ATi Radeon 9800 XT (Review)


Recommended Posts

Can't see any other postings on this, so I thought I would - considering the review was released today.

Tom's Hardware Guide (Review)

Conclusion

ATI made the very good Radeon 9800 Pro even better. Regarding performance, the Radeon 9800 XT is only 5-10% faster than the previous top model, but thanks to better cooling, the ability for Video-In -- which also depends on the card maker -- and hardware monitoring, ATI has created a very attractive package. NVIDIA needs to take care that they don't miss the bus. In those DirectX 9 benchmarks, that are available at the moment, the GeForce FX 5900 Ultra is sometimes even beaten by ATI's mid-range cards. However, the results in DX8 titles - some of them part of NVIDIA's "The Way It's Meant To Be Played" program - uncover some surprising issues as well. NVIDIA followers have to hope for the new ForceWare drivers and the upcoming NV38 top model, which was already presented at Computex. But currently ATI cards seem the safer bet and buying a new XT card also means that you get the long awaited Half-Life 2 for free (if there weren't STEAM). Well, it might only be single player version and because of the delay in the game development likely in form of a voucher.

R9800XT_GIFTBOX_lg.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/104554-ati-radeon-9800-xt-review/
Share on other sites

256MB - that's a big card. In the benchmarks the 256MB beats the 128MB by about 2 fps...I don't follow why people buy the 256. I'm not mocking you, just curious...what's the rest of the memory used for..? (larger textures..? similar difference to main memory differences..?)

Mind you, later this year when the 9800 XT is released, your 256MB will have dropped in price ;)

the benchmarks are just that... maybe there is a slightly better textures or something? lol i dunno.. its the best card at the moment.. and my geforce4 mx 440-se is getting dead outdated.. the 256mb should give me a bit more of buffer against the 128mn version for the future i guess

Good point, my GeForce 2 Pro isn't up for EF2 - even on the lowest settings it's a little sluggish. But yeah, 9800 Pro will last us for many years to come, both the 128 & 256's alike.

ForeverUnknown, It's going to be a lot more expensive apparentally...but for a 5-10% (5-10 fps [ish]) difference, it's not really worth it in my opinion. Mind you the 256 will drop down in price, so I would recommend getting that card instead...unless of course you have the extra cash lying around.

Probably just around a few fps's difference. I'm after the "Hercules 3D Prophet 128MB 9800 Pro" because according to benchmarks it's very nice - and the pictures of it are very nice.

Just search Toms Hardware Guide, and you'll find benchmarks of all their cards...go have a looksy.

Probably just around a few fps's difference. I'm after the "Hercules 3D Prophet 128MB 9800 Pro" because according to benchmarks it's very nice - and the pictures of it are very nice.

Just search Toms Hardware Guide, and you'll find benchmarks of all their cards...go have a looksy.

one of these? :woot:

hercules_9800pro.jpg

Right at the bottom

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/acatalog/Onl...rcules_140.html

that card is way to expensive, 5 - 10 % increase??? bah thats not good enough

i jumped from ati 8500 to a ati 9800 pro 128 megs, which is, i think, the best.

the 9800 tx is good if u have beneath 9600 pro if u have a 9800 or 9700 its useless to buy this

btw theres not a big difference between the 9800 ver which has 128 megs, n 256 megs.

apparently the 256 meg version, which is ddr-2 overheats very easily.

saw all the benchmarks n its equal to the 128 megs version.

the radeon9800proXT is only a radeon 9800pro which is overclocked anyways. u can do this with ur radeon9800pro and overclock it and voila, u now have the best card in the world again. all over again. :happy:

you're right but the xt has better cooling for the ddr2 which runs hot. i dont know if it's worth the money though. if i had money i would probably buy the xt but freakin homecoming is breakin me :pinch:

Regarding the size of the RAM - 256MB ..

