Recommended Posts

Uh, that's what I was asking, how do I change it?  Sorry, I got the impression it couldn't be changed.

No, of course it can. Just remove the value called TEXTSHADOW or something of the sort. Set it to false.

Edit - And I would also love that Ergo and Deep Sea Blue version Dazzla. Looks great and would match my wallpaper very well. :)

After seeing all the shots people have been posting of this theme together with Mattahan's GANT set, I really miss the OS X port.. I think I'll give it a shot.

So Dazzla, do you have PSD files with the elements, or anything else that might be of use? Could spare me the time of having to lift the graphics out of the msstyle :)

If you could contact me on MSN ([email protected]) or ICQ (59545258) that would be great.

first olive and now ergo flavor of dynamine?

i hate to complain but why turn this into classix?

shouldn't dynamine be just the way it is and let it be unique alone?

why must all of the themes here have color variations that resembles classix?

ughh....

</rant>

If ay don't like it, so what, there's always regular Dynamine for you. I didn't make it for people who were sick of classix colours as you might have guessed.

As for Blue, it's integrated and ready. When I get home from work I'll make an Olive and Blue WMP9 skin based on Ryu7x's latest skin.

Updated, added the blue colour scheme and 2 new WMP9 skins based on Ryu7x's Watercolor Media Edition skins.

OliveDynamineThumb.png

Download

I've also stuck all my stuff on little homepage, it was made nearly a year ago but I couldn't be assed. It's crappy, simple, but it does what it intends to...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In the boot options in the UEFI is set to legacy or CMS? It needs to be set to UEFI if it's not already.
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!