Smartphone OS only.  

238 members have voted

  1. 1. Most Elegant?

    • Windows Phone 7
      112
    • iOS
      42
    • Android
      61
    • Blackberry OS
      7
    • WebOS
      14
    • Symbian
      1
    • Meego
      1
  2. 2. Most Ugly?

    • Windows Phone 7
      25
    • iOS
      32
    • Android
      35
    • Blackberry OS
      57
    • WebOS
      10
    • Symbian
      63
    • Meego
      16


Recommended Posts

Dont just quote what you like :)

Innovative.

Elegant? ...

It's quite obvious tastefulness is a matter of preference, there didn't appear to be a need to quote the entire thing :whistle: The UI itself isn't exactly innovative, just a straight evolution of Microsoft's exisiting designs, a lot from Zune. A lot of people consider it elegant because it is unusually simple, and it is effective to the point that most of the UI is actual content, to the point and easy to use.

I like a little of them all... wp7 looked ugly in vids and screenshots but up close with it and it looked much better. good thing mango came along and added features that should have been in there at launch. oh well better late then never. I kinda want one but for media I want a droid becuase of more media options and a company is working on a very awesome media streaming/offline music player... when it comes out I might get a droid. I'm big on music and I don't really care for zune software or using any 3rd party software for music transfer I like to just stick em on folder on and SD card and not mess with BS that apple has you go through. yuck. the lack of an sd card and the itunes crap is the reason i don't have an iphone. too bad I didn't play with the wp7 device long enough to dig deep into the media options.... too bad they also don't work with page plus here. only droids, samsung's os, and symbian are known to work 100%

anyone have any luck getting a wp7 on page plus please let me know.

Changing icons doesn't really help how dreadful it's laid out, works and still uses bland matte gradients and pastel colours everywhere and that vile font they've always used. Admittedly it's a hand up over 'hey guys transparency is the new thing, lets release whole OS based around it' blackberry tactic that just looks like a constantly badly made photoshop design.

Whos taking about changing only icons?

Have you seen the Symbian version on N97 when it was released.

They took a Symbian S60 non-touch feature phone and portrayed it to a touch phone.

And we all know it won't work and it didn't either.

What I am saying is that Symbian has grown quite machour since that.

I used N97 when it was released and now I used E7 with Belle and you can tell what is the difference within couple of minutes.

WP7 is the most elegant for me and Microsoft have won design awards for the Metro UI. The most ugly has to be iOS, how long is Apple going to continue use the same tired old interface?

I am intrigued by the wording of this poll, since the first word I used to describe my BB Bold and the updated OS was "elegant". It's just simple and clean and functional and everything I need. So I chose it, even though I know lots of people disagree with that. It's my personal favourite of the lot.

I agree that Symbian is the worst, with iOS coming in behind it. I don't think Apple will change it anytime soon though--it works, it's what people are used to, and it's the most widely recognised.

I've had the chance to use BlackBerry OS7 at it actually looks quite good.

It voted WebOS as the most attractive one. Android as the ugliest one. Google is just terrible at interface design in my opinion: They really don't seem to care one bit and it clearly shows.

WP7 is the most elegant for me and Microsoft have won design awards for the Metro UI. The most ugly has to be iOS, how long is Apple going to continue use the same tired old interface?

A screen full of icons is magical.

:rofl:

A screen full of icons is magical.

:rofl:

If you rip open the battery casing, you won't find lithium ion polymer. Those things are powered by the blood of unicorns.

I like the WP7 interface. It is simple and every item clearly has a job that it is accomplishing without being shiny and glossy and groveling at the user to please lick it.

  • 2 weeks later...

For me, most beautiful is WP7. Metro is clean and brilliant.

Ugliest is Blackberry OS. Never liked the look, I mean black and whites and fonts that look outdated. The menus look horrid compared to what I have seen. Even my basic priority LG Phone's menus looked better.

  • 3 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!