Want to buy a used 2009 Audi A3


Recommended Posts

I'm starting to consider replacing my aging 2003 Suzuki Aerio and I want to upgrade. I want to upgrade big time, to a use Audi A3.

Some local info: I'm in Montreal, Quebec.

I've been looking over local dealers and I'm finding 2008 Premium A3's hovering between $20,000 to $25,000 with good mileage (around 50,000km).

Ideally I would like to get a 2009 model, since Audi upgraded the A3 a bit. I'm finding those models in a similar price range (but tending to be more expensive, obviously).

How much do you think a premium A3 (with or without Quattro, with reasonable mileage - 20,000km/year driven) would go for at auction? Dealers can certify the car but you pay a huge premium when buying from them. If you have the auction alternative available, it seems like it might be better.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1017658-want-to-buy-a-used-2009-audi-a3/
Share on other sites

Buy an A4 Avant, honestly ... A3 is just a golf ... engine layout and everything else is very 'typical' car, front heavy ... A4 has engine and transmission in center of car for best center of gravity and handling. A4 is really where Audi starts. The 09 A3 you are looking at is still a 7 year old car, whereas B7 A4's were released in 06.

Buy an A4 Avant, honestly ... A3 is just a golf ... engine layout and everything else is very 'typical' car, front heavy ... A4 has engine and transmission in center of car for best center of gravity and handling. A4 is really where Audi starts. The 09 A3 you are looking at is still a 7 year old car, whereas B7 A4's were released in 06.

I understand what you're saying. However, there are a few things about the A3 whichI really like that the A4 (to my knowledge) does not have:

1. It's small. I like small cars. The 200hp engine and 207lbs of torque will make it go fast for less.

2. DSG transmission. I wants me my dual-clutch and paddle shifters. (I drive standard now, btw; but the conept of dual-clutch and paddels I really like).

3. It's less expensive compared to a comparable A4. I'm on a budget and I would rather spend the same money on a 'newer' A3 than an 'older' A4 (in actual age and not model year age).

4. It's more like a GTI than a vanilla Golf. And the GTI I like, but the A3 is nicer (in my opinion).

I understand that the current model of the A3 has effectively been around since 2006 (earlier if consider that the 2006 update was more of a facelift rather than a redesign), but model version is less a factor to me than feature set and quality. Even if they replace the A3 next year, I won't be able to afford the new one so I will be stuck with the current model. Similarly for the A4. The current model is unaffordable for me, even used, and the previous model is not what I'm looking for.

I understand what you're saying. However, there are a few things about the A3 whichI really like that the A4 (to my knowledge) does not have:

1. It's small. I like small cars. The 200hp engine and 207lbs of torque will make it go fast for less.

2. DSG transmission. I wants me my dual-clutch and paddle shifters. (I drive standard now, btw; but the conept of dual-clutch and paddels I really like).

3. It's less expensive compared to a comparable A4. I'm on a budget and I would rather spend the same money on a 'newer' A3 than an 'older' A4 (in actual age and not model year age).

4. It's more like a GTI than a vanilla Golf. And the GTI I like, but the A3 is nicer (in my opinion).

I understand that the current model of the A3 has effectively been around since 2006 (earlier if consider that the 2006 update was more of a facelift rather than a redesign), but model version is less a factor to me than feature set and quality. Even if they replace the A3 next year, I won't be able to afford the new one so I will be stuck with the current model. Similarly for the A4. The current model is unaffordable for me, even used, and the previous model is not what I'm looking for.

Well you seem to know what you want :) and I respect that a lot ... but when the next gen A3 comes out next year it will significantly depreciate all current A3's. I was in same boat as you, eventually decided with the Avant but that's because family is expanding; you may not be there yet :p ... I did a few minor suspension updates (Rs4 sway bar and structs+springs) and my Avant feels as lively as ever (I came from a e46 M3). Since you already drive a stick ... PLEASE STICK WITH IT ... the A4 has the slickest transmission I have ever driven, it is truly a joy but to each their own. a DSG A3 won't be 'cheap'. Anyhoo, a 07 A4 6-speed should be similarly priced to 09 DSG A3 and it is significantly 'more car' but for sure not as 'compact', and if I was younger I wouldn't take my own advice ... hehe... either way good luck. Do test drive both side by side, you WILL notice a difference and be surprised (if you haven't already)

How much do you think a premium A3 (with or without Quattro, with reasonable mileage - 20,000km/year driven) would go for at auction? Dealers can certify the car but you pay a huge premium when buying from them. If you have the auction alternative available, it seems like it might be better.

