Smartphone OS only.  

238 members have voted

  1. 1. Most Elegant?

    • Windows Phone 7
      112
    • iOS
      42
    • Android
      61
    • Blackberry OS
      7
    • WebOS
      14
    • Symbian
      1
    • Meego
      1
  2. 2. Most Ugly?

    • Windows Phone 7
      25
    • iOS
      32
    • Android
      35
    • Blackberry OS
      57
    • WebOS
      10
    • Symbian
      63
    • Meego
      16


Recommended Posts

For me, Android is the most elegant. The ability to customise the UI to my personal preferance and it still looks great means for me it beats the others without breaking a sweat.

Symbian just looks like a dumb down vesion of iOS which to me is just poor at best. iOS is so messy to me that I wouldnt touch it.

I love WP7. It's fast, clean and does exactly what it says it does.

Android is great. I have a tablet that runs it well and I'm quite enamoured with it except for it's lack of a side scroll (like WP7 tableau interface).

iOS just feels dated to me :\ I know that people are going to hate me saying it, but it just feel clunky and old..

I kinda like Blackberry's interface. It looks quite cool, but I wouldn't touch it >.<

Meego looks like it could be awesome, but it's just tooooo late to compete.

The prettiest award goes to WP7 for me.

Android on it's own looks fairly okay, but most of the applications are bitch ass ugly, which makes the platform a bit less appealing.

iOS is so-so. A lot of effort has been made to make it look consistent, and that's great. Gloss on everything is just not necessarily my taste.

WP7 is the most elegant, hands down. It may be largely related to Windows market share but Microsoft usually nails the GUI sweet spot and then somehow half of the world goes after them.

Stock Android is not a pretty sight but it has a huge capabilities to tweak it beyong recognition.

iOS, on the other hand... is just a shiny dud. Well, maybe iHate is clouding my judgement, but I don't like it one bit.

Symbian might be next but then again - it's well suited for devices that are not meant to be a bling.

I love WP7. It's fast, clean and does exactly what it says it does.

Android is great. I have a tablet that runs it well and I'm quite enamoured with it except for it's lack of a side scroll (like WP7 tableau interface).

iOS just feels dated to me :\ I know that people are going to hate me saying it, but it just feel clunky and old..

- - - - - - -

Indeed.

I'm sorry, Cupertino, but Microsoft has nailed it. Windows Phone 7 feels like an iPhone from the future. The UI has the simplicity and elegance of Apple's industrial design, while the iPhone's UI still feels like a colorized Palm Pilot.

This is Gizmodo in Feb 2010.

And here's is editor-in-chief of PhoneDog.com

Windows Phone 7 UI makes iPhone look like a dinosaur.

wp7 the most elegant!

and Meego is seriously pretty!

the icons are cute and colorful. Its all really nice. and neat!.

it feels kind of like a refined iOS look. and the rest of the OS isnt bad either. From a design point of view. The performance or experience will be different. And i cant comment on that because the device isnt out yet.

iOS looks outdated. But thats my opinion. From a design POV iOS is very consistent. And it is functional and very simple and contained.

Android is Android. Customize it the way you want. But the basic experience is nothing special from a design POV.

rest is crap..

Blackberry and all.. but the design is sure functional. if not pretty.

And one more thing.

If WP7 allow custom tile and background color. The UI will take another huge step forward in terms of customization and i will place it 10 steps above where i place it now. thats at the 1st spot.

Based solely on those screenshots, I actually think that Blackberry OS is the most elegant. It has all the core smartphone functions right on the "desktop", and the use of transparency makes it look very nice.

My ugliest nomination goes to Symbian, which basically just looks like a cheap knockoff of other smartphone OS's. If Symbian were excluded, I'd probably actually say that iOS is the ugliest, although that's not to say that it's ugly. It's a nice looking OS, but I think it's actually starting to look a bit dated compared to the competition.

Some info about the screenshot I put together.

Android: Nexus S

iOS: iPhone 4

BBOS: Blacberry Torch

WebOS: HP Palm Pre 3

And the last one is Meego's Nokia N9(this wouldn't be a fair picture since it has a unique interface which revolves around three screens; Notifcations | Multitasking | Apps. Their is no "Home screen" as such. And I have shown a App page above. For more http://swipe.nokia.com/)

And WP7 as you all know, are all the same.

