Would you have File History feature or both File History and Previous Versi


Would you have File History feature or both File History and Previous Versions  

12 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you have File History feature or both File History and Previous Versions

    • File History
    • File History but leave Previous Versions as it is


Recommended Posts

So by now you must have read that Windows 8 is going to have a File History feature (called History Vault in the earlier builds) but it's supposed to work only with external/removable drives. In comparison, Previous Versions works today with local drives including the installed Windows partition so you don't have to have removable drive attached to use this feature. In the Windows 8 Developer Preview, Previous Versions doesn't seem to exist. Now I know many bits and pieces are missing in this version, so we don't know if Microsoft is going to replace Previous Versions with File History but what would you rather have? Both or only File History? Because having a removable drive always attached is not always possible and especially if it's a flash drive, it will wear out over time.

  • 4 weeks later...

Bump in case no one has read this topic, this is a Windows 8 issue. Looks like Previous Versions is going away for local disks and replaced by File History (History Vault) but only for removable disks. Or is that no one uses Previous Versions because everyone is dual booting with XP (which makes Previous Versions not work) or everyone is stuck with Windows 7 Home Premium?

  • 3 months later...

Directly from Microsoft's Windows and Windows Server Developer Preview Compatibility Cookbook: http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=27416

Volume Shadow Copy Service UI Removed

Platform

Clients ? Windows Developer Preview

Servers ? Windows Server Developer Preview

Description

Earlier versions of Window employed the Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS). VSS is a service that exposes a set of COM APIs that implements a framework to allow volume backups to be performed on file servers while apps on a system continue to write to the volumes. It does this by creating restore points or ?shadow copies? of file share data. In Windows 7 users could create and schedule shadow copies and later use them to restore previous versions of individual files from a shadow copy.

This feature was available in the Windows Explorer as ?Previous Versions?.

User triggered shadow copies were rarely used and negatively impacted the overall Windows performance. In Windows Developer Preview, the ability to create or schedule a shadow copy was removed. As a result the ?Previous Versions? feature in the Windows Explorer became obsolete and was removed too.

Thus, users can no longer create shadow copies from which to restore files.

Manifestation

The Previous Versions option no longer exists in the Windows Explorer Properties menu.

Windows 7 Backup and Restore Deprecated

Platform

Clients ? Windows Developer Preview

Servers ? N/A

Description

While there is no behavioral change to Backup and Restore, this function is being deprecated and will not be updated. It was rarely used and its functionality has been replaced by the new File History feature. It will ship in Windows Developer Preview and enthusiasts who upgraded from Windows 7 to Windows Developer Preview or depend on Backup and Restore or disk image backup will be still able to use it. However, all access points to Backup and Restore, with the exception of the Control Panel, have been removed

We do not recommend using both features at the same time. File History checks if Backup schedule exists and is active and if it finds one, it will not let users to turn it on.

Manifestation

Workflows may be interrupted and documentation that refers to the previous method for accessing the Windows Backup and Restore feature will need to be updated to reflect these changes.

Mitigation of Impact

Apps that might trigger Backup and Restore should be rewritten to check if File History is on and let users choose their preferred method.

The File History feature in the Developer Preview has replaced Previous Versions and it is once again a case of a feature replacing an existing one which worked nicely and the new one does only half the things of the old one. File History should have complemented Previous Versions. File History seems similar to OS X's Time Machine which *requires* an external drive whereas Previous Versions made use of local hard drive space where older shadow copies were created automatically and transparently and could be quickly deleted should disk space be required. Which means now anyone without a removable drive is going to lose the Previous Versions feature when he "upgrades" to Windows 8.

They say in the document above "User triggered shadow copies were rarely used and negatively impacted the overall Windows performance." which is simply not true or correct. User did not have to trigger shadow copies in the first place as system restore automatically created shadow copies at periodic intervals and I was able to restore any file from Previous Versions.

  • 4 weeks later...

Ugh I Just noticed this while trying out the Consumer Preview. This is one of the first removed features that xpclient complains about that I think is actually useful. I don't see why they had to remove this! It was invaluable. Playing with the CP, I am actually more inclined to leave my desktop running Windows 7 than before. I thought the Developer Preview was just missing things because it was such an early build, but it really doesn't seem that a whole lot has changed.

I don't want to use removable or network drives to keep file histories. My desktop has 4 internal drives, that's enough. Apparently you can use local drives if you refer to them using their UNC path, but that's still annoying. You can't keep file histories of files on their respective drives. You also need to keep all the folders you want backed up in a library. I never liked the libraries, I like using folders.

Windows 8 can access previous versions if you're browsing a Windows 7 shared folder. The Volume Shadow Copy service is still there, I wonder if someone can re-enable this functionality. It's a shame that Microsoft is dumbing down Windows. I usually quickly switch to the latest version but Windows 8 has worried and wondering if it's even worth the hassle.

EDIT: It seems that the volume shadow functionality is still completely intact! Using ShadowExplorer I can browse old versions and deleted files. So they only removed the tab used to browse previous versions. How stupid. This doesn't work perfectly, though. I tried copying a large folder out of a shadow copy onto the same drive the shadow copy was from, and in the middle of the process it seems the old shadow copy it was from was removed to make room. If you're going to be using this, export the files to a different drive so that they still exist while copying.

Browsing the Windows 8 computer over the network and going to previous versions does not show any previous versions, though.

Really dumb IMO. Windows 8 was designed to support tablet devices, but by removing previous versions, now you have to carry an external storage device to get the same functionality. Tablets are meant to be portable, who the heck wants to carry an extra drive around so they can recover an old version of a file?

I just realized that a nice workaround for this is you can share the local volumes and then point the File History feature to use the locally shared volume. So it's not really a removed feature as long as it works for shared local volumes. Share permissions can be locked down to only "System".

You can't choose to have the files backed up on their respective drives, though, can you? You have only one repository used for file history, and using a UNC path that "network" location can be the very same computer. It really bugs me that the shadow copies are still completely there, they just don't let you retrieve old files from them. You can get the files out using ShadowExplorer, though.

What's weird is according to Microsoft the shadow copies are not persistent and the volume shadow copy service can only be used to create a backup. But without persistent shadow copies, how is system restore supposed to work? I hope they gimp it no further between now and the release.

It looks like File History is only for certain file types (documents, music, videos and pictures) in Libraries and desktop and browser favorites. Previous Versions worked for any generic file type in any folder. One annoyance though of Previous Versions was that if you dual booted with XP (for whatever reason), they would all be deleted (because of an incompatibility with NT5.x and NT6.x).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And Microsoft got walloped on here for what they were charging for the new Surface book. Not looking as bad now. This was inevitable as they have to maintain those Apple margins.
    • Now 8GB of ram looks even worse in the Neo. I'm so happy I purchased 128GB of DDR 4 when I did.... paid $174. Upgraded my parents laptop to 32GB around the same time for $48. Luckily I have a TON of spare laptops. So i'm good on laptops for a while. I also have a lot of desktops too that I could use if i had to. Lets just hope nothing happens to my main 4 monitor couch workstation.
    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      453
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Xenon
      77
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!