Monitor shootout for new system Samsung vs. Asus vs. LG thoughts?


Recommended Posts

Monitor shootout for new system Samsung vs. Asus vs. LG thoughts? Discussion re what you use for gaming monitors/ your monitor brand of choice. Looking for 3 monitors for a tri monitor system. Use for gaming 1080p support needed no 3d support or touch needed (won?t rule out one of the monitors being touch screen but I?m leaning away from the idea). Other brands considered (dam you Sony for not creating dedicated pc monitors). Current thoughts include but are not limited to http://www.amazon.co.uk/Samsung-PX2370-Widescreen-Monitor-Charcoal/dp/B00388Y7I2/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top and the Asus ?Designo? series and any decent looking and spec good LG. Suggestions as had never had a desktop before and have no idea where to start? Monitor looking stylish would be good but specs come first. Would respect and appreciate any help.

LG sells their good panels and only use the crap ones for their own monitors. out of those three choices I wouldn't pick any one of them. then again, my next monitor I won't be buying one until I can get a good IPS (not the cheapest, but the next step up, anything higher is just to expensive).

LG, as far as i am concerned they are the best I have seen.

You have one, what makes then so good in your eyes (slight pun there given were talking monitors) would you care to quote your model?

LG sells their good panels and only use the crap ones for their own monitors. out of those three choices I wouldn't pick any one of them. then again, my next monitor I won't be buying one until I can get a good IPS (not the cheapest, but the next step up, anything higher is just to expensive).

I assume by panel you mean TV panel? Ok what would you pick? ISP?

I managed to get 2 HP 2310m monitors for 150 each. they are pretty nice. there is edge bleeding of course but it's not noticeable unless the screen is completely black. I love the reflective panel and the way it presents the picture. my older monitor is a samsung that's 3-4 years old. i didn't know i was missing anything until i put it next to the HP.

I bought a very expensive Asus monitor a few weeks ago and tested it out, i wasn't impressed at all. I love their thinish frame specially for multiple monitors but i couldn't stand paying so much for colors that weren't so great compared to my HP.

IPS Monitors are the way to go these days, and games responsiveness on them are actually fine really.

Thanks a lot of them seems to have very similar specs these days and most IPS (I have now looked it up) is the general rule for gaming still don?t go for 5ms go for 2m or under? Does it really matter?

I managed to get 2 HP 2310m monitors for 150 each. they are pretty nice. there is edge bleeding of course but it's not noticeable unless the screen is completely black. I love the reflective panel and the way it presents the picture. my older monitor is a samsung that's 3-4 years old. i didn't know i was missing anything until i put it next to the HP.

I bought a very expensive Asus monitor a few weeks ago and tested it out, i wasn't impressed at all. I love their thinish frame specially for multiple monitors but i couldn't stand paying so much for colors that weren't so great compared to my HP.

Edge bleeding not something I know of on my laptops. Do you know if the HP 2310m is on sale in the UK can?t seem to find it on Amazon UK. Oh and what Asus was it I was looking at some of their new range so would be useful to know what you were looking at.

+1 Any IPS would probably be a good bet.

Yep narrows it down lol not seems a lot of monitors have no USP these days.

samsung ftw.................

Thanks for that, I know this is the older model but what do you or anyone else knows of the http://www.amazon.co.uk/Samsung-PX2370-Widescreen-Monitor-Charcoal/dp/B00388Y7I2/ref=pd_cp_computers_2 PX2370? I guess you might not have this one (state your model won?t you?) Anyone got any reviews of the PX it?s my front runner right now.

Thanks a lot of them seems to have very similar specs these days and most IPS (I have now looked it up) is the general rule for gaming still don?t go for 5ms go for 2m or under? Does it really matter?

You can safely ignore the ms values on pretty much any monitor today. anything 16 or below is fast enough that you won't notice it, and is more than fast enough for gaming.

