Recommended Posts

OK, silly question, but I'm in college, and the game's at home (hopefully), so I don't know. :p Does MW3 have an "online pass"? Hopefully not.

BTW, I had an Xbox Live message from a friend last night (which was probably a "message to all friends") simply saying... (major spoiler, unless you've been watching recent MW3 videos on YouTube, in which case, you've already seen it in the comments :p )

SOAP DIES IN MW3!!!!!!!!!!!

Git. Treating it like Harry Potter. :p

To be fair, in Madden they did re-use all the same coach models from Madden 2010, and some player models. Coach Tony Sparano is still a fat tub of lard in Madden 12, though, in real life now he has lost around 80lbs and is fairly thin.

But that is a different department in EA, and one where they have no competition thanks to the contract with the NFL, (which expires in 2012, I believe) and until that contract does expire, there won't be any competition in that market, and if they reach a new one, well, we are all stuck with the same Madden. :(

On the launch problems; yeah, it does suck, but I would rather a completely new game, and engine, graphics, textures, models, that is more or less 90-95% done and plays beautifully, to be tested on us at release to work out the tweaks, rather than a re-re-hash that is MW. Yes, it is pure laziness, especially when you do it for a third time in a row. I'm just wondering how they are even competing. I guess the name sells all.

Can't blame them. They sell more and more copies every year. Until they see a need to change, I don't think they really should push it harder than having a side project in the works for the next gen Call of Duty.

Yeah, it may blow up in their face like Guitar Hero and Tony Hawk but sucks to be them if it happens. Just gives another dev and series a chance at the top which would be great. Respawn Studios for one could hit the ground running like last time when EA let Medal of Honor slide and Call of Duty took the crown. Speaking of EA, what on earth are they going to do with MOH, BF and whatever Respawn do. Throw them all and one will hopefully stick.

OK, silly question, but I'm in college, and the game's at home (hopefully), so I don't know. :p Does MW3 have an "online pass"? Hopefully not.

BTW, I had an Xbox Live message from a friend last night (which was probably a "message to all friends") simply saying... (major spoiler, unless you've been watching recent MW3 videos on YouTube, in which case, you've already seen it in the comments :p )

SOAP DIES IN MW3!!!!!!!!!!!

Git. Treating it like Harry Potter. :p

Nope, no online pass which is nice.

What assets are they reusing? The only thing in the back to Karkand pack is that the maps *might* have the same layout and we don't even know if that's going to be true or not. Other than that the maps had to be completely remade for Frostbite 2 engine because Battlefield 2 was a completely different engine. That means new textures and everything else. And I don't know about anyone else, but I wasn't charged for that.

Just look at the ump-45 from MW2 and MW3. They are the same exact model. Same texture. Same mesh. Same sounds. That's lazy.

And I've never played a single sports game made by any company so I wouldn't know about that.

and them acting, looking and sounding completely different would make more sense to you when the game takes place right after another?

To be fair, in Madden they did re-use all the same coach models from Madden 2010, and some player models. Coach Tony Sparano is still a fat tub of lard in Madden 12, though, in real life now he has lost around 80lbs and is fairly thin.

But that is a different department in EA, and one where they have no competition thanks to the contract with the NFL, (which expires in 2012, I believe) and until that contract does expire, there won't be any competition in that market, and if they reach a new one, well, we are all stuck with the same Madden. :(

On the launch problems; yeah, it does suck, but I would rather a completely new game, and engine, graphics, textures, models, that is more or less 90-95% done and plays beautifully, to be tested on us at release to work out the tweaks, rather than a re-re-hash that is MW. Yes, it is pure laziness, especially when you do it for a third time in a row. I'm just wondering how they are even competing. I guess the name sells all.

NHL has the same things, coaches are the same year after year and they don't change them. most of the players don't even look real yet. just generic faces. i guess that is lazy too. it's not pure lazyness. they have 16 new maps, new locations, added new ish to the engine iteration after iteration. they all do it, that is my point. ALL OF THEM. movies do it too. for sure, bf looks better, bf has better sound (has since bc2), but calling the game exactly the same or mostly the same just proves your popping out at the mouth without actually playing the game. if the game is such a re-hash and a redo it would have gone the way of guitar heroes and not have BETTER RATINGS then bf3 so far (well consoles anyways)

if the game is such a re-hash and a redo it would have gone the way of guitar heroes and not have BETTER RATINGS then bf3 so far (well consoles anyways)

Check out those user scores...the ones that actually matter.

