Recommended Posts

It doesn't have to be loved. It doesn't even have to be liked. As paying consumers, gamers have the right to be dissatisfied with a game, its content, or its ending. They are free to comment, rant, or rave. They are even free to start a petition. But none of this requires BioWare to listen.

Wrong. It does.

By categorizing video games solely as art to be consumed it testifies to complete lack of understanding of what video games have been since their conception; something that a site like Gamespot would be required to know. Moreover, given my paranoia, this article might advocate an increasingly growing idea to be afraid of: brainless consumerism, that Gamespot supports, and by taking this stance tries to stroke EA, so that it continues to get early releases of games and such - stroked back.

No, primary role of video games has never been art, rather it has been entertainment. While original creations of art are a part of a quality entertainment, there are many other factors that define it, it's a mixed bag. Business model of every entertainment is to establish, preserve and advance a single mutually beneficial concept - entertained get entertainment according to their wants and needs, entertainees, in turn, get adequately paid. However, video games are incredibly complex form of entertainment, especially branching story RPGs like Bioware do are perhaps the most complex experiences currently in existance. Therefore, concepts like "you don't like, you don't buy" and "vote with your wallet" doesn't hold true.

While gamers indeed aren't entitled to anything, because entertainment is not a necessity to our existance, Bioware would still do wise to listen to and try not to annoy people. I gather their profits are surging despite the continuing , thus they can readily afford it, but pride comes before fall. To wrap this up, I might add that Westwood was destroyed by EA in a very similar way.

Yay! 2 kiloposts! :woot:

For the Quarian homeworld if you save the admiral then both races should survive personally I preferred the Geth to the Quarians the Geth were never the aggressors were as the Quarians just seemed like ######, the games been out for over a week now theres no point in keeping with the spoiler tag.

Well at least keep them for the ending.

My thoughts exactly (Y)

If you haven't played the entire game, DO NOT look at the image.

http://i613.photobuc...31092683607.png

The last image. :omg:

First off the other things are really just nit picking. Putting something to such a simple explanation can easily create parallels from a lot of things. The first image is similar but it isn't stolen. The last image is something I deem ok, specifically because it is content not everyone is going to see and probably wasn't originally planned to be in the game (fans just wanted a face to the person, so they gave us one).

Nothing is original anymore, and expecting it to be so is just asking to be disappointed.

Edited by Anaron

While I didn't really like the endings of Deus Ex I at least enjoyed the monologue for one of them. But it did not make me hate the game, I just threw out the boss fights and ending and enjoyed the other 19 hours I spent with the game. Same will go for ME3 if I end up not liking the ending. I may not like the last 20 mins but I sure as hell have enjoyed the 22 hours I've put in so far.

The reason the ending made so many people disappointed with the whole game, was the way it completely disregards all the choices you made in the series. You are presented with 3 contrived, ****ty choices, and the "16 different endings" are almost completely identical.

I did enjoy the rest of the game, but man the ending massively disappointed me :(

And that's not to mention the gaping plot holes in the ending lol.

  • Like 1

People keep mentioning plot holes in the ending. The only ones I know of is how your party ended up on the Normandy and the Normandy somehow being launched to another planet. Other than those small things I don't see any real plotholes.

So I'm finally slowly making my way through Mass Effect 2 and they talk about reapers indoctrination so much through out that game.

I've gone ahead and read spoilers so I already know about the endings of ME3 and it's my fully informed opinion without even playing that game that the video was posted a few pages back about indoctrination is correct. It makes sense when they are foreshadowing it so much in ME2.

I don't know if this post is spoilerific for those that haven't played it yet so I guess I'll use spoiler tags.

A quick question about ME2. My Shepard is level 27 right now after doing all the dlc and loyalty missions and I'm just getting to the derelict reaper. Are the N7 missions worth doing in ME2 at that point? Not sure how much time I want to invest into them if there isn't much point in doing them other than a few hundrded experience and credits.