Definitely go the auction route. The price will be about 20% less than a similar dealer certified model.

Just find a good broker with the license and pay no more than $500-1000 commission for the deal.

I can't help with the decision on whether to go to auction or with a dealer but I just got an 06 A3 S-Line with the 3.2 and Quattro from a dealer (I know, I know) and absolutely love it. It was a bit more expensive than I would want to spend on an 06 but the smile it puts on my face when I drive it is totally worth it :D and it was only at 60,000 km so it still looks and feels brand new. Good luck on your search!

I also wanted to add that the DSG is definitely a different beast than driving a manual or an automatic. It's a fantastic transmission and can shift faster than you can take your hand off the paddle but I still miss the good old manual some times. Ah well, it was worth it to trade up to a v6 and quattro :)

I also wanted to add that the DSG is definitely a different beast than driving a manual or an automatic. It's a fantastic transmission and can shift faster than you can take your hand off the paddle but I still miss the good old manual some times. Ah well, it was worth it to trade up to a v6 and quattro :)

If you ask me, unless it's a Supercar-grade dual clutch paddle shifter transmission like those found in Ferraris and Zondas, then I don't care if the transmission can shift faster than I can.

For street use, performance difference in shifting speeds is irrelevant in the application of a daily driver. With the manual you can heel & toe and rev match on your own and have fun using all 3 pedals like a boss.

My desire for paddle shifters comes from driving a standard for so long. I like the concept of having an automatic (particularly for stop and go traffic and highway congestion), but which I can then switch to a manual mode that gives me more control when I want to open up on the highway or force downshifts. Since it's not an automatic gearbox (which can simulate, to some extent, what I'm talking about) I will have the power and control I want, when I want it.

And paddle shifters are cool. I may be jumping onto the paddle fad, but I don't care. The car will be 4 to 6 years which, in the grand scheme, is not too long.

Those are perfectly good reasons to get a car with a manumatic transmission. The issue now remains finding the car with paddle shifters that work. If they do actually work in the A3, then by all means go for it :cool:

A lot of cars out there offer "manumatic" transmissions that are useless because they'll sometimes shift for you in manual mode. I have a feeling that it's typically higher end cars that have transmissions that actually give you full control in manual mode, like the M3's DCT.

On the DSG, my beef with them is that they never have an appropriate mode. D is too lethargic, S is too energtic, whenever I'm in a DSG car I always wish for a mode somewhere in the middle - i.e. one that keeps the revs in an appropriate range so it doesn't have to double-downshift when you put your foot down, but equally doesn't sit on the red line any time you come off the gas.

Buy an A4 Avant, honestly ... A3 is just a golf ... engine layout and everything else is very 'typical' car, front heavy ... A4 has engine and transmission in center of car for best center of gravity and handling. A4 is really where Audi starts. The 09 A3 you are looking at is still a 7 year old car, whereas B7 A4's were released in 06.

I...er...the engine in an A4 is not in the center of the car, it is in the front of the car, probably as far forward as they could manage in the usual Audi fashion.

don't audi's tend to go to complete **** once they hit about 90/100 k on the engine? i would avoid them like the plague.

WHAT? you've been lied to, sir!

######'s engines are ones of the most reliable in the World! Audi's father, August Horch, was an engineer and a pioneer of the automobile industry having built his first auto in 1901! He had worked with Karl Benz before that.

Audi/VW's engines have been praised by the industry and won numerous awards for innovation and reliability!

In the most recent history, check out the annual winners of the International Engine of the Year Award where ######'s legendary 1.8T/2.0T engine won consecutively for five years from 2005 to 2009! Audi's newest 2.5L T 5 cyl has been the king in it's class in the last two years!

Audi's 6.0 liter V12 turbo deisel was a world's first and remains one of the most powerful engines with a wooping 1000 newton per meter torque!

Audi's won numerous racing completions (rallies, Le Mans) thanks to it's expertise...

I could go on and on...

p.s. it's no brainer to ruin even the most reliable engine...feed it cheap fuel, don't maintain it properly,...in winter, rev it high up as soon as you start it despite the fact that the engine hasn't been warmed up enough...it's so easy! The problem is that people do this all the time knowingly or unknowingly and then they complain about the quality when it's clearly their fault, not the manufacturer's.

p.s. #2. If the aforementioned isn't convincing enough for you, check out this link too for a list of used Audi's for sale with up to 500,000 km on them and still running!!! To put it in perspective, Earth's equatorial circumference is 40,000 km - so these cars have virtually circled the globe 12 times!

