Saudi Arabian restaurant 'fines diners for leaving food'

By Hum
in Real World News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

P!P

Posted
Posted

This would never fly where I live. First of all, this could really only apply to all you can eat buffets. I don't see how a restaurant could charge you for a meal you ordered but didn't finish. So I'll focus on buffets. It doesn't seem like a horrible idea I guess but it seems like that would make ordering and paying such a complicated thing. How would you determine what the charges are? Would you charge by pound or by the item left? Obviously half a pound of potatoes is cheaper than half a pound of meat. What if something is half eaten? What would stop you from taking or hiding items? It seems like it would be so difficult it wouldn't be worth the money to pay the staff. Lastly, since 99.999% of places don't charge based on what you have left, why would you ever go to the places that do?

Grand Master

Sir Topham Hatt

Posted
Posted

There are a few issues I raise with this:

Charging people for wastage at "all you can eat" restaurants is fair enough, I can understand that.

However, if I order something and the portion size is HUGE, then it's not my fault if I can't eat it all. The same can also go to what FireTalon said - if I pay for it, then the restaurant has got it's money, so what is it to them if I want to leave all of it?

An easy way round it is to do what many people do and ask for it to be wrapped up to take away. Again, if I pay for it, I don't want to waste any of it, so will eat it later in the day.

Grand Master

primexx

Posted
Posted

The problem is no one really knows how much food each dish cones with.

this.

I was brought up like many people not to waste food, but now that nobody forces me to down all my food anymore, given the choice of "wasting" some left over food and feeling sick for the next couple of hours or even throwing up, I'll take "wasting" food any day. You'll need systemic changes on a national/international level to make any difference to the hypothetical "hungry children in africa". the stage at which you're sitting in front of a plate of food that they made too giant is wayyy too late to matter to worldwide food supply issues.

Veteran

Aethec

Posted
Posted

I agree with the fact we can't know how much food there will be - but that's not the reason this guy does it.

Read the article again. This guy does it because people order a ton of food just to impress other people - they know they can't eat everything they order.

Mentor

DrunkenBeard

Posted
Posted

I like this idea. There's something that you guys seem to ignore : when you order something and you don't finish it, it actually costs the restaurant. So the thing to do here is simple, if you like the food, can't finish it but don't want to be charged then bring a bag and take the leftover with you. "Your food, your waste", if you want the restaurant to take care of your waste for you then you pay for it. I think it's a pretty fair deal.

Grand Master

mokthraka

Posted
Posted

I think what 90% of everyone who is posting is this is to cut down on people who order 5x the amount of food then could possibly be eaten. I doubt they will charge people who leave a little left. But only got enough for the selfs.

Grand Master

zhangm Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted

If they order and pay for it they should be able to do so. Just because people are starving in the world doesnt mean everyone else should stop eating.

I don't see how people should be free to do whatever they want on business property. Private businesses have always reserved the right to place conditions on customer behavior. At most places, you can't show up naked. Some places ban children below a certain age because they make a lot of noise and cannot be controlled. Upper-scale restaurants will demand a certain level of formal dress for patrons. In this particular restaurant, the business demands that a customer finish the majority of their orders.

It isn't a law, and I don't see what the fuss is. If certain patrons can't handle it, there are plenty of other places for them to eat. Remember, this isn't a case of "I paid for it and I can do whatever I want." You can do whatever you want if you have takeout, but as long as you're a diner on the premises, you have to adhere to their rules of conduct.

Grand Master

zhangm Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted

and I hope they go out of business, and then the entire family starves to death. This is ****ing stupid, and so are the people that agree with it.

Gosh, thanks for sharing that with us. Maybe you should start an online petition. :rolleyes: :laugh:

Mentor

DrunkenBeard

Posted
Posted

If they order and pay for it they should be able to do so. Just because people are starving in the world doesnt mean everyone else should stop eating.

You're able to do whatever you want with it. Basically, think of it like this : It's your food, you can eat it, you can eat only half of it etc. If you choose to eat only a portion then you can take the left over with you, it's your food after all. But eating only a portion AND returning the left overs back to the restaurant is a service that the restaurant offers you. The restaurant takes care of your left over, you pay for it. Simple.

Grand Master

Steven P. Administrators

Posted
  • Administrators
Posted

If I order and pay for it then **** you. Its mine to do as I want with it. If I want to order it and toss it in the trash, I bought it so **** off.

Please: Think of the children! :shifty:

But yeah, this will remind some customers of strict parents who required the same thing (I was taught to not waste food as a kid).

Now I'm a fat f*****!

  • 4 months later...
Grand Master

tiagosilva29

Posted
Posted

I never leave food behind.

In all the places I've eaten in Saudi Arabia, the normal portion for 1 person can feed 2 persons.
So I would have have to order two plates in order to feel a little satisfied.
  • Muhammad Farrukh
  • Like 1
Grand Master

ozgeek

Posted
Posted

I like this because it encourage you to actually pay for what food you actually are going to eat and not paying for food just for it to sit out there to go waste.

Besides, we are consuming more food than ever before and more than we ever need. Your body can't handle so much food that it stores them as fat and that is why we are having problems with obesity.

Infact I want to see the "scrap fees" increase. This makes people be sensible for what they are paying and consuming. There is just so much greed and selfish people in this world.

Grand Master

ylcard

Posted
Posted

I like this because it encourage you to actually pay for what food you actually are going to eat and not paying for food just for it to sit out there to go waste.

