Monitor shootout for new system Samsung vs. Asus vs. LG thoughts?


Recommended Posts

Monitor shootout for new system Samsung vs. Asus vs. LG thoughts? Discussion re what you use for gaming monitors/ your monitor brand of choice. Looking for 3 monitors for a tri monitor system. Use for gaming 1080p support needed no 3d support or touch needed (won?t rule out one of the monitors being touch screen but I?m leaning away from the idea). Other brands considered (dam you Sony for not creating dedicated pc monitors). Current thoughts include but are not limited to http://www.amazon.co.uk/Samsung-PX2370-Widescreen-Monitor-Charcoal/dp/B00388Y7I2/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top and the Asus ?Designo? series and any decent looking and spec good LG. Suggestions as had never had a desktop before and have no idea where to start? Monitor looking stylish would be good but specs come first. Would respect and appreciate any help.

LG sells their good panels and only use the crap ones for their own monitors. out of those three choices I wouldn't pick any one of them. then again, my next monitor I won't be buying one until I can get a good IPS (not the cheapest, but the next step up, anything higher is just to expensive).

LG, as far as i am concerned they are the best I have seen.

You have one, what makes then so good in your eyes (slight pun there given were talking monitors) would you care to quote your model?

LG sells their good panels and only use the crap ones for their own monitors. out of those three choices I wouldn't pick any one of them. then again, my next monitor I won't be buying one until I can get a good IPS (not the cheapest, but the next step up, anything higher is just to expensive).

I assume by panel you mean TV panel? Ok what would you pick? ISP?

I managed to get 2 HP 2310m monitors for 150 each. they are pretty nice. there is edge bleeding of course but it's not noticeable unless the screen is completely black. I love the reflective panel and the way it presents the picture. my older monitor is a samsung that's 3-4 years old. i didn't know i was missing anything until i put it next to the HP.

I bought a very expensive Asus monitor a few weeks ago and tested it out, i wasn't impressed at all. I love their thinish frame specially for multiple monitors but i couldn't stand paying so much for colors that weren't so great compared to my HP.

IPS Monitors are the way to go these days, and games responsiveness on them are actually fine really.

Thanks a lot of them seems to have very similar specs these days and most IPS (I have now looked it up) is the general rule for gaming still don?t go for 5ms go for 2m or under? Does it really matter?

I managed to get 2 HP 2310m monitors for 150 each. they are pretty nice. there is edge bleeding of course but it's not noticeable unless the screen is completely black. I love the reflective panel and the way it presents the picture. my older monitor is a samsung that's 3-4 years old. i didn't know i was missing anything until i put it next to the HP.

I bought a very expensive Asus monitor a few weeks ago and tested it out, i wasn't impressed at all. I love their thinish frame specially for multiple monitors but i couldn't stand paying so much for colors that weren't so great compared to my HP.

Edge bleeding not something I know of on my laptops. Do you know if the HP 2310m is on sale in the UK can?t seem to find it on Amazon UK. Oh and what Asus was it I was looking at some of their new range so would be useful to know what you were looking at.

+1 Any IPS would probably be a good bet.

Yep narrows it down lol not seems a lot of monitors have no USP these days.

samsung ftw.................

Thanks for that, I know this is the older model but what do you or anyone else knows of the http://www.amazon.co.uk/Samsung-PX2370-Widescreen-Monitor-Charcoal/dp/B00388Y7I2/ref=pd_cp_computers_2 PX2370? I guess you might not have this one (state your model won?t you?) Anyone got any reviews of the PX it?s my front runner right now.

Thanks a lot of them seems to have very similar specs these days and most IPS (I have now looked it up) is the general rule for gaming still don?t go for 5ms go for 2m or under? Does it really matter?

You can safely ignore the ms values on pretty much any monitor today. anything 16 or below is fast enough that you won't notice it, and is more than fast enough for gaming.

And on top of that, a 12 ms IPS monitor will in reality be just as fast as a 2-5ms TN monitor, it's only the TN monitor will either be that fast and have crappy colors, or it will have decent colors, but in reality be a 12ms monitor, but in the testign they cheap and only measure white to grey, instead of proper white to black to white.

low ms values only mean that you won't have good saturated colors because the panels is set up to never reach full saturation.

You can safely ignore the ms values on pretty much any monitor today. anything 16 or below is fast enough that you won't notice it, and is more than fast enough for gaming.

And on top of that, a 12 ms IPS monitor will in reality be just as fast as a 2-5ms TN monitor, it's only the TN monitor will either be that fast and have crappy colors, or it will have decent colors, but in reality be a 12ms monitor, but in the testign they cheap and only measure white to grey, instead of proper white to black to white.

low ms values only mean that you won't have good saturated colors because the panels is set up to never reach full saturation.

Thanks so open question for all. Other than the ms ips and res what other factors should I be taking into account for a modern gaming monitor just tft vs. LCD? Other than that aesthetics?

TFT is a kind of LCD.

Here's what you should look for/ignore: http://www.maximumtech.com/display-myths-shattered-how-monitor-hdtv-companies-cook-their-specs

tl;dr: if you're getting an IPS panel, you can't go wrong with any since even the low-end IPSes are superior to any TN monitor you can get. Someone made a thread recently that should help you within the IPS choices https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1004870-2324-ips-monitor-poll/

TFT is a kind of LCD.

Here's what you should look for/ignore: http://www.maximumtech.com/display-myths-shattered-how-monitor-hdtv-companies-cook-their-specs

tl;dr: if you're getting an IPS panel, you can't go wrong with any since even the low-end IPSes are superior to any TN monitor you can get. Someone made a thread recently that should help you within the IPS choices https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1004870-2324-ips-monitor-poll/

Thanks reading. Can anyone give me a mini check over on the specs of these I?ve look at reviews all sing its praises so it seems I can't decide if I even like the look of it rather like a net top screen. http://www.asus.com/Display/LCD_Monitors/MS246H/

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
    • Yes, I actually glossed over the Linux part from the OP. You could always go for a 9070 XT and if you really want to play Ray Traced games in the future, GeForce Now is pretty damn good on Linux https://www.neowin.net/news/nvidias-native-geforce-now-app-for-linux-bridges-the-gaming-gap-hands-on/
    • One reason it might be running hotter is dust build up within the cooling or perhaps the paste has dried out. You could always try repasting your old GPU and cleaning the cooler. Your experience in Linux will be much better with an AMD GPU; the performance in gaming is much closer to Windows than nVidia would be. I personally think on Windows, AMD drivers are junk.
    • I reviewed it back in March, but I didn't have a 5070 at the time https://www.neowin.net/reviews/amd-rx-9070-review-vs-rtx-5070-4070-and-rx-9070-xt-7800-xt--just-good-enough/ When I reviewed the 9070 I did have a 5070 to compare it against, so the scores are there for the 9070 XT. it outperforms the 5070 in raster, and is barely neck and neck in Ray Tracing. So it's better than a 5070 in everything but Ray Tracing where it is neck and neck, or just under. To be honest, the uplift from 3080 when it was new to the 9070 XT is not as great a step up. If you can find a used 4080 Super for around the same money, you would probably be better off, but if you only want to buy new then the 16GB 9070 XT is the best value for money in its category.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!