Why Apple Enthusiasts Are Wrong About Windows 8


Recommended Posts

my god we have only seen a few demos and articles like this are already appearing, and this is only the beginning. Is it wrong for software companies to take risks these days?

What did people say before the iphone or ipad came out? Apple took a big risk with those. Most people talked about people not needing the iphone or the interface was too simple, OR with the ipad. Microsoft is trying to change up the UI direction, and Im sure they have sufficient research to back this up.

Microsoft is taking a risk, yes, but there is a reason, and its the evolving UI direction.

All of these are not ready for prime time. Intel's processor are just not as power efficient as arm. But next year Intel, AMD are going have processors that close the chasm. Right now nobody is succeeding except for Apple in the tablet space. Sales of the both the playbook and android based tablets have been very disappointing.

I agree and yet some tablets like the Asus transformer are selling out in some areas of the market. So it might be more the products rather then the demand for them.

The truth is that nobody wants tablets, but they want something just to be cool... and i call them loser (or emos).

Thats a rather broad sweeping statement, personally the reason I'm getting a tablet is because it will be massively beneficial for my studying. Reading ebooks and watching videos primarily which I can only currently do on my Laptop which is just too big and bulky and is starting to irritate me having to carry it around. I might be alone in this thinking but I'm guessing I'm not.

I agree and yet some tablets like the Asus transformer are selling out in some areas of the market. So it might be more the products rather then the demand for them.

You could say the say the same thing about windows 7 tablets Hp had to make more because they didn't build enough but the reality is Android based tablets are not taking off in any sizable numbers. Just look at the ****ty software for android tablets at the android market place.

I wouldn't say that I would say that ....Windows is definitively going to make windows phone 7 sales higher because it is familiar user interface. My guess is Windows 8 sales going dwarf android, ios, and os x.

I agree, with an interface they have shown I would DEFINATLY get a Windows 8 tablet, it looks brilliant!

At Macworld, Jason Snell argues that this is a risky approach. If the iPad ran Mac apps, he says, developers probably wouldn't have bothered creating all-new apps for the touch screen. I'm not convinced that the same will be true for Windows 8, with its huge potential customer base. There will be demand for touch-based apps simply because of how many people are already using Windows. And besides, Microsoft has proven willing to grow its app ecosystem by paying developers.

This train of thought is quite sensible. I mean even today many third-party developers don't seem to care much about providing a consistent interface on Windows, so why would they in the future? Every application on Windows 8 now requires two vastly different interfaces in order to look good on both sides. It's not so much than I'm doubting Microsoft in this particular area, I just have little faith in many third-party developers. Personally I think you'll end up with a tablet that has relatively seen few applications that are actually optimized for touch input.

This train of thought is quite sensible. I mean even today many third-party developers don't seem to care much about providing a consistent interface on Windows, so why would they in the future? Every application on Windows 8 now requires two vastly different interfaces in order to look good on both sides. It's not so much than I'm doubting Microsoft in this particular area, I just have little faith in many third-party developers.

If you watched the videos you will notice a tile called store. Believe me, software devs are going to want to get into that store and Microsoft is going to make them jump through hoops to get there.

They are right, past and present shows that no one wants a Windows tablet/slate. Win8 with wp7 tiles won't change this attitude in the future.

They have used Windows tablets at my work for years in hazardous environments. It's not a high-volume market, but they're very much appreciated.

I hope that Microsoft's efforts with touch interfaces won't adversely affect the stylus based ones.

Finally someone who can write about the facts and does some extra research. Not the crap that the OP and MacWorld does, attacking each others fan-base.

This train of thought is quite sensible. I mean even today many third-party developers don't seem to care much about providing a consistent interface on Windows, so why would they in the future? Every application on Windows 8 now requires two vastly different interfaces in order to look good on both sides. It's not so much than I'm doubting Microsoft in this particular area, I just have little faith in many third-party developers. Personally I think you'll end up with a tablet that has relatively seen few applications that are actually optimized for touch input.

