Crap articles and moderators...


Recommended Posts

When I've published articles in the past, I have not deleted comments, even if they are negative. To me they make a good way of learning and spotting mistakes so I can (hopefully) avoid issues in the future. I'm curious though as to who is actually deleting comments, as the comments are what makes the article writing worthwhile, IMO.

To get on the point immediately, what's up with you guys lately deleting comments that suggest a news post / article is wrong / crap? We can't give feedback anymore?

EDIT: Also, why not add a dislike button too?

I totally agree. Stuff seems to get deleted without notice.

If you guys are going to "censor" threads, at least be consistent about it.

there is a button to report problems you might have with articles, comments isn't the place for them... that has been general knowledge for a long while now.... report it like it should be, if its a comment that should of been an issue report, it will get deleted by a mod

there is a button to report problems you might have with articles, comments isn't the place for them... that has been general knowledge for a long while now.... report it like it should be, if its a comment that should of been an issue report, it will get deleted by a mod

What he said. People should use common sense a little more.

I typically do not remove comments, but pointless banter (FIRST!!), intentional troll/flame, and if someone points out a spelling mistake (and doesn't use the report an issue) I will sometimes delete them after the adjustment has been made. Plenty of negative comments are left untouched, everyone is entitled to an opinion.

There is a big difference too between genuine feedback and "this is crap" or "zomg nawt news". It's easy to troll, it's difficult to be productive.

Ninja Edit:

Also the comment to view ratio is very low (typical across many sites) so one negative comment is not representative of the majority. If we bork up, and I have in the past, it is known and we get slammed from all sides. One simple comment that is derogatory doesn't mean all agree with you.

I don't care if my comments about errors get deleted when they are, but if I see a glaring grammar/spelling/other error that could have been caught with simple proofreading, I'm going to point it out in the comments and get a laugh at the author's expense. *shrug* I'll let others play copy editor, life's too short for unpaid work.

The only comments that get deleted are the obvious troll ones, people who comment in Apple articles and clearly dislike the company should imo be banned for it outright, because it serves no purpose and usually makes the person look stupid.

Oh and most of the time those comments are (quite correctly) reported by other readers too.

If theres a problem with an article, you can use the report link.

As I see no actual examples here, I'll leave it at that! :)

there is a button to report problems you might have with articles, comments isn't the place for them... that has been general knowledge for a long while now.... report it like it should be, if its a comment that should of been an issue report, it will get deleted by a mod

Lets say an article contains a picture that says something. But it is either incomplete or misinterprets the facts, just because the creator of that picture is either biased towards one thing and wants to make that thing look better, or simply doesn't care to check the correctness of what he did.

Where am I supposed to write a feedback for this? Why add the comments part in the first place, if the author can't accept negative comments?

If an article is crap, it is crap. It is not "not good enough". It is crap. ;)

(really don't give a **** about mine and others' comments being deleted, but seriously, the site right now is light years away from what it was in the past, and a lot of that has to do with the kind of articles that are being posted)

I don't care if my comments about errors get deleted when they are, but if I see a glaring grammar/spelling/other error that could have been caught with simple proofreading, I'm going to point it out in the comments and get a laugh at the author's expense. *shrug* I'll let others play copy editor, life's too short for unpaid work.

We have one full-time reporter, the rest do it for your and others benefits.

I'm glad you didn't read Neowin between 2000-2006 because you would have had a problem with every article :p That's how "unprofessional" we are.

We have one full-time reporter, the rest do it for your and others benefits.

I'm glad you didn't read Neowin between 2000-2006 because you would have had a problem with every article :p That's how "unprofessional" we are.