How long would a Digital Download take on a HS connection?

depends on your definition of high speed. i have a 50 mbps connection and it took me 20 minutes to download the game...

Check out those user scores...the ones that actually matter.

those are the ones you ignore... like spore or assassins creed games getting a 1 rating on sites like amazon because people didn't like the DRM (which yeah sucked) does not reflect on the game at all. plus those are always full of fanboys anyways.

Can't blame them. They sell more and more copies every year. Until they see a need to change, I don't think they really should push it harder than having a side project in the works for the next gen Call of Duty.

Yeah, it may blow up in their face like Guitar Hero and Tony Hawk but sucks to be them if it happens. Just gives another dev and series a chance at the top which would be great. Respawn Studios for one could hit the ground running like last time when EA let Medal of Honor slide and Call of Duty took the crown. Speaking of EA, what on earth are they going to do with MOH, BF and whatever Respawn do. Throw them all and one will hopefully stick.

Well, I hope they do keep making games. If it weren't for their success, we would not have competition, thus no BF3 (at its current state). ^_^

But, I can see this getting run into the ground, and probably soon. Both Activision and EA have a knack for that. Tony Hawk (Activision) started great but, we all see what happened there. The SKATE games (EA), were next, and I loved all of them. To be honest, I'm sad there was not a Skate 4, but what really can you do differently. EA stopped at a good point there, and decided not to milk it. (Or they weren't getting sales, I do not know the numbers.)

Honestly I do not care who wins the sales battle, if the MW series does, good, that means the competition will continue to step up and not slack. If they don't, well good, more money and a pat on the back for the other company to continue to do great. Or vice versa. No sense in saying I wouldn't play the next Call of Duty, if it were good, just like I am with BF3. Hell I still play MoHAA: Spearhead (The MP demo! mp_malta all day baby! :p). Competition is good, but this time around EA/Dice/BF has won my buck.

those are the ones you ignore... like spore or assassins creed games getting a 1 rating on sites like amazon because people didn't like the DRM (which yeah sucked) does not reflect on the game at all. plus those are always full of fanboys anyways.

Not really, considering critics are full of **** 95% of the time. If a game has DRM which people don't agree with then yes, ignore the 1 rating. If there is no DRM present or anything outstanding to pick at then the rating is fair. It's not like BF3 got a perfect score either, but it's a hell of a lot better than MW3 on either console.

Not really, considering critics are full of **** 95% of the time. If a game has DRM which people don't agree with then yes, ignore the 1 rating. If there is no DRM present or anything outstanding to pick at then the rating is fair. It's not like BF3 got a perfect score either, but it's a hell of a lot better than MW3 on either console.

eh, each their own. i don't take user reviews seriously ever cause of ish like that. i respect why people would. but i would rather take a collection of pro reviews then a collection of randoms seriously. that and friends (and all my friends play CoD anyways...)

, but calling the game exactly the same or mostly the same just proves your popping out at the mouth without actually playing the game. if the game is such a re-hash and a redo it would have gone the way of guitar heroes and not have BETTER RATINGS then bf3 so far (well consoles anyways)

It is true, I haven't played it. But, also, my heart is not pumping at the trailers, and I barely make it through the ads. BF3, I was ecstatic when watching gameplay. As I said, I will try it, the single player, when I borrow it from a friend. I will probably watch him play MP, and might grab a round or two, but I do not think my view will change. If it does, you will be the first to know. ;)

  • Like 1

It is true, I haven't played it. But, also, my heart is not pumping at the trailers, and I barely make it through the ads. BF3, I was ecstatic when watching gameplay. As I said, I will try it, the single player, when I borrow it from a friend. I will probably watch him play MP, and might grab a round or two, but I do not think my view will change. If it does, you will be the first to know. ;)

and that's fair. i get why people don't like the game. my beef is people who talk **** about and haven't played it. you just look like an idiot/troll trying to talk **** because you can on the internet.

