Recommended Posts

Thats not fair, +cralias ^^

BioWare May Still Change Mass Effect 3's Ending

Publisher 'considering your feedback' and has not made a decision.

BioWare has provided a new statement about the ending of Mass Effect 3, noting that it is considering fan feedback and has not yet made a decision about altering it.

Following comments from director Casey Hudson last week, the official Mass Effect Facebook page has now posted the following statement:

"We are aware that there are concerns about a recent post from this account regarding the ending of the game. In this post it was stated that at this time we do not have plans to change the ending.

We would like to clarify that we are actively and seriously taking all player feedback into consideration and have ruled nothing out. At this time we are still collecting and considering your feedback and have not made a decision regarding requests to change the ending.

Your feedback and opinions are of the utmost importance to us. We apologize for any confusion this has caused. Our top priority regarding this discussion is to keep communication with you, our loyal fans, open and productive."

Previously, the game's ending has been so controversial that fans have joined together to form a massive petition asking BioWare to change it.

IGN

Bioware considering changing Mass Effect 3 ending

Studio says it is "actively and seriously" taking all feedback into consideration,

with no decision made yet regarding end to space-bound role-playing game.

Will gamers get a new Mass Effect 3 ending? BioWare hasn't ruled it out. Writing on the official Mass Effect 3 Facebook page last night, the company said it has not yet decided whether or not it will offer fans a new ending to the space-faring role-playing game.

"We would like to clarify that we are actively and seriously taking all player feedback into consideration and have ruled nothing out," reads the statement. "At this time we are still collecting and considering your feedback and have not made a decision regarding requests to change the ending."

Mass Effect 3 launched on March 6 to a warm critical reception and heat from users regarding the game's ending and its day-one downloadable content, From Ashes. Regarding the end to Mass Effect 3, executive producer Casey Hudson said last week that he wanted the game to be memorable, admitting that the conclusion was intentionally designed to get gamers talking.

Members of the Mass Effect community have formed the charity petition called Retake Mass Effect ChipIn fund, collecting PayPal donations for the Child's Play charity as a way of encouraging BioWare to make alternate Mass Effect 3 endings.. As of press time, the fund has amassed over $67,000.

Concerning the From Ashes DLC, Hudson has defended the content, noting that work did not begin on the ware until after the developer finished Mass Effect 3. Electronic Arts later revealed that parts of the DLC were included on game discs.

GameSpot

Don't do it. BioWare. Don't do it

Mass Effect 3 Easter Egg - Blasto the Hanar Spectre "movie" - Blasto 6: Partners In Crime :rofl:

Starring:

Blasto - hanar Spectre

Chief - volus... well, Chief

Booben - "badass" elcor C-Sec agent

Booben's sister

and some angry vorcha...

Badassfully: easily the most interesting [useless] mix of species Mass Effect has to offer :laugh:

"Spawn of questionable parentage!" - :rofl:

Why would you not want them to change the ending? It is terrible.

The ending was intentional. It was MEANT to be that way. Its not like it was an accident or just poor writing. They could have planned for this. People are only upset because of the lack of significance the rest of their choices had on the ending. And even if that is the case, this does not make the ending bad. The only other viable complaint is the lack of closure we get. But that is only minimal seeing as all plot points that matter are concluded, all characters fleshed out to their fullest and enough of a glimpse at the results to keep us wondering. I think people are taking this way too harshly and have allowed hype to heighten the expectations to an astronomical level that the ending couldn't help but end with people raging.

The only valid suggestion anyone has made that I know of for fixing the ending was adding the construction of a new Mass Relay to the after credits cinematic. Instead people have just decided to hop on the cop-out band-wagon of it being a hallucination which just ignores the ending rather than tries to make sense of it.

The game didn't break any established canon, it didn't ruin any image of any of the characters and honestly I'm fine with that. Halo: Reach decimated the canon of Halo and no one seemed to care about that. Yet just because people didn't get the "16" different endings people are breaking down and throwing the disc into the trash (literally or figuratively)?

Its not like it was an accident or just poor writing. They could have planned for this.

They rewrote the entire ending and implemented it in a few months after the script leaked. It's hardly what I'd call "masterful writing", not from a dialogue standpoint nor from an imaginative one.

People are only upset because of the lack of significance the rest of their choices had on the ending. And even if that is the case, this does not make the ending bad.

