LibreOffice 3.4.2 Final


Recommended Posts

NveE3.png

LibreOffice is the free power-packed Open Source personal productivity suite for Windows, Macintosh and Linux, that gives you six feature-rich applications for all your document production and data processing needs: Writer, Calc, Impress, Draw, Math and Base. Support and documentation is free from our large, dedicated community of users, contributors and developers. You, too, can also get involved!

klzfc.png Link: Homepage

Ck093.gif Download: LibreOffice 3.4.2 for Windows

Ck093.gif Download: LibreOffice 3.4.2 for Mac OS

Ck093.gif Download: LibreOffice 3.4.2 for Linux

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1016156-libreoffice-342-final/
Share on other sites

Are they still working on this for real? They are at least 8 years behind Microsoft in terms of interface, features, optimization, number of applications and number of bugs. Same goes for OpenOffice.

I never understood people that are so cheap they won?t even spend $300 on a solid Office suite. This and the OS are the base of everything.

At best they could merge the OpenOffice team with the LibreOffice team and work together on really deploying a good product and enter the competition with Microsoft.

Are they still working on this for real? They are at least 8 years behind Microsoft in terms of interface, features, optimization, number of applications and number of bugs. Same goes for OpenOffice.

I never understood people that are so cheap they won?t even spend $300 on a solid Office suite. This and the OS are the base of everything.

At best they could merge the OpenOffice team with the LibreOffice team and work together on really deploying a good product and enter the competition with Microsoft.

Troll much? Most people don't think MS Office is worth it, perhaps that's why I've never seen a copy of office outside of the workplace that was genuine :-P

Are they still working on this for real? They are at least 8 years behind Microsoft in terms of interface, features, optimization, number of applications and number of bugs. Same goes for OpenOffice.

I never understood people that are so cheap they won?t even spend $300 on a solid Office suite. This and the OS are the base of everything.

At best they could merge the OpenOffice team with the LibreOffice team and work together on really deploying a good product and enter the competition with Microsoft.

First off this is a branch of OpenOffice (only it has been developed further)

Second it contains nearly every feature Microsoft Office does only it does it for free

Third, Who cares if it is not "exactly Microsoft office" Because it is a free alternative that is compatable and allows normal low income families to have a fully functional Office suite) as far as i am concerned they are doing a GREAT service to the world with thier work. Where as Microsoft creates a new version with a few new features every other year and charges Hundreds of dollars for it.

Are they still working on this for real? They are at least 8 years behind Microsoft in terms of interface, features, optimization, number of applications and number of bugs. Same goes for OpenOffice.

I never understood people that are so cheap they won?t even spend $300 on a solid Office suite. This and the OS are the base of everything.

At best they could merge the OpenOffice team with the LibreOffice team and work together on really deploying a good product and enter the competition with Microsoft.

you clearly no nothing. Firstly oracle refuse to let openoffice and libreoffice merge so that won't happen. Secondly $300 is a huge amount of money, not everyone is rich and can afford 27" imacs and other ridiculously expensive things. Libreoffice is free and has the functionality that 95%+ of the people need.

Are they still working on this for real? They are at least 8 years behind Microsoft in terms of interface, features, optimization, number of applications and number of bugs. Same goes for OpenOffice.

I never understood people that are so cheap they won?t even spend $300 on a solid Office suite. This and the OS are the base of everything.

At best they could merge the OpenOffice team with the LibreOffice team and work together on really deploying a good product and enter the competition with Microsoft.

That you ask if "they" are still working on "this" seriously shows your ignorance! What don't you understand about the fact that not everyone who uses a PC, comes from the US or wealthy first world countries!!

Only $300.00 equates to about R3000.00 in my currency. A **** load of people do not earn that sort of money monthly!! The other part that you also do not seem to get is that Open Office and LibreOffice office are NOT competing with Microsoft's' equivalent product!

Lastly OpenOffice is now "owned" by Oracle (It still is open source.) LibreOffice is an Open Source personal productivity suite for Windows, Macintosh and Linux that is community-driven and developed software which is a project of the not-for-profit organization, The Document Foundation.

First off this is a branch of OpenOffice (only it has been developed further)

Second it contains nearly every feature Microsoft Office does only it does it for free

Third, Who cares if it is not "exactly Microsoft office" Because it is a free alternative that is compatable and allows normal low income families to have a fully functional Office suite) as far as i am concerned they are doing a GREAT service to the world with thier work. Where as Microsoft creates a new version with a few new features every other year and charges Hundreds of dollars for it.

It is very feature limited, or at the very least, the interface disallows straightforward access to these features.

Everything is hidden somewhere, while it is easily findable in MS Office.

Not true, MS Office improved drastically over the years.

My University switched form 2007 to 2010 and I have to say, if 2007 was God-tier, 2010 is Dao-Tier.

you clearly no nothing. Firstly oracle refuse to let openoffice and libreoffice merge so that won't happen. Secondly $300 is a huge amount of money, not everyone is rich and can afford 27" imacs and other ridiculously expensive things. Libreoffice is free and has the functionality that 95%+ of the people need.