So I'm finally slowly making my way through Mass Effect 2 and they talk about reapers indoctrination so much through out that game.

I've gone ahead and read spoilers so I already know about the endings of ME3 and it's my fully informed opinion without even playing that game that the video was posted a few pages back about indoctrination is correct. It makes sense when they are foreshadowing it so much in ME2.

My only issue with this is that the Catalyst specifically states that Shepard is able to choose the Control option because he is NOT indoctrinated. Are we just to assume that was a flat out lie?

My only issue with this is that the Catalyst specifically states that Shepard is able to choose the Control option because he is NOT indoctrinated. Are we just to assume that was a flat out lie?

I don't know. As I said I haven't actually played ME3 yet, that was my totally uninformed opinion. All I know is that in ME2, the past 2 or so missions that I did they mentioned indoctrination quite a bit.

But I mean.. isn't the entire point of indoctrination that you don't know that is actually what is happening?

It felt weird the moment I saw the child (catalyst), how can the catalyst and the kid from begining can be the same?

Most likely the same reason that in Babylon 5 every race saw the Vorlon as their own "gods". It is just representing itself as a familiar image.

Well, can't speak for the ending coz not even close, I love this game much more than the previous two. While doing a certain rescue mission, the way they brought back so many characters into it, and how those people all seemed to have genuine feelings for one another...it was very touching.

Also like how in background conversations people are always apologizing for being insensitive or rude. Wish we were like this in real life.

Updated respond of Casey Hudson

Update: In a response to the huge fan feedback regarding Mass Effect 3's ending, Chris Priestly, Bioware's community coordinator, wrote on Bioware's official forums that they are waiting for the appropriate time to respond.

Priestly wrote: "we appreciate everyone's feedback about Mass Effect 3 and want you to know we are listening. Active discussions about the ending are more than welcome here, and the team will be reviewing it for feedback and responding when we can.

"Please note, we want to give people time to experience the game so while we can't get into specifics right now, we will be able to address some of your questions once more people have had time to complete the game. In the meantime, we'd like to ask that you keep the non-spoiler areas of our forums and our social media channels spoiler free.

"We understand there is a lot of debate on the Mass Effect 3 ending and we will be more than happy to engage in healthy discussions once more people get to experience the game. We are listening to all of your feedback."

Is it a capital crime that I'm starting to release my hate towards Vega? He's not that bad, actually. And the way he stumbled after the latest attempt of hitting on my Femshep and, consequentially, being called bluff (tattoo scene down in the Docks) - priceless.

