Recommended Posts

Well, finally got in, took ages to get in. but.. I am in!

Edit: Spoke too soon, can't make my "hero" keeps timing out.

Got in - hacking my way through the Old Cathedral. (That's right - this admitted Diablo n00b smoked through the first three quests without dying.)

However, the Fallen Star quest (set in the Old Cathedral) more than makes up for it in nasty (I've already died three times and nearly died one other). By default, you are soloing your way through the quests and playing on Normal difficulty (and be glad of it) - that way, you aren't too embarrassed to die. Fortunately, you don't get penalized for dying until you crack level 10. I'm playing as a wizard (not a barbarian or monk); however, unlike most RPGs, wizards can certainly wield swords (I currently do, in fact) - hence "hacking" can be taken literally. Watch out for Beasts (swollen corpses) - splitting them open (which you HAVE to do to make them dead again) releases poisonous snakes (anywhere from six to ten per Beast). So NOT fun (especially if you are also dealing with Risen and more Beasts or other awfuls).

Connectivity - they haven't got things balanced quite right yet - expect difficulty logging on (there's a note on this at the login screen).

Looting and scavenging - do NOT be afraid to loot the corpses; there well could be gold or other needfuls (like weapons and potions) - there's also a Scavenger achievement for this.

I left the settings at the defaults it picked up (1280x720 with HIGH (!) detail) and I don't exactly have the strongest of GPUs (AMD HD5450). That indicates that even laptops will have few issues with the game (like StarCraft II and unlike World of Warcraft pre-4.0), as long as they aren't ancient in terms of graphics hardware. My CPU is powerful enough (Intel Q6600), and even the system RAM (4 GB) is quite suitable.

Overall, I'm surprisingly impressed (and I didn't expect to be). I do believe I'm going to have to add time for D3 to my gameplay rotation.

Got in - hacking my way through the Old Cathedral. (That's right - this admitted Diablo n00b smoked through the first three quests without dying.)

However, the Fallen Star quest (set in the Old Cathedral) more than makes up for it in nasty (I've already died three times and nearly died one other). By default, you are soloing your way through the quests and playing on Normal difficulty (and be glad of it) - that way, you aren't too embarrassed to die. Fortunately, you don't get penalized for dying until you crack level 10. I'm playing as a wizard (not a barbarian or monk); however, unlike most RPGs, wizards can certainly wield swords (I currently do, in fact) - hence "hacking" can be taken literally. Watch out for Beasts (swollen corpses) - splitting them open (which you HAVE to do to make them dead again) releases poisonous snakes (anywhere from six to ten per Beast). So NOT fun (especially if you are also dealing with Risen and more Beasts or other awfuls).

Connectivity - they haven't got things balanced quite right yet - expect difficulty logging on (there's a note on this at the login screen).

Looting and scavenging - do NOT be afraid to loot the corpses; there well could be gold or other needfuls (like weapons and potions) - there's also a Scavenger achievement for this.

I left the settings at the defaults it picked up (1280x720 with HIGH (!) detail) and I don't exactly have the strongest of GPUs (AMD HD5450). That indicates that even laptops will have few issues with the game (like StarCraft II and unlike World of Warcraft pre-4.0), as long as they aren't ancient in terms of graphics hardware. My CPU is powerful enough (Intel Q6600), and even the system RAM (4 GB) is quite suitable.

Overall, I'm surprisingly impressed (and I didn't expect to be). I do believe I'm going to have to add time for D3 to my gameplay rotation.

I actually got in just after I made the post. I'm currently doing the quest where I am going to put the crown on the guy. I too am a diablo noob. I rolled a monk and am yet to die. I am level 9, almost level 10 and am thoroughly enjoying myself. I've been playing solo though the templar guy you get is good for the social bit.

