Download everything from Microsoft without WGA


Recommended Posts

ghacks.net has found a workaround to bypass the WGA, wonder how long MS will take to fix this.

When you want to download a file from Microsoft a WGA (windows genuine advantage) check is performed. Microsoft installs a small piece of software on your computer that contacts the Microsoft server and checks for validity. If the test fails you will not be able to download the file(s). The following method gives you the ability to download every file from Microsoft without a WGA check.

All you need is the tool mgadiag.exe and the download url of the file that you want to download. Mgadiag.exe is the Microsoft Genuine Advantage Diagnostic Tool. Start this tool and check the value of the ?Download Center Code?, this should be seven chars consisting of upper case letters and numbers. Remember that code and open the website of the file that you want to download.

Source

Jeeze. I don't understand why people are bashing WGA when everyone with legit copy of Windows does not have trouble downloading. WGA does not hinder your ability to download MS files in anyway. It's not that hard to click an extra button on their site.

Just buy XP. If you say you have a legit copy of XP and WGA disagree. That's what WGA is designed to do - Tell you whether your XP is really legit or not. It's your responsiblity to make it legit by reporting whoever you got XP from to MS. You might even be compenstrated by MS (free product key, maybe) if you report a business selling illegial copies.

WGA is NO big deal if you just leave it.

This thread should be closed since it cirumvent MS's right to lock illegial people out of "premium" downloads only provided to people that pass the WGA.

why not just use autopatcher?

that works... or people could just buy a legit copy, and wouldn't run into this problem in the first place.. and microsoft would have to release stuff like this.

that tool isn't even needed...

most of the downloads you can just go to the page, copy the file name, open www.filemirrors.com and paste it in... there you go! lotsa links to that file.... most from microsoft's own site :p

Jeeze. I don't understand why people are bashing WGA when everyone with legit copy of Windows does not have trouble downloading.

Your assumptions are wrong.

My wife bought a brand new Asus notebook PC earlier this year with Windows XP Home, but when we got home we discovered that the OS had been overwritten with a copy at the store when they installed various drivers and free extra software, and now WGA complains about an illegal copy. Fact is that her PC was bundled with Windows XP, yet now she can not download any updates from Microsoft.

So before you claim that everyone with legitimate copies of Windows do not have trouble downloading, you should check the facts.

Your assumptions are wrong.... So before you claim that everyone with legitimate copies of Windows do not have trouble downloading, you should check the facts.
Agreed.

I build/distribute computers for friends, co-workers, and various other clients. I usually install Windows XP for them (unless they don't want an OS installed, or a linux distro). I purchase all my copies of Windows from Newegg as OEM bundles. And I never take the contents out of the cellophane packaging before giving it to the client. I install Windows from my personal discs, and register it using the product key on the clients copy. I've NEVER had a problem doing this.

However, 2 months ago I was contacted by Microsoft, and they told me they had received two reports of software counterfeiting against myself. I was shocked, to say the least. After arguing with them and providing extensive documentation for several days, they finally agreed that there had been an error on their end, and that I had properly distributed legitimate copies of Windows.

I have many repeat customers, not because my prices are dirt cheap, but because I'm always fair, honest, and do my best to help my clients. But I can be pretty sure that, thanks to Microsofts WGA program, I've lost two clients on trust issues.

Your assumptions are wrong.

My wife bought a brand new Asus notebook PC earlier this year with Windows XP Home, but when we got home we discovered that the OS had been overwritten with a copy at the store when they installed various drivers and free extra software, and now WGA complains about an illegal copy. Fact is that her PC was bundled with Windows XP, yet now she can not download any updates from Microsoft.

So before you claim that everyone with legitimate copies of Windows do not have trouble downloading, you should check the facts.

As I said in my previous post, if you bought a computer with XP on it and take it home to find that copy of XP is illegial (WGA is designed to tell you whether you got a legit copy of XP. If it complains that you got a illegial copy of XP...then your computer is defective and you should return it to whereever you bought it from and demand they repair the problem (provide you a legit key or threaten to report them to MS (you can because if you do, MS will likely to take them to court for counterfeiting their software and making customers, like you, suffer all this.

