Crap articles and moderators...


Recommended Posts

When I've published articles in the past, I have not deleted comments, even if they are negative. To me they make a good way of learning and spotting mistakes so I can (hopefully) avoid issues in the future. I'm curious though as to who is actually deleting comments, as the comments are what makes the article writing worthwhile, IMO.

To get on the point immediately, what's up with you guys lately deleting comments that suggest a news post / article is wrong / crap? We can't give feedback anymore?

EDIT: Also, why not add a dislike button too?

I totally agree. Stuff seems to get deleted without notice.

If you guys are going to "censor" threads, at least be consistent about it.

there is a button to report problems you might have with articles, comments isn't the place for them... that has been general knowledge for a long while now.... report it like it should be, if its a comment that should of been an issue report, it will get deleted by a mod

there is a button to report problems you might have with articles, comments isn't the place for them... that has been general knowledge for a long while now.... report it like it should be, if its a comment that should of been an issue report, it will get deleted by a mod

What he said. People should use common sense a little more.

I typically do not remove comments, but pointless banter (FIRST!!), intentional troll/flame, and if someone points out a spelling mistake (and doesn't use the report an issue) I will sometimes delete them after the adjustment has been made. Plenty of negative comments are left untouched, everyone is entitled to an opinion.

There is a big difference too between genuine feedback and "this is crap" or "zomg nawt news". It's easy to troll, it's difficult to be productive.

Ninja Edit:

Also the comment to view ratio is very low (typical across many sites) so one negative comment is not representative of the majority. If we bork up, and I have in the past, it is known and we get slammed from all sides. One simple comment that is derogatory doesn't mean all agree with you.

I don't care if my comments about errors get deleted when they are, but if I see a glaring grammar/spelling/other error that could have been caught with simple proofreading, I'm going to point it out in the comments and get a laugh at the author's expense. *shrug* I'll let others play copy editor, life's too short for unpaid work.

The only comments that get deleted are the obvious troll ones, people who comment in Apple articles and clearly dislike the company should imo be banned for it outright, because it serves no purpose and usually makes the person look stupid.

Oh and most of the time those comments are (quite correctly) reported by other readers too.

If theres a problem with an article, you can use the report link.

As I see no actual examples here, I'll leave it at that! :)

there is a button to report problems you might have with articles, comments isn't the place for them... that has been general knowledge for a long while now.... report it like it should be, if its a comment that should of been an issue report, it will get deleted by a mod

Lets say an article contains a picture that says something. But it is either incomplete or misinterprets the facts, just because the creator of that picture is either biased towards one thing and wants to make that thing look better, or simply doesn't care to check the correctness of what he did.

Where am I supposed to write a feedback for this? Why add the comments part in the first place, if the author can't accept negative comments?

If an article is crap, it is crap. It is not "not good enough". It is crap. ;)

(really don't give a **** about mine and others' comments being deleted, but seriously, the site right now is light years away from what it was in the past, and a lot of that has to do with the kind of articles that are being posted)

I don't care if my comments about errors get deleted when they are, but if I see a glaring grammar/spelling/other error that could have been caught with simple proofreading, I'm going to point it out in the comments and get a laugh at the author's expense. *shrug* I'll let others play copy editor, life's too short for unpaid work.

We have one full-time reporter, the rest do it for your and others benefits.

I'm glad you didn't read Neowin between 2000-2006 because you would have had a problem with every article :p That's how "unprofessional" we are.

We have one full-time reporter, the rest do it for your and others benefits.

I'm glad you didn't read Neowin between 2000-2006 because you would have had a problem with every article :p That's how "unprofessional" we are.

Like I said I don't mind being deleted for it, and I don't do it all the time, but sometimes it's too easy and I just have too. As far as I can recall, the times I have done it weren't malicious trolling, at least I hope they weren't taken that way. I've been reading neowin since '02, at least, and yeah it's gotten waaaaaaaaaay better over the years as far as the quality goes, still some facepalm moments but I try to keep those to myself >.>;

Just so everyone is aware, a reported issue is treated much more seriously than a commenter making a correction in a comment. The writer (and editors) also gets notified in a few different ways so that we're sure the problem will be addressed and fixed if need be. If your goal to is to get someone to fix the issue, you should be using the issue report button. If you feel the need to point these out in the comments, you don't really have the site's interests in mind, do you?

