Apple going after the pirate site AppTrackr


Recommended Posts

Creators Of AppTrackr (Cracked iOS Applications) Feeling Apple?s Wrath

The creators Apptrackr, the most popular cracked iOS application download site, have recently mentioned in a blog post (through Installous) that Apple has been severely scrapingApptrackr for links and sending huge takedown notices for a lot of content. With this statement made by Apptrackr it finally looks like Apple is addressing the increasingly large problem of cracked iOS applications and how it is effecting developers....

http://www.ijailbreak.com/applications/apptrackr-feeling-apples-wrath/

post-376446-0-31427900-1325316061.jpg

^ The Oatmeal hitting the nail on the head. It's grotesque how people have no problem spending hundreds on hardware (be it smartphones or PC components), yet feel entitled to pirate all kinds of software.

  • Like 3

Firstly, affect not effect ijailbreak!!! Secondly, why don't they have a solid refund policy in place? I'm surprised the iTunes store made it this far without one.

I think a lot of you are missing the deal here. Only Hollow.Droid seems to have addressed it.

I use installous - to trial apps. If i like an app then i'll go buy it. I paid out ?49.99 for TomTom UK for christs sake!! So ?0.99 to me is nothing.

What i don't like is developers who charge a fee for tat - something that doesn't even work.

A few times i've downloaded an app that costs ?0.99 or ?1.49 or ?1.99 whatever, and the app either plain old doesn't work, or only sections of it works.

So what do you do? You get in touch through iTunes saying "pretty please can i have a refund".

Do you know how many times i've had a refund out of about 10 faulty apps? ONCE!

I'm not a big time app downloader, but if i was then these ?0.99 (i.e. small amounts) could soon add up to a very large amount - all because there's a lot of crap on there. And then the user is out of pocket because Apple don't feel like giving a refund today.

It works both ways i'm afraid. Both sides should have protection - developer AND consumer!!

of course, by going after AppTrackr, Apple will definitely hurt or cripple app piracy /s

I could go on a torrent site and get any iOS app i want, from TomTom and Navigon all the way down to Angry Birds and TapTap Revenge. not saying I will or do, just pointing out that going after a site that only puts up links won't have any effect or the bottom line.

for every site that gets taken down, many more pop up to take it's place. piracy will always exist

for every site that gets taken down, many more pop up to take it's place.

This line again? I swear, I've been hearing this since the 90s. It's one of the most stubbornly antiquated opinions on piracy I've ever come across, and it's every torrenter's first.

Piracy relies heavily on the fact that international borders are a roadblock to taking action against sites. Even if SOPA itself fails, it shows that the leading problem has been outlined (borders) and eventually legislation WILL come along that passes and addresses this limitation. Once that happens, I'd like to see this cute little opinion stick around. Will there still be piracy? Yeah, sure, but it'll have to find a new way to travel, and its next presentation may not be as fast and convenient as bittorrent-style tracker sites.

^ The Oatmeal hitting the nail on the head. It's grotesque how people have no problem spending hundreds on hardware (be it smartphones or PC components), yet feel entitled to pirate all kinds of software.

There is this idea that because they're not receiving a physical product then it is open season to piracy.

To a certain extent I could understand for example a engineering university student pirating Solidworks so that he or she can do their assignment at home but it boggles the mind when I see people pirate 99cent applications let alone $24.99 ones from the Mac Appstore.

They tried with Appulous which closed and AppTrackr sprung up, AppTrackr will close and another site will pop up. 'You cant stop the signal'.

Whist what you've said is 100% true, taking out each site as they pop up takes away the connivence that pirates enjoy. Each time the site goes down a few pirates will give up on it. And it also makes it more difficult for the people running these services. If you look at the news this current site is having financial issues and have had to move their servers frequently as each home eventually becomes hostile to their existence.

So although some may see what Apple is doing as a waste of time it is their time to waste and I believe it does have an effect. I mean can you imagine if the RIAA just said gee we'll never stop P2P so lets not go after Napster. Everyone and their dog would be using it right now to get music, it would be a word in everyones vocabulary but by shutting that service down it divided people between a lot of different services and some of those services were legal avenues like iTunes and Rhapsody. This to me shows fighting piracy can pay off, not absolutely but it does stop some piracy.

