Saudi Arabian restaurant 'fines diners for leaving food'


Recommended Posts

This would never fly where I live. First of all, this could really only apply to all you can eat buffets. I don't see how a restaurant could charge you for a meal you ordered but didn't finish. So I'll focus on buffets. It doesn't seem like a horrible idea I guess but it seems like that would make ordering and paying such a complicated thing. How would you determine what the charges are? Would you charge by pound or by the item left? Obviously half a pound of potatoes is cheaper than half a pound of meat. What if something is half eaten? What would stop you from taking or hiding items? It seems like it would be so difficult it wouldn't be worth the money to pay the staff. Lastly, since 99.999% of places don't charge based on what you have left, why would you ever go to the places that do?

There are a few issues I raise with this:

Charging people for wastage at "all you can eat" restaurants is fair enough, I can understand that.

However, if I order something and the portion size is HUGE, then it's not my fault if I can't eat it all. The same can also go to what FireTalon said - if I pay for it, then the restaurant has got it's money, so what is it to them if I want to leave all of it?

An easy way round it is to do what many people do and ask for it to be wrapped up to take away. Again, if I pay for it, I don't want to waste any of it, so will eat it later in the day.

The problem is no one really knows how much food each dish cones with.

this.

I was brought up like many people not to waste food, but now that nobody forces me to down all my food anymore, given the choice of "wasting" some left over food and feeling sick for the next couple of hours or even throwing up, I'll take "wasting" food any day. You'll need systemic changes on a national/international level to make any difference to the hypothetical "hungry children in africa". the stage at which you're sitting in front of a plate of food that they made too giant is wayyy too late to matter to worldwide food supply issues.

I agree with the fact we can't know how much food there will be - but that's not the reason this guy does it.

Read the article again. This guy does it because people order a ton of food just to impress other people - they know they can't eat everything they order.

I like this idea. There's something that you guys seem to ignore : when you order something and you don't finish it, it actually costs the restaurant. So the thing to do here is simple, if you like the food, can't finish it but don't want to be charged then bring a bag and take the leftover with you. "Your food, your waste", if you want the restaurant to take care of your waste for you then you pay for it. I think it's a pretty fair deal.

I think what 90% of everyone who is posting is this is to cut down on people who order 5x the amount of food then could possibly be eaten. I doubt they will charge people who leave a little left. But only got enough for the selfs.

If they order and pay for it they should be able to do so. Just because people are starving in the world doesnt mean everyone else should stop eating.

I don't see how people should be free to do whatever they want on business property. Private businesses have always reserved the right to place conditions on customer behavior. At most places, you can't show up naked. Some places ban children below a certain age because they make a lot of noise and cannot be controlled. Upper-scale restaurants will demand a certain level of formal dress for patrons. In this particular restaurant, the business demands that a customer finish the majority of their orders.

It isn't a law, and I don't see what the fuss is. If certain patrons can't handle it, there are plenty of other places for them to eat. Remember, this isn't a case of "I paid for it and I can do whatever I want." You can do whatever you want if you have takeout, but as long as you're a diner on the premises, you have to adhere to their rules of conduct.

and I hope they go out of business, and then the entire family starves to death. This is ****ing stupid, and so are the people that agree with it.

Gosh, thanks for sharing that with us. Maybe you should start an online petition. :rolleyes: :laugh:

If they order and pay for it they should be able to do so. Just because people are starving in the world doesnt mean everyone else should stop eating.

You're able to do whatever you want with it. Basically, think of it like this : It's your food, you can eat it, you can eat only half of it etc. If you choose to eat only a portion then you can take the left over with you, it's your food after all. But eating only a portion AND returning the left overs back to the restaurant is a service that the restaurant offers you. The restaurant takes care of your left over, you pay for it. Simple.

If I order and pay for it then **** you. Its mine to do as I want with it. If I want to order it and toss it in the trash, I bought it so **** off.

Please: Think of the children! :shifty:

But yeah, this will remind some customers of strict parents who required the same thing (I was taught to not waste food as a kid).

Now I'm a fat f*****!

  • 4 months later...

I never leave food behind.

In all the places I've eaten in Saudi Arabia, the normal portion for 1 person can feed 2 persons.
So I would have have to order two plates in order to feel a little satisfied.
  • Like 1

I like this because it encourage you to actually pay for what food you actually are going to eat and not paying for food just for it to sit out there to go waste.

Besides, we are consuming more food than ever before and more than we ever need. Your body can't handle so much food that it stores them as fat and that is why we are having problems with obesity.

Infact I want to see the "scrap fees" increase. This makes people be sensible for what they are paying and consuming. There is just so much greed and selfish people in this world.

I like this because it encourage you to actually pay for what food you actually are going to eat and not paying for food just for it to sit out there to go waste.

Besides, we are consuming more food than ever before and more than we ever need. Your body can't handle so much food that it stores them as fat and that is why we are having problems with obesity.

Infact I want to see the "scrap fees" increase. This makes people be sensible for what they are paying and consuming. There is just so much greed and selfish people in this world.

Speak for yourself, I am not having problems with obesity.

Why the **** should I pay if I can't finish my dinner ?

Like it was said by some people here, it's fine when it's in a all-you-can-eat types of places, but never in a million years will I go to a restaurant that did this **** to me.

They should put a huge warning sign that they are fining people for not finishing their dinner, see how that works for them.

Just out of spite I'm going to order a pizza and take a picture of it half finished, on its way to the trash bin.

Some of you are so high on "morality" you forget that it's none of your (or the restaurant's) business.

Some places in the UK do this too, but only ever seen it in all-you-can-eat places.

If I order something and pay for it, if I choose to leave some of it, that is my choice. Where I can, I will try and take things home (although I can't stand the term "doggie bag". A doggie bag is what you put poo in isn't it? I just ask for it to be wrapped up to take home). It's not my fault if the restaurant gives huge portions - I don't have the largest of stomachs.

If I am at an "all you can eat" buffet, I can understand charging.

I don't think the concept is wrong at all, but well, you've payed for it. Why not take the rests home?

Cultural thing perhaps? Here in Ireland I never see anyone take, ask, or be offered to take their leftovers home. Yet everytime I'm over in Olive Garden on Chili's you bet I take it home ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!