I wouldn't be so sure about that. Take a look at the apps that are available for WP7 and you'll see that in general they fit in well with the OS and are well optimised for touch. Microsoft have provided the tools, the controls and the guidance that developers need and they in turn are producing high quality apps that are easy and a pleasure to use. There's no reason why the same can't happen for the Windows 8.

This train of thought is quite sensible. I mean even today many third-party developers don't seem to care much about providing a consistent interface on Windows, so why would they in the future? Every application on Windows 8 now requires two vastly different interfaces in order to look good on both sides. It's not so much than I'm doubting Microsoft in this particular area, I just have little faith in many third-party developers. Personally I think you'll end up with a tablet that has relatively seen few applications that are actually optimized for touch input.

that hasn't stopped apps on iOS looking all different from each other, have they? Compare Kindle to iTS to AppStore to Weather to Amazon.com app to Twitter to Facebook to iBooks to Maps.

I must admit. I am a lifelong Windows user but own a chromebook, iPad, iPhone, and Android phone, and LOVE certain things about each, but after seeing Windows 8 this week, I was VERY turned off by it, to the point I told my wife we are now moving to a Mac...But now the more I think about it, and of course we are in very early stages, I really think its a very smart way they are doing it. Best of both worlds type thing. You can appeal to the people that want the tablet/mobile interface, and also to the users who want the standard windows 7 interface. I think its perfect. The problem is, programmers are going to have to make applications in both and that is the problem. I do however HATE the windows phone 7 interface

Even if you hated the early stages of Win8's UI, there would've been nothing stopping you from staying on Win7.

The fact is, as far as apps go, start screen specific apps just have to be a nice clean full screen finger friendly UI. I mean it's not that complicated, and in the end you can have one app with 2 UIs, i'd hate to think the UI is the hardest part of building the app. The thing is that Win8 will give you the ability to use both types of apps, it doesn't mean a dev has to build an app for touch and have it in the start screen, if the app doesn't support that it'll just load to the desktop like how they showed Office 2010 do.

Now all people with tablets need is a, in most cases, wireless KB+mouse or some sorta dock ( and you know the hardware makers will love to sell you this stuff) and they can use those apps which will more or less fall into the "work" catagory in the end. Either way apps will have to get a new touch UI, devs will want to target tablets etc so new UI's will be made for existing Windows apps with time.

