Recommended Posts

I had ran thru the other thread, and agree with some members : this is progress, try to adapt to it, use the old thing as a temporary way until you get use to Metro.

Impossible. Metro only has about 1/10 (or less) the shortcuts that are in the standard start menu from a clean install. Want to run notepad? It's not shown in Metro! Want to run wordpad? It's not shown in Metro! And on, and on, and on. I can only imagine how far out the damn thing will have to scroll right once someone has a decent number of programs installed. As it stands now in it's current state in this dev build, Metro is full of fail.

Is there some way to change my account name? It has my full name, and I just want my first name. It seems I have to alter my Live information, but I'd rather not do that.

It's under the Users and Accounts category in the standard control panel. (Look at the bottom of the Metro CP)

The option you want is the one to change to a local account.

It's under the Users and Accounts category in the standard control panel. (Look at the bottom of the Metro CP)

The option you want is the one to change to a local account.

Will that take away the integration with the Live services, though? Because I'd like to retain that and just alter my account name.

Will that take away the integration with the Live services, though? Because I'd like to retain that and just alter my account name.

I guess it pulls that from live services. I know choice is good but does it matter though? There isn't much of a security risk I guess :D I've always used my full name on my PC as that makes it personal again :)

It's also worth noting that the start screen is going to far more useful when it's actually filled with real immersive apps that you've downloaded yourself - complete with all you own personal data and animating around - not just a bunch of random coloured and pictorial icons that you see on the developer builds now, that don't do much at all. This really isn't something for users to be basing too much opinion on yet, when it's not being used as it should :p <img>

It's also worth noting that the start screen is going to far more useful when it's actually filled with real immersive apps that you've downloaded yourself - complete with all you own personal data and animating around - not just a bunhc of random coloured and pictorial icons that you see on the developer builds now.

<img>

Agree, MS (Sinofsky) has clearly said that this release is for developers to make their own apps.

It's a M3, not even pre-beta, if there were bugs, apps that can't function, ......, it's normal, just live with it atm.

And you actually think the learning curve there will be any easier?

Consider GNOME, or UNITY, or even Wayland - all have a higher learning curve than even Metro does from a user point of view.

All the keyboard tricks from as far back as Windows 9x/NT still work - even within Metro. If you're even a halfway-competent keyboard jockey, Metro/Immersive can be dealt with quite easily - even without touch support.

Something I said (elsewhere) is coming true - far too many of us may SAY we want change; yet, when confronted with it, we become very Pharonic in our attitudes and insist on staying put.

And it doesn't seem to matter whether it's applications, games, operating systems (including FOSS), and even politicians.

Far too many of us don't want new - what we REALLY want is *improved old*, and with as little real change as we can get away with.

That does not imply that I have to accept any changes anyone makes just because its "new".Otherwise there would be no failed products at all, people would always have to accept the new products and changes in old ones no matter how ugly\not usable\not friendly they look to them, just because they are new ?

I won't just be screaming metro owns, screw old stuff, just because MS wants me to believe its cool.From what it looks, its very unpleasing to me, and my opinion is what dictates what I would use, not MS opinion.

Besides, migrating to new GUI isn't that hard, ask all people who got their Macs, or the people who used Linux as their first OS.I already tried various versions of Linux before on VMs\booting from live USBs\CDs and they were all pretty usable for me, it may take few days till getting fully comfortable but thats okay, besides most of the time is spent in the browser and\or 2-3 other apps I use, which are identical between Windows\Mac\Linux.

It's also worth noting that the start screen is going to far more useful when it's actually filled with real immersive apps that you've downloaded yourself - complete with all you own personal data and animating around - not just a bunch of random coloured and pictorial icons that you see on the developer builds now, that don't do much at all. This really isn't something for users to be basing too much opinion on yet, when it's not being used as it should :p <img>

I've already got the music player I was working on loaded up in the new Visual Studio to fiddle with... :)

There is a considerable problem in the current build with little to no consistency in between the two desktops. It randomly jumps between one and the other at the most inopportune times, and it's an incredible pain in the ass and is massively confusing. I know I'm not the only one because this very same argument has been stated in reviews as well. As it currently stands in the preview build, I do believe the learning curve is higher than with GNOME or UNITY. Wayland by the way isn't a Desktop Environment. It's a display server that lets you run DE's like GNOME or UNITY on it.