I'd say quite a few people from the Bioware Social forums could've written a better, more detailed and more engrossing ending in 15 minutes. The lack of imagination, combined with a completely laughable explanation of what controls the reapers and why left "a few" people jaded.

Hurr durr I created machines that kill everyone to prevent your machines from killing everyone. Seriously, what.

They rewrote the entire ending and implemented it in a few months after the script leaked. It's hardly what I'd call "masterful writing", not from a dialogue standpoint nor from an imaginative one.

A similar thing happened with Halo 2 and while many were enraged by the event it barely anyone even remembers it these days and still regard Halo 2 as the best Halo game. In fact, Halo 2 was basically remade in 9 months from the ground up as well as having its story partially rewritten and extended due to the engine being completely useless on the Original Xbox. This isn't an unheard of situation.

Hurr durr I created machines that kill everyone to prevent your machines from killing everyone. Seriously, what.

Such an outlook on something is poor practice. We can easily narrow something down to a simple statement like that just to make it look worse than it is.

The mere fact that the created rebel against the creators. The Krogan are a great example, not just the Geth. It comes down to the fact that this chaos would inevitably destroy the universe and thus the Reapers were created to keep that situation from evolving. What you have accomplished in the end of Mass Effect 3 is giving the races of the current cycle the ability to choose their destiny for themselves, rather than having it controlled by the Reapers and by association the Catalyst. I see it as the final choice that gives back freedom to the galaxy.

A similar thing happened with Halo 2 and while many were enraged by the event it barely anyone even remembers it these days and still regard Halo 2 as the best Halo game. In fact, Halo 2 was basically remade in 9 months from the ground up as well as having its story partially rewritten and extended due to the engine being completely useless on the Original Xbox. This isn't an unheard of situation.

Such an outlook on something is poor practice. We can easily narrow something down to a simple statement like that just to make it look worse than it is.

The mere fact that the created rebel against the creators. The Krogan are a great example, not just the Geth. It comes down to the fact that this chaos would inevitably destroy the universe and thus the Reapers were created to keep that situation from evolving. What you have accomplished in the end of Mass Effect 3 is giving the races of the current cycle the ability to choose their destiny for themselves, rather than having it controlled by the Reapers and by association the Catalyst. I see it as the final choice that gives back freedom to the galaxy.

Krogan? There was only one created Krogan, Grunt. Unless something was learned in ME3 that I don't know about.

Krogan? There was only one created Krogan, Grunt. Unless something was learned in ME3 that I don't know about.

As I understand it, they weren't created like the Geth were created, but they were "manufactured" so to speak. They weren't capable of space travel until the Salarians dropped in and gave them mass effect technology in exchange for using their numbers them against the Rachni. Then they rebelled when the Salarians declared them a pest and deployed the genophage.

As I understand it, they weren't created like the Geth were created, but they were "manufactured" so to speak. They weren't capable of space travel until the Salarians dropped in and gave them mass effect technology in exchange for using their numbers them against the Rachni. Then they rebelled when the Salarians declared them a pest and deployed the genophage.

Maybe you learn about that in ME3 but they never talked about the Krogan (pre Grunt/Okeer) being manufactured.

Also the ME wiki doesn't mention anything about them being created (again, pre Grunt/Okeer):

http://masseffect.wi...com/wiki/Krogan

Warlord Okeer is the one who was trying to create a pure Krogan, and that was only very recently in the Mass Effect timeline.

As I understand it, they weren't created like the Geth were created, but they were "manufactured" so to speak. They weren't capable of space travel until the Salarians dropped in and gave them mass effect technology in exchange for using their numbers them against the Rachni. Then they rebelled when the Salarians declared them a pest and deployed the genophage.

Sort of, what the Salarians did was "uplift" them (similiar to what the Protheans were doing with the Humans, Asari, Salarians etc), to use them as a weapon against the Rachni. The Krogan became a problem because they were adapted to a extremely harsh environment (reason for high birth rate, greatly increases chances of survivial) and when taken out of that environment they florished too well due to the harsh environment adaptations. It's not a case of created rebelling from creator, but more forcefully taking a species out of their naitive environment when they are not ready. That is my take at any rate anyway.