Like I said I don't mind being deleted for it, and I don't do it all the time, but sometimes it's too easy and I just have too. As far as I can recall, the times I have done it weren't malicious trolling, at least I hope they weren't taken that way. I've been reading neowin since '02, at least, and yeah it's gotten waaaaaaaaaay better over the years as far as the quality goes, still some facepalm moments but I try to keep those to myself >.>;

Just so everyone is aware, a reported issue is treated much more seriously than a commenter making a correction in a comment. The writer (and editors) also gets notified in a few different ways so that we're sure the problem will be addressed and fixed if need be. If your goal to is to get someone to fix the issue, you should be using the issue report button. If you feel the need to point these out in the comments, you don't really have the site's interests in mind, do you?

You are so so right.

I posted this article a few days earlier on Neowin.net and the page about an error.

THEY DELETED IT!!! :angry: :angry:

This is search done in Bing. The first link is my article. IT DOES NOT EXIST ANYMORE. http://www.bing.com/search?setmkt=en-US&q=neowin+news+error

I corrected them that that MS-Skype deal has not been cleared by FTC yet, and they deleted the link. It was mistake on behalf of AP.

I don't know how much longer before they delete this post too. :angry:

And you are right, I have some people reply to my comments in news section. But I can neither find their replies or my post. It has happened at least 3 times in recent memory. And I'm not a troll.

I haven't seen it happen, except yesterday, but mine wasn't a negative one. Was just me asking what "audio audio" was because of a typo in the article. So easy to see why they removed it :p

We don't want to see discussions on typos as that takes away from the point of the article. There is a report button that can be used to tell us of mistakes.

We would like our discussions to be as on-topic as possible.

Like I said I don't mind being deleted for it, and I don't do it all the time, but sometimes it's too easy and I just have too. As far as I can recall, the times I have done it weren't malicious trolling, at least I hope they weren't taken that way. I've been reading neowin since '02, at least, and yeah it's gotten waaaaaaaaaay better over the years as far as the quality goes, still some facepalm moments but I try to keep those to myself >.>;

NP :p I appreciate the response but we do have a report a problem with this article link.

You are so so right.

I posted this article a few days earlier on Neowin.net and the page about an error.

THEY DELETED IT!!! :angry: :angry:

This is search done in Bing. The first link is my article. IT DOES NOT EXIST ANYMORE. http://www.bing.com/search?setmkt=en-US&q=neowin+news+error

I corrected them that that MS-Skype deal has not been cleared by FTC yet, and they deleted the link. It was mistake on behalf of AP.

I don't know how much longer before they delete this post too. :angry:

And you are right, I have some people reply to my comments in news section. But I can neither find their replies or my post. It has happened at least 3 times in recent memory. And I'm not a troll.

We don't want to see forum threads that report errors on the mainpage. That just bloats out the site unnecessarily.

I moved your thread to a location where the Newsies could read and implement any required changed.

Technically, it does still exist. You just don't have the permissions to see it. It wasn't, however, deleted.

If you want to be helpful, it would be nice to establish a working relationship first.

I'd be more inclined to respond to a person who uses the reported issues link properly than deal with someone who sends me an essay via email explaining why I should go back to high school and take remedial English.

I'm trying to ignore the irony of you making a grammatical error in this thread after saying what you said..... but I just can't. :)

Noooo! The second 'too'! Curse you, homophones! Curse you!!! My inner grammar and spelling Nazi failed me this day.

If you want to be helpful, it would be nice to establish a working relationship first.

I'd be more inclined to respond to a person who uses the reported issues link properly than deal with someone who sends me an essay via email explaining why I should go back to high school and take remedial English.

People who go to that length need help and take it far too seriously. >.> Let me guess. That's actually happened?

Lets say an article contains a picture that says something. But it is either incomplete or misinterprets the facts, just because the creator of that picture is either biased towards one thing and wants to make that thing look better, or simply doesn't care to check the correctness of what he did.

Where am I supposed to write a feedback for this? Why add the comments part in the first place, if the author can't accept negative comments?

