Recommended Posts

I've yet to complete Rage, Dead Island, Dirt 3, F1 2011 and Dark Souls :(

I'll still get this though because it's such an amazing game to just pick up and play.

To be fair, CAN you complete Dirt 3 or F1 2011?

IGN review: 9.5

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/119/1199705p1.html

Batman: Arkham City isn't perfect, but listing the little things I didn't like gets in the way of all the stuff I adored. The voice acting, the challenges, the amazing opening, the unbelievable ending and the feeling of being the Dark Knight -- these are the things that standout looking back. I've beaten this thing twice and still want to call in sick and chase Riddler Trophies.

Batman: Arkham City isn't just better than Batman: Arkham Asylum, it's better than most games on the market.

Here is the review from Gameinformer which they call "The Best Licensed Video Game Ever Made" 10/10

Arkham City not only lives up to the standards set by Arkham Asylum, it bests its predecessor in every way and stands tall as one of Batman’s greatest moments.

Like the first one, I'll probably wait to pick this up. Got a few games I need to work through at the moment and I know that Batman will pull me from them.

And Larry, that's surprising. I think I've seen more BF3/MW3 commercials than anything else. It's fine to say Arkham City can be a sleeper - Skyrim, BF3/MW3, RAGE - all those games are getting more pub than Batman, imo. Going to be tough for GOTY.

Ya, I'm seeing very little trailers for Batman. But for game of the year, I don't know about any of those... Dark Souls is amazing :p

I am between this and Uncharted 3. I can buy it used later on but I lose out on the catwoman levels unless i pay $9.99 (they online pass'ish a single player game). The catwoman level are not needed so no big deal if I go U3 first. I hope the boss (or mini-boss) fights are better than the first game. As a joke they should have a boss (or mini-boss) do the rush towards you and you jump out of the way so they run into a wall and when you go to attack them you get the s*** beat out of you while they are saying "not this time".

If i build a new system then ill think about the NVIDIA voucher for this game if its still offered.

I am between this and Uncharted 3. I can buy it used later on but I lose out on the catwoman levels unless i pay $9.99 (they online pass'ish a single player game). The catwoman level are not needed so no big deal if I go U3 first. If i build a new system then ill think about the NVIDIA voucher for this game if its still offered.

Hmmm, that is a REALLY tough decision TBH. I think Uncharted 3 is also going to be brilliant, but a very different game. Granted they are both 3rd person action games, but the gameplay is pretty damn different. Uncharted 3 is going to be a blockbuster, and it also has MP. So if you like the MP modes in Uncharted, that will really extend the life of it for you, as the SP is probably only going to be around 12 hours long. Batman is a much deeper SP experience, meaning there is a lot more to explore, more ways to get lost so to speak in the open world, and I think I recall reading the SP Campaign of Batman is at least 20 hours long. Add in all of the side quests and missions, I think it is much longer than that. But of course, Batman has no MP aspect (which I personally think is why the SP is so good).

So really tough call to be honest. Good luck with the decision. Look at it this way. You truly cannot make a bad decision here.

I am between this and Uncharted 3. I can buy it used later on but I lose out on the catwoman levels unless i pay $9.99 (they online pass'ish a single player game). The catwoman level are not needed so no big deal if I go U3 first. I hope the boss (or mini-boss) fights are better than the first game. As a joke they should have a boss (or mini-boss) do the rush towards you and you jump out of the way so they run into a wall and when you go to attack them you get the s*** beat out of you while they are saying "not this time".

If i build a new system then ill think about the NVIDIA voucher for this game if its still offered.

If you buy it used at Gamestop they will print a code for Catwomen on the receipt. Kotaku

I'll pick this up when it goes on sale. Just don't have the time for it especially when I just brought Gears 3 and Forza 4. On top of that there is going to be BF3 and AC:R. Probably will have to wait till the prices to drop on those.

I'll pick this up when it goes on sale. Just don't have the time for it especially when I just brought Gears 3 and Forza 4. On top of that there is going to be BF3 and AC:R. Probably will have to wait till the prices to drop on those.

yeah im going to wait until it's on sale too. i still haven't played AC brotherhood yet... plus MW3 coming out along with my obsession with GT and NHL 12. no time.

If you buy Batman at Kmart you get a $30 game coupon and a $10 game coupon for Lords of the Ring: War in the North.

http://gamer.kmart.com/

Also Toys R Us is having a buy 2 get the 3rd for free for all gaming stuff.

edit: Im sorry it seems you have to be a "Shop Your Way Reward" member. Looks like it is also free so i will check it out.

http://www.shopyourwayrewards.com/sywr/home_do

So why isn't the pc version coming out until next month? And why isn't there a collectors edition for the pc? When this game finally is out on the pc no one will care about it anymore between MW3, Skyrim, and BF3.

The publishers will have no one but themselves to blame when the game is pirated heavily. :s

So why isn't the pc version coming out until next month? And why isn't there a collectors edition for the pc? When this game finally is out on the pc no one will care about it anymore between MW3, Skyrim, and BF3.

The publishers will have no one but themselves to blame when the game is pirated heavily. :s

That's not surprising. When devs fail to sell as much as they hope to they blame piracy, pretty common tactic. Though this game will still do well, I couldn't possibly care less about MW3 or BF3, not really interested in Skyrim, but definitely want Batman.

So much better than the last.

The combat is 3x's as deep. Encounters contain a much more diverse set of enemies each requiring a different way of approach..

It isn't really so much an open world per'se' but there's plenty within the one you're put in to keep you busy.

The Riddler for one, is much more involved than he was last game.

If I had to pick one thing I didn't like, or just something that I felt was a step back from the previous, it would have to be the boss fights.

So far I've been able to one-shot every boss I've encountered. Not much thought has gone into defeating each encounter thus far.

Though the story keeps you engaged with a sense of desperation without going into any spoilers.

Still a great game. My GOTY to date.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!