Recommended Posts

Microsoft planning to market Windows 8 ARM in a unique way, different naming?

Sinofsky revealed that Microsoft will be very clear in its product marketing to ensure end users are aware that Windows 8 ARM will not run their old legacy x86 applications. ?We are going to be very clear with how we name the product, what we talk about as the features and value proposition,? said Sinofsky. ?It?s only to our advantage to not have confused customers.? He then went on to explain that Microsoft will not allow a world where a customer goes into a store and has to buy software in a red box for ARM and a green box for x86. ?We won?t ever let that happen to a customer,? said Sinofsky. ?We will be clear what the value proposition and what the software is capable and we?ll do that with all the communication tools at our disposal.?

The admission that Microsoft will be clear in how it names Windows 8 ARM could see the company create a unique name for its tablet offering. Microsoft has long been a fan of marketing its different Windows offerings under separate SKUs, think Tablet PC Edition or Media Center Edition. Could the separate Windows 8 ARM naming and separate from x86 apps also mean that the product arrives early though?

Extract from: http://www.winrumors...fferent-naming/

Back to the topic laugh.gif : http://www.neowin.ne...-foley-reports/

post-345940-0-19272900-1316272142.png

Windows Compact Edition Embedded ARM Software Ultimate Live Tablet 8?

I think you need to come up with a more original and/or modern joke. That ones a little tired.

it was funny lol

I'm going with "Microsoft Octopus".... get it? 8 Arm... lol, I'm so funny.

:laugh: :blink:

how about W360 ?

I'm just thinking going to 5 SKU's

Starter = Less Features, lighter, restrictions and no Metro UI. (For netbooks with a resolution that can't use Immersive apps).

Home = Metro/Start Menu choice, most features.

Professional = HyperV/Other Features/Exclusive Features

ARM = Tablets, Metro UI default, no classic desktop.

Enterprise = Buisness, classic dsektop as default.

I'm just thinking going to 5 SKU's

Starter = Less Features, lighter, restrictions and no Metro UI. (For netbooks with a resolution that can't use Immersive apps).

Home = Metro/Start Menu choice, most features.

Professional = HyperV/Other Features/Exclusive Features

ARM = Tablets, Metro UI default, no classic desktop.

Enterprise = Buisness, classic dsektop as default.

But there would be ARM laptops too. And +1 to the list. :)

I'm just thinking going to 5 SKU's

Starter = Less Features, lighter, restrictions and no Metro UI. (For netbooks with a resolution that can't use Immersive apps).

Home = Metro/Start Menu choice, most features.

Professional = HyperV/Other Features/Exclusive Features

ARM = Tablets, Metro UI default, no classic desktop.

Enterprise = Buisness, classic dsektop as default.

From what I understand, the ARM edition will also have the classic desktop, but it will be limited as to what applications it can run. And I highly doubt they will call it the "ARM" edition.

From what I understand, the ARM edition will also have the classic desktop, but it will be limited as to what applications it can run. And I highly doubt they will call it the "ARM" edition.

Well it'll be something. But I think they should axe the classic desktop. I mean none of the classic desktop apps will run on it.

Wholly different architectures! Wow!

Did you see Apple rebrand the whole thing when Mac OS X started running on Intel? Nope. Even apps are universal: PPC/Intel 64/32-bit. Why Microsoft won't provide a single neat package is beyond me.

Did you see Apple rebrand the whole thing when Mac OS X started running on Intel? Nope. Even apps are universal: PPC/Intel 64/32-bit. Why Microsoft won't provide a single neat package is beyond me.

Because x86 apps won't run on ARM. If they don't tell people, newbies will buy a ARM computer and try and install a desktop app and can't install. So they flood forums/tech support asking why. I doubt Microsoft and developers want to recode everysingle app.

Did you see Apple rebrand the whole thing when Mac OS X started running on Intel? Nope. Even apps are universal: PPC/Intel 64/32-bit. Why Microsoft won't provide a single neat package is beyond me.

Backwards compatibility maybe? That's ignoring dotNET programs of course, which are platform agnostic.

Did you see Apple rebrand the whole thing when Mac OS X started running on Intel? Nope. Even apps are universal: PPC/Intel 64/32-bit. Why Microsoft won't provide a single neat package is beyond me.

Apple moved to a more powerful architecture and was able to emulate the old Power PC with the newer system (Not that it ever ran well) in this case Microsoft is allowing a less powerful architecture to run Windows and most probably it is not powerful enough to emulate x86.

Apple moved to a more powerful architecture and was able to emulate the old Power PC with the newer system (Not that it ever ran well) in this case Microsoft is allowing a less powerful architecture to run Windows and most probably it is not powerful enough to emulate x86.

Rosetta worked perfectly well in most cases. In any case it would be interesting to see if Microsoft will actually come up with a universal package themselves so developers won't have to put out multiple versions of the same app. Also, it doesn't explain why Microsoft insists on still having separate 64 / 32-bit versions instead of having one that does both things properly.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think you meant the "ntfs3" driver, but yes there have been a lot of fixes for it in this release and previous releases, not 100% sure if the issue you mentioned is fixed though. In any case, the new "ntfs" driver in 7.1 doesn't have that issue (at least, no reports of such have come thru), but your kernel needs to explicitly enable support for the new driver first (like how CachyOS kernel has it), and you need to edit your mount points in /etc/fstab to use "ntfs" instead of the other drivers.
    • Epic Games says Unreal Engine 6 will help developers "build content faster" using AI models by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Epic Games is rolling out the latest major update to Unreal Engine 5 today, and at the same time, the company also dropped some information on the next-generation version of the product, Unreal Engine 6. This was already revealed a few weeks ago alongside the new Rocket League upgrade reveal. The company says it is combining the features of Unreal Engine and Unreal Editor for Fortnite to create this new version of its popular media creation tool. On top of creating entire games, the new engine will also focus on letting developers operate large-scale live service titles more easily, whether by shipping content into their own ecosystems or into Fortnite. The use of large language models is also mentioned here, with Epic saying it will be a core part of the engine. "We see LLMs, generative AI models, and tools like Claude and Codex playing a central role in helping you build content faster while maintaining the creative control you need," adds the company. Here is the rundown of what's new about version 6 of Unreal Engine: With all these changes to the programming model, portability upgrades, and generative AI integration, Epic says the new version of the engine will "change a lot about how games are made." The company aims to ship Unreal Engine 6 into early access in late 2027, with a full release planned for 12-18 months later. Epic Games also dropped a lengthy blog post about the new Unreal Engine 5.8 update for game developers over here. The release is focused on delivering better performance, customization, and streamlined workflows for development teams. This will be the final major update for this version of the engine before Epic switches to focus fully on Unreal Engine 6's early access launch.
    • Watch Louis Rossmann's recent experience on YouTube about trying to get a warranty replacement from Samsung. It's crazy.
    • That is the thing, how many of these people don't realise they are using AI? If they use Google Search they have no choice but to use AI. So yes, maybe half of American adults do use and I expect a lot of Uk adults do to, but I bet most of them don't realise it. Myself, i avoid the rubbish.
    • They use FREE AI. They aren't paying for this meme-generating slopware...
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!