Proposal for porn domain revived


Recommended Posts

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6240725.stm

Source: BBC News

Proposal for porn domain revived

Plans to create an internet domain for pornographic websites have been resurrected.

The proposal for the .xxx domain was rejected in May 2006 by the overseer of the net's addressing system over fears about how it would be run.

But the proposal has won approval following promises by the domain's backer to actively police any site that signs up to use the .xxx suffix.

The plan has come under fire from pornographers and politicians.

History lesson

The idea of creating a net domain for pornography was first floated in 2001 and attempts to set up the system have had a troubled history.

The proposal was given approval in June 2005 by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (Icann) which oversees the net's addressing system.

Final approval was scheduled to take place in December 2005 but this was delayed until May 2006 when the proposal was abruptly dropped.

At the time Icann boss Paul Twomey said the decision was not "politically motivated" and now documents posted on the Icann site show that the decision was taken over worries about how sites signing up to use .xxx would be policed.

As a result, ICM Registry - the backer of the .xxx scheme - has given pledges that it will ensure sites signing up do not hit users with spam or spyware. Sites will also have to use a tagging system that accurately labels their content.

ICM must also put in place systems that stop children seeing the sites and ensure no .xxx sites are used to promote child pornography or any "practices that appeal to paedophiles or suggest the presence of child pornography on the site".

Icann has now invited the public to comment on the revised .xxx agreement. Those interested have until 5 February to comment.

In the past, plans for the .xxx domain have come under fire from conservative groups, politicians and even pornographers. Some operators of adult sites fear that adopting the .xxx domain would make it easier for such sites to be blocked en masse.

Critics have also noted that use of the .xxx domain is entirely voluntary and some suspect that few sites would sign up to use the suffix.

If final approval is won it is not yet clear when the domain will start operating.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/528335-proposal-for-porn-domain-revived/
Share on other sites

its a strange one this. I've always thought its silly. for instance...

a kid wants to look at some porn, he/she has to use some imagination to thing of what could be a site name. sara.com isnt going to be porn.

But if only porn can use the .xxx they can just type anything and no doubt it will be porn!

All they need to know is the xxx bit, not the rude words...

does that make sense?

its a strange one this. I've always thought its silly. for instance...

a kid wants to look at some porn, he/she has to use some imagination to thing of what could be a site name. sara.com isnt going to be porn.

But if only porn can use the .xxx they can just type anything and no doubt it will be porn!

All they need to know is the xxx bit, not the rude words...

does that make sense?

I think the idea though is that the family filter that comes with ISP's just block all .xxx domains, however I see you point, if the family does not apply the filter the kid knows where to go straight away.

its a strange one this. I've always thought its silly. for instance...

a kid wants to look at some porn, he/she has to use some imagination to thing of what could be a site name. sara.com isnt going to be porn.

But if only porn can use the .xxx they can just type anything and no doubt it will be porn!

All they need to know is the xxx bit, not the rude words...

does that make sense?

however, it would also be easier to block access to the domains. so it has it's good and bad points. i think they should use it.

I don't question that this sounds like a good idea. After all, setting up an ".xxx" filter would be very easy.

The problem I have is who determines what content gets ".xxx"? What laws get used to enforce this when the servers can be hosted in any country?

Some porn for .xxx would be obvious. How about artistic photo sessions that happen to have some nude content? Soft-core porn? Overly provocative swimwear or underwear? (I can't probably post an example link to a current Aussie provider with some partially see-through swimwear). Perhaps pictures on family websites of new baby's birth or first bath?

The biggest problem with .xxx is that there is no cut-and-dried definition of "porn" and "not porn". Add in the lack of global enforcability/laws...

This is pointless.

I don't question that this sounds like a good idea. After all, setting up an ".xxx" filter would be very easy.

The problem I have is who determines what content gets ".xxx"? What laws get used to enforce this when the servers can be hosted in any country?

Some porn for .xxx would be obvious. How about artistic photo sessions that happen to have some nude content? Soft-core porn? Overly provocative swimwear or underwear? (I can't probably post an example link to a current Aussie provider with some partially see-through swimwear). Perhaps pictures on family websites of new baby's birth or first bath?

The biggest problem with .xxx is that there is no cut-and-dried definition of "porn" and "not porn". Add in the lack of global enforcability/laws...

This is pointless.

I agree with you Mark. It sounds like an awesome idea, but to be able to actually enforce this you'd need the corporation of other countries, which isn't going to happen. And on top of that, who would be in charge of deciding what is porn and what isn't. The Victoria's Secret website shows women wearing some pretty skimpy clothing, could that be considered porn? I think to some it might be. My point is, where does the government draw the line. And what about educational purposes, personally I'm not sure if I agree that what's on Wikipedia is for educational purposes. Maybe it was uploaded with innocent purposes, but that doesn't mean it is used for innocent purposes. So could you consider that porn? Again, some might.

A nice thought, but this is pointless and a waist of time.

I agree with you Mark. It sounds like an awesome idea, but to be able to actually enforce this you'd need the corporation of other countries, which isn't going to happen. And on top of that, who would be in charge of deciding what is porn and what isn't. The Victoria's Secret website shows women wearing some pretty skimpy clothing, could that be considered porn? I think to some it might be. My point is, where does the government draw the line. And what about educational purposes, personally I'm not sure if I agree that what's on Wikipedia is for educational purposes. Maybe it was uploaded with innocent purposes, but that doesn't mean it is used for innocent purposes. So could you consider that porn? Again, some might.

A nice thought, but this is pointless and a waist of time.

The people who will 'police' the .xxx will surely have the authority to revoke or blackhole the domain name at any times and will set the exact guidelines on what is an isn't considered appropriate for the domain.

The people who will 'police' the .xxx will surely have the authority to revoke or blackhole the domain name at any times and will set the exact guidelines on what is an isn't considered appropriate for the domain.
Which will push that site to find a .com. or .hk, or .whatever.

Not a solution.

No legal authority plus no agreed-upon definition equals dismal failure.

I agree with markjensen and Hurmoth. .xxx isn't a solution. And there was a time when I thought this would be a good idea. I have changed my mind. Set aside the examples they have about other countries not cooperating and defining porn. What about Newgroups? P2P so on. .xxx will do NOT stop online porn. It may change the way it's done, somewhat, but that's about it.

its a strange one this. I've always thought its silly. for instance...

a kid wants to look at some porn, he/she has to use some imagination to thing of what could be a site name. sara.com isnt going to be porn.

But if only porn can use the .xxx they can just type anything and no doubt it will be porn!

All they need to know is the xxx bit, not the rude words...

does that make sense?

A kid can just type 'porn' into google so it doesn't matter what the domain name is!

Having a .xxx for adult sites makes sense, it makes it easier for parents/schools to block inappropriate content. It's not to stop online porn, it is there to help make it harder for kids to get their hands on it. It would be nice to think that the co-operative/legal porn sites will move to .xxx and the ones left are either dodgy or just unco-operative.

In most countries pornography is a legitimate commercial/business venture, thus, the natural attribution to .com and .biz

If theoretically they could move everything to .xxx , wouldn't we expect that the companies could charge the governments, etc for compensations?

its not a solid solution, but i think it would help...if enforced.

if it was enforced that u couldn't have ANY material on a website that could be considered pornagraphic without having a .xxx

etc....

then parents/schools/work places/library's all those places could just block that domain extension.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!