Would you have File History feature or both File History and Previous Versi


Would you have File History feature or both File History and Previous Versions  

12 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you have File History feature or both File History and Previous Versions

    • File History
    • File History but leave Previous Versions as it is


Recommended Posts

So by now you must have read that Windows 8 is going to have a File History feature (called History Vault in the earlier builds) but it's supposed to work only with external/removable drives. In comparison, Previous Versions works today with local drives including the installed Windows partition so you don't have to have removable drive attached to use this feature. In the Windows 8 Developer Preview, Previous Versions doesn't seem to exist. Now I know many bits and pieces are missing in this version, so we don't know if Microsoft is going to replace Previous Versions with File History but what would you rather have? Both or only File History? Because having a removable drive always attached is not always possible and especially if it's a flash drive, it will wear out over time.

  • 4 weeks later...

Bump in case no one has read this topic, this is a Windows 8 issue. Looks like Previous Versions is going away for local disks and replaced by File History (History Vault) but only for removable disks. Or is that no one uses Previous Versions because everyone is dual booting with XP (which makes Previous Versions not work) or everyone is stuck with Windows 7 Home Premium?

  • 3 months later...

Directly from Microsoft's Windows and Windows Server Developer Preview Compatibility Cookbook: http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=27416

Volume Shadow Copy Service UI Removed

Platform

Clients ? Windows Developer Preview

Servers ? Windows Server Developer Preview

Description

Earlier versions of Window employed the Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS). VSS is a service that exposes a set of COM APIs that implements a framework to allow volume backups to be performed on file servers while apps on a system continue to write to the volumes. It does this by creating restore points or ?shadow copies? of file share data. In Windows 7 users could create and schedule shadow copies and later use them to restore previous versions of individual files from a shadow copy.

This feature was available in the Windows Explorer as ?Previous Versions?.

User triggered shadow copies were rarely used and negatively impacted the overall Windows performance. In Windows Developer Preview, the ability to create or schedule a shadow copy was removed. As a result the ?Previous Versions? feature in the Windows Explorer became obsolete and was removed too.

Thus, users can no longer create shadow copies from which to restore files.

Manifestation

The Previous Versions option no longer exists in the Windows Explorer Properties menu.

Windows 7 Backup and Restore Deprecated

Platform

Clients ? Windows Developer Preview

Servers ? N/A

Description

While there is no behavioral change to Backup and Restore, this function is being deprecated and will not be updated. It was rarely used and its functionality has been replaced by the new File History feature. It will ship in Windows Developer Preview and enthusiasts who upgraded from Windows 7 to Windows Developer Preview or depend on Backup and Restore or disk image backup will be still able to use it. However, all access points to Backup and Restore, with the exception of the Control Panel, have been removed

We do not recommend using both features at the same time. File History checks if Backup schedule exists and is active and if it finds one, it will not let users to turn it on.

Manifestation

Workflows may be interrupted and documentation that refers to the previous method for accessing the Windows Backup and Restore feature will need to be updated to reflect these changes.

Mitigation of Impact

Apps that might trigger Backup and Restore should be rewritten to check if File History is on and let users choose their preferred method.

The File History feature in the Developer Preview has replaced Previous Versions and it is once again a case of a feature replacing an existing one which worked nicely and the new one does only half the things of the old one. File History should have complemented Previous Versions. File History seems similar to OS X's Time Machine which *requires* an external drive whereas Previous Versions made use of local hard drive space where older shadow copies were created automatically and transparently and could be quickly deleted should disk space be required. Which means now anyone without a removable drive is going to lose the Previous Versions feature when he "upgrades" to Windows 8.

They say in the document above "User triggered shadow copies were rarely used and negatively impacted the overall Windows performance." which is simply not true or correct. User did not have to trigger shadow copies in the first place as system restore automatically created shadow copies at periodic intervals and I was able to restore any file from Previous Versions.

  • 4 weeks later...

Ugh I Just noticed this while trying out the Consumer Preview. This is one of the first removed features that xpclient complains about that I think is actually useful. I don't see why they had to remove this! It was invaluable. Playing with the CP, I am actually more inclined to leave my desktop running Windows 7 than before. I thought the Developer Preview was just missing things because it was such an early build, but it really doesn't seem that a whole lot has changed.

I don't want to use removable or network drives to keep file histories. My desktop has 4 internal drives, that's enough. Apparently you can use local drives if you refer to them using their UNC path, but that's still annoying. You can't keep file histories of files on their respective drives. You also need to keep all the folders you want backed up in a library. I never liked the libraries, I like using folders.

Windows 8 can access previous versions if you're browsing a Windows 7 shared folder. The Volume Shadow Copy service is still there, I wonder if someone can re-enable this functionality. It's a shame that Microsoft is dumbing down Windows. I usually quickly switch to the latest version but Windows 8 has worried and wondering if it's even worth the hassle.

EDIT: It seems that the volume shadow functionality is still completely intact! Using ShadowExplorer I can browse old versions and deleted files. So they only removed the tab used to browse previous versions. How stupid. This doesn't work perfectly, though. I tried copying a large folder out of a shadow copy onto the same drive the shadow copy was from, and in the middle of the process it seems the old shadow copy it was from was removed to make room. If you're going to be using this, export the files to a different drive so that they still exist while copying.

Browsing the Windows 8 computer over the network and going to previous versions does not show any previous versions, though.

Really dumb IMO. Windows 8 was designed to support tablet devices, but by removing previous versions, now you have to carry an external storage device to get the same functionality. Tablets are meant to be portable, who the heck wants to carry an extra drive around so they can recover an old version of a file?

I just realized that a nice workaround for this is you can share the local volumes and then point the File History feature to use the locally shared volume. So it's not really a removed feature as long as it works for shared local volumes. Share permissions can be locked down to only "System".

You can't choose to have the files backed up on their respective drives, though, can you? You have only one repository used for file history, and using a UNC path that "network" location can be the very same computer. It really bugs me that the shadow copies are still completely there, they just don't let you retrieve old files from them. You can get the files out using ShadowExplorer, though.

What's weird is according to Microsoft the shadow copies are not persistent and the volume shadow copy service can only be used to create a backup. But without persistent shadow copies, how is system restore supposed to work? I hope they gimp it no further between now and the release.

It looks like File History is only for certain file types (documents, music, videos and pictures) in Libraries and desktop and browser favorites. Previous Versions worked for any generic file type in any folder. One annoyance though of Previous Versions was that if you dual booted with XP (for whatever reason), they would all be deleted (because of an incompatibility with NT5.x and NT6.x).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!