Sort of, what the Salarians did was "uplift" them (similiar to what the Protheans were doing with the Humans, Asari, Salarians etc), to use them as a weapon against the Rachni. The Krogan became a problem because they were adapted to a extremely harsh environment (reason for high birth rate, greatly increases chances of survivial) and when taken out of that environment they florished too well due to the harsh environment adaptations. It's not a case of created rebelling from creator, but more forcefully taking a species out of their naitive environment when they are not ready. That is my take at any rate anyway.

Yeah, that's exactly how I understood it too. All that was learned during Grunt and Mordins missions in ME2.

Sort of, what the Salarians did was "uplift" them (similiar to what the Protheans were doing with the Humans, Asari, Salarians etc), to use them as a weapon against the Rachni. The Krogan became a problem because they were adapted to a extremely harsh environment (reason for high birth rate, greatly increases chances of survivial) and when taken out of that environment they florished too well due to the harsh environment adaptations. It's not a case of created rebelling from creator, but more forcefully taking a species out of their naitive environment when they are not ready. That is my take at any rate anyway.

Krogan/Geth uplifted/created, found dangerous and are sterilized/destroyed. Resentment builds and eventually the persecuted/created will rebell against those who have been the object of their hatred.

Either way, its man messing with things they shouldn't be and creating/advancing life to a point that they can't control it any longer.

Oh, and depending on whether or not the female Krogan survives, Wrex/Wreav will plot to take over the other races without her around.

Krogan/Geth uplifted/created, found dangerous and are sterilized/destroyed. Resentment builds and eventually the persecuted/created will rebell against those who have been the object of their hatred.

Either way, its man messing with things they shouldn't be and creating/advancing life to a point that they can't control it any longer.

Oh, and depending on whether or not the female Krogan survives, Wrex/Wreav will plot to take over the other races without her around.

EDIT: Obviously I cannot read :p scratch what I said in this post previously.

It doesn't seem that simple to me though though, the Protheans also meddled and advanced life beyond what it was ready for and because of them the Asari, Salarians, Hanar and Humanity (and others) were able to evolve to what they are now. Also to me the Geth did not rebel, it did not need to end in war it could of been peaceful. Except the Quarians didn't like their slaves thinking for themselves and tried to exterminate them and the Geth defended themselves. The Geth do not hate or resent and are more then happy to allow the Quarians to live on their homeworld, the Quarians exiled themselves. The Krogan are a different matter, I agree to the most part what you say about them and not surprised if they plan to conquer the galaxy if you cannot save the female. They are a war like race and thanks to the Turians/Salarians they know only war and the hatred/resentment is a result of the genephage and not their uplifting.

A similar thing happened with Halo 2 and while many were enraged by the event it barely anyone even remembers it these days and still regard Halo 2 as the best Halo game.

In other words the story was so insignificant that no one even remembers it any more, which essentially means it was badly written and unimaginative - then again it being Halo, that's hardly a surprise.

This isn't an unheard of situation.

Whilst it may not be unheard of, I have yet to hear of a situation where it improved the game.

Such an outlook on something is poor practice. We can easily narrow something down to a simple statement like that just to make it look worse than it is.

The mere fact that the created rebel against the creators. The Krogan are a great example, not just the Geth.

Both of which were optionally fixed by Shepard in the storyline, which completely debunks the theory that you cannot get the races to work together - especially the Geth that originally spared the Quarians by letting them go. Hardly something a ravenous murdering synthetic bent on the destruction of all life would do?

I see it as the final choice that gives back freedom to the galaxy.

Destruction of all methods of interstellar transportation means freedom? You certainly have an odd concept of freedom.

News; I get it, you like Bioware, however Bioware doesn't need you to defend them. They can stand up for themselves and defend their actions on their own, you don't need to wear your shining knight armour and parade for them. They don't give a ****.

Who'd have thought the end of a war that tore up the entire galaxy and pretty much destroyed the home systems of 4 races would lead to anything but a happy ending where everything continued as if nothing had happened?

The people complaining about the ending of Mass Effect 3 are the same people that complained about Dragon Age 2 dumbing everything down and treating it's players like children. Bioware can't win.

Who'd have thought the end of a war that tore up the entire galaxy and pretty much destroyed the home systems of 4 races would lead to anything but a happy ending where everything continued as if nothing had happened?

