Recommended Posts

I'm gonna have to stay away from the net from the time the finale airs (tomorrow morning for me) until tomorrow night when I can sit and watch it.

 

There is no way Walt is going to kill Elliott and Gretchen. The only reason they were brought back in last week was to prevent Walt from giving up and turning himself in.

Killing them would be meaningless and uncharacteristically spiteful.

 

Hopefully he will discover Jesse down the hole first, then they can take on Jack and the gang together, with Jesse getting to waste Todd. Maybe Walt will be able to orchestrate the whole affair in such as way as to make it clear that the Jack and all were the ones who killed Hank and Gomez.

I really wish the finale was 2 hours long instead of 50 / 60 mins. With only 50 / 60 mins to rap everything up this episode has got to feel rushed. With only 50 / 60 mins just a 3 second close up of someones face is wasting to much time.

  • Like 1

They are going to have to something extraordinary to get everything wrapped up in 50 mins! I bet Vince Gilligan has something clever up his sleeve to make the 50 min finale work well.

I really expected it to be a bit more. I personally think

Walter deserved a better death, it really seems like he can go to the hospital and recover from that wound

.It was a great ending though don't get me wrong.. but it just seems a bit rushed to fit everything into the episode. 

 

 

  • Like 2

I really expected it to be a bit more. I personally think [spoilers] Walter deserved a better death, it really seems like he can go to the hospital and recover from that wound.[/spoilers] It was a great ending though don't get me wrong.. but it just seems a bit rushed to fit everything into the episode.

I liked it because he died with his masterpiece.

Fantastic show! I caught up to Breaking Bad Season 5 Part 1 in about 2 weeks, sad I didn't start the show when it began. Finale was so much better than Dexter!

I really expected it to be a bit more. I personally think

Walter deserved a better death, it really seems like he can go to the hospital and recover from that wound

.It was a great ending though don't get me wrong.. but it just seems a bit rushed to fit everything into the episode.

As sick as he was, it makes sense. I feel like it wasn't rushed. The pacing was perfect.

It's the best series finale I've ever seen. They have really set the bar high.

 I thought Walt (Heisenberg) died in a very dignified way. It was also noble of him to poison Lydia who was Todd's crush, and kill everyone to let Jesse free. Heisenberg was born in a meth lab and then died in a lab. If you saw Jesse's expression when he found Walt poisoned Lydia with Ricin, he was kind of in a way happy. Felina was extremely satisfying finale for Breaking Bad!

  • Like 2

I think the series finale is the best-directed episode I've ever seen. The ending was perfect. I was worried that there wouldn't be any closure and I'm glad it ended the way it did.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!