That is because Metro isn't desktop-centric (as has been the case with every GUI for the desktop to date). Metro/Immersive treats the desktop as just another application (like Outlook or Word or IE or Firefox). If you're used to a desktop-centric UI (and, as I've stated, practically every desktop UI is that way - it's far from unique to Windows) the learning curve will be massive, for the most part.

That's why pretty much every UI for the desktop is as close to identical as can be gotten away with - and also why every attempt to move away from that (and not just on desktops) is met with FUD, ridicule, and outright scorn.

I was referring to a lot of the sample code that has been shown on Wayland - very Unity/GNOME Shell-ish. And neither GNOME Shell or Unity have gotten much in the way of respect, either (as neither is desktop-centric) - same applies to Front Row and Launch Pad (OS X).

If you're used to a smartphone or iOS device (such as iPad), Immersive will likely be your cup of tea. Immersive is not what I'm used to - however, there's lots of reward (both in terms of development and as a user) in my learning how to navigate around Immersive, even with a traditional keyboard and mouse.

Device UIs and desktop UIs have become stovepipes, with little to no real common code between them. It's a pain in the butt for developers, and it's becoming just as painful for users, as you wind up carrying both a traditional desktop/portable *and* one or more devices, due to lack of commonality. (It's also why XP Tablet PC Edition failed - too little commonality with XP on the desktop.) Stovepipes are as inefficient that way as they are in anything else - how do you mesh the different types of data structures?

It's not like we haven't been given plenty of warning that the desktop UI as we have known it is in trouble - device sales alone have been plenty of evidence of that. (It's why I likened resisting the change to being in front of an oncoming train.)

Look at it as an opportunity - a learning opportunity.

I don't know if anyone else has said this but for those complaining about missing things on the Immersive view start menu that would be on a regular start menu .... to search you can start typing from any point and it will search. You don't need to press the windows key or anything like that .... just start typing.

I don't know if anyone else has said this but for those complaining about missing things on the Immersive view start menu that would be on a regular start menu .... to search you can start typing from any point and it will search. You don't need to press the windows key or anything like that .... just start typing.

So... with a GUI that makes everything easy to see and access they want you to type for everything else? That's not intuitive at all. That's the most absurd design decision ever.

@PGHammer

I have nothing against Metro. I like the UI in fact, as a tablet UI. On a PC I want something functional though, and more importantly I want it to be consistent and cohesive. Currently Metro and the Classic desktop jump around so arbitrarily at all times it's a giant f*cking mess. For example I wanted to get to the Control Panel when I was in the Classic desktop, but I couldn't. There was no entry for it anywhere aside from typing it in explorer's address bar or searching for it, but first off searching for things is not intuitive, and it didn't even come to my mind at the time. I had to jump into Metro, hit the Control Panel applet, then scroll down and hit the "Advanced Options" to finally have it jump back into the Classic desktop with the Control Panel open. What the f*ck is that?

A little, obvious tip I guess - but the settings button is context sensitive, and that's where all the app settings are hidden (took me a while to figure out I could change the weather to Celsius using it :p)

The search is pretty awesome too - and once apps start coming down the pipe and have implemented all these search contracts and pickers it's going to go a very amazing, interconnected world of apps. Being able to quickly share and pull content from anywhere, in anything is a great experience. At any time you press search at the bottom left - you can use the search feature of any ap you have installed, right from your sidebar without leaving what you're doing. It's a great system, and a great UI. I wanted to change my wallpaper, in two clicks I'd gone and taken a picture from Facebook, right from in the OS. What's not to like? It's bringing all YOUR content back to you. Everything that's been separated into many clouds and data locations all just come back to you, with barely any effort on your part. As an operating system, it really does make the PC more personal than anything else out there.

And important part of this Metro desktop is that, it's really just a place for apps to live and shine - and most of what makes the Metro interface what it is will be the apps - they're what populates it, they're what animates in and lights it up, they're what takes advantage of all the great new API's, notifications etc. And they don't exist yet - so you're missing out on a massive part of the experience at the moment. We've got a blank slate that's filled with some placeholders, ready for us dev to plug things into,. It's great being able to switch in an out of apps quickly and smoothly, and not having to worry about them bogging down the system. It's a great sign on things to come to see the kind of performance they've gotten, even on underpowered first generation netbooks, which feel like brand new, competitive devices running Windows 8.

Takes a bit of time to adjust - but you just have to think about it differently - it's a far more connected experience than a desktop - it's not meant to be a new coat of paint an old way of doing things. It's a new paradigm. Don't bother trying to rate it as it is, just try and explore everything you can, pin loads of stuff and make it personal.

