Crap articles and moderators...


Recommended Posts

Neowin aint what it was 9 - 10 years ago that's for sure. Maybe it's because I was younger, but I remember news stories being limited to actually new WORTHY stories. I also remember it being alot less strict, it seemed people called talk about more liberal things etc. I suppose this added strictness could come with the site getting bigger and having more responsibility though....

Naziitistic may no be the best way to put it lol, but it's the right direction. It seems now people get warnings and posts deleted allot more easily and the mods are generally more sensitive and less open minded. I don't particularly care, as I mainly come here when I need an answer to a question or just to browse areas of my interest and laugh at people getting worked up over posts etc., it's just something I have observed and you can't really single anything out as an example because it's happened so gradually over a wide space of time.

Also I understand you don't need a whole mountain of comments posted each saying an article has it's facts wrong, but surely you need a few people to post that it's wrong, otherwise people won't know it's wrong until Neowin gets round to changing it.

If your just stating the facts about an article, whether disproving it or not, this surely still counts as discussion, and can be discussed....

edit: don't get me wrong, i'm not hating, Neowin's still my favourite place for anything geek related

If your just stating the facts about an article, whether disproving it or not, this surely still counts as discussion, and can be discussed....

It's not about quantity, but quality. There's a difference between "This writer sux" and "I think the facts might be wrong because xyz" I'm pretty sure those aren't getting deleted. One sparks meaningful discussion/corrections, one wants attention.

Tzvi I think what you're saying is completely incorrect, recently Neowin seems to be focussing on content over quality. In this thread you all seem to be ignoring the feedback your getting and just saying 'use the report button'. None of you have acknowledged that the quality has decreased in the past year or so, people seem to be writing ****ty articles just for the pay check.

There has to be some form of quality control in place as well as fact checking - so many articles recently have been incorrect / silly spelling errors. I'd point them out - but oh wait all the comments have been deleted? lol To be honest I'd go through and highlight them all but it's 2340 so .. night.

It's not about quantity, but quality. There's a difference between "This writer sux" and "I think the facts might be wrong because xyz" I'm pretty sure those aren't getting deleted. One sparks meaningful discussion/corrections, one wants attention.

That statement alone implies censorship without solid criteria. You just leave to the moderator to determine what's "meaningful discussion" and what's not. And with that criteria you're assuming that the quality of all the articles is good enough to warrant 'meaningful arguments', which is not the case.

And by the way, when people comment or point out typos, at least they can get replies. The report button is this obscure thing and the only way of knowing your message got through, is when the article is corrected. IF it's corrected.

Tzvi I think what you're saying is completely incorrect, recently Neowin seems to be focussing on content over quality. In this thread you all seem to be ignoring the feedback your getting and just saying 'use the report button'. None of you have acknowledged that the quality has decreased in the past year or so, people seem to be writing ****ty articles just for the pay check.

I'm pretty sure the topic of discussion is why we're deleting critical comments. The answer is that for most simple grammatical/misspell mistakes, the proper course of action is to use the report button. It is more effective, and keeps the comments section cleaner. If you think the writing is just horrible in general, I'm sorry to hear that. We're always trying to improve where we can.

There has to be some form of quality control in place as well as fact checking - so many articles recently have been incorrect / silly spelling errors. I'd point them out - but oh wait all the comments have been deleted? lol To be honest I'd go through and highlight them all but it's 2340 so .. night.

We won't catch everything. That's assumed. We actually depend a lot on the reports system to fix our own fails. We appreciate all the reasonable feedback from that tool, and we fix everything as quickly as possible. If you want the site to be better, use the tool and help us. We aren't perfect.

That statement alone implies censorship without solid criteria. You just leave to the moderator to determine what's "meaningful discussion" and what's not. And with that criteria you're assuming that the quality of all the articles is good enough to warrant 'meaningful arguments', which is not the case.

I'm not a moderator, so i can't comment on specifics, but it isn't random. There are definitely criteria, and the mod team is trusted to uphold certain standards of moderation. That's what they're hired for.

And by the way, when people comment or point out typos, at least they can get replies. The report button is this obscure thing and the only way of knowing your message got through, is when the article is corrected. IF it's corrected.

Well, isn't that the point? I hear what you're saying, recognition is nice, and maybe that's a feature we can implement down the line, but the response is almost always "fix'd". Is that what you would want?