No, I actually and downloading it from Steam. I never have downloaded a game before from Seam. Just to lazy to go to Best But and get it.

oh that makes sense.

and that's fair. i get why people don't like the game. my beef is people who talk **** about and haven't played it. you just look like an idiot/troll trying to talk **** because you can on the internet.

oh that makes sense.

It's not like we're even picking at the gameplay. We're picking at obvious faults including the reuse of assets, which we clearly don't need to play the game to see.

It doesn't matter if the game takes place 2 days or 2 years after MW2, there's always room for improvement. If we all had the same mindset as you do we might as well be using models from a 10 year old game simply because it takes place during the same time period.

  • Like 1

It's not like we're even picking at the gameplay. We're picking at obvious faults including the reuse of assets, which we clearly don't need to play the game to see.

It doesn't matter if the game takes place 2 days or 2 years after MW2, there's always room for improvement. If we all had the same mindset as you do we might as well be using models from a 10 year old game simply because it takes place during the same time period.

haven't played many EA sports games have you ;)

and yeah i get what you mean, thank god this is the last MW game cause i am done with this series/story line. i'm a sucker for their formula that they use. it's all run and gun, no real time for campers cause you'll get owned, i love it. works great. i like the perks and the leveling system and the game modes. i know tech wise it's far from the best, but IMO it's still the best MP game out there.

i basically look at this game like a sports game franchise now anyway. i by madden every year, fifa almost every and NHL for sure every year for 60 bucks and i definitely get my money out of all of them every year cause it's all me and my friends play.

haven't played many EA sports games have you ;)

and yeah i get what you mean, thank god this is the last MW game cause i am done with this series/story line. i'm a sucker for their formula that they use. it's all run and gun, no real time for campers cause you'll get owned, i love it. works great. i like the perks and the leveling system and the game modes. i know tech wise it's far from the best, but IMO it's still the best MP game out there.

i basically look at this game like a sports game franchise now anyway. i by madden every year, fifa almost every and NHL for sure every year for 60 bucks and i definitely get my money out of all of them every year cause it's all me and my friends play.

Never played a single EA Sports game in my life, but if they do reuse the same models then I find that incredibly lazy and lame as well.

Is this really the last MW game? Is CoD done as a whole, or are they planning on rebooting the franchise? I respect the fact that you enjoy the game, because when it comes down to it that's all that matters. Personally though, I don't see any need to defend them because no matter what way you look at it, they cut corners and took the lazy way out several times with this game.

You know what I'm interested in? Some news from Respawn Entertainment...

^ yeah seconds after

Never played a single EA Sports game in my life, but if they do reuse the same models then I find that incredibly lazy and lame as well.

Is this really the last MW game? Is CoD done as a whole, or are they planning on rebooting the franchise? I respect the fact that you enjoy the game, because when it comes down to it that's all that matters. Personally though, I don't see any need to defend them because no matter what way you look at it, they cut corners and took the lazy way out several times with this game.

You know what I'm interested in? Some news from Respawn Entertainment...

i'm not really defending them, i'm just saying they all do it. The modern warfare story line is done. this is the last one, what is next who knows. nothing been announced for treyarch yet or what's IW is up to next.

and is respawn the MoH guys, cause if they are, i though rot for ruining one of my all time favourite series...

i'm not really defending them, i'm just saying they all do it. The modern warfare story line is done. this is the last one, what is next who knows. nothing been announced for treyarch yet or what's IW is up to next.

and is respawn the MoH guys, cause if they are, i though rot for ruining one of my all time favourite series...

Respawn Entertainment is the original Infinity Ward. West, Zampella and all of the guys who followed them after what happened with Activision.

Respawn Entertainment is the original Infinity Ward. West, Zampella and all of the guys who followed them after what happened with Activision.

oh yeah, i forgot about those guys... i'm sure they'll do well considering they created MoH and Call of Duty.

