Mac OS X Lion Can Run in Chrome OS-Like Browser Only Mode


Recommended Posts

Mac OS X Lion Can Run in Chrome OS-Like Browser Only Mode

guest.jpg

While all the focus has been the many new features found in iOS 5 Beta, Apple also released a new developer beta of Mac OS X Lion last week.

Many of Mac OS X Lion's features have been known for months, but Apple has snuck in at least one interesting new feature called "Restart to Safari". According to a tipster, on the user lock screen, you are given the option to "Restart to Safari" rather than logging in. This allows you to boot the computer into just the web browser and nothing else. This browser only mode allows unauthorized users to simply browse the web through Safari rather than having access to any personal files or other applications on the machine. Of course with Lion's new auto-save and application restore feature, returning users will find themselves back at the same place they were before the restart. This browser-only mode is reminiscent of Google's lightweight Chrome OS which is designed to offer the user a web-only based operating system.

Apple's motivations for offering such a browser-only mode differs from Google's. Google is partnering with manufacturers in order to build Chrome OS only laptops that offer cheap browser-only machines. Apple's not likely to be going that route with Mac OS X Lion but is instead offering a nice sandboxed mode so Lion can easily act as a secure and anonymous web kiosk.

Source: Mac Rumors

I really like this feature, because sometimes others in my household want to use my computer just to browse the web and print a few things, and I don't like them being on my main account (nor do I want to make a guest account.) This will be a useful feature to me and many others.

I really like this feature, because sometimes others in my household want to use my computer just to browse the web and print a few things, and I don't like them being on my main account (nor do I want to make a guest account.) This will be a useful feature to me and many others.

Honestly, I wouldn't want to restart my computer just to let someone browse, seems a bit excessive. Then I'll justinsall another browser they can use, or I'll add a guest account and use fast user switchign wich seems about a million times more elegant.

Then again, Would you really want to do this, sure they say you only have access tot he browser and surfing the internet.... But what happened last time Apple did a similar guest function...

I really like this feature, because sometimes others in my household want to use my computer just to browse the web and print a few things, and I don't like them being on my main account (nor do I want to make a guest account.) This will be a useful feature to me and many others.

I agree. I have the same situation where I want to give others access to my Mac, so now it will be much easier.

Honestly, I wouldn't want to restart my computer just to let someone browse, seems a bit excessive. Then I'll justinsall another browser they can use, or I'll add a guest account and use fast user switchign wich seems about a million times more elegant.

Then again, Would you really want to do this, sure they say you only have access tot he browser and surfing the internet.... But what happened last time Apple did a similar guest function...

Yea, I think I'd use the a guest account instead too, faster, not that a Mac is has a slow reboot time (like windows which is a 3-4 minutes for me, a minute to the login screen and 2-3 minutes after logging in) , specially not with Lion saving the state of all your apps like it does.

In either case they can't just log out/reboot and be on my account because that ones is password protected. I sure wouldn't just let them use an alternate browser though.

Think: Public Libraries, Schools, Internet Caf?s, Hotels, Hostels...... Pretty neat feature. Not something for the average user but I sure see some usecases.

Decent idea, but it'll hardly be used for it, there are several ways to set up a computer with windows with an account unable to do anything but surf the web, setting up a kiosk with just a browser ins too complicated either and more importantly, a lot cheaper than a Mac.

While I personally have no hard time seeing the value of a Mac and it being worth ever buck it costs, I doubt someone would say it was worth it just to put it in the hotel lobby in browser only mode :p

Decent idea, but it'll hardly be used for it, there are several ways to set up a computer with windows with an account unable to do anything but surf the web, setting up a kiosk with just a browser ins too complicated either and more importantly, a lot cheaper than a Mac.

While I personally have no hard time seeing the value of a Mac and it being worth ever buck it costs, I doubt someone would say it was worth it just to put it in the hotel lobby in browser only mode :p

Well, I have to disagree there, entirely depends on the Library or Hotel/Hostel. My University Library (the History Of Arts-Department, that it) only uses Mac Minis to access the Internet and the internal search system.

And many Hostels I've been to have set up iMacs in the Lobby. Not all of them but many. ;)

But you sure are right. ;) Still, this does have it's usecases. And if not... well... just don't use it.

Do we have access to local WiFi network printers with this?

I could log in quickly in the morning to print my Powerpoint/PDF presentations for University classes. Right now it takes 1min30 to log into OS X and 1 minute for my printer to warm up. Then I can print like a raging monster though.

How? Safari 5.1 is already sandboxed, and this is on a separate partition.

So that's why Safari has never been the attack vector for successful attacks at the hacker/security conventions.... oh wait ;) Sandboxed doesn't == secure.

So that's why Safari has never been the attack vector for successful attacks at the hacker/security conventions.... oh wait ;) Sandboxed doesn't == secure.