Also, another tip for those multitasking with a mouse with the immersive UI: Using the scroll wheel will cycle through apps that you can snap onto the edges or drag back to full screen.

That does not imply that I have to accept any changes anyone makes just because its "new".Otherwise there would be no failed products at all, people would always have to accept the new products and changes in old ones no matter how ugly\not usable\not friendly they look to them, just because they are new ?

I won't just be screaming metro owns, screw old stuff, just because MS wants me to believe its cool.From what it looks, its very unpleasing to me, and my opinion is what dictates what I would use, not MS opinion.

Besides, migrating to new GUI isn't that hard, ask all people who got their Macs, or the people who used Linux as their first OS.I already tried various versions of Linux before on VMs\booting from live USBs\CDs and they were all pretty usable for me, it may take few days till getting fully comfortable but thats okay, besides most of the time is spent in the browser and\or 2-3 other apps I use, which are identical between Windows\Mac\Linux.

If you are willing to migrate to a new GUI, why not give Immersive/Metro an honest shake, then?

Simple - all the other desktop GUIs (even OS X) are by and large just as desktop-centric as Windows itself has been to date. Even attempts to change that with OS X (Front Row and Launchpad) have been ridiculed, dismissed, and treated with excessive scorn. (I'm not talking out of my hat - the Developer Preview replaced OS X on this drive; specifically both Snow Leopard and Lion.) Going from OS X to iOS is no walk in the park, either - ask any person that has both a Mac and an iPad. iOS gets away with it because it doesn't *have* a desktop per se. Front Row and Launch Pad treat the OS X desktop as just another application, taking away from that desktop-centricity - hence the brickbats both have suffered.

Going from one desktop-centric UI to another is a picnic by comparison to migrating from a desktop-centric UI to one that isn't. Even NextOS, which didn't start out desktop-centric, changed to become desktop-centric just to survive (and eventually give birth to OS X).

Metro/Immersive is very much a different paradigm - however, I knew that from the beginning. It's all the harder for me because I'm as used to a desktop-centric UI as anyone else that's been running any desktop GUI is, and I'm using traditional desktop hardware to run the Developer Preview on. However, I'm still willing to give Immersive an honest and fair hearing, and the only way I know to do that is by using it, despite the handicaps (largely due to inexperience) I face in using it. (I don't own any sort of device - not even a smartphone. While I do own a cellphone, it's an old Samsung *candybar* phone.)

If you are willing to migrate to a new GUI, why not give Immersive/Metro an honest shake, then?

Simple - all the other desktop GUIs (even OS X) are by and large just as desktop-centric as Windows itself has been to date. Even attempts to change that with OS X (Front Row and Launchpad) have been ridiculed, dismissed, and treated with excessive scorn. (I'm not talking out of my hat - the Developer Preview replaced OS X on this drive; specifically both Snow Leopard and Lion.) Going from OS X to iOS is no walk in the park, either - ask any person that has both a Mac and an iPad. iOS gets away with it because it doesn't *have* a desktop per se. Front Row and Launch Pad treat the OS X desktop as just another application, taking away from that desktop-centricity - hence the brickbats both have suffered.

Going from one desktop-centric UI to another is a picnic by comparison to migrating from a desktop-centric UI to one that isn't. Even NextOS, which didn't start out desktop-centric, changed to become desktop-centric just to survive (and eventually give birth to OS X).

Metro/Immersive is very much a different paradigm - however, I knew that from the beginning. It's all the harder for me because I'm as used to a desktop-centric UI as anyone else that's been running any desktop GUI is, and I'm using traditional desktop hardware to run the Developer Preview on. However, I'm still willing to give Immersive an honest and fair hearing, and the only way I know to do that is by using it, despite the handicaps (largely due to inexperience) I face in using it. (I don't own any sort of device - not even a smartphone. While I do own a cellphone, it's an old Samsung *candybar* phone.)

I am not against the concept, I would love to try it out, but what I find disturbing the most is the aesthetic part, the tiles look very ugly to me, specially the monochrome square-shaped ones, they just feel so wrong and not pleasing to me.Besides, it doesn't feel its a UI suitable or can be adapted for someone busy who wants to have tons of documents on his desktop, and dozen or more programs running on his 2-row taskbar (which is what most people use or would be using the desktop for, with basic web surfing done on their tablets\phones most of the time).

