Recommended Posts

Man Ubuntu it getting better and better

Seriously? Are you kidding? That Unity UI is horrible dude. Confusing, hard to navigate and find things, an annoying sidebar that can't be removed or moved anywhere else.

I would say Ubuntu is getting worse and worse. Ubuntu needs to re-focus on their UI and listen more to their users. Don't get me wrong, I love Ubuntu, I just don't like this new UI they are using and that is why I am using Linux Mint now, until they fix and correct the UI abominations.

Linux Mint is the way to go right now.

Unity's coming into place, took a while, but I say it's getting there. There are still some obviously "weird" design choices, to put it lightly, but they are in fact working on making it very customizable and rethinking some of the UI decisions (example: there might be an option in the system settings to remove the global menu -- still a rumor, though).

This is what I'm referring to. This here is a screenshot of Kubuntu. Look at the launch bar. That is where Ubuntu 11.10's launch bar should be at, not planted on the left side of the screen permanently like it is right now.

Ubuntu needs to give the user the option to either hide it or remove it permanently or let the user move it where they see fit. Forcing that side bar on the left side like that and making the user see it there all the time without being able to move it anywhere or customize it is disrespectful.

2dj44sy.jpg

@ Scorbing: That's Xubuntu, bud. :shiftyninja: Kubuntu is the KDE 4 flavor -- and it's a bit obnoxious imho, but not like Unity and Gnome-Shell are. At least you can tweak KDE to be non-obnoxious.

XFCE in "Openbox Mode" (no desktop icons), with a patched Compiz (I'll direct those interested to this Launchpad post ), a recompiled, patched and fixed Emerald (those interested check this Ubuntu Forums thread ) and Avant-Window-Navigator (fixes pending, from what I read). It's all I need it to be and more. :rofl: :woot:

XFCE in "Openbox Mode" (no desktop icons), with a patched Compiz (I'll direct those interested to this Launchpad post ), a recompiled, patched and fixed Emerald (those interested check this Ubuntu Forums thread ) and Avant-Window-Navigator (fixes pending, from what I read). It's all I need it to be and more.

XFCE with Openbox? That seems redundant. Might as well just run LXDE.

@ Scorbing: That's Xubuntu, bud. :shiftyninja: Kubuntu is the KDE 4 flavor -- and it's a bit obnoxious imho, but not like Unity and Gnome-Shell are. At least you can tweak KDE to be non-obnoxious.

XFCE in "Openbox Mode" (no desktop icons), with a patched Compiz (I'll direct those interested to this Launchpad post ), a recompiled, patched and fixed Emerald (those interested check this Ubuntu Forums thread ) and Avant-Window-Navigator (fixes pending, from what I read). It's all I need it to be and more. :rofl: :woot:

I am also running XFCE with compiz + emerald + awn, but on arch. Its pretty nice.

@ Kreuger: It's (lovingly) referred to as "Openbox Mode" due to 1) no Desktop icons, and 2) the XFCE Applications Menu showing up when one right-clicks the Desktop -- same behavior as Openbox, anyway. It's nice and fast, too.

@ ViperAFK: I hear it runs even better on Arch than on a 'buntu base. True?

I tried a few of these "install everything for you so you don't have to know squat about linux" distros and i gotta say i don't see what the big hype is unless that is the type of distro your aiming for. Definitely glad i didn't remove my gentoo partitions.

Some good changes. I actually think unity is shaping up nicely, but unfortunately I don't know if I can ever go back to ubuntu unless they fix these obnoxious bugs:

https://bugs.launchp...ity/+bug/754000

https://bugs.launchp...ics/+bug/873482

1st one is just very poorly thought out behavior in unity, it uses 3 finger tap for a function that is only useful for a touchscreen devices, with no way to disable or change it.

2nd, even if you don't use unity their custom patches to the synaptics driver stops 3 finger taps from even being recognized correctly in the first place!

