Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Sweet! I can only see the pre-purchase, how do I play beta?

You need to pre-purchase it in order to get early access to the beta. Once you do that, the beta should show up in your library.

Me and a friend are going to be hosting 12 player servers for our friends and whatnot. Feel free to join our beta servers.

We will have a classic server and a gungame server. I'm still setting the gungame (Arms race) server up. I'll post it once I get finished.

b_560_95_1.png

b_560_95_1.png

So does anyone know why Steam would be telling me I already own the game when I am pretty damn sure I do not?

I have been in the Beta for a decent while now, but it is not telling me the beta is the duplicate copy, but the game itself.

But if you look in my Library, it only says the Beta?

post-34384-0-03240200-1345338859_thumb.g

So is this a mistake on Steams behalf? Or did I somehow purchase the game, not remember it, and it also is not showing up in my library?

I am leaning towards it is a mistake and I do not own it, but I definitely do not want to purchase it if I do not need to.

Been playing the beta for a week now...as much as I want to like it I just don't think it lives up to its predecessors in the CS series. Gameplay is just not as fluid as one would expect it to be. The hitbox and aiming system are abysmal imho. With some time I think the developers could make it into a great game but just isn't there yet.

So does anyone know why Steam would be telling me I already own the game when I am pretty damn sure I do not?

I have been in the Beta for a decent while now, but it is not telling me the beta is the duplicate copy, but the game itself.

But if you look in my Library, it only says the Beta?

So is this a mistake on Steams behalf? Or did I somehow purchase the game, not remember it, and it also is not showing up in my library?

I am leaning towards it is a mistake and I do not own it, but I definitely do not want to purchase it if I do not need to.

Did you buy that special last weekend? Looks like you did. It came with all counter-strike games, and you got CS:GO when it releases, all for 18$!

Sweet deal, eh?

So does anyone know why Steam would be telling me I already own the game when I am pretty damn sure I do not?

I have been in the Beta for a decent while now, but it is not telling me the beta is the duplicate copy, but the game itself.

But if you look in my Library, it only says the Beta?

post-34384-0-03240200-1345338859_thumb.g

So is this a mistake on Steams behalf? Or did I somehow purchase the game, not remember it, and it also is not showing up in my library?

I am leaning towards it is a mistake and I do not own it, but I definitely do not want to purchase it if I do not need to.

That's bug! From Valve they said buy it as gift and then when 21. came just activate it!

So does anyone know why Steam would be telling me I already own the game when I am pretty damn sure I do not? I have been in the Beta for a decent while now, but it is not telling me the beta is the duplicate copy, but the game itself. But if you look in my Library, it only says the Beta? post-34384-0-03240200-1345338859_thumb.g So is this a mistake on Steams behalf? Or did I somehow purchase the game, not remember it, and it also is not showing up in my library? I am leaning towards it is a mistake and I do not own it, but I definitely do not want to purchase it if I do not need to.

seems to be a mistake of some sort i get it as well when i know for a fact i haven't bought it , i just have the beta

Did you buy that special last weekend? Looks like you did. It came with all counter-strike games, and you got CS:GO when it releases, all for 18$!

Sweet deal, eh?

Definitely did not buy that bundle last week. Always been a big fan of CS, so have owned all the games in the series going back to the beginning, hence why they are in my library.

Is a good deal though for anyone who does not have them.

The only other thing I was thinking is perhaps the PS3 version also includes the PC version, as i have already preordered that, but I see nothing on the PS3 saying that is the case at all.

So yeah, thinking it is obviously a bug. Thanks WinA and KnightWolf for responding.

Ah, my mistake.

I had an old boxed copy but that thing was long gone. I have actually transferred my CS:S files from hard drive to drive over the years, so I just decided to finally delete it and re-buy it so I could have it on steam, plus that was just a great deal.

Does anyone have any experience in gameservers.com? I'm having a ton of trouble trying to setup a gungame/arm race server for CS:GO. I'm hoping this isn't going to be an issue Tuesday on release. For some reason my server only wants to start on de_dust, causing issue with connecting when it is supposed to load ar_xxx maps. Have had a ticket with gameservers open for about 7 hours now and still no luck. :(

Ah, my mistake.

I had an old boxed copy but that thing was long gone. I have actually transferred my CS:S files from hard drive to drive over the years, so I just decided to finally delete it and re-buy it so I could have it on steam, plus that was just a great deal.

