Recommended Posts

Diablo 3 is my game to end all games. I cannot tell you how much I played D1 and D2, or how much I want this game. I watched Gamespot's hour long beta gameplay video this morning, and it has only made me crave Diablo 3 more. I'm so excited for this game.

I was originally miffed about the art direction changes when compared to Diablo 2 too, but then I read a developer blog or interview which explained their thought process, logic, and how they came to the art style that we see now. And, I must say that I agreed with everything they said. The skill system is all new, crafting is new, companions, vendors, even multiplayer has been changed for the better from what I've read. There is no other game I want more.

That being said, Blizzard needs to light some fires under their asses and release this game already...or give me beta access.

I totally agree. This game is going to own my life for a long time to come once it hits the shelves.

i wanted this game, until i heard you need to be online 24/7 to play it. also, as a sidenote, the graphics of the game look like they came straight out of 2006. torchlight 1 looks better then that...

To be fair, the game was in development since before 2006 even (granted it has changed art styles since then)......good thing graphics have nothing to do with how fun a game is.

Why didn't I play longer? That's a good question. You see, the game requires an always-on Internet connection, and the servers seemed to set themselves on fire a few hours after I downloaded the beta, and this dumped me from the game. You not only need to be online to play, you need to connected to Blizzard at all times. So if your connection goes down, or if their servers crash, you can't play. Not even single player. At least this means I can sleep tonight! I know this is a beta and these things are bound to happen, but it's still an ill omen.

that is why the launch of the game is doing to ****ty for people who pick up it at launch, cause i promise you no way blizzard is going to be able to keep up with all the traffic that is going to hit them.

that is why the launch of the game is doing to ****ty for people who pick up it at launch, cause i promise you no way blizzard is going to be able to keep up with all the traffic that is going to hit them.

And people pirating it will have a hassle free experience ... that's not the right way to combat piracy (N)

that is why the launch of the game is doing to ****ty for people who pick up it at launch, cause i promise you no way blizzard is going to be able to keep up with all the traffic that is going to hit them.

They handled the release of Starcraft 2 perfectly fine, I don't see Diablo being any different. Blizzard have a bad rep from years ago that says there service is totally crappy and unreliable which is simply not true nowadays.

that is why the launch of the game is doing to ****ty for people who pick up it at launch, cause i promise you no way blizzard is going to be able to keep up with all the traffic that is going to hit them.

Just like Olemus said, they handled SC2 just fine. They also handled Cataclysm's launch very well.

They handled the release of Starcraft 2 perfectly fine, I don't see Diablo being any different. Blizzard have a bad rep from years ago that says there service is totally crappy and unreliable which is simply not true nowadays.

i could be wrong. hopefully i am. i usually feel pretty bad for people who have been waiting forever to play something, and get stomped cause their developper crapped out on servers or Q&A (effin Dice and the BC2 launch... or brink... bastheda should rot for brink...)

i tend to love blizzard, but they've dropped down a couple of notches in my book for the online thing, and also making the sequel to my all time fave RTS an MMORPG and not another RTS.

that is why the launch of the game is doing to ****ty for people who pick up it at launch, cause i promise you no way blizzard is going to be able to keep up with all the traffic that is going to hit them.

I think Blizzard will handle it just well.....they do run the largest MMO to date still, they likely have a pretty good idea of the traffic to expect at launch of D3.

And people pirating it will have a hassle free experience ... that's not the right way to combat piracy (N)

And people pirating it will be unable to play the game period.

How exactly is that a hassle-free experience?

I think Blizzard will handle it just well.....they do run the largest MMO to date still, they likely have a pretty good idea of the traffic to expect at launch of D3.

And people pirating it will be unable to play the game period.

How exactly is that a hassle-free experience?

how do you figure that?

how do you figure that?

I know! Because there's no way to emulate a server's signal response... oh wait.

ubisoft games are a clear example that it can be easily done.

Because from what I understand there is no single-player in D3, unlike Ubisoft's games and SC2. I may be misinterpreting what I have read, but you have to physically log into battle.net and play on your battle.net character to play the game at all. Basically, from what I have read (and I have double-checked this), Diablo 3 is multiplayer only, no singleplayer exists period. Therefor you cannot simply emulate the servers response signal, you would have to emulate the server in full to be able to play, which physically yes, it can be done, but it will take quite awhile, and any major updates will break it.....just like WoW private servers.

The only form of single-player that D3 will have, is the capability to play without other players while logged into your battle.net account, so until you emulate battle.net, good luck playing "singleplayer" after downloading the game.

