore you can't have a real opinion of the email scanning. Your opinion of the plugin configuration and setup is probably not very high as you have had problems but you can't really say its email scanning sucks. That is like me looking at a Ford and not liking the design so saying "all Ford's suck".

  • 0

sorry, i was just in a mood the other day,

Im eager to get AVG working with Outlook 2003 again

But even when i had the Plugin selected, it still came up with the email scanning not working properly.. why is this?

What versions are you all using? Im have the latest :huh:

Thanx for your help everyone

Alex :cool:

  • 0

Alex_is_Axel what options do you have in AVGs drop down list for email plugins?

If you have just the AVG MS Outlook Extenstion then it should work no problem. It can't not work really as it is just an extension that Outlook loads. If you have "Personal E-mail Scanner" installed and not setup then it will be reporting an error and that is why you will get the red error . On all the installed plugins click the "Ignore plugin status" check box so that it reports no errors, then untick it for one plugin and check the status, keep doing that until you get the error again and then you know which plugin(s) are causing problems.

  • 0

i thought id try something out and download the free version of AVG

AVG 6 Free Download

And guess what?!?!?.. Outlook worked with it no problem! I couldnt believe it

For once IMO, Free version of software works better than a paid edition.. *laughs to himself*

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!