Does anyone have any experience in gameservers.com? I'm having a ton of trouble trying to setup a gungame/arm race server for CS:GO. I'm hoping this isn't going to be an issue Tuesday on release. For some reason my server only wants to start on de_dust, causing issue with connecting when it is supposed to load ar_xxx maps. Have had a ticket with gameservers open for about 7 hours now and still no luck. :(

No problem at all. yeah I somehow had boxed copies of the original game and condition zero, the latter of which I think I picked up in a bargain bin at Target years ago for like $4, was something crazy.

And when I ran a CS Source server way back when, iirc it was art of war central, so no experience with gameservers, but I can share never had any issues, and the one time I did it was sorted within the hour. If you share the cfg file for the server it may jog my memory and perhaps I can see why it is not starting on the right map. You do have those map packs loaded onto the server right?

Yeah, two are default maps, and one is a custom map, all loaded onto the server. GameServers finally got back to me and asked what map I would like as default. I am wondering if this is the place I should be hosting, if they are having issues with people setting their default map...

Here is my setup:

(None of this code is working or in effect, at all. :()

"GameModes_Server. txt"
{
"gameTypes"
{
"gungame"
{
"gameModes"
{
"gungameprogressive"
{
"convars"
{
				  "bot_quota_mode"			   "fill"
				  "bot_quota"				  "10"
				  "bot_defer_to_human_items"		 "1"
				  "bot_defer_to_human_goals"		 "0"
				  "bot_difficulty"			   "1"
				  "bot_dont_shoot"			   "0"
				  "bot_chatter"				  "off"
				  "cl_playerspraydisable"			"1"
					 // bot_quota is ommited here because the map's min/max players determine's it's value.
				  "mp_friendlyfire"			   "0"
				  "ff_damage_reduction_grenade"	  "0.4"
				  "ff_damage_reduction_bullets"	  "0.1"
				  "ff_damage_reduction_other"		 "0.4"
				  "ff_damage_reduction_grenade_self"   "0"
				  "mp_startmoney"				  "0"
				  "mp_maxmoney"				  "0"
				  "mp_afterroundmoney"			"0"
				  "mp_playercashawards"			"0"
				  "mp_teamcashawards"			   "0"
				  "mp_timelimit"				  "30"
				  "mp_roundtime"				  "30"
				  "mp_freezetime"				  "6"
				  "mp_buytime"				  "0"
				  "mp_forcecamera"			   "0"		 // Set to 1 for team only spectating.
				  "mp_defuser_allocation"			"0"		 // 0=none, 1=random, 2=everyone
				  "mp_death_drop_gun"			   "0"		 // 0=none, 1=best, 2=current or best
				  "mp_death_drop_grenade"			"0"		 // 0=none, 1=best, 2=current or best
				  "mp_death_drop_defuser"			"0"  
				  "mp_match_can_clinch"			"0"		 // 0=No mercy rule, 1=team can clinch match win early if they win > 1/2 total rounds
				  "mp_gungameimmunitytime"		 "4"
				  "cl_enable_roundstart_autobuy"	  "0"
				  "spec_freeze_time"			   "2"
				  "spec_freeze_panel_extended_time"   "1"
				  "sv_ignoregrenaderadio"			"1"
				  "mp_ggprogressive_round_restart_delay" "15"
				  "mp_ggprogressive_win_panel_pct" "0.33333"
				  "mp_molotovusedelay"			"0"
				  "sv_alltalk"				  "1"
				  "sv_deadtalk"				  "1"
				  "bot_autodifficulty_threshold_low"   "-2.0"   // Value between -20.0 and 20.0 (Amount below avg human contribution score, below which a bot should raise its difficulty)
				  "bot_autodifficulty_threshold_high"   "0.0"   // Value between -20.0 and 20.0 (Amount above avg human contribution score, above which a bot should lower its difficulty)
				  "sv_allow_votes"				  "1"	  // Voting allowed in this mode
				  "sv_arms_race_vote_to_restart_disallowed_after"   "26"
// required defaults
				  "mp_maxrounds"				  "0"
				  "mp_force_pick_time"			"15"
}
"mapgroupsMP"	// List of mapgroups valid for this game mode
{
"mg_armsrace"	""
}
}
}  
}
}
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// Map groups
//
// To use a mapgroup, it needs to be defined in a keyvalues
// block such as the example below, as well as listed in the
// 'mapgroupsMP' block within the game mode that will run it,
// such as the example above.
//
// Then launch the server with '+mapgroup MAPGROUPNAME'
//
// Example:
//
// srcds -game csgo +game_mode 1 +mapgroup mg_bomb_se +map de_nuke_se
//
//
// Check the developer wiki for updated community info
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