  • Like 2

Completely agree. But until they have some sort of automated refund functionality like the Android Marketplace I will continue to use sites like these to try out apps.

You mean steal. You don't need to defend yourself and the $0.99 that you worked hard for.

Completely agree. But until they have some sort of automated refund functionality like the Android Marketplace I will continue to use sites like these to try out apps.

I understand the frustration of not being able to try an app before you buy it and I do think Apple will fix this eventually but until then I can't really condone piracy as an alternative. To me developing software is like an art and the artist should be the one deciding how people experience their creation, I don't think the user should be abusing that relationship. So in this situation I air on the side of the developers rights over the users. Again I think there should be trials for all apps in the store I'm just saying whilst there isn't I don't think it's right to ignore the developers wishes by stealing the software to try it as that is not what the developer wanted.

Apps with lite ad-supported versions ftw, support those developers by only buying and only using apps that have trials.

Completely agree. But until they have some sort of automated refund functionality like the Android Marketplace I will continue to use sites like these to try out apps.

You mean steal. You don't need to defend yourself and the $0.99 that you worked hard for.

Exactly. The 'I want to try out apps/games, so I jailbreak my phone/console' excuse is getting old.

You mean steal. You don't need to defend yourself and the $0.99 that you worked hard for.

I'm not going to get into an argument about semantics.

I try out apps I think I might like, if they are crap they get deleted, if they are good they get deleted and I buy it from iTunes, whether you think that's morally wrong or not I don't give a toss.

Exactly. The 'I want to try out apps/games, so I jailbreak my phone/console' excuse is getting old.

So I'm supposed to buy the App and give the developer money for something i dont like just for the sake of trying it out?

With Android you have 15 mins from purchasing it where you can go back to the store and press refund for an automated no quibble refund.

With Apple i have to go through some convoluted process and wait a week to get my money back, if i do it too many times they might stop refunding me.

Get off your high horse, not everything is so black and white.

You won't get into an argument because it's largely indefensible. You're not going to win an abstracted argument on why you shouldn't be conned out of your $0.99. The iOS model vastly undercut the pricing for mobile games and allows individuals to install and redownload their purchases to multiple devices. It's been a massive win for consumers, but we still have pirates like yourself who feel entitled to free software just because.

The large majority of these apps are cheaper than buying a coffee at a cafe. You know what I've done when I didn't like a dollar or $5 program I didn't like? Shrugged and deleted it. Then again, I usually don't purchase apps till I go online and do some research first.

I'm not going to get into an argument about semantics.

I try out apps I think I might like, if they are crap they get deleted, if they are good they get deleted and I buy it from iTunes, whether you think that's morally wrong or not I don't give a toss.

So I'm supposed to buy the App and give the developer money for something i dont like just for the sake of trying it out?

With Android you have 15 mins from purchasing it where you can go back to the store and press refund for an automated no quibble refund.

With Apple i have to go through some convoluted process and wait a week to get my money back, if i do it too many times they might stop refunding me.

Get off your high horse, not everything is so black and white.

1. As pointed out by Vice: There are a lot of apps offering an ad-supported version you can try before buying the full version.

2. You could just, you know, read reviews or look at screenshots before deciding to buy an app.

Both options are better than pirating apps to 'try them out'. My comment above isn't so much about me being on the high horse. It's more about pointing out that you're full of **** when you attempt to justify the use of shady tools.

I do have to echo other peoples statements about doing research. Before I buy any game or app on the app store I read the reviews inside the store page itself and if that isn't a clear indicator of quality I google the app and look for either youtube videos or general information. I never buy any app that I can't find feedback on and I certainly wouldn't then just pirate it to find out.

Which by the way is kind of dangerous to your device as many of the app releasers change the apps. I've seen apps where game mechanics have been modified to make the games easier / enable cheats basically. And I've also seen apps where the release group has altered the loading graphic. If they have made these changes it would be possible to make other more malicious alterations or just to post an App that says it is one thing but in reality it is something else entirely and as soon as you run it they've screwed your phone over.

I just don't think it's worth the risks for 99 cents when there are so many more safe ways to check out an app before buying.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. They are seeking a better life too. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!