Man tries to pay old traffic ticket in pennies


Recommended Posts

Ron Seys took out his frustration over having to pay a 16-year-old traffic ticket on a clerk at the Scott County Courthouse this week.

He carried a sack with $59.40 in pennies into the courthouse in Davenport, showed the clerk the old ticket and then dumped the load on her counter.

?Did I do this on purpose? Yes, I did, to make a point,? Seys said afterward.

The rural Clinton County man said he went to a bank Wednesday morning to get the pennies and emptied each roll into his sack.

About a month ago, Seys received a letter from the Iowa Department of Transportation demanding that he pay an outstanding 1996 ticket for improper registration.

The state recently entered into a contract with the Kansas City, Mo., law firm of Linebarger, Goggan, Blair and Sampson LLP to collect court fines and fees that have been unpaid for more than a year. State law also requires county treasurers to refuse to renew a vehicle registration when the vehicle owner owes unpaid fines and court fees.

State Court Administrator David Boyd said in September that the state is boosting collection efforts to recoup past-due obligations in the face of shrinking revenues.

Seys doesn?t remember getting the ticket and said he?s been able to renew his driver?s license in the years since, until recently.

Seys also said he didn?t realize he couldn?t use pennies to pay off the ticket, although signs at the clerk?s office say no more than $3 in pennies can be used for payment.

Two Scott County sheriff?s deputies showed up in the office and told Seys he was harassing the clerk. They asked him to pick up the pennies and put them back into the bag. Many of the pennies had fallen onto the floor.

He then paid the ticket in other cash, slung the sack of pennies over his shoulder and left the courthouse.

Outside, he said he didn?t do anything wrong.

?Since when is it wrong to use legal tender?? he said.

Source

I believe that in many states, small change like that is legal tender, up to X amount (usually $5), in one transaction, at the cashier's discretion.

Should have paid it in $3 instalments.

I would have thought that Statute of limitations would have been applicable.

in Canada, of course pennies are legal tender too, but its limit to 100 coins per transaction. For each transaction, its a limit of 100 pennies, 100 nickels, 100 dimes, 100 quarters, 100 loonies (1 dollar) or 100 toonies (2 dollars). After that, the cashier or who is accepting the money, does have the right to say no.

I would have requested the refusal in writing by the clerk and then I would have sued the county for violating the US Legal Tender Law.

I would have requested the refusal in writing by the clerk and then I would have sued the county for violating the US Legal Tender Law.

and you would be laughed at. They can refuse to take payment in $20. Bills if they wanted

There are lots of places that have laws about how much change you can give a cashier before they have the right to reject it. Apparently people don't know this.

And what point was the guy trying to make? That because he doesn't wanna pay his parking ticket like the rest of us, he's gonna try and make a DMV rep miserable?

Yeah you can refuse payment if it's in ridiculous amounts of change. It's the first thing you learn in retail 101. :p

if someone is buying something, and it costs $4.99 and they pay with exact change, you can reject the change and only accept $5. there is absoultley no law on what people have to accept.

if someone is buying something, and it costs $4.99 and they pay with exact change, you can reject the change and only accept $5. there is absoultley no law on what people have to accept.

I'm pretty sure you're wrong on that one though... If you try to hand a clerk a 20, and they decide they don't want it because its got ugly pen marks on it, it's tough for them... they can be fined or something for not taking it... I think.

If I'm right, then the same applies to handing someone three quarters, two dimes, and 4 pennies

if someone is buying something, and it costs $4.99 and they pay with exact change, you can reject the change and only accept $5. there is absoultley no law on what people have to accept.

There is. The United States Code includes the Legal Tender Law that specifies it (see my post above).

Retailers will usually ignore the law because someone suing them for violation is very slim and outweigh the benefits (such as not accepting $100 in the middle of the night to ensure you don't get robbed).

and you would be laughed at. They can refuse to take payment in $20. Bills if they wanted

The laughter would have been fine, but they wouldn't have had a case to prove that I had to pay the fine. As when I attempted to pay they refused legal US tender, which the law states they can't. I would have sued them to have the fine removed and to force the county to adhere to current US law. If they desire it to be changed they can petition Congress to do so.

There is. The United States Code includes the Legal Tender Law that specifies it (see my post above).

Retailers will usually ignore the law because someone suing them for violation is very slim and outweigh the benefits (such as not accepting $100 in the middle of the night to ensure you don't get robbed).

The laughter would have been fine, but they wouldn't have had a case to prove that I had to pay the fine. As when I attempted to pay they refused legal US tender, which the law states they can't. I would have sued them to have the fine removed and to force the county to adhere to current US law. If they desire it to be changed they can petition Congress to do so.

Legal Tender Status

I thought that United States currency was legal tender for all debts. Some businesses or governmental agencies say that they will only accept checks, money orders or credit cards as payment, and others will only accept currency notes in denominations of $20 or smaller. Isn't this illegal?

The pertinent portion of law that applies to your question is the Coinage Act of 1965, specifically Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, entitled "Legal tender," which states: "United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues."