They seem too content with throwing touchpad users under the bus to have touchscreen functionality. Both should work, and I wager there is far more people using ubuntu on laptops than on touchscreens right now.

Never have any issues with touchpad taps in any other distro. This is what made me switch from 11.04 in the first place.

  • 2 weeks later...

I have a fairly old Sony Vaio P netbook. Do you think Ubuntu 12.04 would run well on it? I'm thinking of giving it a try.

I'm running 12.04 on VMware Fusion right now and find it's a bit sluggish, although that's to be expected, given the virtual setup.

Also why use unified menu and window buttons on the left?

Coming from Mac OS X, I much like the global menu bar, it saves space and it always context sensitive to the currently active application. Thus, I like it in Ubuntu and hope it stays, although I suppose an option to have per-application menu bars (like in Windows), would be nice, too.

Anyway, I'm running 11.10 on my ThinkPad, and was considering upgrading to w/e the latest build of 12.04 is. But I haven't done an Ubuntu upgrade in a long time, and I've kind of forgotten:

  1. What is the exact command to do a distro upgrade again? Is it apt-get install upgrade?
  2. Once I get upgraded to the latest 12.04 build, I can use the same process to upgrade to final builds, including the RTM, right?

I'm not too worried about running a stable release, since I mainly use Linux for hobbyist purposes, anyway.

Coming from Mac OS X, I much like the global menu bar, it saves space and it always context sensitive to the currently active application. Thus, I like it in Ubuntu and hope it stays, although I suppose an option to have per-application menu bars (like in Windows), would be nice, too.

Anyway, I'm running 11.10 on my ThinkPad, and was considering upgrading to w/e the latest build of 12.04 is. But I haven't done an Ubuntu upgrade in a long time, and I've kind of forgotten:

  1. What is the exact command to do a distro upgrade again? Is it apt-get install upgrade?
  2. Once I get upgraded to the latest 12.04 build, I can use the same process to upgrade to final builds, including the RTM, right?

I'm not too worried about running a stable release, since I mainly use Linux for hobbyist purposes, anyway.

1. "sudo do-release-upgrade -d" OR just hit ALT+F2 and run "update-manager -d"

2. You won't have to use the same process, once you swich to Precise, you stay on Precise, you'll just update your system normally (more updates will be rolled out than usual since it's in development), and at one point you'll reach the stable level (whenever they announce it as stable).

Coming from Mac OS X, I much like the global menu bar, it saves space and it always context sensitive to the currently active application. Thus, I like it in Ubuntu and hope it stays, although I suppose an option to have per-application menu bars (like in Windows), would be nice, too.

Anyway, I'm running 11.10 on my ThinkPad, and was considering upgrading to w/e the latest build of 12.04 is. But I haven't done an Ubuntu upgrade in a long time, and I've kind of forgotten:

  1. What is the exact command to do a distro upgrade again? Is it apt-get install upgrade?
  2. Once I get upgraded to the latest 12.04 build, I can use the same process to upgrade to final builds, including the RTM, right?

I'm not too worried about running a stable release, since I mainly use Linux for hobbyist purposes, anyway.

1 - apt-get install dist-upgrade

2 - yes.

Thanks, ran that command and now am on the latest 12.04 build. Also added the Unity PPA to test out Unity 5. Seems most of the new features are limited to the 3D Compiz build, though, as I'm on the 2D Desktop and don't have the option to set a color or resize the icons.

This is why we can't have nice things. Yes, the user is an idiot. But this is just wrong.

Why the f*** do you care? It's not like you'll even use it, Jesus Christ. And it looks similar to the system on AskUbuntu, so I really can't see anything wrong with that if it gives the incentive for some people to contribute.

EDIT:

Also, I haven't seen anything that implicates this will be included in the OS, so what's the point of posting it here?

Why the f*** do you care? It's not like you'll even use it, Jesus Christ. And it looks similar to the system on AskUbuntu, so I really can't see anything wrong with that if it gives the incentive for some people to contribute.