It doesn?t equal "secure" in the absolute way (nothing does anyway), but it definitely equals to "more secure".

Basically it blocks applications from certain specific functions that could potentially affect the OS.

Spam?

No. He?s just saying that he likes it in the shortest way possible.

So that's why Safari has never been the attack vector for successful attacks at the hacker/security conventions.... oh wait ;) Sandboxed doesn't == secure.

Safari 5 was the one that was compromised, and that's not sandboxed. Safari 5.1 on Lion is sandboxed.

Do some research before you start spouting off.

So that's why Safari has never been the attack vector for successful attacks at the hacker/security conventions.... oh wait ;)

Sandbox mode is new in Safari 5.1... The tets you're referring to have been performed with older versions.

Edit: Ellioitt beat me to it.

Decent idea, but it'll hardly be used for it, there are several ways to set up a computer with windows with an account unable to do anything but surf the web, setting up a kiosk with just a browser ins too complicated either and more importantly, a lot cheaper than a Mac.

While I personally have no hard time seeing the value of a Mac and it being worth ever buck it costs, I doubt someone would say it was worth it just to put it in the hotel lobby in browser only mode :p

You'd be suprised how many hotels, stores, schools, libraries etc. deployed iMacs simply because it has a very small footprint and doesn't look like ass compared to most computer hardware.

So far sandboxing hasn't stopped attacks on ANY browser.

And I'm no great fan of linux, but libraries, schools and such buying Mac Mini's to use as internet boxing becoes they don't look like crap. besides that being a very subjective argument. They could have bought an Acer Revo for a fraction of the cost with an Atom CPU and linux installed. use the VESA attachments to stick it to the back of the monitor, and you would NEVER have to see it, even if it doesn't look that bad. and you have a internet box that does the exact same thign as the many times as expensive Mac Mini.

It's a neat option but the fact you have to reboot into it makes it ridiculous.

So far sandboxing hasn't stopped attacks on ANY browser.

I don't think anyone here claims it will suddenly offer 100% protection, but it is an effective additional security layer. Not entirely sure why you dispute this. Not too long ago Chrome was found the hardest to hack because of sandboxing.

And I'm no great fan of linux, but libraries, schools and such buying Mac Mini's to use as internet boxing becoes they don't look like crap. besides that being a very subjective argument. They could have bought an Acer Revo for a fraction of the cost with an Atom CPU and linux installed. use the VESA attachments to stick it to the back of the monitor, and you would NEVER have to see it, even if it doesn't look that bad. and you have a internet box that does the exact same thign as the many times as expensive Mac Mini.

Doesn't matter how you spin it fact is you see a lot of iMacs these days in public places around here. We've ran a background item on the subject and been in contact with 115 small and large businesses asking why they choose Mac: Aesthetics, small footprint, portability, less maintenance and fewer cables were amongst most the popular reasons. Many businesses looked into what you said as well: VSA mounting, hiding the computer itself from view in a stand or behind a wall etc. can turn out to be both more expensive and less flexible.

It's a neat option but the fact you have to reboot into it makes it ridiculous.

What you don't seem to get is that this feature is part of the iCloud feature Find My Mac. A thief stealing your Mac can use the internet and thus give up his/her location without being able to access personal files, so in that light it makes perfect sense. This isn't meant as a Chrome OS or Guest Account replacement. The feature isn't even visible without setting up the iCloud beta.

What you don't seem to get is that this feature is part of the iCloud feature Find My Mac.

What does this have to do with anything?

May it be part of Find My Mac or not, it doesn't change the fact that it shouldn't require a reboot. The option on the login screen could be an additional account icon that when you click on it, it doesn't prompt you with a password and it only opens a clean install of Safari and nothing else.

Honestly if my library or school where spending my tax money on buying one computer when they could have bought 3+ for the same job. Then I would definitely start raising some questions that the people in charge of those places would find hard to answer.

Aesthetics doesn't factor in, VESA mounting a Revo not even close to approaching the same price as a Mini, and a Mini would need the exact same amount of cables, except the cables would be more visible since it wouldn't be VESA mounted. Your arguments would be valid if we where arguing Vesa mounted REVO vs iMac, except, the Revo would then, monitor included, be even cheaper compared to the Mac.

The whole stolen Mac argument doesn't really count for anything though, why would a thief boot up into this so he can browse the Internet while the owner/police can still trace him. Most thieves aren't as stupid as that guy in the news, most will wipe the damn thing, and with physical access if they want yoru data, and you don't have encryption, it's theirs.

What does this have to do with anything?

May it be part of Find My Mac or not, it doesn't change the fact that it shouldn't require a reboot. The option on the login screen could be an additional account icon that when you click on it, it doesn't prompt you with a password and it only opens a clean install of Safari and nothing else.