If an article is crap, it is crap. It is not "not good enough". It is crap. ;)

(really don't give a **** about mine and others' comments being deleted, but seriously, the site right now is light years away from what it was in the past, and a lot of that has to do with the kind of articles that are being posted)

Hit the "report" button. This sends it to us. That way, it doesn't pointlessly spam the comments with "ZOMG YOU GOT IT WRONG?!!11!" and we can fix it quickly.

I suspect if you explained why you thought the article was "crap" it would be more helpful, however, most just say "this is crap" and refuse to explain why. I welcome constructive criticism on things I write, but it has to be for a reason, not just because you think its crap. Sometimes news joints get stuff wrong. Look at Engadget, they get things wrong all the time. It's not the end of the world. We correct, we move on.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft released Windows 11 KB5094149 / KB5095971 / KB5094156 Setup, Recovery updates by Sayan Sen Earlier this week Microsoft released its newest Patch Tuesday updates (KB5094126 / KB5093998 on Windows 11 and KB5094127 on Windows 10). Alongside those, Microsoft also released new dynamic updates. These Dynamic Update packages are meant to be applied to existing Windows images prior to their deployment. Dynamic Updates also help preserve Language Pack (LP) and Features on Demand (FODs) content during the upgrade process. VBScript, for example, is currently an FOD on Windows 11 24H2. This time both recovery and setup updates were released for Windows 11 as well as Windows 10. The company writes: "KB5095185: Safe OS Dynamic Update for Windows 11, version 26H1: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to the Windows recovery environment (WinRE). After installing this update, the WinRE version installed on the device should be 10.0.28000.2269. KB5094149: Safe OS Dynamic Update for Windows 11, versions 24H2 and 25H2: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to the Windows recovery environment (WinRE). After installing this update, the WinRE version installed on the device should be 10.0.26100.8655 KB5095971: Setup Dynamic Update for Windows 11, version 23H2: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to Windows setup binaries or any files that setup uses for feature updates in Windows 11, version 23H2. KB5094156: Safe OS Dynamic Update for Windows 11, version 23H2: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to the Windows recovery environment (WinRE). After installing this update, the WinRE version installed on the device should be 10.0.22621.7219 KB5098815: Windows Recovery Environment update for Windows 10, version 21H2 and 22H2: June 9, 2026 This update automatically applies Safe OS Dynamic Update (KB5094154) to the Windows Recovery Environment (WinRE) on a running PC. The update installs improvements to Windows recovery features. KB5094154: Safe OS Dynamic Update for Windows 10, versions 21H2 and 22H2: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to the Windows recovery environment (WinRE). After installing this update, the WinRE version installed on the device should be 10.0.19041.7417. KB5094153: Safe OS Dynamic Update for Windows 10, version 1809 and Windows Server 2019: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to the Windows recovery environment (WinRE). After installing this update, the WinRE version installed on the device should be 10.0.17763.8880. KB5094152: Safe OS Dynamic Update for Windows 10, version 1607 and Windows Server 2016: June 9, 2026 This update makes improvements to the Windows recovery environment (WinRE). After installing this update, the WinRE version installed on the device should be 10.0.14393.9234." Microsoft notes that both the Recovery and Setup updates will be downloaded and installed automatically via the Windows Update channel.
    • Quantum Error Correction Validated in Nature: Microsoft and Quantinuum Log 800-Fold Improvement Two years after the original press-release announcement, independently peer-reviewed results published in Nature on June 10, 2026, have confirmed that Microsoft and Quantinuum achieved an 800-fold reduction in quantum error rates on real trapped-ion hardware — the largest gap between physical and logical error rates ever independently validated.    What Quantum Error Correction Actually Does — and Why Breaking Even Is Hard https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318329/20260613/quantum-error-correction-validated-nature-microsoft-quantinuum-log-800-fold-improvement.htm   Quantum Computing Wiring Bottleneck Cracked by HKU Silicon Carbide Chip at Qubit Temperature Engineers at the University of Hong Kong have built the first cryogenic control chip that operates at the same temperature as superconducting qubits — 10 millikelvin, or just one-hundredth of a degree above absolute zero — without generating the heat that has forced every competing approach to park its electronics hundreds of meters of cable away. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318325/20260613/quantum-computing-wiring-bottleneck-cracked-hku-silicon-carbide-chip-qubit-temperature.htm  