This is just my guess at this time but if we end up with apps that have a dual UI of their own then we could very well see a basic for touch and a advanced UI for kb+mouse etc. The best of both that only a full OS could give you really. Even big apps like say, photoshop for example, could have a basic version for touch that lets people do some simple things to photos and then jump into an advanced desktop UI to do more complicated editing with a mouse. I think this is the way apps will go in the future with Win8 and the next version after it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • BrowserOS 0.46.0 by Razvan Serea BrowserOS is a free, open-source Chromium-based browser that runs AI agents natively, offering a smarter, more productive browsing experience. It supports Chrome extensions and integrates AI agents to automate tasks, fill forms, and streamline workflows. Your data stays on your computer: you can use your own API keys or run local models via Ollama, making it a privacy-first alternative to tools like Perplexity, Comet, or Dia. With built-in productivity tools and app integrations, BrowserOS boosts efficiency while keeping control firmly in your hands. Being Chromium-based, BrowserOS lets you effortlessly import your bookmarks, passwords, and Chrome extensions in just a few clicks. BrowserOS works with OpenAI GPT models, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, and local AI models via Ollama or LMStudio. You can use your own API keys and effortlessly switch between providers. BrowserOS Agent Your AI productivity assistant that organizes and manages your browsing effortlessly Quickly list, group, or close tabs Save and resume browsing sessions Search your history and organize bookmarks Switch instantly to the tab you need BrowserOS Navigator – Automate web tasks with ease Navigate websites and search automatically Interact with pages without manual effort Handle repetitive tasks in seconds What makes BrowserOS special Feels like home - same familiar interface as Google Chrome, works with all your extensions AI agents that run on YOUR browser, not in the cloud Privacy first - bring your own keys or use local models with Ollama. Your browsing history stays on your computer Open source and community driven - see exactly what's happening under the hood MCP store to one-click install popular MCPs and use them directly in the browser bar (coming soon) Built-in AI ad blocker that works across more scenarios! BrowserOS 0.46.0 changelog: Run Claude Code & Codex right in your browser — We've extended the agent harness to bring full coding agents into BrowserOS. Claude Code and Codex now come bundled and plug straight into the assistant, so you can drive your browser with the agent — and the subscription — you already use. A brand new experience — A redesigned new tab, a calmer composer, and a rebuilt command center for switching between agents. The whole assistant is cleaner, faster to reach, and easier to live in. New MCP tools — We rebuilt the browser tool surface from the ground up — a tighter, more reliable set of tools for agents to drive the browser. Plus one-click install of BrowserOS as an MCP server into the agents you already run, with automatic URL sync. Chromium 148 — Updated to the latest Chromium base with all recent upstream fixes and security patches. Streamlined — We've pulled back a few features that weren't getting much use — Skills, Soul, and Memory — so we can focus and ship better versions of them soon. Download: BrowserOS 0.46.0 | 181.0 MB (Open Source) Download: BrowserOS for macOS | 485.0 MB Links: BrowserOS Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally admits its default Windows 11 25H2, 24H2 action broke key legacy component by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. So far the company has acknowledged two known issues that have popped up after the release which include bugged-out Office apps as well as the Recycle Bin; though there could be more at play too. Speaking of bugs and issues, Microsoft seems to have finally acknowledged a problem that probably has been around for close to a year. That's because back in July of 2025 the company made a default change to the latest Windows 11 versions, wherein it switched to JScript9Legacy on Windows 11 24H2 and later releases. Hence following the release of version 25H2 in October 2025, JScript9Legacy also remained default-enabled. As a result there has been a compatibility issue ever since then. For those wondering, by switching to JScript9Legacy Microsoft intended to improve the security of modern Windows PCs by reducing vulnerabilities tied to legacy scripting like cross-site scripting (XSS), among others. XSS exploits can allow cyber-attackers to attach malicious code onto legitimate websites and use them to execute the code when a potential victim loads such a website. Hence the new JScript9Legacy engine enforced stricter execution policies and improved object handling, which should help mitigate such attacks. Microsoft today has published a new support article detailing the problem. Neowin spotted it while browsing. The company says that JScript global definitions and execution context may fail to persist across scripts, potentially breaking older dependent apps and web-based components that relied on this legacy behavior. In the article Microsoft has confirmed that the issue stems from its move away from the older jscript9.dll engine in favor of jscript9legacy.dll. As mentioned above, while the newer engine was designed to address vulnerabilities and strengthen security it also changes how JScript handles execution context. As a result functions and definitions loaded by one script could no longer remain available to subsequent scripts once execution ended. The company notes that some applications worked correctly on earlier Windows versions because the older JScript engine automatically retained global definitions and execution state between scripts. Under the newer model though that behavior is disabled by default causing certain legacy workloads and polyfill-dependent scripts to fail. Microsoft says it addressed the problem via the KB5077241 update though the fix had not been enabled automatically in the following updates. As such admins must explicitly turn on persistent JScript execution context using a Registry setting that the tech giant shared today. The configuration can be applied to individual processes or system-wide through the FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE registry key. The steps have been outlined below: Run the following command to create the feature control registry key: reg add "HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE" Under this key, create a new DWORD (32-bit) value. Configure the value as follows: To enable persistence for specific processes only: Set the value to 1 for each target process name. To enable persistence for all processes: Add * as the key name and set its value to 1. You can find the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • The possibility that milk gathers back into a glass implies that gravity can be 'reversed'.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      590
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!