You can probably do this in OSX to, but the sensible option would be to make a new guest/browser account, with full restrictions on what they can do, then edit it so they start up with iexplorer.exe as shell, or any other browser. heck there are even shells made specifically for this purpose.

Honestly if my library or school where spending my tax money on buying one computer when they could have bought 3+ for the same job. Then I would definitely start raising some questions that the people in charge of those places would find hard to answer.

They're saving so much in maintenance, customer support and installation costs that you don't really need to worry about how they spend your money.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
    • A roguelike and a 4X strategy game are free to claim on the Epic Games Store by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final leg of the Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways promotion just landed, and it brought along two more games to keep. Last week's Lonestar and Calico giveaways have now been replaced with copies of Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest to claim for PC gamers. As always, the game is yours to add permanently to your Epic Games Store library within the next seven days. Diving into the games, Songs of Conquest is developed by Lavapotion. This is a turn-based 4X strategy experience that has players making tough decisions and participating in tactical combat while also managing their kingdom. "Songs of Conquest is a turn-based strategy game inspired by 90s classics. Lead powerful magicians called Wielders and venture to lands unknown," explains the developer. "Wage battles against armies that dare oppose you, hunt for powerful artifacts and expand your territory. The world is ripe for the taking – seize it." Meanwhile, Rogue Waters comes from developer Ice Code Games. This rogue-lite experience has you taking the role of Captain Cutter as he commands his ship and crew through procedurally generated encounters. You'll be recruiting and training crew, use sea creatures, and battle with other ships and pirates. "Set sail as Captain Cutter, a pirate caught in a deadly struggle for power and vengeance," adds the developer. "Navigate dangerous waters, unleash mythical sea creatures, and outwit enemies as you chase legendary treasure and confront dark secrets." The newly available Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest giveaways on the Epic Games Store are set to run until June 11, giving PC gamers seven days to claim the latest offer. Once this closes out, a new freebie will take its place on the same day, which is slated to be Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks. Don't forget that mobile gamers can check out the Epic Game Store's weekly giveaways on Android and iOS to grab a freebie there as well.
    • Still using Classic Outlook? Microsoft highlights 15 reasons to switch to New Outlook by Usama Jawad As many of you may know, Microsoft has been trying to get customers to ditch Classic Outlook in favor of New Outlook for quite some time now. To that end, it has added numerous capabilities to the latter, including PST features, and it is working on several more, such as a unified inbox. However, customer response has been a bit lukewarm so far, with many considering the New Outlook to be "hot garbage". Now, Microsoft has highlighted 15 features that users can leverage in New Outlook in yet another attempt to get customers to migrate. Although not all of the 15 capabilities are exclusive to New Outlook, in fact, most of them are available in Classic Outlook as well. But Microsoft hopes that this combination of familiar and fresh features will be able to attract existing users as well as new ones. For ease of readability, we have summarized the 15 features below: Pin an email: This makes it easier to track important emails Snooze an email: You can temporarily snooze an email thread for a specific time frame until it becomes relevant again. This can be very useful in scenarios where you don't feel like actively following a thread or simply want to follow up on a later date Add multiple categories at the same time: You can assign multiple categories to an email through a single, simplified interface Sweep: As the name implies, you can define automated move processes on your inbox to declutter it, rather than cleaning it up manually Schedule send: Does exactly what it says on the tin, and can be useful when accommodating recipients in different timezones Simplified folder sharing: The sharing process has been simplified so permissions are automatically applied on parent folders Follow a meeting: This is an RSVP option that lets people know that you won't be able to join the meeting but would still like to access a recap Save calendar views: You can save different views for the calendar based on different workflows Improved meeting tracking: Organizers have more controls in viewing meeting responses, such as the ability to sort and download them. Typically useful when there is a large audience Meeting recap: The Outlook Calendar surfaces a meeting recap with recordings, transcripts, and shared files Filtered views: Allows you to declutter your Calendar so that it's easier to scan and schedule Change a recurring event: Users can modify future events of a series of meetings while preserving the configuration of previous ones Rename your email account: This labeling makes it easier to identify multiple accounts in Outlook Modern themes: Exactly what the name says, plus Dark Mode Keyboard shortcuts: This facilitates flexible user behavior as customers can choose between Outlook for Windows shortcuts, Outlook for the web, or turn them off completely There you have it. It's a decent list, but it remains to be seen if it will move the needle in a meaningful way for users who are attached to Classic Outlook. Again, a lot of the aforementioned features are already available in Outlook Classic, but for some, native functionality is not present, and people typically resort to workarounds. Microsoft will be hoping that it's primarily those capabilities that get people to finally switch.
    • Please I need help I been trying to find this secure boot on my ColorFul motherboard in the bios But i cant i turned off CSM everything watch every video i cant find it. BATTLE-AX B660M-HD DELUXE V20
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      478
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!