    • RevPDF 4.5.0 by Razvan Serea RevPDF is a free, fully offline PDF editor for Windows, macOS, and Linux that lets you edit text and images directly inside PDF files — no internet connection, no account, and no cloud uploads required. Unlike bloated alternatives that demand subscriptions and constant connectivity, RevPDF fits in under 60MB on desktop while delivering a complete editing toolkit: annotate, redact, sign, compress, split, merge, convert, and reorganize pages, all processed locally on your device. Smart font matching ensures edited text blends seamlessly with the original, and multi-language support includes RTL scripts such as Arabic and Hebrew. Where most PDF editors force you to choose between features and simplicity, RevPDF manages both. You can build interactive forms from scratch with text fields, checkboxes, and dropdowns, permanently redact sensitive data before sharing, draw freehand on contracts and diagrams, and add custom watermarks — all without a single file leaving your machine. Edit Text and Images Directly Inside PDFs RevPDF supports true inline PDF editing — not just annotation layers on top of a document, but actual modification of existing text and images within the file. A smart font-matching engine identifies the font used in the original document and applies it automatically when you make edits, so changes blend naturally with the surrounding content. You can reposition elements, resize images, and update text across single pages or entire documents. RevPDF 4.5.0 release notes: This is one of the biggest updates to RevPDF yet. A lot of things people have been asking for are finally here. New Features Auto Redaction Permanently redact sensitive text and areas from your PDFs before sharing. Clean, irreversible, and fully offline. Comments, Links & Bookmarks Add comments for review, insert clickable links, and create bookmarks to jump around long documents without scrolling forever. Find & Replace Search across the whole document and replace text in one go. Long overdue. Split Pages Vertically or Horizontally Split any page down the middle, vertically or horizontally. Perfect for scanned books or double-page spreads. New Drawing Tools More tools for freehand drawing and markup, better for annotations, sketches, and detailed notes. Continuous Scrolling in Editor The editor now scrolls continuously through pages instead of jumping between them. Working through long documents is a lot smoother now. PDF Metadata Editor View and edit the metadata stored inside your PDFs, including title, author, subject, and keywords. Better Font Matching Text edits now blend in more naturally by doing a better job of matching the original font. Tabbed PDF Viewer Open multiple PDFs at once in tabs and switch between them without going back to the home screen. Add Links Insert hyperlinks anywhere in your PDF, to external URLs or to other pages within the document. Share & Print Shortcuts Share or print directly from the editing screen, home screen, and viewer. No extra steps. Minor Updates Paste images directly from clipboard into your PDF New image editing tools for more control over images inside documents Bug Fixes Fixed file saving issues on Windows and Linux Everything still works fully offline. No login, no cloud, no account. Your files stay on your device. Download: RevPDF 4.5.0 | 58.0 MB (Open Source) Links: RevPDF Home Page | Github | Screenshots 1 | 2 Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Interesting. I'm not using a VPN with my phone. I tried though my home internet (Rogers) and my cellular internet (Telus) using their respective DNS servers and both trigger the dialog above.
    • Three days after Anthropic launched Claude Fable 5 as the most capable AI model it had ever released to the public, the United States government ordered it switched off — and now the company is refunding customers who paid to use a product that vanished almost overnight https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318342/20260613/us-government-pulls-anthropics-fable-5-offline-now-come-refunds-vanished-ai.htm  
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Contributor
      MarkHughes4096 went up a rank
      Contributor
    • Dedicated
      jordanspringer earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      139
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      91
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!