I suppose my next question is this:

How much (in the Canadian market, since cars in the US are stupid cheap in general) would an A3 with the following specs cost at auction? (20% less, as noted earlier, is a good indicator but I would like to consider some actual prices if they are available).

2009 model year

2.0T with Premium package (equivalent to Premium Plus in the US); effectively, fully loaded minus the S-Line package. I don't need the sunroof either.

DSG transmission

with or without Quattro

Under 75000km

WHAT? you've been lied to, sir!

######'s engines are ones of the most reliable in the World! Audi's father, August Horch, was an engineer and a pioneer of the automobile industry having built his first auto in 1901! He had worked with Karl Benz before that.

Volks engines are generally quite reliable, but its founder has little to do with how the company is today. If that were the case, Honda would still be making fun cars :/

WHAT? you've been lied to, sir!

no im right... uncle had an a6 wagon. soon as it hit 80k it was in the shop. it was so bad that Audi actually gave him a full refund for the car 2 and ahalf years after he bought it because it was in the shop for 8 months out of the next 12.

also

The 2011 Audi A3 reliability score of 5.0 out of 10 is the Predicted Reliability rating provided by J.D. Power and Associates. This score is based on trending the past three years of historical initial quality and dependability data from J.D. Power's automotive studies, specifically the Vehicle Dependability Study (VDS) and the Initial Quality Study (IQS).

Audi gives the 2011 A3 a new vehicle limited warranty that's good for four years or 50,000 miles. Audi also offers twelve years of protection against corrosion. As a bonus, the first scheduled maintenance after the first 5,000 miles or 12 months is free.

http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/Audi_A3/Reliability/

these are for the 2009 model below...

audi.jpg

audi2.jpg

audi's and VW are **** now. i don't care about power. i'm glad they are efficient. but who cares. no one buys audi for power...

in summary... junk. i appreciate that the older generations are great, but not the newer ones... as i got the handi down 86 jetta from my dad that ran like gold even at 350 k on it.

On the DSG, my beef with them is that they never have an appropriate mode. D is too lethargic, S is too energtic, whenever I'm in a DSG car I always wish for a mode somewhere in the middle - i.e. one that keeps the revs in an appropriate range so it doesn't have to double-downshift when you put your foot down, but equally doesn't sit on the red line any time you come off the gas.

I...er...the engine in an A4 is not in the center of the car, it is in the front of the car, probably as far forward as they could manage in the usual Audi fashion.

... now you're being 'funny' ... the A4, like BMW, Mercedes. & most luxury sports sedans positions the longitudinal engine so crankshaft is parallel to length of car, hence the mount of a transmission sits dead center and doesn't have to be compact like in most 4 bangers & odd entry level v6's

I suppose my next question is this:

How much (in the Canadian market, since cars in the US are stupid cheap in general) would an A3 with the following specs cost at auction? (20% less, as noted earlier, is a good indicator but I would like to consider some actual prices if they are available).

2009 model year

2.0T with Premium package (equivalent to Premium Plus in the US); effectively, fully loaded minus the S-Line package. I don't need the sunroof either.

DSG transmission

with or without Quattro

Under 75000km

Since it's a closed auction, the final sales numbers are private and, naturally, they are unavailable beforehand.

Nevertheless, your car shouldn't cost more than $20,000-22,000 (including broker's commission).

Do you know any auto auction brokers? If you don't, you can visit a few local used car dealerships and talk to them. These guys have the license and you can try negotiating a deal with them. Some will be strongly against it and will try to rip you off by offering you the retail show-room price - don't fall for that. Tell them exactly what you want. Make sure to specify that you need a green line car (no accidents) and you're only willing to pay $500-1000 commission tops. The car will never have to use their precious show-room space, so make it clear that you won't pay the retail price :)

Of course, it's best to find people who specialize in these kinds of auction deals.

no im right... uncle had an a6 wagon. soon as it hit 80k it was in the shop. it was so bad that Audi actually gave him a full refund for the car 2 and ahalf years after he bought it because it was in the shop for 8 months out of the next 12.