This statute means that all United States money as identified above are a valid and legal offer of payment for debts when tendered to a creditor. There is, however, no Federal statute mandating that a private business, a person or an organization must accept currency or coins as for payment for goods and/or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether or not to accept cash unless there is a State law which says otherwise. For example, a bus line may prohibit payment of fares in pennies or dollar bills. In addition, movie theaters, convenience stores and gas stations may refuse to accept large denomination currency (usually notes above $20) as a matter of policy.

http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/faqs/Currency/Pages/legal-tender.aspx

enjoy being counter sued for lawyer fees.

For the record, you can't pay for your bus fare in NYC with anything less then quarters or dimes (I forget which).... the machine won't let you. So there's that too.

Fareboxes on buses do not accept pennies. They accept nickels, dimes, quarters and dollar coins.

in Canada, of course pennies are legal tender too, but its limit to 100 coins per transaction. For each transaction, its a limit of 100 pennies, 100 nickels, 100 dimes, 100 quarters, 100 loonies (1 dollar) or 100 toonies (2 dollars). After that, the cashier or who is accepting the money, does have the right to say no.

Are you sure about that? Is it a federal law or specific to the province you live? Because this is the first time I hear that kind of law
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I am not a US citizen nor a Trump fan. Respect to both left and right. But I will, for the sake of fun, predict something for my own. There will come a day when the US and China will collide like titans ( over Taiwan or anything else ). Then, on that day, some people in this comment section will realize how good an idea it was to become independent in areas like that. ( Or atleast try )
    • Microsoft Edge gets tons of security features, including AI model that can see your screen by Usama Jawad Microsoft Edge may not be the most popular browser out there, but it does receive quite frequent updates that sometimes bring surprising new features and axe others that are not as popular. Now, Microsoft has detailed some of the new security enhancements that it has introduced in Edge for Business, typically used by commercial customers. Microsoft has emphasized that security features are baked into Edge for Business and offer native integration with security and governance tools like Defender and Purview. Browser sessions are governed by default on managed devices but can also be governed through dedicated work profiles on unmanaged devices. An important aspect in this area is controlling the use of shadow AI. We have talked about this before, but it essentially restricts employees from using unsanctioned AI apps through data loss prevention (DLP) policies, with Edge redirecting them to trusted AI services like Microsoft 365 Copilot. This feature, available as a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) license, ensures that confidential data never exits AI boundaries set by your organization in Purview. Additionally, Microsoft also has strong DLP policies for contractors. Contractors leveraging a Entra ID-joined work profile provisioned by their contracting company on a device managed by their actual employer can be restricted from downloading files locally. In such scenarios, the file is saved on the contracting firm's OneDrive rather than being downloaded locally. Another useful Edge security feature disallows copying and pasting from unmanaged locations and apps. Similarly, DLP policies can be configured at a granular level to restrict screenshots or downloading of files from certain locations. In the same vein, IT admins can block the installation of extensions, hosted apps, themes and scripts, and control if users can install extensions from external locations. They can also enable the installation of specific extensions and allow users to request access to certain extensions, so that they can be managed on a case-by-case basis. Finally, Edge for Business now has an on-device AI model that uses computer vision to see what's on your screen and block potentially malicious content immediately. This does not rely on site reputation, as it simply monitors what is being displayed on your screen, which means that it is effective against malicious content that takes over your screen and employs scareware tactics. Since this is an on-device AI model, it does use your system's resources, so it's enabled by default only on devices with at least 2GB of RAM and four CPU cores. You can find more details in the Microsoft Mechanics video here.
    • Could you come up with a slightly less depressing background for Tux instead of that gray gradient? Doesn't have to be cheerful, just less of a downer...
    • Linux 7.2's first release candidate gets off to a good start by Paul Hill Credit: Larry Ewing It has been a few weeks since the release of Linux 7.1, and in that time, the Linux 7.2 merge window has been open, where developers can submit their features and patches ready for the upcoming release. That window is now shut, and the release candidate phase has begun so that new features can be tested and further fixes applied. According to the founder of Linux, Linus Torvalds, this week’s release candidate looks “reasonably normal”. Although we are super early in the release candidates, this is a good sign as it makes it more likely that an eighth release candidate will not be needed. Torvalds even mentioned that the update’s stats are only larger than they really are because there was another AMD header drop with a third of the patch just being AMD GPU register definitions, which aren’t big changes but make the code contributed look larger overall. In addition to this, he noted that just over half the patch is drivers, even when excluding the AMD register dump. The rest of the changes are spread out over architecture updates, tooling, documentation, and core kernel updates. In the next week, Torvalds says that he will be chilling out, taking the week “mostly off”. Despite this, he will be reading emails and keeping up with things, so if he is slow responding, now you know why. He said he is hoping for a calm week, but we will just have to see if the second release candidate is actually like that. We should expect seven or eight release candidates before Linux 7.2 is released, so expect it around the end of August. If you missed it a few weeks ago, be sure to check out our coverage of Linux 7.1's release.
    • Ridiculous claim that the labor cost difference of $6000 annually would increase cost per phone by $200. The employees produce 3 phones per month or what?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Zeynel earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      JKR earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      248
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      86
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!