You are so so right.

I posted this article a few days earlier on Neowin.net and the page about an error.

THEY DELETED IT!!! :angry: :angry:

This is search done in Bing. The first link is my article. IT DOES NOT EXIST ANYMORE. http://www.bing.com/search?setmkt=en-US&q=neowin+news+error

I corrected them that that MS-Skype deal has not been cleared by FTC yet, and they deleted the link. It was mistake on behalf of AP.

I don't know how much longer before they delete this post too. :angry:

And you are right, I have some people reply to my comments in news section. But I can neither find their replies or my post. It has happened at least 3 times in recent memory. And I'm not a troll.

I haven't seen it happen, except yesterday, but mine wasn't a negative one. Was just me asking what "audio audio" was because of a typo in the article. So easy to see why they removed it :p

We don't want to see discussions on typos as that takes away from the point of the article. There is a report button that can be used to tell us of mistakes.

We would like our discussions to be as on-topic as possible.

Like I said I don't mind being deleted for it, and I don't do it all the time, but sometimes it's too easy and I just have too. As far as I can recall, the times I have done it weren't malicious trolling, at least I hope they weren't taken that way. I've been reading neowin since '02, at least, and yeah it's gotten waaaaaaaaaay better over the years as far as the quality goes, still some facepalm moments but I try to keep those to myself >.>;

NP :p I appreciate the response but we do have a report a problem with this article link.

You are so so right.

I posted this article a few days earlier on Neowin.net and the page about an error.

THEY DELETED IT!!! :angry: :angry:

This is search done in Bing. The first link is my article. IT DOES NOT EXIST ANYMORE. http://www.bing.com/search?setmkt=en-US&q=neowin+news+error

I corrected them that that MS-Skype deal has not been cleared by FTC yet, and they deleted the link. It was mistake on behalf of AP.

I don't know how much longer before they delete this post too. :angry:

And you are right, I have some people reply to my comments in news section. But I can neither find their replies or my post. It has happened at least 3 times in recent memory. And I'm not a troll.

We don't want to see forum threads that report errors on the mainpage. That just bloats out the site unnecessarily.

I moved your thread to a location where the Newsies could read and implement any required changed.

Technically, it does still exist. You just don't have the permissions to see it. It wasn't, however, deleted.

If you want to be helpful, it would be nice to establish a working relationship first.

I'd be more inclined to respond to a person who uses the reported issues link properly than deal with someone who sends me an essay via email explaining why I should go back to high school and take remedial English.

I'm trying to ignore the irony of you making a grammatical error in this thread after saying what you said..... but I just can't. :)

Noooo! The second 'too'! Curse you, homophones! Curse you!!! My inner grammar and spelling Nazi failed me this day.

If you want to be helpful, it would be nice to establish a working relationship first.

I'd be more inclined to respond to a person who uses the reported issues link properly than deal with someone who sends me an essay via email explaining why I should go back to high school and take remedial English.

People who go to that length need help and take it far too seriously. >.> Let me guess. That's actually happened?

Lets say an article contains a picture that says something. But it is either incomplete or misinterprets the facts, just because the creator of that picture is either biased towards one thing and wants to make that thing look better, or simply doesn't care to check the correctness of what he did.

Where am I supposed to write a feedback for this? Why add the comments part in the first place, if the author can't accept negative comments?

If an article is crap, it is crap. It is not "not good enough". It is crap. ;)

(really don't give a **** about mine and others' comments being deleted, but seriously, the site right now is light years away from what it was in the past, and a lot of that has to do with the kind of articles that are being posted)

Hit the "report" button. This sends it to us. That way, it doesn't pointlessly spam the comments with "ZOMG YOU GOT IT WRONG?!!11!" and we can fix it quickly.