Because from what I understand there is no single-player in D3, unlike Ubisoft's games and SC2. I may be misinterpreting what I have read, but you have to physically log into battle.net and play on your battle.net character to play the game at all. Basically, from what I have read (and I have double-checked this), Diablo 3 is multiplayer only, no singleplayer exists period. Therefor you cannot simply emulate the servers response signal, you would have to emulate the server in full to be able to play, which physically yes, it can be done, but it will take quite awhile, and any major updates will break it.....just like WoW private servers.

yes it does! period.

Why didn't I play longer? That's a good question. You see, the game requires an always-on Internet connection, and the servers seemed to set themselves on fire a few hours after I downloaded the beta, and this dumped me from the game. You not only need to be online to play, you need to connected to Blizzard at all times. So if your connection goes down, or if their servers crash, you can't play. Not even single player. At least this means I can sleep tonight! I know this is a beta and these things are bound to happen, but it's still an ill omen.

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2011/09/hands-on-with-the-diablo-3-beta-keep-that-internet-on.ars

Where there is a will there is a way. Hell, WoW is an MMO and people still setup rogue realms so that people who don't want to pay can still play.

The game will have a single player experience but my understanding is that your character will be stored on battle.net servers much like it was in D2 if you wanted to do any of the ladders.

My internet is always on so this isn't a problem for me. If my internet is interrupted for whatever reason and I can't play I might actually go outside for a moment. God knows I'll need some actual sunshine because after Diablo 3 is released I'll likely become a cave troll.

I know! Because there's no way to emulate a server's signal response... oh wait.

From what I read somewhere, being connected all the time isn't merely to "ping" the Blizzard servers. Your characters are saved server side like in WoW and the loot is not shared with your party, it is parsed by the server for your "instance" of the game, regardless if youre in a party or not.

That said, eventually someone will setup a server to emulate the Blizzard server-client setup a-la WoW cracked servers.

No it doesn't. When I say single-player, I mean no dedicated single-player mode. The "single-player" in Diablo 3 is a private game you create on battle.net, it is not a mode you select where the characters are stored on your computer like Diablo 2 has. Therefore no, it doesn't have a single-player. It has solo-play and multi-player. How exactly do you play with a cracked client when you don't even have access to any character data?

From what I read somewhere, being connected all the time isn't merely to "ping" the Blizzard servers. Your characters are saved server side like in WoW and the loot is not shared with your party, it is parsed by the server for your "instance" of the game, regardless if youre in a party or not.

That said, eventually someone will setup a server to emulate the Blizzard server-client setup a-la WoW cracked servers.

Exactly my point, Diablo 3 won't be a game that lets you play offline with a crack that responds to attempted pings to battle.net servers, in Diablo 3, the "single-player" is all server-side, you do not have your character files on your computer, your game client doesn't even have the code to create and run a solo game, the game itself is create on battle.net servers and your client connects to it and gives you feedback as to what your character is doing in your Blizzard-hosted solo game.

And yes, it may be cracked eventually, but not as easily, quickly, or reliably as Assassins Creed 2/Brotherhood/etc.

No it doesn't. When I say single-player, I mean no dedicated single-player mode. The "single-player" in Diablo 3 is a private game you create on battle.net, it is not a mode you select where the characters are stored on your computer like Diablo 2 has. Therefore no, it doesn't have a single-player. It has solo-play and multi-player. How exactly do you play with a cracked client when you don't even have access to any character data?

Exactly my point, Diablo 3 won't be a game that lets you play offline with a crack that responds to attempted pings to battle.net servers, in Diablo 3, the "single-player" is all server-side, you do not have your character files on your computer, your game client doesn't even have the code to create and run a solo game, the game itself is create on battle.net servers and your client connects to it and gives you feedback as to what your character is doing in your Blizzard-hosted solo game.

And yes, it may be cracked eventually, but not as easily, quickly, or reliably as Assassins Creed 2/Brotherhood/etc.

you're hilarious if you actually think that's true...

I think what I liked most about Diablo 2 was the artwork. Matt Uelmen wrote the best music he ever wrote for that game, and it's a soundtrack I've been listening in and out of the game for years. It was introspective, experimental, unique and incredibly effective at creating distinct atmospheres, especially very creepy ones.

Matt Uelmen is not working for Blizzard anymore. The little I've heard of D3's music was much more orchestral, movie-like and ...generic.

On the graphical side of things, it looks a bit too colorful and cartoony, as many have said over the past years. It's actually not that bad, but I haven't seen anything remotely as sinister and gory as, say, the Monastery in D2.

Gameplay should be a lot improved though. It's going to be a great game, but definitely not the same atmosphere.

You'd have to emulate a lot if you wanted to play without giving Blizzard your money. It's probably possible, but it won't be a quick crack.

We have nice WoW Servers emulators. (Antrix/Ascent/summit etc, Mangos)

I don't know if Burlex (<3) is still around, last thing I heard was that he was working on a AION emulator, but maybe he will get started on a D3 BN emu.

