iOS5 faster than Mango at HTML5 rendering? Wrong!


Recommended Posts

Winrumors have claimed that the latest version of iOS5 has overtaken Windows Phone 7 Mango in the HTML5 speed rendering stakes, going from 1-2 fps to 32 fps, faster than the 25 fps demonstrated for Mango at MIX11.

What Tom has not taken into account was that Mango has continued to improve itself, and in testing done by The Next Web Windows Phone 7 repeatedly hit 41 FPS, and this is of course with a Snapdragon processor generations older than that in the iPhone 4.

While it seems the iPhone did a lot to catch up with Windows Phone 7 in iOS5, like with many other features Apple stole from Windows Phone 7 Apple still has a long way to go to do it better.

Read more at The Next Web here.

http://wmpoweruser.com/ios5-faster-than-mango-at-html5-rendering-wrong/

post-345940-0-16218800-1308740167.png

post-345940-0-73052500-1308740278.png

Someones forgetting that iOS 5 is in beta. Generally I find iOS5 slower than 4, but I still wouldn't comment on actual performance until it has been officially released!

I just did that same test as the OP images link to.

IOS5 iPhone 4 and I got 19fps

I just did that same test as the OP images link to.

IOS5 iPhone 4 and I got 19fps

No one should be running benchmarks on beta software, especially an OS, it's madness and really is just there to incite the idiots.

By all means run the benchmarks on release and start slagging it off then, no worries! But to do so before hand is just moronic.

Has Mango been released either?

Didn't know mango hadn't been released, but my point stands doubly so, you're comparing TWO BETAS, both of which could change before release... Still moronic to do so.

Again this is just to incite the apple-haters. Wait till release of both, do the comparison and let the flame war begin!

No one should be running benchmarks on beta software, especially an OS, it's madness and really is just there to incite the idiots.

By all means run the benchmarks on release and start slagging it off then, no worries! But to do so before hand is just moronic.

Didn't know mango hadn't been released, but my point stands doubly so, you're comparing TWO BETAS, both of which could change before release... Still moronic to do so.

Again this is just to incite the apple-haters. Wait till release of both, do the comparison and let the flame war begin!

I don't think there's necessarily anything wrong with this and it doesn't have to result in a flame war. What it shows is that Microsoft have done eveyone a favour by dramatically raising the stakes in the mobile internet performance race and now Apple are working hard to catch up. it might be beta software but at least we know that the two companies are working on improving peformance and the final releases should be even better.

I agree no-one should be running benchmarks against beta software but that was never my aim. The point here is that MSFT demonstrated beta Mango software against an iPhone 4 with iOS 4. My aim was to just show that iOS 5 is now a lot better, just weeks after MSFT last demoed iOS 4 performing badly. Now that Apple has iOS 5 beta it seems to be catching up and in most cases surpassing the performance of existing Windows Phone devices with Mango. Thenextweb found that the Samsung Focus performs better than iOS 5. However, both the Trophy and ASUS E600 perform worse. It's clear there's still optimization and work to be done but it's also strange that one device has much better performance than the others.

I don't think there's necessarily anything wrong with this and it doesn't have to result in a flame war. What it shows is that Microsoft have done eveyone a favour by dramatically raising the stakes in the mobile internet performance race and now Apple are working hard to catch up. it might be beta software but at least we know that the two companies are working on improving peformance and the final releases should be even better.

Yup! +1 :yes:

I agree no-one should be running benchmarks against beta software but that was never my aim.

I don't agree with your first statement. They tell about the company's current level. Didn't we had IE Previews to know how much level MS had achieved. I think they are alright for bench-marking, since they are subject change just like the stable release.

No one should be running benchmarks on beta software, especially an OS, it's madness and really is just there to incite the idiots.

By all means run the benchmarks on release and start slagging it off then, no worries! But to do so before hand is just moronic.

Didn't know mango hadn't been released, but my point stands doubly so, you're comparing TWO BETAS, both of which could change before release... Still moronic to do so.

Again this is just to incite the apple-haters. Wait till release of both, do the comparison and let the flame war begin!

I wasn't aware i was slagging anything off? Just giving my record vs the screenshot record (19fps for me vs 31fps in screenshot)

Real world tests.. any harm done?

While it seems the iPhone did a lot to catch up with Windows Phone 7 in iOS5, like with many other features Apple stole from Windows Phone 7 Apple still has a long way to go to do it better.

Yeah, Apple copied the feature "faster browser" from Microsoft. Microsoft should patent it and sue Apple until they go bankrupt

This'll probably be a back-and-forth HTML5 performance war (which I love :D).

One thing that's always been consistent with iOS betas though: they run like ass in comparison to the final product.

Apple FUD as usual. Nothing to see here, move along people. Hope iOShit die a slow and painful death like Blackberry.

Did you bother to read where the 'faster' claims were coming from (or even anything other than the title of the thread for that matter)?

Apple FUD as usual. Nothing to see here, move along people. Hope iOShit die a slow and painful death like Blackberry.

As much as I hate iOS, I hope it survives, and it certainly will. With a big name like Apple, iOS is here to stay. More mobile OS's = more choice. Choice = competition. Competition = better products. Better products = consumers win

Apple FUD as usual. Nothing to see here, move along people. Hope iOShit die a slow and painful death like Blackberry.

You don't expect to be taken seriously with all those BS posts of yours, do you?

Great to see WP7 is getting better and better. I really love the concept but it wasn't quite there yet when they released it first. Now, with Mango, things are about to change and WP7 is slowly but surely becoming a real competitor for Android and iOS.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If only Windows would have a toggle switch named "Get the latest updates as soon as possible" inside Windows Update settings... But nah, let's hide the new stuff inside a controlled feature rollout, even if the user is explicitly asking for the new stuff as soon as possible.
    • After watching the Apple event earlier this week it is quite the contrast. Apple is going back and tweaking the code to make things more efficient in many areas of MacOS. Windows is boosting your electric build to hide their issues.
    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!