And on top of that, a 12 ms IPS monitor will in reality be just as fast as a 2-5ms TN monitor, it's only the TN monitor will either be that fast and have crappy colors, or it will have decent colors, but in reality be a 12ms monitor, but in the testign they cheap and only measure white to grey, instead of proper white to black to white.

low ms values only mean that you won't have good saturated colors because the panels is set up to never reach full saturation.

You can safely ignore the ms values on pretty much any monitor today. anything 16 or below is fast enough that you won't notice it, and is more than fast enough for gaming.

And on top of that, a 12 ms IPS monitor will in reality be just as fast as a 2-5ms TN monitor, it's only the TN monitor will either be that fast and have crappy colors, or it will have decent colors, but in reality be a 12ms monitor, but in the testign they cheap and only measure white to grey, instead of proper white to black to white.

low ms values only mean that you won't have good saturated colors because the panels is set up to never reach full saturation.

Thanks so open question for all. Other than the ms ips and res what other factors should I be taking into account for a modern gaming monitor just tft vs. LCD? Other than that aesthetics?

TFT is a kind of LCD.

Here's what you should look for/ignore: http://www.maximumtech.com/display-myths-shattered-how-monitor-hdtv-companies-cook-their-specs

tl;dr: if you're getting an IPS panel, you can't go wrong with any since even the low-end IPSes are superior to any TN monitor you can get. Someone made a thread recently that should help you within the IPS choices https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1004870-2324-ips-monitor-poll/

TFT is a kind of LCD.

Here's what you should look for/ignore: http://www.maximumtech.com/display-myths-shattered-how-monitor-hdtv-companies-cook-their-specs

tl;dr: if you're getting an IPS panel, you can't go wrong with any since even the low-end IPSes are superior to any TN monitor you can get. Someone made a thread recently that should help you within the IPS choices https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1004870-2324-ips-monitor-poll/

Thanks reading. Can anyone give me a mini check over on the specs of these I?ve look at reviews all sing its praises so it seems I can't decide if I even like the look of it rather like a net top screen. http://www.asus.com/Display/LCD_Monitors/MS246H/

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD is supported out of the box in linux because of their open source driver. Nvidia does not. All my systems are amd and all of them work nicely on linux arch without doing anything.
    • Never had a problem with TPM and started using that many years ago in Win10. Through several motherboards and OS versions, it just does what it does without complaint. My games library doesn't even know it's there. Secure boot does a lot more than support anti-cheat, as it came along long before anti-cheat software. I've used it religiously since before I started using TPM, and I always liked it for being able to nullify virus contagions that try their best to come in underneath the firmware during boot, so that the OS doesn't see them, etc. That is its purpose, imo. I'll never understand why people who elect to use another OS feel compelled to run down Windows... I guess they need to do that to feel secure about their choices? I run Windows because it supports all the software (including games) natively that I want to buy, and I've never had to run down another OS to make me feel better about it. (Although it's certainly possible to do that, of course...) Win10 is on a ventilator atm, and Win11 is very close to being free, and I finally got to stop running StartAllBack as I moved to the Experimental/Dev channel and my 26300.8553 build supports the moveable taskbar and it's running fine at the top of the screen! Finally, my last major dislike of Win11 is being rectified! So, I'm not at all surprised to see Win11's share of the Steam survey hitting 70%.
    • I can answer about the Linux bit. I only used AMD GPUs. I currently have a 9060XT (8GB) that fits my needs, I'm not a gamer, so I don't need that much GDDR. But lately, NVIDIA has grown a lot in the recent years. Oh, the horrors of NVIDIA drivers not working. But they have been getting better. I know a lot of members onm here that are running cachyOS and other distros, and are fine with a 4090/5090 variants. Really, though, I would stick with AMD variants.
    • Everything they say you can already do yourself on the registry by changing some things.
    • Artist's renderings are so much nicer to view than the real thing, don't you think?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!