So... with a GUI that makes everything easy to see and access they want you to type for everything else? That's not intuitive at all. That's the most absurd design decision ever.

@PGHammer

I have nothing against Metro. I like the UI in fact, as a tablet UI. On a PC I want something functional though, and more importantly I want it to be consistent and cohesive. Currently Metro and the Classic desktop jump around so arbitrarily at all times it's a giant f*cking mess. For example I wanted to get to the Control Panel when I was in the Classic desktop, but I couldn't. There was no entry for it anywhere aside from typing it in explorer's address bar or searching for it, but first off searching for things is not intuitive, and it didn't even come to my mind at the time. I had to jump into Metro, hit the Control Panel applet, then scroll down and hit the "Advanced Options" to finally have it jump back into the Classic desktop with the Control Panel open. What the f*ck is that?

Consistency and cohesiveness has meant largely a sameness, as there is shockingly little variance between desktop UIs, even among different operating systems. Worse, any attempt to break out of that on the desktop-UI front (GNOME Shell, Launch Pad, Front Row, etc.) has gotten slammed rather hard. What change that has been accepted has, as you so nicely put it, come in devices - especially iOS devices, such as the iDevices. Apple, to its credit, has actually tried to bring that paradigm back to OS X (first with Front Row in Snow Leopard, then with Launch Pad in Lion), and just looking in Neowin's Apple forums shows how well that has gone. (It's no different in forums related to OS X elsewhere.)

That's my complaint with *all* desktop UIs - except for dress-up niche applets (including Object Desktop, to be honest), the differences between them are surprisingly few. Consigning Metro to tablets and slates leads to the same likelihood as what happened with XP Tablet PC Edition - other than niches, it failed badly. Also, there is the real dilemma that developers face writing apps for a *tablet UI* on a non-tablet - how can you check the functionality without buying a test device (such as a tablet or slate) to test the prospective app on?

Metro/Immersive (in the Developer Preview) tackles both issues head-on. First, it's not desktop-centric at all. (That, in and of itself, is quite a turn from where all desktop GUIs have been literally from the beginning - the closest thing to Metro/Immersive on desktops was the niche NextStep OS in the early days.) Second, it makes a maximum effort to encourage code reuse among all non-desktop-centric Windows platforms - without requiring the additional expense of purchasing test devices for code-checking purposes. It still comes down to doing more with less - the increased efficiency of the Developer Preview, even when compared to 7+SP1, drives that point home hard.

If you want the desktop-centric experience that you're used to, then the Developer Preview as it stands isn't for you as a user.

I am not against the concept, I would love to try it out, but what I find disturbing the most is the aesthetic part, the tiles look very ugly to me, specially the monochrome square-shaped ones, they just feel so wrong and not pleasing to me.Besides, it doesn't feel its a UI suitable or can be adapted for someone busy who wants to have tons of documents on his desktop, and dozen or more programs running on his 2-row taskbar (which is what most people use or would be using the desktop for, with basic web surfing done on their tablets\phones most of the time).