I remember when the first 128MB card come out, that was the same response - Why need 128MB card when all you get is a 1-2% increase inperformance, 10% if your luckk, BUT, having a card with a insanely huge amount of onboard video ram helps alot. Maybe its not needed now, but no doubt in the VERY near future those textures and going to get bigger and bigger and the fact is that 64MB/32MB video cards barely cut it now-a-days.

The more onboard ram you have, the more future proof you are.

My 2c

The only problem is that it takes up 2 bays (AGP & PCI), because the cooling unit is so large. It reminds me of the forst GeForce FX card...that also takes up 2 bays and the cooling unit was too loud aswell.

The only problem is that it takes up 2 bays (AGP & PCI), because the cooling unit is so large. It reminds me of the forst GeForce FX card...that also takes up 2 bays and the cooling unit was too loud aswell.

I never use PCI 1 slot (old habits die hard!!!).

And the reviews of this card say it quiter than the 'usual' 9800 cooling solutions!!

Via a voucher. Since the game isn't released for a while Valve & ATi are doing a voucher system. Mind you, the price isn't bad because from what I've read ATi are purchasing HL2 for $15 per copy...and, it will be the SINGLE player version only. So the multiplayer version will be $10 more.

So I'm hoping that Valve will release an add-on from Single to Multi player for a low charge (hopefully).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you have a TV in your living room, chances are you can probably just use the Steam Link app and play your huge PC in big picture mode, effectively giving you the Steam Machine experience to see if you'd actually like it. The good news is the Steam Machine can have it's drives upgraded. It has a USB-C 10Gbs port as well, so the 512GB drive could be quickly moved to an external enclosure and repurposed.
    • This machine could very well be a second gaming PC for their living room as a console experience. So we would have to assume their main PC exists as well; With that said, I have 10gb home network with a 2.5gigabit internet connection here so we tend to have more than enough speed to download games. However, we can't make use of the 10gb LAN using Steam's built in transfer tool because it always compresses transfers and that slows the transfer down to well below a standard gigabit port speeds, sometimes as slow as 200-300Mb/s transfers. While that's probably still faster than most internet connections anyway, if they'd fix the LAN transfer issue it'd be upto x5 faster even on a gigabit LAN, than simply dropping a 2.5gbe port on there with hopes of a few people having fast internet connections. There are solutions, work arounds, like using LANCache if you run a NAS... or simply copying the files over manually using a network share.
    • Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI by Paul Hill Local AI models tend to run a lot more slowly than cloud services like Claude and Gemini; however, Samsung has just announced that it has developed its UFS 5.0 solution, which increases data transfer to speeds of 10.8GB/s, enabling faster storage and processing in mobile memory that has the potential to provide more optimal local AI experiences. Commenting on this development, Jangseok Choi, head of Memory Product Planning at Samsung Electronics, said: If you’ve tried local AI, you’ll know it can be quite slow, especially if using the larger parameter models. By developing this new solution, Samsung says that storage is evolving from just storing data to a core piece of infrastructure that supports AI computation, too. The Korean company said that UFS 5.0 integrates the latest embedded memory interface standard from JEDEC and achieves up to 10.8 gigabytes per second (GB/s) transfer speeds. Regarding write speeds, Samsung UFS 5.0 can reach 9.5 GB/s. Both the read and write speeds are twice as fast as those of the previous UFS 4.1 standard. Aside from being ideal for local AI, Samsung’s UFS 5.0 is more power efficient by 40% compared to UFS 4.1. Samsung achieved this by implementing innovations such as clock gating and multi-voltage technologies. UFS 5.0 is also ultra-compact at just 7.5mm x 13mm x 0.9mm; that is 16.7% smaller than UFS 4.1. The company said it will be bringing it to multiple devices in the future, including mobile, wearable, and extended reality.
    • A bit like the steamdeck, this probably isn't for you.
    • Gamers Nexus already did their review, and building your own will be faster and cheaper, so not very convincing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      209
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      99
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!