Sure, you are /sarcasm :laugh:

I feel bad for your uncle, although I don't fully believe this anecdotal story of yours. The only thing you've convinced me of is that Audi's warranty is reliable since your uncle got a refund after all, didn't he? ;) :D

Besides, do you just trust all authorized service dealers? Just keep in mind that they're operated independently as a franchise, only interested in profits, and, generally, make more bucks from the service dept. than new sales.

Did your uncle meet the mechanic, did he talk directly to him? I doubt that since a rep takes care of customer service. In that case, how do you know that they didn't screw up? What was so complicated there that the car needed 8 months of service? Do they lack experience in fixing cars or something? :laugh: Have they had proper official Audi training? Even if they had to wait for some rare part from Germany, it shouldn't have taken that long...unless there had been a car accident before and some bureaucratic delay with the insurance caused the delay. So, was the car ever in a car accident?

Now, since it seems that personal stories are more credible to you, my current 2006 A4 2.0TFSI Quattro with 109,000 km on it should have failed 10,000 km ago! The only thing I've had done to the engine outside of regular maintenance so far is changing a PCV valve ($90), its gasket ($20), and the valve cover gasket ($30) + $100 for the labour.

In the past, my old folks used to own a 1995 Audi A6 and sold it in 2000 with 150,000 km - no major repairs.

http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/Audi_A3/Reliability/

these are for the 2009 model below...

audi.jpg

audi2.jpg

audi's and VW are **** now. i don't care about power. i'm glad they are efficient. but who cares. no one buys audi for power...

JD Power's rating is laughable. I always get a kick out of each new annual rating.Last year Kia was more reliable than Audi (I have no grudge against Kia as I'm myself a proud owner of one), and this year Chrysler is more reliable than Audi :laugh: and GMC, Hyundai, and Subaru are rated higher than BMW - the rating is such a joke.

Just like credit rating agencies (S&P, Moody's) are a political tool to preserve American interests abroad (dollar hegemony), JD Power is another political tool acting in the interests of the American industry.

in summary... junk. i appreciate that the older generations are great, but not the newer ones... as i got the handi down 86 jetta from my dad that ran like gold even at 350 k on it.

This is laughable :laugh: Newer gen VW/Audi's are by all means better than their predecessors, surely they aren't worse... In that used cars list I linked in my previous post, you can find mid-2000's Audis with 300,000+ km on them..like this beautiful white 2006 A6 Avant 2.7TDI with 487,000 km and still running!

---

VW Group is simply the strongest, the most innovative player in the auto industry in this day and age. I don't have to resort to fanboyism because the facts speak for themselves. It's the most profitable, the most successful, and the most diverse auto consortium today spanning product offerings from mass market brands such as VW, Seat, and Skoda to luxury Audi to exclusive brands such as Bentley, Bugatti, and Lamborghini, and to heavy trucks MAN and SCANIA. In 2010, even before merging with Porsche, VW Group netted 6.8 billion euros (9.1 billion dollars @ 1.35) vs GM's $6.1B vs Toyota's $5B.

Audi's sales have been growing year after year setting new sales records. If they make unreliable engines - then why do more and more people buy Audis with each new year?

VW Group is simply the strongest, the most innovative player in the auto industry in this day and age. I don't have to resort to fanboyism because the facts speak for themselves. It's the most profitable, the most successful, and the most diverse auto consortium today spanning product offerings from mass market brands such as VW, Seat, and Skoda to luxury Audi to exclusive brands such as Bentley, Bugatti, and Lamborghini, and to heavy trucks MAN and SCANIA. In 2010, even before merging with Porsche, VW Group netted 6.8 billion euros (9.1 billion dollars @ 1.35) vs GM's $6.1B vs Toyota's $5B.

If that whole paragraph doesn't sound like fanboyism, then I don't know what is. Besides, you just explained to yourself why VW is so profitable, listing all the brands they own. Older Volks are renown for having electronics gremlins. The engines you are right, they are quite reliable (even the VR6), but it's everything else that you have to worry about, and that also goes for most car companies.

I could write an equally factual impressive sounding paragraph for Nissan, Honda, Toyota (pre 90s times) or BMW but I won't make any lies because I'm biased and love those makes.

I just bought a new 2011 GTI this winter and I've looked at numerous used A4 and A3's. A4s are downright ugly until 2009 (when they redesinged the model). I really miss not having the quattro system tho which is spectacular!

That being said, I'll NEVER buy another engine than the 2.0T (or whatever equivalent comes next). Economic and peppy. Reliable as ever.