I am running at the default settings, except I am playing in windowed mode. I have an 8800GT Akimbo Super-clocked, 4gb ram, and a Core2 Quad Q6700, and I am having 0 visual issues.

luckily (or unluckily) I don't have a real social life.. so with D3 and GW2 I am set.

edit: 10 mins after I posted this.. I defeated the king and beat the beta!

My friend and I finished the beta say around 2 hours.

Took me about 2 hours solo, and was about 40 minutes in a 3 person co-op.

I just love the "Congratulations, you have defeated the Diablo 3 beta!" thing. LOL awesome Blizzard.

Yea, that made me laugh, but at least I knew it was the end haha.

Well with the open beta weekend my friend and I played through the beta (I've been in the closed beta but he wasn't), we have decided that Diablo 3 is just not fun. It feels really slow for the style of game it is in our opinions, to the point that we thought maybe it was just us getting bored of games in general, then remembered Path of Exile and how much fun it was. I think D3 just changed from D2 too much, they took everything that was fun about D2, modified it, and made it worse. About the only improvement we can find from D2, is the drops are assigned individually to each player so you don't have to try to click faster than the other players to get drops. Don't get me wrong, the game is polished (like any Blizzard game), but it's simply not as fun for me as D2 is even in todays computer age. In terms of fun factor, D3 is a major regression from D2, definitely won't be buying it unless they do something amazing after release.

Luckily for me, I got into the Path of Exile closed beta as well, so I'll be playing that instead, if only I could get a friend key....

Well with the open beta weekend my friend and I played through the beta (I've been in the closed beta but he wasn't), we have decided that Diablo 3 is just not fun. It feels really slow for the style of game it is in our opinions, to the point that we thought maybe it was just us getting bored of games in general, then remembered Path of Exile and how much fun it was. I think D3 just changed from D2 too much, they took everything that was fun about D2, modified it, and made it worse. About the only improvement we can find from D2, is the drops are assigned individually to each player so you don't have to try to click faster than the other players to get drops. Don't get me wrong, the game is polished (like any Blizzard game), but it's simply not as fun for me as D2 is even in todays computer age. In terms of fun factor, D3 is a major regression from D2, definitely won't be buying it unless they do something amazing after release.

Luckily for me, I got into the Path of Exile closed beta as well, so I'll be playing that instead, if only I could get a friend key....

What's missing from Diablo 2 that was more fun or better? It feels just like Diablo 2 to me (pacing, gameplay). The things that are gone (im glad they are) are talent trees and spamming potions. Talent trees give the illusion of customization, yet everyone uses the same optimal build. And spamming potions is just... a joke.

Same mechanics; click-kill-random loot-repeat.

Great Diablo story and lore (from what we've seen).

Better graphics.

Better skill system; all viable yet they limit the number you can equip to cause tough choices.

I see only win. But different strokes man, do what makes yah happy.

Just tried to play but seems the server is having problems at the moment. And this is exactly why I won't be buying it - I hate wanting to play a game and being unable to play it simply because the server is down or my internet is down. At least with Steam there is an offline mode. Yes I could play something else but I'm not playing games all day, just a couple of hours or so in the evening.

I'm aware that this is a beta but with just 3 weeks or so until release I can see a lot of players bitching upon release day about not being able to play!

What's missing from Diablo 2 that was more fun or better? It feels just like Diablo 2 to me (pacing, gameplay). The things that are gone (im glad they are) are talent trees and spamming potions. Talent trees give the illusion of customization, yet everyone uses the same optimal build. And spamming potions is just... a joke.

Same mechanics; click-kill-random loot-repeat.

Great Diablo story and lore (from what we've seen).

Better graphics.

Better skill system; all viable yet they limit the number you can equip to cause tough choices.

I see only win. But different strokes man, do what makes yah happy.

This sums up my thoughts as well. I've played the beta for a couple months now. Running through it again with each patch, etc and I've played the Path of Exile beta as well. To be honest I'm still looking forward to D3 and not at all looking forward to Path of Exile. I thought it was fun but just okay. Different strokes!