"mapgroups"
{
"mg_armsrace"	// mapgroup definition
{
"name"	"mg_armsrace"
"maps"
{
"ar_fight"			  ""
"ar_baggage"			  ""
"ar_fight"			   ""
"ar_shoots"				""
"ar_fight"		   ""
}
}
}
}

"weaponprogression_ct"
			   {
				  "mp9"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "mac10"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "mp7"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "bizon"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "ump45"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "p90"				  { "kills"   "1" }
				  "nova"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "mag7"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "xm1014"				 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "sawedoff"			  { "kills"   "1" }
				  "galilar"			  { "kills"   "1" }
				  "famas"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "ak47"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "m4a1"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "sg556"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "aug"				  { "kills"   "1" }
				  "awp"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "m249"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "negev"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "glock"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "hkp2000"			  { "kills"   "1" }
				  "tec9"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "p250"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "deagle"			  { "kills"   "1" }
				  "fiveseven"	  { "kills"   "1" }
				  "elite"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "knifegg"		 { "kills"   "1" }
			   }

			   "weaponprogression_t"
			   {
				  "mp9"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "mac10"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "mp7"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "bizon"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "ump45"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "p90"				 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "nova"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "mag7"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "xm1014"				 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "sawedoff"				 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "galilar"					{ "kills"   "1" }
				  "famas"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "ak47"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "m4a1"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "sg556"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "aug"						{ "kills"   "1" }
				  "awp"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "m249"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "negev"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "glock"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "hkp2000"				   { "kills"   "1" }
				  "tec9"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "p250"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "deagle"			  { "kills"   "1" }
				  "fiveseven"	  { "kills"   "1" }
				  "elite"		 { "kills"   "1" }
				  "knifegg"		 { "kills"   "1" }
			   }
			}

A good friend of mine, whom I met on CS 1.6, asked me to buy it with him. I started to remember all the fun times I had playing CS over the years so I decided to buy it. I haven't played the beta in a long while but when I did, I thought it was better than CS:S but not quite like CS 1.6.

Yeah, two are default maps, and one is a custom map, all loaded onto the server. GameServers finally got back to me and asked what map I would like as default. I am wondering if this is the place I should be hosting, if they are having issues with people setting their default map...

Here is my setup:

(None of this code is working or in effect, at all. :()

Can you ask them just to put in the default untouched cfg file on the server and start over?

One thing I am noticing is Lines 62 (that is when I copy and paste it into a text editor starting with the first line of

) 93,94,95,96 and 97, which all seem to be names of maps, all have the empty quotation marks, maybe try getting rid of them, as they seem to be serving no purpose and may be messing everything up.

Really has been awhile since I have messed with a server cfg file, and this is indeed different then the one I used to mess with, but I would try that and see if it helps.

Again though, could never hurt to have them put the default file back, make a backup of that, and then try adding one map at a time to the rotation.

Oh, CS:GO doesn't really use the server.cfg file anymore. It goes through Gamemodes_server.txt. I should have mentioned that. I've reset the server 3 times already. I'm nearly 100% positive now it isn't on my end.

Using their forums, some other users have been complaining about this, and how gameservers.com won't let them alter back-end files like certain instances of the command line. (And what I need to make it a gungame server.)

Come Tuesday I think I am going to take my business elsewhere, because taking 12 hours to get one response, and now around 8 hours still awaiting the next, and my server still isn't functional.

EDIT: Finally was able to speak to someone, and finally got everything worked out.

The mapgroup, game style, and default level had to all be done on their end. They didn't mention if this would be an option upon release, but if it isn't, well that is disappointing. Just happy that the server is finally up and running.

Is GO welcoming for new players? I never played CS:S or even 1.6, for whatever reason, but if there is going to be interest from the neowin community I'd like to give it a go.

Well, it's easier than it used to be I'd say. Not very complex of a game, but more of a quick pick up and go.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!