Is this really the last MW game? Is CoD done as a whole, or are they planning on rebooting the franchise? I respect the fact that you enjoy the game, because when it comes down to it that's all that matters. Personally though, I don't see any need to defend them because no matter what way you look at it, they cut corners and took the lazy way out several times with this game.

Last MW game, yes. CoD won't be done as a whole though. They'll probably start something new, but nothing has been announced.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Save 74% on this Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle by Steven Parker Today on offer via our Online Courses section of the Neowin Deals store, you can save 74% on the Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle. This comprehensive 2026 CompTIA training bundle is created for aspiring IT professionals who want a faster, clearer way to earn multiple industry-recognized certifications while building practical, job-ready skills. Designed around real-world expectations, the curriculum guides you from foundational IT concepts to hands-on technical mastery across A+, Network+, Security+, Cloud+, Server+, and Pentest+ domains. You'll develop the confidence to troubleshoot systems, secure networks, manage cloud and on-prem environments, and tackle complex technical challenges with a methodical approach that employers value. By focusing on practical application and exam-aligned content, this bundle helps you stand out in the job market, prove your capabilities, and prepare for roles such as IT technician, network specialist, cybersecurity analyst, and system administrator with clarity and confidence. Certificate of Completion only. You will not receive official CompTIA certificates upon completion of each course. It's only designed to help you prepare for the covered certification exams. You need to take and pass the exams to get certified. Courses included in this bundle A Plus Certification - CompTIA A+ 220-1202 Training Master hardware, software, networking, and security essentials Covers the full Core 1 & Core 2 scope with inclusive materials that reflect real-world IT work CompTIA Cloud+ (CV0-004) Comprehensive pathway to mastering essential cloud concepts & acing the certification exam Practical skills in cloud architecture, security, and DevOps CompTIA Network+ (N10-009) Training Course Design, configure, manage & secure modern networks Covers OSI & DoD models, IP addressing, subnetting, routing technologies, VLANs, wireless networking, structured cabling, and robust disaster recovery planning CompTIA Server+ (SK0-005) Master server management, administration, and security Practical skills for server hardware installation, disaster recovery & enhancing data security CompTIA Pentest+ Course (PT0-003) Gain demonstrable capabilities in penetration testing, security testing & risk assessment Hands-on pentest labs online and real-world deliverables CompTIA Security+ Certification Course (SY0-071) Essential skills in security concepts, threats & risk management Compliance considerations & authentication mechanisms, with a practical lens to implement them in real-world networks CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst CySA+ (CS0-004) Hands-on experience in threat modeling, vulnerability assessment & incident response Effective security measures that protect networks & data Tangible outcomes you'll achieve Validated hands-on skills across operating systems, networks, cloud, and security Confidence to pass multiple certification exams on or before your target dates A versatile toolkit for diagnosing, securing, and optimizing IT environments Ability to communicate technical concepts clearly to both technical and non-technical stakeholders Who is this course for Aspiring IT technicians and support professionals who want a clear, practical pathway to multiple industry‑recognized CompTIA certifications IT learners looking to build real‑world skills in hardware, networking, cloud, security, servers, and penetration testing Those aiming to qualify for roles like help desk technician, junior network engineer, system administrator, security analyst, or cloud administrator by earning key certificates efficiently About Vision Training Systems Since 2012 and more than 100,000 students, Vision Training Systems has been delivering expertly crafted online IT training courses to help you earn industry-recognized certifications like CompTIA A+, Network+, Security+, Cisco CCNA, Project Management, CEH V13, Microsoft Azure, AWS, and more. Plus dive into the world of AI, IT Leadership, and core soft skills needed to excel in an IT Career. Whether you’re launching your IT career or looking to grow into a senior role, our flexible, on-demand platform empowers you with the skills and certifications employers demand. Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: desktop or mobile Maximum number of device(s): 1 Available to BOTH new and existing users Certificate of Completion ONLY Experience level required: all levels Closed captioning NOT available NOT downloadable for offline viewing Here's the deal The Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle normally costs $199, but you can pick it up for just $40, that's a saving of $159. For terms, specs and license info, click the link below. Deal Price $40.00 with code SAVE20 (was $199) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!