HTC Pays Microsoft $5 Per Android Phone, Says Citi


Recommended Posts

HTC Pays Microsoft $5 Per Android Phone, Says Citi

Microsoft gets $5 for every HTC phone running Android, according to Citi analyst Walter Pritchard, who released a big report on Microsoft this morning.

Microsoft is getting that money thanks to a patent settlement with HTC over intellectual property infringement.

Microsoft is suing other Android phone makers, and it's looking for $7.50 to $12.50 per device, says Pritchard.

We knew hardware companies were paying Microsoft, we just didn't know how much. (In October Steve Ballmer said, "Android has a patent fee. It's not like Android's free.")

Pritchard says we can expect more legal activity to pick up around Android in the coming months because "Google appears to have very little IP to defend itself with."

This is good for Microsoft which is about to enter the tablet market and is trying to make a dent in the smartphone market.

Another Citi analyst, Kevin Chiang, believes Android phone makers have 10%-15% operating margins, and Android tablet makers have operating margins of just 2%-3%.

As Microsoft, Oracle (which is suing over Google's use of Java), Apple, and others sue companies using Android, their margins take a whack for every settlement they make.

As the margins are crushed, it makes using a Microsoft-based operating system for tablets and phones much more attractive, argues Pritchard. (Unaddressed by Pritchard is how much Microsoft gets per device and if it's less than or equal to what Android-based devices end up costing.)

Of course, Microsoft has to prove it has a compelling software package to put on tablets.

Source: Business Insider

If you can't beat 'em, sue 'em. Microsoft has hitherto been unable to leverage its desktop OS monopoly advantage, so it needed to find a new way of putting the competition at a disadvantage. For we all know, given its history, that without such tactics, Microsoft can never succeed.

It's sad when a product (WM7) can't stand on its own merits, and can only compete by forcing the "Microsoft Tax" on competitors. But we all know by now, Microsoft wins by hook - OOXML: we're open really!, or by crook - Bing stealing search results from Google, forcing the "Microsoft Tax" on competitors in order to make your product seem more attractive, and corrupting the ISO process to get a proprietary locked down format standardised.

If you can't beat 'em, sue 'em. Microsoft has hitherto been unable to leverage its desktop OS monopoly advantage, so it needed to find a new way of putting the competition at a disadvantage. For we all know, given its history, that without such tactics, Microsoft can never succeed.

AFAIK, Microsoft has never sued HTC (but don't quote me on that).

Ok granted the patents system needs an overhaul,

To the guy above who said why are they being sued its because the Android OS copied lines of code and intellectual property from companies such as MS and co? Now because Google made Android open source and only charge OEM?s for the use of Google services such as Gmail, google maps etc etc? the companies that own the IP have cannot sue Google directly and thus sue them via proxy with the OEM?s taking the full brunt. You could say its Googles fault (I do) but then again, no one is forcing the OEMs to use the Android platform.

Ok granted the patents system needs an overhaul,

To the guy above who said why are they being sued its because the Android OS copied lines of code and intellectual property from companies such as MS and co? Now because Google made Android open source and only charge OEM?s for the use of Google services such as Gmail, google maps etc etc? the companies that own the IP have cannot sue Google directly and thus sue them via proxy with the OEM?s taking the full brunt. You could say its Googles fault (I do) but then again, no one is forcing the OEMs to use the Android platform.

Actually MS and HTC did not disclose which patents was covered by the agreement.

AFAIK, Microsoft has never sued HTC (but don't quote me on that).

Yep it did. But then it settled with the usual NDA so HTC can't discuss how Microsoft is pricing the fees just right so that Android appears more expensive than WM7 (The Microsoft Tax). These are dirty tactics not intended to protect IP, but to disadvantage the competition through patent trolling. This is how big business maintains its hegemony these days, not through superior products or innovation, but through the application of Government issued monopolies (patents).

Why is everyone taking HTC's side? We don't even know what HTC did because the settlement is not public. For all we know, HTC stole something from Microsoft.

If they settled, HTC probably knew they were going to lose because they did something wrong.

Yep it did. But then it settled with the usual NDA so HTC can't discuss how Microsoft is pricing the fees just right so that Android appears more expensive than WM7 (The Microsoft Tax). These are dirty tactics not intended to protect IP, but to disadvantage the competition through patent trolling. This is how big business maintains its hegemony these days, not through superior products or innovation, but through the application of Government issued monopolies (patents).

Patents inherently disadvantage competition. That is the purpose of a patent. It says, "I came up with it first so you can't use."

Duh.