Quick search on Google gave ~$100

That is the price of two video games these days.

Not anywhere near ridiculously expensive.

LibreOffice still has issues opening simple files.

Had many instances of "This should be one page, but FailOffice opens it as two" and so on.

It is a joke.

That you ask if "they" are still working on "this" seriously shows your ignorance! What don't you understand about the fact that not everyone who uses a PC, comes from the US or wealthy first world countries!!

Only $300.00 equates to about R3000.00 in my currency. A **** load of people do not earn that sort of money monthly!! The other part that you also do not seem to get is that Open Office and LibreOffice office are NOT competing with Microsoft's' equivalent product!

Lastly OpenOffice is now "owned" by Oracle (It still is open source.) LibreOffice is an Open Source personal productivity suite for Windows, Macintosh and Linux that is community-driven and developed software which is a project of the not-for-profit organization, The Document Foundation.

Those that do not want to pay can simply pirate the product. Why bother with FailOffice LibreOffice?

It is very feature limited, or at the very least, the interface disallows straightforward access to these features.

Everything is hidden somewhere, while it is easily findable in MS Office.

Not true, MS Office improved drastically over the years.

My University switched form 2007 to 2010 and I have to say, if 2007 was God-tier, 2010 is Dao-Tier.

Quick search on Google gave ~$100

That is the price of two video games these days.

Not anywhere near ridiculously expensive.

LibreOffice still has issues opening simple files.

Had many instances of "This should be one page, but FailOffice opens it as two" and so on.

It is a joke.

Those that do not want to pay can simply pirate the product. Why bother with FailOffice LibreOffice?

You're a joke.

I don't think you understand the fact that the vast majority of people don't need all those obscure features that Microsoft claims it has. People want a word processor, a slideshow app, and a spreadsheet app. They get all that, and LibreOffice is quite close to what Microsoft offers. It doesn't need every single feature to be useful to the vast majority of people, just like Google Docs doesn't need all those extra features to take off, and Google Docs is taking off.

Are they still working on this for real? They are at least 8 years behind Microsoft in terms of interface, features, optimization, number of applications and number of bugs. Same goes for OpenOffice.

I never understood people that are so cheap they won?t even spend $300 on a solid Office suite. This and the OS are the base of everything.

At best they could merge the OpenOffice team with the LibreOffice team and work together on really deploying a good product and enter the competition with Microsoft.

So cheap they don't spend 300 ?

WTF is wrong with the kids here at Neowin ?

Do you have a family ?

300$ is a lot of money for something most people use once a year. Most people use Word to update their CV and that's it. And for that Open Office and Libre Office no matter what MS babies like to say is more than enough.

So cheap they don't spend 300 ?

WTF is wrong with the kids here at Neowin ?

Do you have a family ?

300$ is a lot of money for something most people use once a year. Most people use Word to update their CV and that's it. And for that Open Office and Libre Office no matter what MS babies like to say is more than enough.

Indeed. Office should be free.

Heck, you can do everything better with Latex if you know how to use it.

Indeed. Office should be free.

No it should not. But unless you own a cie the price is simply too high for the average joe.

The home and student version is 160$. It includes Word, Excel and PowerPoint only. The license is very restrictive and it can't be used for any activity beside home activities and this include non profit activities. I'm not even sure you can legally use Excel to track the lemonade stand of your daugther ...

The lack of acess and publisher makes it totally useless for a lot of students. PowerPoint is totally useless for most home users. So basically i don't know who is supposed to buy this. Most students already get a full version for free from their school. Home users will use Word and Excel only and 160$ for 2 softwares coming with a very restrictive license is a lot of money.

MS Office Pro is a good product for a cie (small, medium or large). But the home and student version is underwhelming at best. Not worth the price asked for it if you are a home users and legally only do what you are suppoed to do with it which is next to nothing considering the license.

If you are going to make a CV only Libre Office do the job. If you need Office for job then ask your boss to buy you a license. If you want to start a cie then it's a good investment.

How about you guys let others use whatever they want instead of preaching? I don't get how this affect you.

Yeah you are right and anyway it's probably just trolling.

Couldn't find a changelog for this release, good news nonetheless. I use LibreOffice for home use on Linux, although I do have MS Office 2007 for Windows. I must admit that aside from the UI looking like total ass compared to newer versions of office, it's pretty much the most feature complete office suite that many people could ask for, and it boggles the mind how a competitive office suite can be offered for free.

=====================

Also, (despite the obvious trolling) lmao at the people that think that not spending $160-300 on features they'll never need makes us cheapskates. Some people actually don't have thousands of <insert currency here> lying around to spend on the latest update to Microsoft Office. I certainly don't since the newer versions of LibreOffice seem to do everything that I need them to do.

For $300, I was talking about the business suite that even includes Outlook in there. You can easily get away with Windows Live Mail and Windows Calendar if you?re not so much into scheduling rendezvous and connecting with everybody. If you only need Word, Excel and Powerpoint, you can get it for $150, taxes included. If you can?t afford to pay $150 for a robust Office suite every 6-7 years, why can you even afford a computer? Nobody said you needed to upgrade on every release. ;)

Yes I know it?s multi-platform, which is also a synonym of slow.