The people complaining about the ending of Mass Effect 3 are the same people that complained about Dragon Age 2 dumbing everything down and treating it's players like children. Bioware can't win.

You have absolutely no idea why the endings are bad, or why so many people hate them.

In other words the story was so insignificant that no one even remembers it any more, which essentially means it was badly written and unimaginative - then again it being Halo, that's hardly a surprise.

Not a real argument. Halo was known for its campaign before Halo 2. Halo 2 destroyed that campaign. The only thing that kept Halo 2 going was its multiplayer. Mass Effect lacks such a "phenomenon" which is why more people will remain outraged longer.

Whilst it may not be unheard of, I have yet to hear of a situation where it improved the game.

My point isn't that it improves the game, but that people are getting mad over something that has happened more than once in the past. If people would just not expect perfection then maybe they wouldn't be so disappointed with what they get. Halo 2 destroyed my ability to be hyped for a game and since then I have yet to be truly disappointed by a game unless it was mechanically broken.

Both of which were optionally fixed by Shepard in the storyline, which completely debunks the theory that you cannot get the races to work together - especially the Geth that originally spared the Quarians by letting them go. Hardly something a ravenous murdering synthetic bent on the destruction of all life would do?

Yet this already demonstrates the incorrect decision of the Catalyst and that there are exceptions to the rule, all events that greatly influence what decision you make at the end (many of these decisions stemming back to the first game). And here we are assuming that these decisions don't matter when in fact they provide an entirely different context to the final decision.

Keep in mind that unless you are Paragon you CANNOT save both the Geth and the Quarians. It is one or the other.

Destruction of all methods of interstellar transportation means freedom? You certainly have an odd concept of freedom.

No, you are again only stating things in a poor light to make your opinion sound more correct. Freedom goes beyond movement through the galaxy. They now have the right to a FUTURE. Without your choice they would have been doomed to destruction. And you're worried about the equivalent of freeways being lost?

News; I get it, you like Bioware, however Bioware doesn't need you to defend them. They can stand up for themselves and defend their actions on their own, you don't need to wear your shining knight armour and parade for them. They don't give a ****.

I'm not parading, I'm just sick of idiots getting angry at the ending because they expected far too much. In fact, its the fans themselves who could be said to have ruined it by leaking the information and they have the audacity to **** and moan about this? I still have yet to see anything canonical that is broken by the ending which means it doesn't warrant this much hate. It doesn't destroy the storyline, its just a less than satisfactory ending. You have yet to give me any REAL arguments, only obvious rhetoric.

Stop using Halo 2 as an example. Halo 2 is not the end of the Master Chief story arc. Regardless of how bad Halo 3 was, Halo 2 was still not the end.

Mass Effect 3 is the END of the Shepard story arc. THAT is why the ending is complete garage.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
    • A roguelike and a 4X strategy game are free to claim on the Epic Games Store by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final leg of the Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways promotion just landed, and it brought along two more games to keep. Last week's Lonestar and Calico giveaways have now been replaced with copies of Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest to claim for PC gamers. As always, the game is yours to add permanently to your Epic Games Store library within the next seven days. Diving into the games, Songs of Conquest is developed by Lavapotion. This is a turn-based 4X strategy experience that has players making tough decisions and participating in tactical combat while also managing their kingdom. "Songs of Conquest is a turn-based strategy game inspired by 90s classics. Lead powerful magicians called Wielders and venture to lands unknown," explains the developer. "Wage battles against armies that dare oppose you, hunt for powerful artifacts and expand your territory. The world is ripe for the taking – seize it." Meanwhile, Rogue Waters comes from developer Ice Code Games. This rogue-lite experience has you taking the role of Captain Cutter as he commands his ship and crew through procedurally generated encounters. You'll be recruiting and training crew, use sea creatures, and battle with other ships and pirates. "Set sail as Captain Cutter, a pirate caught in a deadly struggle for power and vengeance," adds the developer. "Navigate dangerous waters, unleash mythical sea creatures, and outwit enemies as you chase legendary treasure and confront dark secrets." The newly available Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest giveaways on the Epic Games Store are set to run until June 11, giving PC gamers seven days to claim the latest offer. Once this closes out, a new freebie will take its place on the same day, which is slated to be Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks. Don't forget that mobile gamers can check out the Epic Game Store's weekly giveaways on Android and iOS to grab a freebie there as well.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!