Recommended Posts

winFamLogo_XP.gif

Welcome to the Windows XP Guide!

The purpose of this guide is help you get the most out of your experince.

hls_Tip_34x34.gifPrograms You'll Need

PerfectDisk

Ad-Aware SE

RegSupreme

Crap Cleaner

SpywareBlaster

Windows Update

Registry Defragmentation

Once you've got the above we're ready to move on!

xp1.gifUpdate Windows

Execute Internet Explorer and go to Tools and choose Windows Update.

If there are any results in critcal or drivers updates then Select All and perform a Install Now.

xp2.gifRemoving Spyware

Execute Ad-Aware SE and perform a Full System Scan.

If there are any results then Select All and choose Remove.

xp3.gifPreventing Spyware

Execute Spyware Blaster and perform a Enable All Protection.

xp4.gifCleaning Drive

Execute Crap Cleaner and perform a Clean.

xp5.gifCleaning Registry

Execute RegSupreme and perform Deep Scan.

If there are any results Select All and choose a Remove

xp6.gifDefragmenting Registry

Execute Registry Defragmentation and perform a Defragment.

xp7.gifDefragmenting Drive

Execute Perfect Disk and perform a Defragment.

Your done!

It's recommended you perform a reboot now.

I hope you enjoyed my Windows XP Guide,

If you have any comments, etc feel free to post them.

Edited by User540
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/260431-windows-xp-guide/
Share on other sites

Regsupreme is not necessary because Ccleaner (you are not showing the latest version which is different btw) also cleans the registry.

585142764[/snapback]

RegSupreme is necessary because it's cleaning ability is far greater than CCleaner...

Simply go do a registry scan in CCleaner followed be one with deep mode in RegSupreme and you will see the diffrence.

As for the screenshots except for CCleaner which is from majorgeeks, the rest are from the actual author's site.

It doesn't matter as the options I gave are still in effect...

Like when I said "Deep" as the mode in RegSupreme even though "Extra Deep" was in the screenshot because from personal experince I know that the mode shown is no longer given.

585144213[/snapback]

As taken from there website...

I myself by the way have noticed a diffrence.

Windows registry is its core, constantly modifying and growing in size. It's being altered each time you install/remove programs or config system settings. Such changes made to Windows registry cause it to grow in size, no matter whether new information is added or deleted from registry. Thus registry quickly loses its linear structure which results in increase of application response time and registry access time.

"Registry defragmentation" performs physical defragmentation of the Windows registry file. After defragmentation your registry will acquire linear structure which will reduce application response time and registry access time. "Registry defragmentation" also removes unused entries, thus making registry even smaller in size. Do not worry if sometimes after defragmentation the registry will become smaller only by 1-5%, the key is not in size but in its linear structure, hence it determines access time.

As for disk defragmentation I will update the guide soon with alot more!

w00t - damn fast response times on this thread :p i hadnt even finished posting and the adware/spy malware removal section had been added - good work. Dare we try to implement a safe 'generally speaking' Services tweak? Also - How to properly configure the Security Center in SP2 to be most effective/least annoying (i can provide this if needed)

Just some thoughts/suggestions

I know right but I just got up early but now all my energy is exhausted so back to bed. :p

If you want to do the security center section then feel free as well as the services (if not then I can do the services)...

Simply private message me!

I will defiantly try to clean it up even more maybe with some bullets as well as screenshots once my image provider gets back online.

Edit: Don't worry about how it's written because I'll customize it to intergrate into the current or future layouts of the post. Also you will most defiantly get credit don't worry!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!