Snooki still sucks, though. Sadly, garbage compactor doesn't work anymore. I'd use it without hesitation to send her off the ship.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Still using Classic Outlook? Microsoft highlights 15 reasons to switch to New Outlook by Usama Jawad As many of you may know, Microsoft has been trying to get customers to ditch Classic Outlook in favor of New Outlook for quite some time now. To that end, it has added numerous capabilities to the latter, including PST features, and it is working on several more, such as a unified inbox. However, customer response has been a bit lukewarm so far, with many considering the New Outlook to be "hot garbage". Now, Microsoft has highlighted 15 features that users can leverage in New Outlook in yet another attempt to get customers to migrate. Although not all of the 15 capabilities are exclusive to New Outlook, in fact, most of them are available in Classic Outlook as well. But Microsoft hopes that this combination of familiar and fresh features will be able to attract existing users as well as new ones. For ease of readability, we have summarized the 15 features below: Pin an email: This makes it easier to track important emails Snooze an email: You can temporarily snooze an email thread for a specific time frame until it becomes relevant again. This can be very useful in scenarios where you don't feel like actively following a thread or simply want to follow up on a later date Add multiple categories at the same time: You can assign multiple categories to an email through a single, simplified interface Sweep: As the name implies, you can define automated move processes on your inbox to declutter it, rather than cleaning it up manually Schedule send: Does exactly what it says on the tin, and can be useful when accommodating recipients in different timezones Simplified folder sharing: The sharing process has been simplified so permissions are automatically applied on parent folders Follow a meeting: This is an RSVP option that lets people know that you won't be able to join the meeting but would still like to access a recap Save calendar views: You can save different views for the calendar based on different workflows Improved meeting tracking: Organizers have more controls in viewing meeting responses, such as the ability to sort and download them. Typically useful when there is a large audience Meeting recap: The Outlook Calendar surfaces a meeting recap with recordings, transcripts, and shared files Filtered views: Allows you to declutter your Calendar so that it's easier to scan and schedule Change a recurring event: Users can modify future events of a series of meetings while preserving the configuration of previous ones Rename your email account: This labeling makes it easier to identify multiple accounts in Outlook Modern themes: Exactly what the name says, plus Dark Mode Keyboard shortcuts: This facilitates flexible user behavior as customers can choose between Outlook for Windows shortcuts, Outlook for the web, or turn them off completely There you have it. It's a decent list, but it remains to be seen if it will move the needle in a meaningful way for users who are attached to Classic Outlook. Again, a lot of the aforementioned features are already available in Outlook Classic, but for some, native functionality is not present, and people typically resort to workarounds. Microsoft will be hoping that it's primarily those capabilities that get people to finally switch.
    • Please I need help I been trying to find this secure boot on my ColorFul motherboard in the bios But i cant i turned off CSM everything watch every video i cant find it. BATTLE-AX B660M-HD DELUXE V20
    • LibreWolf 151.0.3-1 by Razvan Serea LibreWolf is an independent “fork” of Firefox, with the primary goals of privacy security and user freedom. It is the community run successor to LibreFox. LibreWolf is designed to increase protection against tracking and fingerprinting techniques, while also including a few security improvements. This is achieved through our privacy and security oriented settings and patches. LibreWolf also aims to remove all the telemetry, data collection and annoyances, as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM. LibreWolf features: Latest Firefox — LibreWolf is compiled directly from the latest build of Firefox Stable. You will have the the latest features, and security updates. Independent Build — LibreWolf uses a build independent of Firefox and has its own settings, profile folder and installation path. As a result, it can be installed alongside Firefox or any other browser. No phoning home — Embedded server links and other calling home functions are removed. In other words, minimal background connections by default. User settings updates Extensions firewall: limit internet access for extensions. Multi-platform (Windows/Linux/Mac/and soon Android) Community-Driven Dark theme (classic and advanced) LibreWolf privacy features: Delete cookies and website data on close. Include only privacy respecting search engines like DuckDuckGo and Searx. Include uBlockOrigin with custom default filter lists, and Tracking Protection in strict mode, to block trackers and ads. Strip tracking elements from URLs, both natively and through uBO. Enable dFPI, also known as Total Cookie Protection. Enable RFP which is part of the Tor Uplift project. RFP is considered the best in class anti-fingerprinting solution, and its goal is to make users look the same and cover as many metrics as possible, in an effort to block fingerprinting techniques. Always display user language as en-US to websites, in order to protect the language used in the browser and in the OS. Disable WebGL, as it is a strong fingerprinting vector. Prevent access to the location services of the OS, and use Mozilla's location API instead of Google's API. Limit ICE candidates generation to a single interface when sharing video or audio during a videoconference. Force DNS and WebRTC inside the proxy, when one is being used. Trim cross-origin referrers, so that they don't include the full URI. Disable link prefetching and speculative connections. Disable disk cache and clear temporary files on close. Disable form autofill. Disable search and form history...and more. LibreWolf 151.0.3-1 changelog: Upstream release, see the Firefox 151.0.3 Release Notes Notable changes: Clears the preference toolkit.winRegisterApplicationRestart, which may otherwise trigger an upstream bug on Windows (librewolf/issues#3056) Download: LibreWolf 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: LibreWolf Home Page | Addons | Screenshot | Reddit Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Unsurprisingly, there's what the law says and what the old white wealthy males legally enforce...
    • Or anything online that requires an anti-cheat
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      478
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!