EDIT:

Also, I haven't seen anything that implicates this will be included in the OS, so what's the point of posting it here?

If anything, it will make filing bug reports a little more fun interactive.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Qmmp 2.3.3 by Razvan Serea Qmmp (Qt-based MultiMedia Player) is a free, open-source audio player that delivers a classic music listening experience with a modern foundation. Inspired by the legendary Winamp, Qmmp features a familiar, customizable interface that supports both Winamp and XMMS skins, making it instantly recognizable to long-time users. It handles a wide variety of audio formats including MP3, OGG Vorbis, FLAC, WAV, AAC, and many others, ensuring smooth playback across diverse music libraries. In addition to basic playback, Qmmp offers advanced features such as a 10-band equalizer, crossfading, gapless playback, and audio visualization plugins. Users can manage playlists efficiently, create and save multiple lists, and even enable streaming from online sources. Plugin support extends the player’s capabilities, allowing integration of features like lyrics display, ReplayGain, and more. Built with the Qt framework, Qmmp runs smoothly and efficiently, making it ideal even for older systems. 10 great QMMP features you might not know: Global Hotkeys Support – Control playback using customizable system-wide keyboard shortcuts. CUE Sheet Support – Automatically detects and plays tracks from CUE files for full album playback. Last.fm Scrobbling – Integrated support for sending playback data to Last.fm. Audio CD Playback – Play music directly from audio CDs. Command Line Interface – Control Qmmp via command-line options for scripting or automation. System Tray Integration – Minimize to and control playback from the system tray. MPRIS Support – Integration with desktop media player controls via the MPRIS (Media Player Remote Interfacing Specification) interface. Spectrum Analyzer and Oscilloscope – Built-in visualizations for real-time audio feedback. Configurable Notifications – Custom pop-ups for track changes and playback status. Multiple Output Backends – Support for ALSA, PulseAudio, JACK, and more, offering flexible audio routing. Qmmp 2.3.3 changelog: fixed build with PipeWire versions less than 0.3.50; fixed settings dialog layout; fixed default CUE encoding; fixed possible null pointer dereference; fixed tracks order when added using drag and drop (2.3.3 only); fixed uninitialized structure usage; improved sid plugin: added libsidplayfp 3.0 support; added feature to build without residfp engine; fixed memory leak; fixed displaying audio information; updated Japanese translation (2.3.3 only). Download: Qmmp 64-bit | 24.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Qmmp 32-bit | 24.1 MB View: Qmmp Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • BATorrent 3.0.3 is out.
    • The current Statcoungter desktop numbers has Google Chrome increasing it's market share this past year and currently commanding 75% share. Everybody else is just making up the numbers with even MS Edge losing 3% this past year and has dipped just below 10% share which is staggering considering it's default on every Windows deviced purchased. If these numbers are correct that terrible Edge number is both devastating and embarrassing for MS especially when you add in the terribly low Bing market share. This leads me to ask a couple of questions as the default browser holding just less than 10% market share seems really weird. It used to be that all Chromium browsers were being counted as Google Chrome in some cases.  Is this still happening? Do these high Google Chrome numbers contains some Edge user numbers?
    • Yeah, all web browsers seem to have some junk in them these days. The regular Brave browser has a lot of unnecessary stuff in it, similar to Microsoft Edge, so I don't see any benefits of using Brave over Microsoft Edge if you already have Microsoft Edge fully set up with adblockers and that. The cleanest or best free browser outside of 'Microsoft Edge' I’ve tried so far is 'Opera Air'. It still has some bloat, but nowhere near as much as Brave browser, for example. I also really like the web browser called 'Floorp' that is based on Firefox. I have a system wide Adblocking program for Windows 11 that doesn't just blocks ads in the the web browser, but over the whole thing. I don't really need a web browser with an inbuilt adblocker because of that.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      moog19 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Mentor
      grik went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Dedicated
      JKR earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      491
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!