I still use Office 2003 at my job, and they were thinking of switching the whole company to LibreOffice or OpenOffice. After some research, they?re much better off staying with Office 2003 and I am not kidding. These open source projects don?t do much more. It?s not that I don?t believe in free and open source projects, there are great things out there, but such a huge project really needs a lot of devoted people and it doesn?t really ever happen.

I know LibreOffice and OpenOffice can do a lot, but God everything?s so wrong and badly implemented it?s ridiculous. It looks like an engineering application, and I have yet to see an engineering application with an native, intuitive and fast interface.

About Oracle not merging LibreOffice and OpenOffice together, they still thought about killing OpenOffice. Doesn?t that tell you how bad it is?

?

By the way, as you can see in my sig, yes I do have an iMac. I have it because I hate Microsoft to death and was tired of Windows. But I do owe them a lot of respect for their Office suite. In the past decade, nobody has ever approached its feature set and robustness yet, not the LibreOffice team, not the OpenOffice team, and not Apple?s team either.

I use ms office 2007 at work, but I just have no use for it at home. For the odd times I need to edit a document LibreOffice does just fine.

It doesn't look that pretty, but with the faenza icons it doesn't look that bad either. I mean, we've been dealing with that crappy UI on ms office for years, and now it's such a big deal?

About Oracle not merging LibreOffice and OpenOffice together, they still thought about killing OpenOffice. Doesn?t that tell you how bad it is?

Oracle wanted to kill OO.org because there was no way to monetize it, not because it was bad. Besides, OO.org is all but dead now anyway, since the LibreOffice team have pushed forward without Oracle, and left them behind.

Yes I know it?s multi-platform, which is also a synonym of slow.

No it's not, it's a synonym of "I use Linux, and Microsoft don't do an office suite for Linux, so I use an office suite that I can use on Linux".

=========================

LibreOffice/OpenOffice offer a competitive suite of office utilities for free. Granted, MS Office is better, but to me, it's not ?150 better for what I use it for, and it's still three applications vs six.

Seriously, I don't understand the hate. Has LibreOffice somehow offended you because it gives people a free office suite?

Seriously, I don't understand the hate. Has LibreOffice somehow offended you because it gives people a free office suite?

You?ll find it funny because in fact it does offend me every day. The story?s a little complicated, but here it goes :

The company where I work for has Office 2003 and Access 97, they are overdue for a change. They asked for companies to deploy Office 2010 on their 3000 computers or something, with the best support, cheapest price, etc.

Now, a journalist wrote a nice article saying we weren?t looking for alternatives like LibreOffice and OpenOffice. Result, instead of working with Office 2010 all summer, I?m working with an antique piece of software, buggy, slow as a dog and unoptimized for my dual-core computer. What this journalist doesn?t know is, it?s clearly not viable to switch to this. It has uncertain future, it?s not robust, and we would have gazillions of compatibility problems with our existing documents. The guy wrote that in the newspaper just to create **** and gain fame.

Having tried LibreOffice and OpenOffice this year, I realized that we would gain nothing over Office 2003, except more problems.

I put OpenOffice (well now LibreOffice) on all my new non-business builds if the customer wants it and doesn't have Wordperfect (lawyers tend to prefer it) or MS Office to put on it. I do tell them we can't guarantee the speed or compatibility of the program but people want something better than the crappy stuff that comes with Windows 7. We still suggest MS Office for business use though.

You?ll find it funny because in fact it does offend me every day. The story?s a little complicated, but here it goes :

The company where I work for has Office 2003 and Access 97, they are overdue for a change. They asked for companies to deploy Office 2010 on their 3000 computers or something, with the best support, cheapest price, etc.

Now, a journalist wrote a nice article saying we weren?t looking for alternatives like LibreOffice and OpenOffice. Result, instead of working with Office 2010 all summer, I?m working with an antique piece of software, buggy, slow as a dog and unoptimized for my dual-core computer. What this journalist doesn?t know is, it?s clearly not viable to switch to this. It has uncertain future, it?s not robust, and we would have gazillions of compatibility problems with our existing documents. The guy wrote that in the newspaper just to create **** and gain fame.

Having tried LibreOffice and OpenOffice this year, I realized that we would gain nothing over Office 2003, except more problems.

Yeah that's pretty bad. I don't think I'd be in a place at the minute to recommend LibreOffice in a corporate environment when the MS Office UI is so far ahead. I certainly wouldn't recommend rolling it out as a replacement to office without testing the water first. But for personal use, I still recommend it to people, since if they don't like it, they haven't spent anything, and can still upgrade to Office if they're disgruntled enough.

About Oracle not merging LibreOffice and OpenOffice together, they still thought about killing OpenOffice. Doesn?t that tell you how bad it is?

Actually, if anything, that tells me that it is pretty good, since it seems that Oracle is intent on killing anything that was good about Sun.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!