Not EVERY copy of XP bought are branded as legit. Many people assume brand new copies of XP are always legit when in fact some are branded as pirated by MS because the product key included was used before (people can open software boxes and get the product then re-shrinkwrap it to make it as if it has never been opened). WGA is designed to tell you if you bought one of those pirated copies in which all you need to do is return the product (if it is on a computer, take the computer back too) and demand them to legitmise it or a refund or threaten to report to MS.

large_nostril, where did you buy your copies of XP to be resold to your customers? Are you sure you bought your software from a legitmize wholesaler? I know you said that MS admit it as an error. But if you say many of your customers are recieving illegial software, then there is something wrong with your wholesaler.

large_nostril, where did you buy your copies of XP to be resold to your customers? Are you sure you bought your software from a legitmize wholesaler? I know you said that MS admit it as an error. But if you say many of your customers are recieving illegial software, then there is something wrong with your wholesaler.
I get them from Newegg.com, as OEM "system builder" bundles:

WinXP Pro

WinXP Pro x64

WinXP Home

As far as I can tell, there have only been two instances of WGA reporting a copy I've distributed as "pirated". I've followed up with as many of my clients as possible (about 50 or so), and none of them report this problem. Granted that's only two instances out of 83 copies I've distributed in the last three years. But I've also had at least three other new clients come in with computers (that I had never worked on before) reporting their retail copies as pirated, while two of them were able to provide the original COA and packaging.

While Microsoft has been helpful in the process, by replacing the "pirated" copies promptly, I can say from personal experience that WGA is flawed, and I don't support it.

I get them from Newegg.com, as OEM "system builder" bundles:

WinXP Pro

WinXP Pro x64

WinXP Home

As far as I can tell, there have only been two instances of WGA reporting a copy I've distributed as "pirated". I've followed up with as many of my clients as possible (about 50 or so), and none of them report this problem. Granted that's only two instances out of 83 copies I've distributed in the last three years. But I've also had at least three other new clients come in with computers (that I had never worked on before) reporting their retail copies as pirated, while two of them were able to provide the original COA and packaging.

While Microsoft has been helpful in the process, by replacing the "pirated" copies promptly, I can say from personal experience that WGA is flawed, and I don't support it.

http://blogs.msdn.com/wga/archive/2006/07/16/667063.aspx

The chances on getting 2 legit keys out of 83 flagged as non-geniuine are slim to non, i think it's fair to say that theres a good explanation as to why these were. I've installed well over 83 copys of Genuine Windows over the last 3 years and have had zero problems. Also as someone else said just because you have a disc and COA etc doesn't mean it's genuine.

Just wanted to say, at the end of the day you have no idea what happens to those PC's after they have left you, i've known people who have had Genuine Windows and have asked a family member or friend to have a look at it and they have installed a Corporate Version of XP on it, i've also known people that have had the same thing done when they have took there PC to a shop to be fixed and allot of these people don't even know. I've even known people who have had a legit copy and have had to format there PC for one reason or another and have installed a corporate version simply because they couldn't be bothered to activate there own genuine copy.

Your assumptions are wrong.

My wife bought a brand new Asus notebook PC earlier this year with Windows XP Home, but when we got home we discovered that the OS had been overwritten with a copy at the store when they installed various drivers and free extra software, and now WGA complains about an illegal copy. Fact is that her PC was bundled with Windows XP, yet now she can not download any updates from Microsoft.

So before you claim that everyone with legitimate copies of Windows do not have trouble downloading, you should check the facts.

If you read what the guy has wrote he said his wifes laptop came with XP but was overwritten with a diffrent copy at the store where he got it from so clearly whats happened is the copy the store put on wasn't genuine. How can you claim your wifes laptop is running a legit copy when the fact is you don't even know. How WGA is at fault here is beyond me.

WGA is not fool proof my friend just got IE7 and Media Player 11,with his pirated copy of XP.He un installed IE(It is a cr@p).Cracking WGA is very simple, but MS can't go further because it will frustrate the experience of legal users.

