Xcode 4.1 now free, available for your Lion development pleasure


Recommended Posts

Note that Xcode 2.5 could be used on Tiger and Leopard, as well as side by side with 3.0.

http://lists.apple.com/archives/webobjects-dev/2007/Oct/msg00560.html

(I could not find a better source, but there's many reports of it). Could not find versions earlier than Xcode 3.2 on ADC. I'm glad I downloaded the final versions of Xcode for Panther, Tiger, Leopard a few weeks ago . :o

Very good point. I thought there was something a little off about Rudy's claim about there never being any other case of more than one major version of Xcode working on a single release of OS X. I'm thinking that some of the betas were that way too, but can't find any proof one way or the other.

edit: actually there is a list in the sidebar of the Wikipedia article on Xcode: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xcode

Mac OS X v10.3 (Version 1.x)

Mac OS X v10.4 (Version 2.x)

Mac OS X v10.5 (Versions 2.5, 3.0, 3.1)

Mac OS X v10.6 (Versions 3.2, 4.x)

Mac OS X v10.7 (Versions 4.1, 4.2)

Very good point. I thought there was something a little off about Rudy's claim about there never being any other case of more than one major version of Xcode working on a single release of OS X. I'm thinking that some of the betas were that way too, but can't find any proof one way or the other.

edit: actually there is a list in the sidebar of the Wikipedia article on Xcode: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xcode

While 10.5 supported 2.5 it actually came bundle with 3.0

While 10.5 supported 2.5 it actually came bundle with 3.0

And 3.2.6 or whatever the newest 3.2 is can run on 10.7 with a little coaxing.

I think "works with" should be replaced with "is supported with" in this conversation.

They're charging for a Snow Leopard version (and they still are as far as I know), as I said before they've never had an OSX release have more than one major Xcode release before so charging $5 is like an upgrade fee (Xcode 3.2 was still free)

Xcode is included on the Snow Leopard DL DVD (both the upgrade version from Apple retailers and the Store and the install DL DVD included with Macs that came preloaded with it). If installed via either, Xcode updates will be available via Software Update - just like all other Apple software updates.

Quirk - When installing Xcode 4.1, the installer may alert you that iTunes needs to be closed. The issue isn't iTunes itself, but the iTunesHelper process; kill it via /Applications/Utilities/Activity Monitor. Once that is done, the installer completes normally.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
    • Yes, THIS is wordart, not the styling that can now be done. Wordart was all about those curvy words, that you could change the path of, like making words go around a circle. I don't think it can be done now, right?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!