Besides, we are consuming more food than ever before and more than we ever need. Your body can't handle so much food that it stores them as fat and that is why we are having problems with obesity.

Infact I want to see the "scrap fees" increase. This makes people be sensible for what they are paying and consuming. There is just so much greed and selfish people in this world.

Speak for yourself, I am not having problems with obesity.

Why the **** should I pay if I can't finish my dinner ?

Like it was said by some people here, it's fine when it's in a all-you-can-eat types of places, but never in a million years will I go to a restaurant that did this **** to me.

They should put a huge warning sign that they are fining people for not finishing their dinner, see how that works for them.

Just out of spite I'm going to order a pizza and take a picture of it half finished, on its way to the trash bin.

Some of you are so high on "morality" you forget that it's none of your (or the restaurant's) business.

Grand Master

Sir Topham Hatt

Posted
Posted

Some places in the UK do this too, but only ever seen it in all-you-can-eat places.

If I order something and pay for it, if I choose to leave some of it, that is my choice. Where I can, I will try and take things home (although I can't stand the term "doggie bag". A doggie bag is what you put poo in isn't it? I just ask for it to be wrapped up to take home). It's not my fault if the restaurant gives huge portions - I don't have the largest of stomachs.

If I am at an "all you can eat" buffet, I can understand charging.

Proficient

thommcg

Posted
Posted

I don't think the concept is wrong at all, but well, you've payed for it. Why not take the rests home?

Cultural thing perhaps? Here in Ireland I never see anyone take, ask, or be offered to take their leftovers home. Yet everytime I'm over in Olive Garden on Chili's you bet I take it home ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute

      By Karthik Mudaliar · Posted

      Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly limiting Meta's use of its Gemini AI models after Meta tried buying more computing capacity than even Google could supply. According to the Financial Times, Google told Meta in March that it could not provide the full Gemini capacity that Meta had requested. This shortfall even disrupted and delayed some of Meta's internal projects. Due to this, Meta even told its employees internally to use AI tokens more efficiently. Meta wasn't the only one to get hit by this sudden refusal by Google; even other customers were affected. But Meta was hit harder because of its unusually high demand for Google's models. The move from Google makes it evident that companies all over are in limited supply of both infrastructure and compute. Alphabet said in April that Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year-over-year to $20 billion in the first quarter, helped by enterprise AI infrastructure and AI solutions. In pursuit of more compute, Meta had earlier signed a multi-billion-dollar AWS agreement as well as a large AMD GPU deal for AI data centers. But the crunch would be short-lived as both Meta and Google have also ramped up infrastructure investments heavily. Meta said in November that it was committing more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 for AI technology, infrastructure, and workforce expansion. In the first quarter of this year, Meta also raised its expected capital expenditure for 2026 to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, citing higher component pricing and additional data center costs for future capacity. However, this doesn't make the company immune to the current dependence on outside suppliers. Meta has also spent many years promoting Llama as an open-weight alternative to closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. But if the reported reliance on Google's Gemini models is severe enough for internal work to get impacted, then it looks like even frontier labs and Big Tech aren't fully self-sufficient. Source: Financial Times
    • Samsung, Amazon extend 990 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD deal beyond Prime Day 2026

      By seeprime · Posted

      I like to reminisce about the good old days, way back in autumn 2025 when building a gaming machine was fun and the drives were about $150 when you caught a deal. Yes duh, back in the day we had it gone. Then baby Skynet came along, hiding in AI datacenters demanding more processing power until it reached singularity. End of a not totally fictional story.
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware

      By +Spark99 · Posted

      My experience in the past with older Windows 11 builds was not great on unsupported machines but I recently used Rufus to put the latest build on a older 5th Gen Core Thinkpad T that we upgraded with a SATA SSD and 8GB of RAM four years ago when hardware was reasonable and it seemed pretty fast and solid. Customer is very happy with the performance and will probably get four more years out of that venerable laptop that he loves so much. Another customer just retired his Dell Studio laptop from 2009 running Windows 10. It got an SSD over 10 years ago and did everything he needed it to for 17 years but he also retired last year and is happy doing everything on his iPad now.
    • Apple's newest AirTag 2 gets first big discount

      By TarasBuria · Posted

      Apple's newest AirTag 2 gets first big discount by Taras Buria In late January 2026, Apple introduced its second-generation AirTag trackers, bringing a refresh to the old model that has been on the market for half a decade. Now, you can get these new trackers at an all-time low price, thanks to the first big discount that brought the price down by 17% on Amazon. While the second-generation AirTag looks identical to its predecessor, it packs meaningful upgrades inside. The second-gen ultrawideband chip works 50% farther than the original AirTag, allowing you to detect lost items in a wider range. In addition, the second-generation AirTag features an upgraded Bluetooth chip for extended range and a significantly louder speaker (up to 50%) so that you can hear it better when locating a lost item. Note that the second-gen AirTag only works with iPhones and iPads that run iOS/iPadOS 26 and newer, so you need a compatible device to use the tracker. Like the original AirTag, the AirTag 2 is available in two packs: one and four pieces. Both are now available at a notable discount on Amazon, and you can purchase them using the links below. Apple AirTag 2 tracker - $24 | 17% off on Amazon Apple AirTag 2 tracker (four-pack) - $89 | 10% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S.- specific and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Tidal won't monetize AI slop music, company says

      By monterxz · Posted

      I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."

  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      267
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!