Just tried to play but seems the server is having problems at the moment. And this is exactly why I won't be buying it - I hate wanting to play a game and being unable to play it simply because the server is down or my internet is down. At least with Steam there is an offline mode. Yes I could play something else but I'm not playing games all day, just a couple of hours or so in the evening.

I'm aware that this is a beta but with just 3 weeks or so until release I can see a lot of players bitching upon release day about not being able to play!

Have you never played a blizz game before? I remember when WOTLK patches started coming out before release. WoW Was pretty much unplayable. Servers crashed left and right, the lag was crazy. Blizz ended up giving everyone 3 days free play because for about 3 days it was pointless to even play.

Also, with this beta test it lets Blizz see what kind of hype there is, so they know how to tackle the servers to ensure it's perfect for launch. I am sorry, but if you are basing buying a game on a free, public, beta and how the servers are.. that's just silly to me.

Game is pretty good. I haven't got too far though. Mostly been messing with options for video. Is this game still being optimized?

I would hope so, never had any issues until my friend and I played, we both had intermittent FPS issues, he has a pretty new laptop (with a dedicated video card) and he put his settings on the lowest and still had the issues. And he's played CoD:MW3 and other much higher quality (graphically) games with no troubles on his laptop.

But I too had similar issues to him while we were playing together, never had any issues playing on my own before the stress test. (and they were choppy graphics, not anything network related)

I would hope so, never had any issues until my friend and I played, we both had intermittent FPS issues, he has a pretty new laptop (with a dedicated video card) and he put his settings on the lowest and still had the issues. And he's played CoD:MW3 and other much higher quality (graphically) games with no troubles on his laptop.

But I too had similar issues to him while we were playing together, never had any issues playing on my own before the stress test. (and they were choppy graphics, not anything network related)

Ok, phew. I had to set almost everything to low, and put shadows off. I would still get these odd jerks, though nothing realy seemed to be running slow. No change to the settings really solved the issue. I would imagine running TF2 with everything maxed would at least enable me to run this game at medium :p

If I were to wrap up my feelings about the stress test beta, it would be best described by the words; "Unable to connect to the service".

Blizzard, 16 years of Battle.Net and you still fail.

Its a stress beta. do you not understand what that means ?

Blizzard wants the servers to go down more or less. They are getting information of this so they can optimize the servers.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
    • Windows 11 version 26H2 is now available for testing in the latest preview build by Taras Buria Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. There are no new features, but Microsoft is officially moving the Experimental Channel to version 26H2. In addition, Microsoft is improving the copy dialog in File Explorer, the Start menu reliability, and fixing virtualization issues. Here is the changelog: [General] With today’s build, Windows Insiders in the Experimental channel will see the versioning updated under Settings > System > About (and winver) to version 26H2. For more information, see the Windows Insiders blog. [File Explorer] We’ve improved the visual consistency and reliability of the Copy dialog in Dark mode, including its launch experience and the expanded progress view. [Start menu] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Start menu reflecting newly installed or removed apps without requiring sign-out or restart. [Taskbar] Fixed an issue for Insiders using the new smaller taskbar option, where the system tray might get cut off or pushed off screen. [Settings] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Settings > Apps > Startup. [Virtualization] - Also available in Beta This update addresses an issue that could result in bugchecks citing HYPERVISOR_ERROR (0x20001) and KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED (0x1E) errors after installing the latest flights on some devices during system restarts, virtual machine operations, or while running some gaming applications. You can find the official changelog for the Experimental build here and for the Beta build here.
    • I've always preferred this possibility. There is something that feels good about the idea that all matter in the universe will eventually come back together and maybe even result in another big bang. The idea that the universe would fizzle out over the eons and forever drift apart is a little depressing. I realize it is not logical to let a basic human desire for life to have a grand everlasting meaning change the way I feel about a scientific theory, but I am human, so that is how I feel :-).
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      574
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!