Recommended Posts

Is GO welcoming for new players? I never played CS:S or even 1.6, for whatever reason, but if there is going to be interest from the neowin community I'd like to give it a go.

I just played a bit of the beta yesterday and, as someone who has also not played any Counter Strike games before, it's not that bad. I would suggest playing against bots first so that you don't just jump into a multiplayer match with people who know every nook and cranny on the maps, though :p

the nicest way i can put it is it seems like a gay CoD

Are you kidding me? First, what does that even mean? Secondly, Counter Strike is about the furthest thing from CoD there can be.

They both are First Person Shooters. They both have guns and a military theme. The similarities literally end there. Gameplay speaking, they are two very, very different games. Counter Strike is a much slower paced, deliberate experience. A lot of people hate it for this fact, but it is by far the more "thinking mans" game out of the two.

  • Like 2

Is GO welcoming for new players? I never played CS:S or even 1.6, for whatever reason, but if there is going to be interest from the neowin community I'd like to give it a go.

If you can find another group of people who are friendly, or also noobs, then yes. Otherwise, absolutely not. :laugh:

Hey, DirtyLarry,

You pre-ordered on PS3 only, or are you getting this on PC also?

I was hoping of purchase once, and have on both systems.

Yeah I was hoping the same, but does not look like it is the case. At least not as far as i can see.

So I may go ahead and purchase the PC version as well, going to play the PS3 version a bit and see if I also want the PC version, which coming from the fact I have always played the game on PC, chances are I will go ahead and get it for it as well. The big thing that may stop me is the PS3 version does support Keyboard & Mouse. But still, this is a game that is a PC title IMO.

My biggest concern about getting this on the Xbox 360. Are the servers going to be P2P? Wonder how large the community will actually be? Those are the things that as of right now scary for me. I prefer the controller over the mouse.

Pre-ordered this on PS3, does anyone know when this actually releases? Google searches claim it's today..

It's supposed to be out today: http://blog.us.playstation.com/2012/08/13/counter-strike-global-offensive-coming-to-psn-august-21st/

The X360 version will be out tomorrow: http://majornelson.com/2012/08/21/a-look-at-content-coming-soon-to-the-xbox-2/

Yeah I was hoping the same, but does not look like it is the case. At least not as far as i can see.

So I may go ahead and purchase the PC version as well, going to play the PS3 version a bit and see if I also want the PC version, which coming from the fact I have always played the game on PC, chances are I will go ahead and get it for it as well. The big thing that may stop me is the PS3 version does support Keyboard & Mouse. But still, this is a game that is a PC title IMO.

I preordered it for both PS3 and Steam. While playing the PS3 version will be fun, you should definitely get it on Steam, just for the custom map and mod support alone. Otherwise, it's pretty much the same experience.

It's even more fun than the beta. The only downside, for me, is the lack of Zombie Mod servers. Apparently, there's only one server up with the mod. And the guys that developed it aren't releasing it to the public yet.

Also, it looks like CS:GO is more popular than CS 1.6 and CS:S. It's already the fourth most-played game on Steam.

14xnsyq.png

http://store.steampowered.com/stats/

I preordered it for both PS3 and Steam. While playing the PS3 version will be fun, you should definitely get it on Steam, just for the custom map and mod support alone. Otherwise, it's pretty much the same experience.

yeah, I will pick it up on the PC as well. Going to hold out and see if I am somehow lucky enough to win it off the Neogamr competition first though.

Also forgot to add, already on my PS3. I know a lot of people say the PSN is slow for them, but I had it in about 10 minutes. (Y)

Played 2 very quick (full) rounds using a controller on the PS3. Just the casual competitive. At first I did about as bad as I have ever done in the game. Did not get a single kill in the first round, and it seemed like the hit detection was way, way off.

2nd full round I went 6-6, which was much, much better then the first round. Still have a long way to go, but damn, brought back some good memories, as the two maps were Office and Italy.

Got my wireless keyboard out that I own just for my PS3, going to see how I fare with it in a little bit.

Waiting for the release tonight on the Xbox. I hope my bod can stay up that long. I'm very excited about this game coming to the Xbox as I remember when the first Counter-Strike released on the Xbox it was awesome, even though I sucked terribly at shooters on a console then. Anyone plan on picking it up on the Xbox other than me?

Played some more just now. Checked out the one mode, forget the name of it but where you get newer guns for kills (Arms Race perhaps) and holy ****, it was a total lagfest on the PS3. Like absolutely unplayable. Am hoping it was just Day 1 server issues, because if not, that is pretty horrible performance. Unacceptable actually.

So went back to Casual Competitive, and I have to say, it is just a fun game to play. Bringing back a whole lot of memories.

It is quite amusing listening to people talk about the game though. Had a few people on the server who had played previous CS games, so they were trying to explain to the other people how they should be playing, etc., then you had people, and I am literally quoting here, saying things like "Where are my killstreaks? This game sucks." :rofl:

So I really wonder if those people will keep on playing, or eventually decide to stop because it is in fact not Call of Duty.

But overall I was pretty impressed by the fact a decent amount of the new players to the game were trying to play it the way it is meant to be played. I felt as if there was some hope for humanity after-all.

Played some more just now. Checked out the one mode, forget the name of it but where you get newer guns for kills (Arms Race perhaps) and holy ****, it was a total lagfest on the PS3. Like absolutely unplayable. Am hoping it was just Day 1 server issues, because if not, that is pretty horrible performance. Unacceptable actually.

So went back to Casual Competitive, and I have to say, it is just a fun game to play. Bringing back a whole lot of memories.

It is quite amusing listening to people talk about the game though. Had a few people on the server who had played previous CS games, so they were trying to explain to the other people how they should be playing, etc., then you had people, and I am literally quoting here, saying things like "Where are my killstreaks? This game sucks." :rofl:

So I really wonder if those people will keep on playing, or eventually decide to stop because it is in fact not Call of Duty.

But overall I was pretty impressed by the fact a decent amount of the new players to the game were trying to play it the way it is meant to be played. I felt as if there was some hope for humanity after-all.

As a newcomer such as myself, do you mind giving me some tips? I don't want to be "that guy" :laugh: I would like to get the most enjoyment out of the game and I want to learn how to play it properly, which is why I'm asking.

As a newcomer such as myself, do you mind giving me some tips? I don't want to be "that guy" :laugh: I would like to get the most enjoyment out of the game and I want to learn how to play it properly, which is why I'm asking.

Always buy a vest. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!