Another point to consider: since we don't know the specifics of which patents HTC is paying Microsoft to use, they could very well be totally unrelated to Android itself and related to other functions of the phone (such as using FAT32 for the SD card, or something to do with how the touchscreen or certain buttons are handled). Remember that HTC has a long history of making Windows Mobile based phones, so they could very well be using technology in their Android phones that they were only originally licensed to use with Windows Mobile, thus requiring the new license.

Microsoft believes Android makes use of ideas and technologies (patents) which Microsoft owns, and rather than have to fight a legal case, they agree to settle and pay Microsoft a fee per device, so they can make use of these technologies with Microsoft's blessing and legal protections.

Google have a history of skirting close to the wind with their use of patents, and then offer no protection to their partners and third party developers.

Why is everyone taking HTC's side? We don't even know what HTC did because the settlement is not public. For all we know, HTC stole something from Microsoft.

If they settled, HTC probably knew they were going to lose because they did something wrong.

Patents inherently disadvantage competition. That is the purpose of a patent. It says, "I came up with it first so you can't use."

Duh.

We don't really know. But the patent system is so ****** these days that you can lose without doing anything morally wrong.

The patent system was at first created to protect creativity and inventive work. It's role today is the complete opposite. Patent trolls redefined the patent system we know today.

To the guy above who said why are they being sued its because the Android OS copied lines of code and intellectual property from companies such as MS

Microsoft is suing Android manufacturers with dubious patents such as "Method for the storage of long/short file names" aka the FAT patent. Microsoft loves to bring that one out against every (yes every) Linux based OS. And others from Microsoft's patent lawsuit against Barnes and Noble:

1. Remote Retrieval and Display Management of Electronic Document with Incorporated Images.

2. Loading Status in a Hypermedia Browser Having a Limited Available Display Area.

3. System Provided Child Window Controls.

4. Selection Handles in Editing Electronic Documents.

5. Method and Apparatus for Capturing and Rendering Annotations for Non-Modifiable Electronic Content.

Those are some real unique and innovative ideas wouldn't you agree? If this isn't patent trolling I don't know what is.

and co? Now because Google made Android open source and only charge OEM?s for the use of Google services such as Gmail, google maps etc etc? the companies that own the IP have cannot sue Google directly

Really? What about Oracle? Although much maligned, at the least, it does go directly to the source instead of waging a campaign against OEM's deploying it with the intention of discouraging them from promoting/selling Android, and making more devices in the future. Absolutely disgusting. This reveals the real Microsoft. Has it changed since the 90's? No. Although it's becoming less and less relevant as evidenced by the SCO behaviour.

You could say its Googles fault (I do) but then again, no one is forcing the OEMs to use the Android platform.

And that's precisely what Microsoft wants. It wants OEMS's to stop producing Android phones and give it a sole monopoly like OEM's do in the desktop OS market. This is the only mentality Microsoft can operate on. Destroy by any means, whether it be by hook, or by crook, and in this case, it's mostly crook. Sue under the guise of protecting IP, all the while, giving your own product a cost advantage.

You see, Microsoft is incapable of competing fairly.. The sooner It goes away the better for everyone in my opinion.

Patents inherently disadvantage competition. That is the purpose of a patent. It says, "I came up with it first so you can't use." Duh.

Yes, but you that's not how patents work.. Just look Apple for example but Microsoft does that too.. They patent every idea (even if it was never made into a product or software) in very very vague terms because patent systems allows them, then they apply for patent and then they wait. Patents are not granted quickly and sometimes it takes years or even decades to get a patent on something. So instead, what they do as we have seen several times in the past months Apple or Microsoft or any company really, applies for some generalized patents and they sue people on it who actually make something that actually uses even remotely similar system.

Basically what the companies who patented these ideas and generalized concept stifle competition plain and simple and that's why patent system needs to be completely overhauled.

You should NEVER ever be allowed to patent ideas alone. You have to make a commercial PRODUCT or application in order to submit for patent. That's who it should be and then patents would actually be valid. You could go and point to a product or software using that technology and that's ok. But right now, they don't even have hardware or software developed and they are allowed to patent it and troll everyone who even comes to the similar idea. It's awful.

Its a fault with the patent system, which everyone exploits!

At least Microsoft allows these products to go to market, and does not demand competitors stop producing the products. Google should take responsibility for Android to ensure it does not intrude on patents, yet Microsoft take the blame!

And Apple seems to be the same. And btw, great post overall.

All big companies are. And HTC would do the same if it was in the same boat. Like someone said earlier it's not a problem between HTC and MS it's a flawed patent system problem.

Nothing I'd assume, Apple and MS have a patent sharing agreement.. They both get to use each others..

Pretty sure that ended years ago.

At least Microsoft allows these products to go to market, and does not demand competitors stop producing the products.

This. Have people forgotten how Google stopped a number of phones shipping from Verizon because they had Bing built in?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!