I think what I liked most about Diablo 2 was the artwork. Matt Uelmen wrote the best music he ever wrote for that game, and it's a soundtrack I've been listening in and out of the game for years. It was introspective, experimental, unique and incredibly effective at creating distinct atmospheres, especially very creepy ones.

Matt Uelmen is not working for Blizzard anymore. The little I've heard of D3's music was much more orchestral, movie-like and ...generic.

Damn.. I was so hoping he'd be involved as his score for Diablo 2 is probably the best of any video game I've ever played. The music is so memorable and it never gets boring or tiresome.. I enjoyed listening to it every time I played.

Ho hum. I've opted in for the Diablo III beta on Battle.NET - I'd guess I have zero chance of being selected but I guess we'll see what happens!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • 1. Define "better". 2. It's still more expensive than equivalent PCs so... And there is not one Windows platform. This is the mistake ALL Apple oriented people make. Apple is one OEM. You could reasonably compare them to one PC OEM, say Dell or HP. But you can't compare them to ALL PC OEMs. Case in point, Apple has NO touch screen MacBooks. No tablet Macs. There are no rugged Macs. The variety of PC OEM design is insane. With Apple, you have... Apple. The problem is that you're starting with Apple as the definition of "good" then filtering out anything that isn't close to an existing Apple product, then trying to homogenise all of those left into a fictional product line and then ignore any innovations to create a minimal feature subset so you can say "See! Apple better!" PS: I was an Apple dev for 17 years and helped develop MacInTalk and disability solutions for Apple, and worked on Microsoft Office for MacOS - and I have several Macs and MacBooks - so tread very carefully.
    • Major Xbox layoffs may claim South of Midnight developer Compulsion entirely by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft has been making major changes in its gaming wing Xbox for a few months now, including the appointment of a new CEO, a large number of leadership changes, and strategy shifts. However, the company is seemingly also looking at initiating a major layoffs wave at Xbox and perhaps even a studio closure. The new report lands from Kotaku, Xbox first-party developer Compulsion Games is being shuttered soon by Microsoft. For those unfamiliar with the studio, it's the team behind Contrast (2013), We Happy Few (2018), and South of Midnight (2025). Its latest game was quite well received, even winning a Peabody Award for its writing. It even received a 9/10 in Neowin's own review, highlighting its engaging storyline, gorgeous world, and curious characters. The studio joined Xbox Game Studios in 2018, just as Microsoft announced it is acquiring Playground Games, Undead Labs, and Ninja Theory. Despite recent listings for new staff roles, according to the new report, Compulsion Games is being closed entirely, with over 90 staff being let go. Kotaku also added that the studio's leadership is in negotiations with Microsoft about this decision, but no official details have been revealed yet. The report lands just as two senior managers of Xbox leave their posts at Microsoft Gaming. Head of Xbox Game Studios Craig Duncan and chief of staff Louise O'Connor originally began their journey in Rare and have been a part of Xbox for over two decades. Dunkan has been responsible for games like Kinect Sports and Sea of Thieves, while O'Connor was primarily working on Rare's Everwild project before its cancelation. If this report about the studio shutdown is accurate, this may just be the start of a major new layoffs wave at Xbox Game Studios. There are also rumors of Arkane Studios being heavily affected. As always, take all these reports with a grain of salt until something official materializes from Microsoft or the studios.
    • The flaw with this analysis is that this laptop has a cellphone CPU in it. In the Intel world, that would be an N150 and those are everywhere, even in low end laptops. You can get an N150 based NUC with 16GB RAM and 256GB-512GB SSD... NOT soldered in... for < $500 Canadian (around US$360). The problem is two fold: tech bloggers/writers on most tech site (like this one, ironically) overvalue Apple and apparently aren't in the same earnings class as most regular people. As a result, we get breathless articles about how everyone needs a folding phone when most people just cannot afford one... or really need one. And we get Apple used as the baseline metric regardless of whether that comparison makes any sense. If Dell or HP released a retail laptop with a cellphone motherboard, you'd be all over them for doing that - but Apple does it and it's genius. I see articles suggesting what Samsung - a company that basically started the foldable phone market and has built them for eight years - needs to do to compete with Apple's unreleased, unspecced and unseen folding phone. Sorry, no - if the Neo (really creative name there BTW - still, better than the Go, the other "creative" product name everyone's using) encourages PC makers to make cellphone laptops using lower end ARM processors, we all lose. It's a step backwards and a capitulation to the fact that semiconductor makers and computer OEMs (and tech bloggers) have totally lost the plot.
    • Everyone should install this extension and ignore games that use AI. https://chromewebstore.google....nnigaaeelfkeomjcngmnh?pli=1 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ai-warning-for-steam/
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      197
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!