That's why I said it's more style vs. substance. There's very little style to the Developer Preview (in fact, the only Developer Preview of any version of Windows to have won any style points was Longhorn, and we know what happened there). However, unlike Longhorn (in fact, unlike any other desktop GUI to date), there's a whole lot of substance to this Developer Preview - in addition to a major learning curve for any desktop user.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Doogee and Ulefone regularly release phones with 10k-25k mAh batteries, but those are bricks. I don't understand how they could make it only weigh 220 grams with a battery that size.
    • Windows 10 quietly gets one more year of support and updates by Taras Buria Windows 10 reached its end of life at the end of 2025. Microsoft kicked off the Extended Security Updates program, aimed at giving regular consumers one more year of security-only updates. By doing so, Microsoft gave users more time and money to update their computers to a newer operating system or compatible hardware. Now, with the end of the Extended Security Updates program quickly approaching, Microsoft is making an important adjustment. Users discovered that the official support article for the program now lists a new end-of-support date: The Extended Security Updates program is not a new concept. It has been an official way for business consumers to continue receiving critical updates for unsupported Microsoft products for many years. However, all this time, it was a business-only, paid feature. With Windows 10, Microsoft brought ESU to regular consumers, allowing them to get security updates for Windows 10 past October 2025 essentially for free. When Windows 10 was approaching the end of support, many guessed that Microsoft might adjust its support timelines, and this is exactly what seems to be happening. Of course, Microsoft would love everyone to switch to new computers, such as its latest Surface devices, but in the days of ever-growing hardware prices, not everyone is lucky enough to have money for a new PC. Leaving hundreds of millions of customers with a Windows version that no longer receives security updates is a major risk that Microsoft is not willing to take. If you have a Windows 10 PC to enroll in the Extended Security Updates program, check out this guide to learn how to do so.
    • Sony announces Bungie layoffs that will affect "significant number of employees" by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Sony today announced that major layoffs are happening at its first-party studio Bungie, the developer that has spawned series like Halo, Destiny, and Marathon over the past decades. The news arrives just weeks after Bungie delivered the final update to Destiny 2, and it's that team being hit with the layoffs the most. CEO of Sony Interactive Entertainment Hermen Hulst revealed the staff reduction today, calling it "painful news." "Over the past several months, together with Bungie leadership, we reviewed the studio’s long-term direction, development priorities, resource needs, and role within our broader portfolio strategy," said Hulst, explaining the decision. "We explored multiple alternatives before concluding that a reduction was necessary to align the studio’s resources with its current priorities and long-term goals." The layoffs will be hitting "a significant number of employees" across most of the Destiny franchise development team. It doesn't look like Sony is planning to continue the series following Destiny 2's sunsetting update. The studio is said to be in early stages of looking at other projects to pivot to, but it's said that keeping the size of the team at current levels is no longer feasible. "We know this decision has a profound impact on the people affected, their families, friends, and teammates," said Bungie leadership in a separate message on social media. "While these changes are necessary to best position the studio now and for the future, that does not lessen the difficulty of this moment or the impact it has on those affected." At the same time, "some" of the Marathon development team are also affected by the layoffs. The recently released multiplayer-only extraction shooter title hasn't seen a big boom of players either, but the company is reportedly hoping that the live service experience will pick up players with future updates.
    • Microsoft adds reusable skills and finance data connectors to Copilot in Excel by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft is giving Copilot in Excel a collection of new features aimed squarely at finance teams. The update introduces reusable instructions for common tasks, connections to services such as FactSet and Morningstar, and a better way to review what Copilot intends to do before it starts changing a workbook. The most interesting addition is 'Skills' finally coming to Copilot in Excel. Skills let companies teach Copilot how to handle a recurring process, so employees do not need to write the same detailed prompt every month. Users can create skills that can specify the steps Copilot should follow, along with the required layout, formulas, and formatting. Microsoft says users can create their own skills by saving a SKILL.md file in OneDrive. The file is written using Markdown and tells Copilot when and how to perform the task. Once it is available, a user can select the skill in the Copilot pane or mention it in a prompt using the @ symbol. There is also a library of prebuilt finance skills for customers who do not want to create their own. Microsoft plans to let developers distribute additional skills through the Microsoft Marketplace and the Microsoft 365 Admin Center, with LSEG, Ramp, Rogo, samaya.ai, Velixo, and Vena among the first partners involved. The company says that it is also expanding the external data that Copilot can access from inside Excel. New connectors are being added for CB Insights, Daloopa, FactSet, Morningstar, PitchBook, and S&P Global data through technology developed by Kensho. There is a catch, however. Accessing these services may require a separate subscription from the relevant data provider, so a Microsoft 365 Copilot licence will not necessarily unlock all of them. FactSet is also only available in preview for now, with general availability planned for July. Microsoft is also trying to make Copilot’s workbook edits easier to inspect. Users can switch to a planning mode that shows which sheets, cell ranges, formulas, and assumptions Copilot intends to work with before it begins making changes. Once the work is complete, the Show Changes pane can distinguish edits made by Copilot from those made by human collaborators. The update continues Microsoft’s push to turn Excel Copilot from a chatbot into an agent that can carry out longer tasks. The company previously added an Agent Mode capable of planning and completing multi-step Excel work. Microsoft also recently acquired financial AI startup Fintool, another indication that finance is becoming a key target for its Excel AI strategy. Prebuilt skills, personalization, workbook rules, external connectors, planning mode, and Copilot attribution in Show Changes are generally available to Microsoft 365 Copilot customers using Excel on the web, Windows, and macOS. Custom skills are initially available to Microsoft 365 Insiders on Windows and Mac starting today. Microsoft plans to make them generally available across Windows, Mac, and the web over the next month. Partner-built skills are expected during the third quarter of the year. Availability may still differ depending on region and licensing.
    • Exactly. They serve different (although related) purposes.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      438
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Xenon
      77
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!