Sony = $60+ Billion in Debt


Recommended Posts

Switch at top prompts takeover talk

By Francesco Guerrera in Hong Kong and David Ibison in Tokyo

Published: March 8 2005 02:00 | Last updated: March 8 2005 02:00

Sony's surprise decision to replace Nobuyuki Idei with Howard Stringer as chief executive has prompted investment bankers and rivals to consider a takeover of the world's second-largest consumer electronics group.

"Incredible though this may seem, these events put Sony in play. I am sure there will be plenty of people considering this over the next few days," said a senior Hong Kong-based investment banker yesterday.

http://news.ft.com/cms/s/20990580-8f79-11d...000e2511c8.html

Standard & Poor's today said it is reviewing Sony's A+ long- term debt rating, its fifth-highest, for a possible downgrade because the acquisition may damage Sony's balance sheet. MGM's losses over three years, which total about $740 million, make it ``uncertain what contribution MGM can make to Sony's profits,'' S&P said. Sony's total debt stood at 6.71 trillion yen ($61 billion) on June 30.

http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=1...zAs0&refer=asia

Edited by Annatar
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/294340-sony-60-billion-in-debt/
Share on other sites

Rot and die Sony. Its mainly all the sheep who think Sony is quality because they're the most expensive out there. I could name a half dozen other brands of TV and other appliances that are cheaper, more durable, and have more features then the sorry excuses Sony puts on the shelf.

Rot and die Sony. Its mainly all the sheep who think Sony is quality because they're the most expensive out there. I could name a half dozen other brands of TV and other appliances that are cheaper, more durable, and have more features then the sorry excuses Sony puts on the shelf.

585586645[/snapback]

very true i kno alot of people who wont buy anythin other than sony. there was a friend of mine bought a tv that was sony an then bought a matching dvd player and stereo and speakers and vcr and u get the point. they figured that they should jus stick with sony since itll work better. and at the end of all that and money they couldnt play copied dvds in the dvd player lol.

Glad that Sony is finally making a change. (Y)

They seriously need to drop those Sony-exclusive formats such as MS or ATRAC, and need to collaborate with other companies a bit more.

Also, their products lines are so over-integrated to each other, that it feels kinda scary to buy one of their products.

For me, once I bought Cybershot about 8 years ago, I had to spend tremendous amount of money for memory stick, and I was naturally led to buying their Handycam and new Cybershot just to save money.

Now I'm thinking of getting Pocket Vaio and PSP just because I have Sony Cybershot and many memory stick duo, and I feel like I lost freedom as a consumer. (at least in financial way)

Heh, 6.71 trillian yen sounds like more than $61 billion. But still, good guacamole that's a lot of money. :|

I hope you're joking.

585586703[/snapback]

There is a difference between able to sell products and able to profit from them. Too bad Sony neither has quality in it's products to sustain premium prices neither does it profit from products because of custom made components and formats in which no one supports other than sony. Not to mention, their tech support is like speaking with the devil.

I hope the South Koreans purchase Sony, would be a happy blow to the japanese.

they were successful- but for the last several years they have droppped... i havent even bought anything sony for the last 6-8years- cuz they are overpriced goods.. which panasonic, hitachi etc can deliver the same for less..

and the ATRAC format was a total waist of time..!!

There is a difference between able to sell products and able to profit from them. Too bad Sony neither has quality in it's products to sustain premium prices neither does it profit from products because of custom made components and formats in which no one supports other than sony. Not to mention, their tech support is like speaking with the devil.

I hope the South Koreans purchase Sony, would be a happy blow to the japanese.

585586729[/snapback]

Ya got that right! LOL :rofl:

There is a difference between able to sell products and able to profit from them. Too bad Sony neither has quality in it's products to sustain premium prices neither does it profit from products because of custom made components and formats in which no one supports other than sony. Not to mention, their tech support is like speaking with the devil.

I hope the South Koreans purchase Sony, would be a happy blow to the japanese.

585586729[/snapback]

You never said you didn't like them, you said they're unsuccessful, which they are. It doesn't matter if you think they suck - they're still successful.

Ever heard of the walkman? Wega TVs? Trinitron monitors (Ok, not that 'successful', not damn sweet monitors).

585586881[/snapback]

Walkman = Not popular anymore

Wega TVs = Overpriced and not easily obtained by Avg Joe

Trinitron Monitors = You called that one yourself.

I meant that the PS was the only thing that was mainstream successful at this time.

Walkman = Not popular anymore

Wega TVs =  Overpriced and not easily obtained by Avg Joe

Trinitron Monitors = You called that one yourself.

I meant that the PS was the only thing that was mainstream successful at this time.

585587001[/snapback]

Icarus, what he said.

And no, I did imply that Sony is unsuccessful, in all of their movies, only spiderman 2 was successful. PSP isnt making a dime for Sony. Their TV, walkmans, camcorders are overpriced and love to brake.

And I have a 60 billion dollars debt to back this up.

*looks at his Sony Trinitron monitor, looks behind him at his 27" Wega and shrugs* never had a problem with either one, the price was just perfect for both and in my personal experience with other products, I still have yet to see anything better than a Sony (Y) :yes:

Annatar, did Sony kill your father and rape your mother? honestly i dont understand people's passionate hatred for large electronic conglomorates. Its like somewhere in your life you owned a sony product that broke, probably because you were mishandling it and now they are blacklisted 4 life for you, every situation, comment, conversion online or in real life you will try to bad mouth sony. Its rediculous- I was reading your apple vs. microsoft -free vs. paid for thread and although i own only PCs and no macs I was shocked when you pretty much called anyone that owned a mac a "maczi" ie nazi and said that they were spreading facist crap, woah woah woah, dude, .... deeeep breath - breath in and about- count to 3 and come back,.

My 2 cents, every company in this day and age is in debt in some way or another, its the price of being successful- getting TTOOO big really ;) BUT who can have any ill will for the company that created the friggin' walkman!? And i hope noone takes over sony so i can one day see a playstation 3 ;)

Macs may not be the best for advanced PC users and maybe they only accelorate at graphics, but they have a place in the industry too ;) I JUST WISH MACS WERE CHEAPER SO THAT I COULD BUY ONE AND USE IT AT MY GRAPHIC DESIGN JOB! AHHHHHH off topic- sorry, but if apple were to lower the prices , the macs would really be flying off the shelves- and i dont mean a half assed mini version ;)

My 2 cents, every company in this day and age is in debt in some way or another, its the price of being successful- getting TTOOO big really ;) BUT who can have any ill will for the company that created the friggin' walkman!? And i hope noone takes over sony so i can one day see a playstation 3 ;)

585587169[/snapback]

Im neither a Sony fanboy nor a hater, but I must say I would not be disappointed to see them go. They are indeed overpriced for what they sell. There are many other better TV manufactuers, better stereo (home and auto) makers, better computer makers that sell for less and do not use proprietary add ons. If Sony is 60 BILLION in debt that does not mean a complete sell off but more likely they will sell MGM and other ventures first.

So now, let the Sony fanboys speak out :whistle:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • add $200 and get DWARF 3 model add $2000 and visit scientists center in your town add $20000 and visit the biggest telescope in Chile
    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!