Also this poll needs a correction.

Meego shouldnt be with Symbian.

Its very different.

Symbian is crap!.. Meego is far from it.

Place Meego as a different choice.

Would this reset the answers some people have choosen?

Maybe I should remove Meego since their has only been a, one known device( Nokia N9). And a lot more people would be familiar with Symbian in smartphones.

Based solely on those screenshots, I actually think that Blackberry OS is the most elegant. It has all the core smartphone functions right on the "desktop", and the use of transparency makes it look very nice.

Hmmm.... What "core smartphone functions" does Blackberry OS have on "desktop" that WP7 doesn't?

Also this poll needs a correction.

Meego shouldnt be with Symbian.

Its very different.

Symbian is crap!.. Meego is far from it.

Place Meego as a different choice.

Looks like Symbian Anna to me. Is there any difference?

big difference.

Symbian Anna is really different.

and Symbians before Anna are so so bad!..

So the symbian line is pretty much different from Meego.

Meego is very fluid compared to Symbian. Its named differently for a reason.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Turbo Pascal was my first real programming experience more than 30 years ago at university. I mostly taught myself from the included examples and help documentation, because the university only taught the basic syntax and philosophy of Pascal, without going deeply into Turbo Pascal’s advanced features. I still remember when I discovered that I could embed assembly language directly into Pascal code, call BIOS functions, manipulate screen memory, use mouse interrupts, and control peripherals from my programs. That opened huge doors for me. Programming back then felt really fun, direct, and close to the machine. What I loved about Pascal was its readability and the almost instant compile time. Turbo Pascal was an amazing environment, but unfortunately Turbo Pascal for Windows 3 did not feel like it fully carried that legacy forward. Later, Delphi got things back on the right track after the messy transition to TP for Windows. Sadly, Delphi suffered from years of uncertainty as it moved from Borland to CodeGear and then to Embarcadero. That instability made many developers lose confidence in it, even though Delphi itself remained a powerful and productive tool. I still work with Delphi from time to time, but I definitely miss the old days of Turbo Pascal.
    • I hope this encodes in to AV1 or AV2 as currently tiktok uses h265 and h264.
    • Qualcomm reportedly in talks to build custom video chips for TikTok parent ByteDance by Karthik Mudaliar Qualcomm is reportedly in advanced discussions to provide custom chip-design services to Chinese tech giant ByteDance, the same company behind TikTok. According to a report from Reuters, Qualcomm could be involved in designing custom silicon tailored for ByteDance's massive data-center workloads. If it goes through, the deal would make ByteDance one of Qualcomm's early anchor customers for its fastly growing custom chip-design division, For years, Qualcomm was the king of making smartphone processors and modems. The company has also been moving into the PC ecosystem and other formats such as on-device AI for Android XR headsets. However, this particular deal is about Qualcomm's custom Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). For a platform like TikTok, ByteDance needs hardware that can help it ingest, process, and serve billions of short-form videos daily. Generalised hardware is no longer the most cost-effective and efficient route, which is why ByteDance is trying to develop custom Video Processing Units (VPUs). VPUs designed specifically for ByteDance’s algorithmic needs could drastically reduce data-center power consumption and improve encoding speeds at an unprecedented scale. The underlying tech behind these processors is actually from Qualcomm's recent acquisition of AlphaWave Semi, a high-speed connectivity specialist company. By combining AlphaWave’s high-bandwidth IP with Qualcomm’s architectural expertise, the company could begin mass production by the end of 2026, if the talks go through. All this also comes at a time when U.S.-China tech relations have dwindled. Escalating trade frictions between Washington and Beijing have severely impacted the export of high-end AI chips from U.S. firms like Nvidia, AMD, and Lam Research. Yet, the Qualcomm-ByteDance discussions show that U.S. tech companies are still actively seeking growth avenues and are open to doing business with China, where regulators still permit. Reuters notes that the outcome of this deal could be uncertain, and ByteDance might also seek partners other than Qualcomm. via Reuters | Image via DepositPhotos.com
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Almohandis earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      166
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      117
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Xenon
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!