Dead man on bus for over 6 hours


Recommended Posts

Nearly a year old but:

A dead bus passenger was driven around London after staff failed to the spot his body, an inquest heard.

Pawel Modzelewski, 25, died on the night bus, but stayed in the garage overnight and was still in his seat when the bus went out the following morning.

Early morning commuters joined the double decker, unaware Mr Modzelewski was in fact dead.

He was on the bus for another six hours before another passenger raised the alarm.

Mr Modzelewski got on the no 36 bus at around 12.29am at Harrow Road, Queens Park, west London on January 19 this year.

The buses's CCTV footage showed him slumping forward in his seat 12 minutes later.

But none of the other passengers spotted him and he was found by the driver at 1.30am, who then went home for the night.

Paul Bailey, accident prevention manager for London Central Bus Company, told the hearing the driver thought Mr Modzelewski was asleep and tried to rouse him at New Cross Gate bus garage.

"But there was no response. He drove the bus into the garage to be refuelled and cleaned by contractors." Mr Bailey said.

'He forgot to tell anyone about the man.

The cleaners didn't clean the bus and on finishing his duty, the driver went home."

Mr Bailey said engineers intended to check the bus before it was used again - to the 171 route - but neglected to check upstairs.

In a statement Morlaye Keppy-Camara said he flagged down a double-decker at 7am the following morning in Brockley.

"I got on the no.171 bus and went upstairs. I walked towards the back of the bus. As I did so I passed a white male.

He was slumped forwards in his seat and not moving."

Mr Keppy-Camara said he went to the back of the bus but became more and more concerned.

"I decided to go and see if I could rouse him."

It was then he noticed vomit on Mr Modzelewski's clothes and spoke to the driver.

Police arrived at 7.11am and discovered an empty syringe in Mr Modzelewski's right hand and a small wrap of what appeared to be heroin.

A post mortem revealed the Polish man had had overdosed on the drug.

Source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1042471-dead-man-on-bus-for-over-6-hours/
Share on other sites

You can't mean that! That's a horrible thing to say. No one deserves to die!

How did him being a heroine addict affected your's, or anyone else's quality of life?

I'm not saying he was(but if he wasn't yet, he would have at some point), but heroine addicts often resort to crime to support their habit.

And I doubt he could have been saved if they found him sooner, sure, maybe if they noticed right away

Did he deserve to die? I didn't know the guy, but probably not, though he made choices in his life that led to this.

You don't know anything about him.

What if he had a cardiac arrest or something like that?

A post mortem revealed the Polish man had had overdosed on the drug.

read the post? I have no sympathy not even an ounce.

And yes FMH I do mean it, its a fact they spread aids, its a fact they are the most likly of all drug users to steal its there own stupidity, this is evolution im not saying all druggys should die... but its his own fault

i know no we have one less heroine addict in the world :/ truly a bad day

So because he has a substance abuse problem he deserves to die?

You know nothing of his life outside of this article and assuming the worst in people just goes to show how little you have in your own life.

Small minded ****!

And yes FMH I do mean it, its a fact they spread aids, its a fact they are the most likly of all drug users to steal its there own stupidity, this is evolution im not saying all druggys should die... but its his own fault

It's a fact that heroine addict spread AIDS. As oppose to normal human-beings who... do not?

And stealing, as something dissimilar to a poor man... stealing food? Or a teenager shop-lifting?

.

Drug-addict or not, these problems exist in humans. But lets have no sympathy for the drug-addicts only.

That's some assumption!

Not really, if he didn't get help, even if he had a job, heroine addicts become very noticable at work, his work performance would suffer a lot, co-workers will start to notice

Eventually they'll find out and likely fire him, where will he get the money to support this expensive habit then? get another job looking like an addict in withdrawls?

He'll either need to stop, clean up and move on with his life, or start stealing, and stealing is much easier, that is the route taken most of the time.

It's a fact that heroine addict spread AIDS. As oppose to normal human-beings who... do not?

And stealing, as something dissimilar to a poor man... stealing food? Or a teenager shop-lifting?

.

Drug-addict or not, these problems exist in humans. But lets have no sympathy for the drug-addicts only.

your comparing a poor hungry man to a drug addict? wow thats just.... wow yea i love your logic

So because he has a substance abuse problem he deserves to die?

You know nothing of his life outside of this article and assuming the worst in people just goes to show how little you have in your own life.

Small minded ****!

doesnt deserve to die... but who says it also means he deserves to live? I actually have alot in my life, women, money, family a large social life... and your right i dont know anything about his life he could of been trying to cope with something using drugs ... but he let it get out of hand and he died... if he ODed on purpose then see ya later was his choice... if he didnt then opps i guess you cant make the same mistake twice... in all honesty its not my problem and i dont care that he is dead why should i ?

and also ew, they didnt even clean the bus.... thats nasty

Not really, if he didn't get help, even if he had a job, heroine addicts become very noticable at work, his work performance would suffer a lot, co-workers will start to notice

Eventually they'll find out and likely fire him, where will he get the money to support this expensive habit then? get another job looking like an addict in withdrawls?

He'll either need to stop, clean up and move on with his life, or start stealing, and stealing is much easier, that is the route taken most of the time.

you seem to be able to put it a much more sympathetic way then i can

I'll be honest, and it seems bad thinking about it, but that was my first thought reading the article.

was my second thought... first i thought homless man on bus? then i thought ewww they didnt even clean it... see no cleaning leaves dead people on busses and around xmas this will be a big issue.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      557
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!