Tzvi I think what you're saying is completely incorrect, recently Neowin seems to be focussing on content over quality. In this thread you all seem to be ignoring the feedback your getting and just saying 'use the report button'. None of you have acknowledged that the quality has decreased in the past year or so, people seem to be writing ****ty articles just for the pay check.

There has to be some form of quality control in place as well as fact checking - so many articles recently have been incorrect / silly spelling errors. I'd point them out - but oh wait all the comments have been deleted? lol To be honest I'd go through and highlight them all but it's 2340 so .. night.

We definitely do not do this for the pay check. I can tell you that much. Please cite your "content over quality" - you can't make these kinds of rash accusations without backing it up. Edit: You know Engadget and Giz make mistakes too right? They're just caught faster because people a) Report them b) They have an entire team dedicated to this.

On the "ignoring feedback" topic you are incorrect here. We accepted your feedback, and have told you our procedures. I'm confused as to how we're ignoring it when we're telling you how to rectify the issue.

We won't catch everything. That's assumed. We actually depend a lot on the reports system to fix our own fails. We appreciate all the reasonable feedback from that tool, and we fix everything as quickly as possible. If you want the site to be better, use the tool and help us. We aren't perfect.

This. (Y)

[...]

And by the way, when people comment or point out typos, at least they can get replies. The report button is this obscure thing and the only way of knowing your message got through, is when the article is corrected. IF it's corrected.

The comment section isn't the right place to mention any typos or other errors. In fact, it's not a good way to mention it at all. With the report system, there's an entire section dedicated to reported issues which can be seen by the staff to be handled accordingly.

I anybody copy/pastes, we sic lyle on them

What about NOT copypasting, but trying to pass something as news when it was first reported by someone else, without giving proper source? I mean I REALLY doubt any news is copypasted, but there's the typical case of news spreading like wildfire all over the net that are way too random to have been discovered at the same time by different 'news sites' like neowin. Properly citing the source doesnt hurt

I've been on both sides of the fence. The guys at Neowin do a good job and for no charge to you. I have posted comments (since I stepped down as admin) and some have been removed and yes it's frustrating for these to be removed as an ordinary member. I've also witnessed people bomb my stories at Neowin with stupid comments and that's even more annoying. No-one likes criticism but it's always best to take it on the chin and move along.

What about NOT copypasting, but trying to pass something as news when it was first reported by someone else, without giving proper source? I mean I REALLY doubt any news is copypasted, but there's the typical case of news spreading like wildfire all over the net that are way too random to have been discovered at the same time by different 'news sites' like neowin. Properly citing the source doesnt hurt

We do cite the source, we just do it inline, many others do this, and it looks tidier.

I've been on both sides of the fence. The guys at Neowin do a good job and for no charge to you. I have posted comments (since I stepped down as admin) and some have been removed and yes it's frustrating for these to be removed as an ordinary member. I've also witnessed people bomb my stories at Neowin with stupid comments and that's even more annoying. No-one likes criticism but it's always best to take it on the chin and move along.

(Y)

What about NOT copypasting, but trying to pass something as news when it was first reported by someone else, without giving proper source? I mean I REALLY doubt any news is copypasted, but there's the typical case of news spreading like wildfire all over the net that are way too random to have been discovered at the same time by different 'news sites' like neowin. Properly citing the source doesnt hurt

There was this same discussion months ago about this topic:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/986524-please-neowin-start-linking-sources-properly/

My take is that some other sites place source links at the bottom, as what they actually write on their end is a small blurb (which more often than not tends to be sarcastic and humourous).

Agreed. I called a person a name ONCE a year or so back and I get a warning against me and my post edited/deleted. I see people doing it all the time and their posts are not removed at all.

There is a button called "Report" plus that mods here have real life too and can't be active 24/7 just to check every bad word on the forum. Most of the time when we delete, edit or warn users we get those reports from the users here in Neowin.

Next time report it and see what we do about it.

To get on the point immediately, what's up with you guys lately deleting comments that suggest a news post / article is wrong / crap? We can't give feedback anymore?

EDIT: Also, why not add a dislike button too?

I don't think "Crappy article is crappy." stands as 'feedback', but more bashing the author. This only leads to further negative comments from other members.

If anyone has an issue with the author/article, just shoot them a PM and explain why. Stating "Crappy article is crappy." isn't exactly leaving us with much to work off of. I've received an email in the past where someone told me to "f-off" and that my "article sucked". I immediately replied once I read it and asked why, turns out the sender was 'under the influence' and apologized.

It's really easy to tell somebody they suck, or a company sucks, or a certain product sucks, but hardly anyone explains why.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!