You know, that "slim to none" statement SIE is making is total crap. Domain of 30k+ Computers, the "odds" of some of the software issues we run across microsoft says is slim to impossible. Yet... several times they have actually changed/reversed thier own policies due to issues we have discovered. Dont even get me started on wua. The "WGA" has an average hit or miss ratio on legit keys to about 20%... so... 20% of legit keys are going to be marked bad. What does that mean, you do the math. Oh and the "product activation" craze other software vendors are doing are 100x better. Take Adobe. Except for the annoying reinstall if you want/need to change the key it works flawless. Oh and btw, most OEM keys you have to activate. Now you always have to talk to a Microsoft rep because they flaged most if not all OEM keys.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Transmission 4.1.2 by Razvan Serea Transmission is a fast, easy-to-use bittorrent client with support for encryption, a web interface, peer exchange, magnet links, DHT, µTP, UPnP and NAT-PMP port forwarding, webseed support, watch directories, tracker editing, global and per-torrent speed limits, and more. Transmission has one of the lowest memory & resource footprints of any major BitTorrent client. Transmission's light overhead is one reason why it is so well suited for home NAS and media servers. Having been used by Western Digital, Zyxel and Belkin, Transmission gives truly impressive performance on almost any compatible hardware. Transmission is an open source, volunteer-based project. Unlike some BitTorrent clients, Transmission doesn't play games with its users to make money. Transmission doesn't bundle toolbars, pop-up ads, flash ads, twitter tools, or anything else. It doesn't hold some features back for a payware version. Its source code is available for anyone to review. Transmission doesn't track users, the website and forums have no third-party ads or analytics. Transmission 4.1.2 changelog: This is Transmission 4.1.2, a bugfix release. It fixes 20+ bugs and has a few performance improvements too. All users are encouraged to upgrade to this version. Highlights Fixed 4.1.0 bug that could cause duplicate HTTP announces to be sent to trackers. (#8639) All Platforms Reject benc data that has invalid characters. (#8577) Fixed a bug during the startup sequence where if one torrent failed to parse, subsequent torrents would also fail. (#8605) Fixed a bug that stalled some downloads at 99%. (#8654) Fixed a 4.1.0 upgrade bug that could overwrite utp_enabled and tcp_enabled settings. (#8658) Fixed a 4.1.0 crash that could happen when a peer supplied reqq value smaller than 32 in LTEP handshake. (#8713) Fixed a 4.1.0 regression that periodically wrote upload & download stats to disk even when Transmission had been idle since the last write, preventing the stats file's disk from hibernating while idle. (#8722) Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that prevented TCP peer connections on some systems. (#8748) Added safeguards to HTTP responses to prevent clickjacking. (#8749) Fixed edge case that didn't preserve the order of a batch of torrents when moving their queue position up or down. (#8782) Added sanitization for UTF-8 client names provided by peers during handshake. (#8809) Stopped appending redundant zeros to blocklist files when downloaded from a remote URL. (#8819) Fixed a build failure that occurred when building with link-time optimization. (#8540) macOS Client Fixed a 4.1.0 memory leak. (#8613) Fixed navigation focus issues in the Inspector. (#8792, #8810) Improved UI code to use less CPU. (#8832, #8833, #8835, #8836, #8842, #8846, #8851) Qt Client Fixed a 4.1.0 crash when parsing some RPC responses from older Transmission servers. (#8618) Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that saved both deprecated and current settings names to settings.json. (#8623) GTK Client Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that did not show translated logging level strings. (#8611) Fixed a 4.1.0 crash when toggling alternative speed limits. (#8709) Web Client Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that displayed timestamps in some dropdowns as 6.75:45 instead of 6:45. (#8624) Fixed a bug that could show incorrect torrent status when reconnecting to the server after a lost connection. (#8780, #8783) transmission-remote Improved transmission-remote console output for JSON-RPC 2. (#8799, #8805) Download: Transmission 64-bit | Qt 5 Setup ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Transmission 32-bit | Qt 5 Setup Links: Transmission Homepage | Other OSes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!