I suspect if you explained why you thought the article was "crap" it would be more helpful, however, most just say "this is crap" and refuse to explain why. I welcome constructive criticism on things I write, but it has to be for a reason, not just because you think its crap. Sometimes news joints get stuff wrong. Look at Engadget, they get things wrong all the time. It's not the end of the world. We correct, we move on.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know The ONLY thing I need to know is the price, which I know will be way higher than I (and most people) are willing to pay for a phone... so basically nothing here I need to know. PS: Nice job getting that Apple reference to a non-existent and unrevealed product as "competition" in there. Cheque is in the mail.
    • Well I really think the repasting helped if your higher clocks have returned, maybe the next thing to look at is if there is a problem with your case airflow? I guess this because your 3080 has returned to optimal state, but is still staying too warm, which might suggest it was thermal throttling before you repasted, of which the only logical conclusion could be outside factors.
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know by Hamid Ganji Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Image via Samsung The next generation of Samsung foldables is set to be unveiled next month at the second Unpacked event of the year. Samsung’s 2026 foldables are not expected to offer significant upgrades over their predecessors, with the Korean firm instead focusing on design refinements and conventional upgrades such as faster processors and better cameras. However, Samsung is reportedly planning to unveil an all-new passport-style foldable this year to rival Apple’s first foldable iPhone, which is expected to debut this September. Here’s a roundup of everything we know about Samsung’s upcoming foldable devices ahead of their official debut. When can we expect Samsung’s new foldables? The Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 series were unveiled in July, and Samsung is expected to maintain this timeframe in 2026. Based on previous reports from Korean sources, Samsung will hold its Unpacked event on July 22 in London, UK, to pull back the curtain on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series. The devices are also expected to hit the shelves a few weeks after launch. However, Samsung has yet to announce an official date. A new naming scheme? One of the most interesting changes we might see this year is a new naming scheme for Samsung’s latest foldables. SamMobile reported that since Samsung is expected to unveil three foldables this year, it has adopted a new naming strategy to simplify product identification for customers. Accordingly, the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8 will reportedly be called the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and will serve as the direct successor to last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 7. The “Ultra” suffix suggests the phone could feature higher-end specifications, such as additional rear camera modules. Samsung’s new passport-style foldable is expected to carry the Galaxy Z Fold 8 name without any suffix. This model is reportedly equipped with two rear cameras. No major changes are expected for the Flip model. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 anticipated specs Rumors over the past few months suggest Samsung is preparing several upgrades for its upcoming foldables, although the devices may continue to rely on larger batteries and faster charging speeds rather than dramatic design changes. The primary focus this year is expected to be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and its wide-screen design. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here are the anticipated specifications for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra based on previous leaks: 6.5-inch outer display and 8-inch inner display, 120Hz refresh rate, and 2,600 nits peak brightness Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, paired with 12GB or 16GB of RAM and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB of storage 4.1mm thickness when unfolded and a weight of 210g 200MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, 10MP or 12MP telephoto camera, 10MP cover camera, and 10MP selfie camera 5,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 As for the Galaxy Z Flip 8, the device is not expected to be a major departure from its predecessor, although it could become slightly slimmer. Expected specifications include: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processor 12GB of RAM with 256GB and 512GB storage options 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X inner dispaly and 4.1-inch Super AMOLED outer dispaly 50MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 Samsung’s foldables are also expected to launch with Gemini Intelligence, Google’s AI suite for automating tasks in Android ecosystem. Moreover, given current memory and component costs, some Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 variants could see a price hike. Galaxy Z Fold 8 adopts a wide-screen design The centerpiece of the upcoming Unpacked event could be the Galaxy Z Fold 8, previously rumored as the Galaxy Z Fold Wide. This model adopts a passport-style form factor and is expected to compete directly with Apple’s iPhone Fold. Galaxy Z Fold 8 official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here’s what to expect: 7.6-inch primary OLED display and 5.4-inch cover display, 120Hz refresh rate, 2,600 nits peak brightness, and 4:3 aspect ratio Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, 12GB or 16GB of RAM, and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB storage options 4,800mAh battery with 45W wired charging 50MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera Android 17 and One UI 9 The three new foldable phones are unlikely to be the only devices unveiled at Samsung’s Unpacked event. The company is also expected to introduce the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and the Galaxy Watch 9 series.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      140
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      89
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!