If that whole paragraph doesn't sound like fanboyism, then I don't know what is. Besides, you just explained to yourself why VW is so profitable, listing all the brands they own. Older Volks are renown for having electronics gremlins. The engines you are right, they are quite reliable (even the VR6), but it's everything else that you have to worry about, and that also goes for most car companies.

I could write an equally factual impressive sounding paragraph for Nissan, Honda, Toyota (pre 90s times) or BMW but I won't make any lies because I'm biased and love those makes.

VW had problems only until 2004-2005ish. They're getting better and better now. Fact is, I've been looking at EVERY car company in a decent price range and VW is the only vehicule I got in that screamed QUALITY.

JD Power's rating is laughable. I always get a kick out of each new annual rating.Last year Kia was more reliable than Audi (I have no grudge against Kia as I'm myself a proud owner of one), and this year Chrysler is more reliable than Audi :laugh: and GMC, Hyundai, and Subaru are rated higher than BMW - the rating is such a joke.

im not trying to hate on your faboy car crush, but do you have any other companies saying differently about audi's? sure their engines are great, but what about the rest? Why can't Kia's and Hyundiai and other asian cart makers be more reliable? (which most of them are) That's just your bias saying Kia's are crap. They are actually good cars now, same with hyundai. just because they don't have the 50-60 year rep, doesn't mean they are bad. profits don't equal reliability. that's like saying transofmers 3 is a good movie because it made a lot of money...

If that whole paragraph doesn't sound like fanboyism, then I don't know what is. Besides, you just explained to yourself why VW is so profitable, listing all the brands they own. Older Volks are renown for having electronics gremlins. The engines you are right, they are quite reliable (even the VR6), but it's everything else that you have to worry about, and that also goes for most car companies.

I could write an equally factual impressive sounding paragraph for Nissan, Honda, Toyota (pre 90s times) or BMW but I won't make any lies because I'm biased and love those makes.

this.

Of course it's reliable, it's a 2011. When you'll sell it, ask the 2nd owner how it's running.

those 2 sentences have nothing to do with each other. that's why they were separated into 2 different paragraphs!!!!!!

Haters gonna hate...

If that whole paragraph doesn't sound like fanboyism, then I don't know what is.

I could write an equally factual impressive sounding paragraph for Nissan, Honda, Toyota (pre 90s times) or BMW but I won't make any lies because I'm biased and love those makes.

It's not fanboyism, blind liking for something with a negative connotation, if it's backed up with hard data, the facts. And no, you cannot claim that any other auto group excels in all those areas (profitability, volumes, market share, diversity, reliability, innovation) at the same time (except for BMW Group and Daimler AG).

You cannot substitute VW for Nissan and write a similar paragraph - that would be lying because the facts wouldn't support your claim as, for example, Nissan makes nearly twice as less cars as VW Group does (>4 mill vs. 7.1+ mil).

im not trying to hate on your faboy car crush, but do you have any other companies saying differently about audi's? sure their engines are great, but what about the rest? Why can't Kia's and Hyundiai and other asian cart makers be more reliable? (which most of them are) That's just your bias saying Kia's are crap. They are actually good cars now, same with hyundai. just because they don't have the 50-60 year rep, doesn't mean they are bad. profits don't equal reliability. that's like saying transofmers 3 is a good movie because it made a lot of money...

Reading and comprehension fail?

I am a Kia owner (2003 Sedona). I never said they were crap. I know they are reliable!

However, the technological gap between Kia and VW is like 20 years at least. And you know what? There's absolutely nothing wrong with that. Not all companies have to innovate. Some just use proven, tested, reliable technologies and this becomes their thing - their edge. Kia/Hyundai are like Dell Inc. They spend very little on in-house R&D. They don't have to be the first to present the very latest technological thing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel, outlets, and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you are at a scale where that minor cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 and beyond WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to as well as all your access layer switches below. This should be a fully managed 10g+ switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports, a few 25g uplink ports are nice for this switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own access layer switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. If your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. If you are at the point of considering a 48-port switch, I would instead get a nice high-end distribution switch for things that need it, and cheaper access layer switches with specs based on the needs of connected devices. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue. Just make sure you always connect them to your distribution/main switch, don't daisy chain, the path should never have more steps than Client>Access>Distribution>Firewall>Internet or Client>Access>Distribution>Server if it is local.
    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!